Title: Improving Independence
1Improving Independence can homecare re-ablement
make a difference in the longer term?
2CSED Homecare Re-ablement Workstream
- 2006 CSED study into the development of homecare
re-ablement in England - Working definition of re-ablement used by CSED
- Services for people with poor physical or
mental health to help them accommodate their
illness by learning or re-learning the skills
necessary for daily living - Study showed that
- 60 CASSR had a homecare re-ablement service of
some kind - Characteristics of these services varied
considerably - Main distinction was between intake and
discharge or discharge support services
3Background to the Study
- Limited evidence base about effectiveness of
homecare re-ablement - Indications of reductions in use of homecare
services following discharge from re-ablement - But no evidence on
- - longer term duration of reductions
- - factors that impact on subsequent service use
4Aims of the Study
- 1. To use routine service data from CASSRs to
examine changes over time in subsequent use of
social care services following homecare
re-ablement - 2. To identify factors that may affect subsequent
use of social care services following homecare
re-ablement - 3. To consider the focus and research design of a
larger evaluation of homecare re-ablement services
5Methods
- Selected 4 CASSRs with re-ablement services (2
intake and 2 discharge) established for at
least 4 years. In each site - Analysis of routine data for clients with an
episode of homecare re-ablement in 2004-5,
including subsequent social care provision
(2005-6 and 2006-7) - Interviews with homecare re-ablement service
manager and colleagues - Interviews with one or more care management team
managers in each site
6The Study Sites
- Wirral Enablement Discharge Service (WEDS),
Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (discharge
support) - Homecare Assessment and Re-ablement Team (HART),
Leicestershire County Council (intake) - Short Term Assessment and Re-ablement Team
(START), London Borough of Sutton (primarily
discharge support) - Intermediate Home Support Service (IHS), Salford
City Council (intake)
7Profile of Re-ablement Service Users
- Four age groups used up to 64 65 to 74 75 to
84 and 85 and over - Percentage of service users in each age group
broadly similar for all four sites - Longer established services (Leicestershire and
Sutton) had higher proportion in the 85 and over
age group - In all four sites 80 of service users were
categorised as physical disability, physical
illness or physical frailty
8Overall Pattern of Homecare and Re-ablement
Service Use
- Between a third and a half of service users in
Salford, Leicestershire and Sutton had reablement
only - Percentage of users who had re-ablement followed
by homecare was remarkably consistent across the
sites at just over 40 - Two most mature services had the greatest
proportion of service users who had homecare
before re-ablement
9Time from Re-ablement to First Episode of Homecare
- Majority of service users who had homecare had
their first episode within one week of leaving
re-ablement - For service users starting homecare later, there
are two peaks in take up at the up to three
months point at the over one year point - Patterns may suggest re-ablement users fall into
two broad groups - - those gaining immediate but relatively
short-term benefit avoiding need for homecare for
a few months - - those for whom impact is more sustained and
which delays the need for homecare by a year or
more
10(No Transcript)
11Change in Homecare Use After Re-ablement
- Examined the changes in the use of homecare after
re-ablement - Used snapshot points of 3, 6, 12, 18 24 months
after re-ablement - In Leicestershire and Sutton, percentage of
service users needing less homecare than they did
on leaving re-ablement increased over the two
years - In Salford, percentage of service users needing
less homecare than they did on leaving
re-ablement fell after 18 months but percentage
of service users needing progressively more
homecare was only slightly higher at end of
2-year period - Wirral is very different but still appears to be
a significant change at the 18-month point
12Change in homecare use all service users
13Change in homecare use over 85 age group
Excludes those who died or went into permanent
residential care
14Intensity of Homecare Use after Reablement
- Examined the intensity of homecare usage after
re-ablement at the snapshot points of 3, 6, 12,
18 and 24 months - Based analysis on hours of homecare categories
used in HH1 returns (2 hours or less 2-5 hours
6-10 hours and 10 hours) - Overall no marked changes in the proportions of
service users in each category at the different
snapshot points - Leicestershire had the smallest proportion of
users in the more than 10 hours group
15Factors Affecting the Longer-Term Impact of
Re-ablement
- Independent providers culture and contracting
arrangements - Culture
- Staff training
- Time and tasks commissioned
- Contracting system
- Frequency of review
- Re-ablement package duration and flexibility
- Service users understanding and attitudes
- Carers perceptions of risk and on-going support
- Signposting to other services and support
- Culture of re-ablement across social care services
16Key Lessons for CASSRs establishing Re-ablement
Services
- Staff attitudes, skills and training
- Communicating the re-ablement ethos
- Capacity and throughput
- Flexibility
- Access to the re-ablement service
- Skill mix and relationship to other professionals
- Relationships with carers
- Role in assessment/review
- A whole systems approach
17Key Lessons for CASSRs establishing Re-ablement
Services
- Staff attitudes, skills and training
- Communicating the re-ablement ethos
- Capacity and throughput
- Flexibility
- Access to the re-ablement service
- Skill mix and relationship to other professionals
- Relationships with carers
- Role in assessment/review
- A whole systems approach
18Contact Details
- Liz Newbronner liz_at_actonshapiro.co.uk
- Websites www.csed.csip.org.uk
- www.york.ac.uk/spru
- www.actonshapiro.co.uk