Welfare and Welfare Reform - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Welfare and Welfare Reform

Description:

Welfare and Welfare Reform – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:216
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Informat2356
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welfare and Welfare Reform


1
Welfare and Welfare Reform

2
Welfare and Welfare Reform

3
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • AFDC (Aid for Families with Dependant Children)
  • Cash Welfare
  • 87 of funds generally went to those who would be
    poor
  • Targeted at single mother families (officially
    benefits could be cut even if a man was found
    living in the house)

4
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Work incentives under AFDC
  • Prior to 1968, benefit payments decreased 1 for
    every 1 earned
  • 1968-1981, benefit not affected by first 30/mo.
    of earnings, after that benefit payment reduced
    by 2 for each 3 earned.
  • 1981-1992, first 4 months of earnings didnt
    affect benefit payment, after that, benefit
    payments decreased 1 for every 1 earned.
  • How does this impact work incentives (think about
    apple farm)?

5
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • By early 1990s many critics charged that the
    welfare system (especially AFDC) was actually
    making poverty worse.
  • Encouraged single parenthood, discouraged work
  • This created a culture of poverty
  • The longer one is on welfare, the harder it is to
    get off.
  • Passing on welfare dependence to next generation.
  • Studies of this provide mixed evidence, mostly
    because these things are hard to identify.
  • Heterogeneity vs. state dependence.
  • Reflection problem

6
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Welfare Reform
  • 1992 Clinton ran on ending welfare as we know
    it
  • 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
    Reconciliation Act (PRWORA).
  • Beginning in 1992, states could experiment with
    welfare regulations but still be funded via
    Federal Government.
  • 29 states did so.

7
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • By 1996, Federal government replaced AFDC with
    TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families)
  • Essentially, Feds provide a block grant to each
    state, and state then determines how to use it.
  • Comes as a block grant (not dependant on number
    of people enrolled), so states have an incentive
    to reduce welfare roles, since any overspending
    must come from state budget, and any savings can
    be used for state tax relief.
  • Block grant does not depend on state of the
    economy.
  • Like AFDC, only available to families with kids
    under 18 with low incomes (lt 85 of poverty line)
    and low assets (lt 4000).
  • The two most notable components of TANF are
  • work requirements
  • time limits

8
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Work Requirements
  • Many of the states have implemented much smaller
    benefit reduction in response to earnings than
    was true under AFDC (e.g., benefit only reduced
    by 0.33 for each 1 earned)
  • Still work incentive issues, but not as severe
    (think of it as a change in price or a tax on the
    apple farm)

9
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Work Requirements (cont)
  • There are also explicit work rules.
  • Under AFDC, mothers with children under 3 yrs old
    were exempt from any work requirement, TANF
    lowered this to one year old (some states even
    lower)
  • After two years of receiving TANF, unmarried
    recipients must work at least 30 hrs/week to
    maintain eligibility.
  • At least 50 of recipients must meet these
    requirements to keep funding.
  • Up to 12 months of vocational training can count,
    which is somewhat controversial (given job
    training literature).

10
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Time Limits
  • TANF has a limit of 60 months (5 yrs) lifetime.
  • However, states can provide non-cash support
    (subsidized with TANF funds) to people longer
    than that.
  • States can also exempt up to 20 of their
    caseloads.
  • 23 states used 60 month limit, 17 chose shorter,
    8 use own funds to provide longer.
  • Idea is to provide correct incentives to work
    and/or invest in self-sustaining human capital.
  • Concern was that a million kids will go hungry

11
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Other issues
  • Child support Under AFDC, half of child support
    payments went back to state for those on welfare.
    TANF not only set up a better tracking system to
    enforce child support, but also all of child
    support goes to custodial parent.
  • TANF increased money for government child care.
  • Case workers were trained differently and
    expected to become more like case managers,
    figuring out solutions and helping clients get
    back into labor market.
  • One controversial aspect is that PRWORA limited
    benefits to only immigrants who have legally been
    in US for 5 yrs or more.
  • In general, welfare reform was a pretty radical
    policy change. Some aspects are very in line with
    economist thinking, some things are purely
    political.

12
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • How big are TANF payments?
  • Size of benefit group Max Monthly
    Benefit Monthly Income limit
  • 1 266 768
  • 2 357 1033
  • 3 447 1297
  • 4 539 1562
  • 5 630 1828
  • 6 721 2092
  • 7 812 2357
  • 8 922 2622
  • 9 1013 2887
  • 10 1102 3152
  • each additional person 91 265

13
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Assessing Welfare Reform Effect on Caseload

14
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Assessing Welfare Reform Effect on Labor Force
    Participation

15
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • So can we say welfare reform was a success?

16
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Assessing Welfare Reform Effect on Total Income

17
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Assessing Welfare Reform Effect on Total Income

10th no kids
5th 10th 25th

income
Pre-reform (c. 1992)
18
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • Assessing Welfare Reform Effect on Total Income

5th 10th 25th
10th no kids

income
Post-reform (c. 2002)
19
Earned Income Tax Credit
  • Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
  • Essentially provides an earnings subsidy via the
    tax system.
  • Tremendous growth and expansion in this program
    over last 15 years.
  • Eligibility and benefit levels were expanded
    dramatically in 90s.

20
Earned Income Tax Credit
  • Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
  • Worker with no children - benefit rate was 7.6
    of earnings, to a max of 390 for those earning
    5100. From 5100 to 6400, benefit stays at
    390. Benefit then reduced by 7.6 of earnings
    for earnings beyond 6400, meaning no benefit if
    earnings exceed 11,490.
  • Worker with 1 child - benefit rate was 34 of
    earnings, to a max of 2,604 for those earning
    7,650. From 7650 to 14,050, benefit stays at
    2,604. Benefit then reduced by 16 of earnings
    for earnings beyond 14,050, meaning no benefit
    if earnings exceed 30,338.
  • Worker with 2 children - benefit rate was 40 of
    earnings, to a max of 4,306 for those earning
    10,750. From 10,750 to 14,050, benefit stays
    at 4,306. Benefit then reduced by 21 of
    earnings for earnings beyond 14,050, meaning no
    benefit if earnings exceed 34,458.
  • For married the range where credit is flat and
    maximum income to receive benefit 1,000 higher.

21

22
Earned Income Tax Credit
  • So how are work incentives affected by this
    program? To look at this question, we must first
    understand
  • Substitution Effect
  • Income Effect
  • How are work incentives affected by this program
    (compared to what?)
  • How will it affect utility/well-being for the
    poor?

23
Earned Income Tax Credit
  • How can we evaluate effect of EITC on labor
    supply?
  • Compare hours worked by those eligible for
    greater EITC benefit to those who are not?
  • Compare hours worked by those eligible for
    greater EITC benefit (two or more child families)
    to those who are eligible for lesser benefits
    (one or no child families)?
  • Compare change in labor supply for those eligible
    for EITC as benefit increases over time?

24
Earned Income Tax Credit
  • Hotz, Mullin, Scholz use a Difference-in-differenc
    e (diff-in-diff) approach (combines above ideas)
  • Exploits the fact that pre-1994, EITC payments
    did not differ much by number of children, but
    after 1994 there are big differences.
  • Compare change in labor supply behavior of 2
    child parents pre- post- 1994 to a similar change
    in behavior for 1 child parents.
  • Effect of increased benefit
  • (avghrspost, 2 child - avghrspre, 2 child) -
    (avghrspost, 1 child - avghrspre, 1 child)
  • What is being estimated (in words)?
  • What is implicit assumption for the result to be
    deemed causal?

25
Earned Income Tax Credit
  • What does this table tell us about the
    importance of accounting for selection and time
    trends in this context?

26
Earned Income Tax Credit
  • EITC and the minimum wage
  • Why might they be related?

27
Welfare and Welfare Reform
  • In-Kind vs. Cash Transfers
  • In 1999, far more was spent on food and housing
    aid (in-kind aid) than standard cash welfare
    (AFDC/TANF and SSI).
  • What is argument against in-kind aid?
  • What are arguments for in-kind aid?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com