- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

Title: Desiderius Erasmus Author: Kyoo Lee Last modified by: Kyoo Lee Created Date: 3/1/2005 7:25:50 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: Kyo94
Category:
Tags: society | tolerant

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
  Immanuel Kant
  • What is Enlightenment?

2
An Answer to the Question What is
Enlightenment? (1784)
  • Enlightenment is man's emergence from his
    self-imposed immaturity.
  • Immaturity is the inability to use one's
    understanding without guidance from another.
  • This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause
    lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of
    resolve and courage to use it without guidance
    from another.
  • Sapere Aude! dare to know "Have courage to use
    your own understanding!"--that is the motto of
    enlightenment.

3
(No Transcript)
4
Questions 1
  • Kant and the Age of Critique
  • 1.1 Kant has written three Critiques, which
    eventually forms the philosophical system of his
    thinking.
  • 1.11 What are they?
  • 1.12 What are the three corresponding key
    questions in those books?
  • 1.13 What is modern about the spirit of those
    questions?
  • 1.2 Kant offers an account of human beings as
    self-conscious entities caught up in some mental
    and historical conflicts Kant posits the human
    being as caught up in an insoluble tension.
    Provide at least two Kantian examples of that
    tension.

5
Questions 2
  • Kant and the Enlightenment
  • Read also this introduction (pdf) and this
    lecture note (pdf) 
  • 2.0 Kant, What is Enlightenment? The key
    thesis is (2.0)
  • Enlightenment is (2.1) NB Learn the entire
    sentence by heart.
  • Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why (2.2)
  • Thus it is difficult for each separate individual
    to work his way out of (2.3) 
  • There is more chance of an entire public
    enlightening itself. This is indeed almost (2.4)
  • Now in some affairs which affect the interests of
    the commonwealth, of the commonwealth, we require
    a certain mechanism whereby (2.5)
  • But should not a society of clergymen, , be
    entitled to commit itself by oath to a certain
    unalterable set of doctrines, in order to secure
    for all time a constant guardianship over each of
    its members, and through them over the people ? I
    reply that this is quite (2.6)
  • If it is now asked whether we at present live in
    an enlightened age, the answer is (2.7)
  • A prince who does not regard it as beneath him to
    say that he considers it his duty, in religious
    matters, not to prescribe anything to his people,
    but to allow them complete freedom, a prince who
    thus even declines to accept the presumptuous
    title of tolerant, is himself (2.8)
  • I have portrayed matters of religion as the focal
    point of (2.9)
  • But only a ruler who is himself enlightened and
    has no far of phantoms, yet who likewise has at
    hand a well-disciplined and numerous army to
    guarantee public security, may say what no
    republic would dare to say Argue as much as you
    like and about whatever you like, but (2.10)

6
Questions 3
  • Kant, Rousseau, Luther and Machiavelli
  • 3.1 Kant is heavily influenced by Rousseau whose
    innovative ideas on human equality, individual
    freedom and pedagogic autonomy turn into a
    philosophical force behind the French Revolution.
  • 3.11 What are the three mottos of the French
    Revolution?
  • 3.12 And how is Kants philosophy of the
    Enlightenment related to those three motives?
    Locate the clues and examples in What is
    Enlightenment?.
  • 3.2 In terms of questioning old authority,
    especially that of the clergy and the monarch,
    there are some notable points of intersection
    among the ideas and practices of Kant, Luther and
    even Machiavelli. What are they? Based on your
    learning so far, draw some large picture of the
    modern genealogy of a theological critique.
  • 3.3 In terms of introducing a new authority,
    Kant, Luther and Machiavelli differ
    significantly. What are the natures of those
    replaced authorities?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com