Improving Independence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Improving Independence

Description:

Improving Independence can homecare re-ablement make a difference in the longer term? Liz Newbronner – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Liz91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving Independence


1
Improving Independence can homecare re-ablement
make a difference in the longer term?
  • Liz Newbronner

2
CSED Homecare Re-ablement Workstream
  • 2006 CSED study into the development of homecare
    re-ablement in England
  • Working definition of re-ablement used by CSED
  • Services for people with poor physical or
    mental health to help them accommodate their
    illness by learning or re-learning the skills
    necessary for daily living
  • Study showed that
  • 60 CASSR had a homecare re-ablement service of
    some kind
  • Characteristics of these services varied
    considerably
  • Main distinction was between intake and
    discharge or discharge support services

3
Background to the Study
  • Limited evidence base about effectiveness of
    homecare re-ablement
  • Indications of reductions in use of homecare
    services following discharge from re-ablement
  • But no evidence on
  • - longer term duration of reductions
  • - factors that impact on subsequent service use

4
Aims of the Study
  • 1. To use routine service data from CASSRs to
    examine changes over time in subsequent use of
    social care services following homecare
    re-ablement
  • 2. To identify factors that may affect subsequent
    use of social care services following homecare
    re-ablement
  • 3. To consider the focus and research design of a
    larger evaluation of homecare re-ablement services

5
Methods
  • Selected 4 CASSRs with re-ablement services (2
    intake and 2 discharge) established for at
    least 4 years. In each site
  • Analysis of routine data for clients with an
    episode of homecare re-ablement in 2004-5,
    including subsequent social care provision
    (2005-6 and 2006-7)
  • Interviews with homecare re-ablement service
    manager and colleagues
  • Interviews with one or more care management team
    managers in each site

6
The Study Sites
  • Wirral Enablement Discharge Service (WEDS),
    Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (discharge
    support)
  • Homecare Assessment and Re-ablement Team (HART),
    Leicestershire County Council (intake)
  • Short Term Assessment and Re-ablement Team
    (START), London Borough of Sutton (primarily
    discharge support)
  • Intermediate Home Support Service (IHS), Salford
    City Council (intake)

7
Profile of Re-ablement Service Users
  • Four age groups used up to 64 65 to 74 75 to
    84 and 85 and over
  • Percentage of service users in each age group
    broadly similar for all four sites
  • Longer established services (Leicestershire and
    Sutton) had higher proportion in the 85 and over
    age group
  • In all four sites 80 of service users were
    categorised as physical disability, physical
    illness or physical frailty

8
Overall Pattern of Homecare and Re-ablement
Service Use
  • Between a third and a half of service users in
    Salford, Leicestershire and Sutton had reablement
    only
  • Percentage of users who had re-ablement followed
    by homecare was remarkably consistent across the
    sites at just over 40
  • Two most mature services had the greatest
    proportion of service users who had homecare
    before re-ablement

9
Time from Re-ablement to First Episode of Homecare
  • Majority of service users who had homecare had
    their first episode within one week of leaving
    re-ablement
  • For service users starting homecare later, there
    are two peaks in take up at the up to three
    months point at the over one year point
  • Patterns may suggest re-ablement users fall into
    two broad groups
  • - those gaining immediate but relatively
    short-term benefit avoiding need for homecare for
    a few months
  • - those for whom impact is more sustained and
    which delays the need for homecare by a year or
    more

10
(No Transcript)
11
Change in Homecare Use After Re-ablement
  • Examined the changes in the use of homecare after
    re-ablement
  • Used snapshot points of 3, 6, 12, 18 24 months
    after re-ablement
  • In Leicestershire and Sutton, percentage of
    service users needing less homecare than they did
    on leaving re-ablement increased over the two
    years
  • In Salford, percentage of service users needing
    less homecare than they did on leaving
    re-ablement fell after 18 months but percentage
    of service users needing progressively more
    homecare was only slightly higher at end of
    2-year period
  • Wirral is very different but still appears to be
    a significant change at the 18-month point

12
Change in homecare use all service users
13
Change in homecare use over 85 age group
Excludes those who died or went into permanent
residential care
14
Intensity of Homecare Use after Reablement
  • Examined the intensity of homecare usage after
    re-ablement at the snapshot points of 3, 6, 12,
    18 and 24 months
  • Based analysis on hours of homecare categories
    used in HH1 returns (2 hours or less 2-5 hours
    6-10 hours and 10 hours)
  • Overall no marked changes in the proportions of
    service users in each category at the different
    snapshot points
  • Leicestershire had the smallest proportion of
    users in the more than 10 hours group

15
Factors Affecting the Longer-Term Impact of
Re-ablement
  • Independent providers culture and contracting
    arrangements
  • Culture
  • Staff training
  • Time and tasks commissioned
  • Contracting system
  • Frequency of review
  • Re-ablement package duration and flexibility
  • Service users understanding and attitudes
  • Carers perceptions of risk and on-going support
  • Signposting to other services and support
  • Culture of re-ablement across social care services

16
Key Lessons for CASSRs establishing Re-ablement
Services
  • Staff attitudes, skills and training
  • Communicating the re-ablement ethos
  • Capacity and throughput
  • Flexibility
  • Access to the re-ablement service
  • Skill mix and relationship to other professionals
  • Relationships with carers
  • Role in assessment/review
  • A whole systems approach

17
Key Lessons for CASSRs establishing Re-ablement
Services
  • Staff attitudes, skills and training
  • Communicating the re-ablement ethos
  • Capacity and throughput
  • Flexibility
  • Access to the re-ablement service
  • Skill mix and relationship to other professionals
  • Relationships with carers
  • Role in assessment/review
  • A whole systems approach

18
Contact Details
  • Liz Newbronner liz_at_actonshapiro.co.uk
  • Websites www.csed.csip.org.uk
  • www.york.ac.uk/spru
  • www.actonshapiro.co.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com