Job Training Programs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Job Training Programs

Description:

Job Training Programs – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:263
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Informat2362
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Job Training Programs


1
Job Training Programs

2
Job Training Programs
  • What has been tried? How well does it work?

3
Job Training Programs
  • Started in the 1960s (war on poverty) with
    Manpower Training and Development Act (MTDA)
  • Implemented a variety of job training programs
    including Job Corps
  • Updates include Comprehensive Employment and
    Training Act (CETA) in 1970s, Job Training
    Partnership Act (JTPA) in 1980s.
  • Both moved control over programs away from
    Federal Government toward state governments.
  • In 1998, Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
  • DOL was to provide one-stop service
  • These have generally been available to
    disadvantaged and other workers needing
    assistance, but all voluntary.

4
Job Training Programs
  • There were also a variety of training programs
    aimed at aid recipients that were mandatory.
  • Work Incentive Program (WIN) - 1967
  • Required single parent recipients of AFDC who did
    not have pre-school aged kids to participate
    (consensus is that program had little effect)
  • Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) 1988
  • More extensive than WIN, but still quite limited.
  • Welfare-to-work (WtW) - 1996
  • Part of welfare reform (AFDC to TANF)
  • State based, with matching funds from Federal
    govt.

5
Job Training Programs
  • In addition to those mentioned, there are also
    numerous smaller state programs and federal pilot
    programs, or more specialized targeted programs.
  • In 1999, GAO identified 16 government sponsored
    training programs aimed at the economically
    disadvantaged, costing 16.2 billion and serving
    almost 3 million people.
  • Should we expect these programs to have an
    effect?
  • Largest program (under TANF) served almost 1
    million people at a cost of about 1000/person
  • Second largest (Food Stamp Employment and
    Training Program) served around ¾ million people
    at cost of 266/person.

6
Job Training Programs
  • In 1999, US spent an average of 6500/student in
    school in 1 yr.
  • Typical estimates of return to a year of
    education are roughly 8
  • So to get an increase of 10 in each trainees
    earnings capacity, govt would have to spend
    roughly 8000.
  • Of all programs, only WtW, Job Corp, and a couple
    of local programs spend anywhere near that much
    (cover only 200,000 participants)
  • Most training programs focus on
    resume/application writing, interviewing, job
    search skills.
  • Not really new productive skills, rather skills
    that help participants distinguish themselves
    over other low-skilled workers.

7
Job Training Programs
  • Evaluating job training programs
  • What makes this so hard?

8
Job Training Programs
  • Schochet, Burghardt, and McConnell. (2009). Does
    Job Corps Work? Impact Findings from the National
    Job Corps Study. American Economic Review.
  • Job Corps
  • 16-24 yr old
  • Legal US resident
  • Economically disadvantaged
  • Live in environment characterized by disruptive
    homelife, high crime neighborhood, limited job
    opportunities
  • Need additional education, training, and job
    skills
  • Free of serious behavior problems

9
Job Training Programs
  • Program focused around residential job training
    centers.
  • Training available for a variety of trades and
    academic skills (including GRE)
  • Length of training varied, but on average 8
    months.
  • After completion, Job Corps placement services
    helps with job search.
  • In 1995, services cost about 16,500 per
    participant.

10
Job Training Programs
  • Study
  • Interested in the long-term effects of Job Corps
    on education, earnings, and arrests.
  • How does this study overcome the selection
    problem?
  • Given the sampling methodology, what question can
    this study hope to help answer? What questions
    can it not answer?

11
Job Training Programs
  • Study can answer
  • What is the average effect of being allowed to
    enroll in Job Corps on outcomes for volunteering
    eligible individuals above and beyond other
    available programs? (Impact per eligible
    applicant)
  • What is the average effect of enrolling in Job
    Corps on outcomes for volunteering eligible
    individuals above and beyond other available
    programs? (IV estimates) (Impact per eligible
    participant)
  •  
  • What is difference?

12
Job Training Programs
  • What study cannot answer
  • What is the average effect of being allowed to
    enroll or enrolling in Job Corps on outcomes for
    a randomly chosen individual?
  • What is the average effect of being allowed to
    enroll or enrolling in Job Corps on outcomes for
    a random eligible individual?
  • Why not?

13
Job Training Programs
  • Data
  • Randomization occurred between Nov 1994 and Dec
    1995
  • Follow-up surveys 12, 30, and 48 months after
    random assignment.
  • Response rates for 48 month follow-up were 81
    for treated, 78 for controls (what could be an
    issue here?)
  • Administrative earnings records
  • Tax records and
  • Unemployment insurance records.

14
Job Training Programs
  • Were those in treatment group treated?
  • 72 enrolled
  • Avg stay 8 months (though with large variation)

15
Job Training Programs
  • Impacts on Education and Training

16
Job Training Programs
  • Impacts on Earnings (using survey data)

17
Job Training Programs
  • Longer-term impacts on Earnings (all data)

18
Job Training Programs
  • Longer-term impacts by subgroup on earnings and
    arrests

19
Job Training Programs
  • In Summary,
  • Job Corps program seemed to have some effect on
    short-run
  • Participants get more training, earn more, and
    are arrested less in the 4 yrs after enrollment.
  • However, these effects are relatively small and
    appear to fade away over time.
  • The most affected group in the long-term is older
    youth who get involved. Appears to offer a
    different type of opportunity than otherwise
    available to turn life around.
  • More generally, most evidence suggests that
    tackling poverty via job training seems to be
    hard and expensive (should this really be
    surprising though?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com