Title: Social Welfare in The UK
1Social Welfare in The UK
- The Transformation of Personal Social Services
from Beveridge to New Public Management
2Welfare Services for Children and Families
3Principles underlying the early relationship
between the State, Children and the Family
- Underlying Social Democratic principles
- Fabian notions of human nature, professional
action and the appropriate role of the state - Social Democratic writers argue that social
services developed out of a collective conscience
in Britain following Beveridge.
4The introduction of state social work with
children
- Introduction through the Curtis Report which was
based on a new and more sympathetic approach to
human need. Emphasis was laid on the differences
of each child and his value as an individual - Slack, 1966, p111)
5The introduction of state social work with
children
- A commitment to meet need through the activities
of government and state whenever or wherever a
social service is introduced it is to meet a need
that has, whether or wherever a social service is
introduced it is to meet a need that has, whether
soon or late, been recognised as real or unmet - Slack, 1966, p.93)
6The introduction of state social work with
children
- Titmus has argued that as the accepted area of
social obligation widened, as injustice became
less tolerable, new services were separately
organised around individual need ( Titmuss,
1968. P21)
7The introduction of state social work with
children
- Awareness of need within society was also
critical in the development of personal social
services at this time. - This process was continuous and cumulative.
8The Children and Young Persons Act 1963
- Sanctioned preventative social work
- Recognised the need to receive children with
behavioural needs into local authority care. - Also laid down a framework intended to minimise
the number of child and young adult offenders
appearing before courts - and say a treatment or
welfare model as more appropriate that a justice
model in such cases.
9The Seebohm Report 1968 and Kilbrandon Committee
(1961-1964)
- Reviewed Social Services in England and Wales
- In Scotland The Kilbrandon Committee (1961-64)
proposed set of reforms and set up Social Work
departments. This report was concerned with
juvenile delinquency. - Both reports concern to address pressures and
challenges.
10The Seebohm Report 1968 and Kilbrandon Committee
(1961-1964)
- Existence of two separate services child health
and health and welfare - Clients as they were know then often needed help
from both child health and child welfare - Problem of coordination across disparate and
fragmented services. e.g. juvenile delinquency - Social worker seeking a more unified coherent
structure professional practice and development
11The Seebohm Report 1968 and Kilbrandon Committee
(1961-1964)
- Implementation of Seebohm Report in 1970 Local
Authority Social Services Act - Reorganization of fragmented provision of
personal social services bringing services
together Social Services Department in England
and Wales. - Unified structure for delivery of personal social
services fusion of diverse tasks carried out by
social workers generic social work. - Between 1970s and 1980s social work was generic
rather than specialist in nature.
12Radical critiques of social work
- From within social work itself
- From service user groups
- From the government and the New Right.
13Radical critiques of social work
- (1) Community Social Work Methods patch social
work - Social worker lives in the area in which they
work develop local knowledge and become actively
involved in community organisations and work
towards structural change rather than focussing
on individual pathology and locating problems at
an individual level. - Belief that social problems could be alleviated
by state provision of welfare services. - Post war consensus on welfare included commitment
to eradication of poverty. - Marxist analysis class inequality as main problem
(Corrigan and Leonard, 1978 Brake and Bailey,
1980).
14Radical critiques of social work
- (2)The Feminist critique Womens movement
feminist perspective on emerging shape of social
work - Also black perspectives anti-racist social work
criticised social work fro being Euro-centric and
reinforcing racist stereotypes labelling black
and other non-white communities as ethic
minority (Saraga, 1998, Lewis 1998)
15Radical critiques of social work
- Challenges and resistances from marginal groups
(regarding class, gender, race, sexuality and
disability) did impact on the organisation and
content of social work training and upon social
work practice. Anti-discriminatory Practice
became central. - In general however social work tends to reproduce
rather than challenge inequalities. - E.g. Social work assessments are mainly carried
out on women living in poverty, yet material
conditions have seldom been a factor within these
assessments.
16Radical critiques of social work
- New Right Critique
- Thatcher Government restructured welfare
- Introducing market mechanisms into all aspects of
welfare - Radically altered the ethos and practices within
welfare - Mixed Economy of Welfare delivery by private,
voluntary and the family, not just the state.
17Re-configuration of social relations of welfare
between the state and the citizen.
- Role of family and voluntary and private sector
promoted - Family care was the right and proper care in most
cases. - Purchaser- provider split state took on the
role of purchaser and voluntary and private
sectors and sometimes even public sector taking
on role of provider. - This would introduce competition between the
state and other providers of services and
therefore reduce expenditure by the state.
18Re-configuration of social relations of welfare
between the state and the citizen.
- Wilding (1992) argued issue was not about cuts in
welfare expenditure rather it was more
ideological. A residual welfare state was to be
created with a lower shabbier base-line and
what was to be decided was appropriate levels of
welfare provision.
19Re-configuration of social relations of welfare
between the state and the citizen.
- The Thatcher governments reform were also
motivated by desire to move away from public
provision to voluntary or private provision
Rolling back the state - Removing dependency on state welfare
- (recurring theme current governments focus on
reform of incapacity and disability benefit
enabling or disabling? Inclusion or exclusion
deserving and underserving poor debate is
recreated here)
20Re-configuration of social relations of welfare
between the state and the citizen.
- Aims, purposes and values of welfare
- Between 1940s and 1970s concern to reduce
inequalities promote and ethic of fairness,
combat poverty and assert rights of citizenship. - In 1980s move from notion of universal provision
free services as a right of citizenship and
toward greater stress on charges for services and
targeting of services to the very poorest.
21Re-configuration of social relations of welfare
between the state and the citizen.
- Restructuring of social work and social care came
later that reorganizations of housing, health
income maintenacne and education. - Survival of personal social services as a
monopoly provider of services throughout 1980s
attributed to complexity of legal, organizational
and professional structures. (Langan and Clarke,
1994)
22Re-configuration of social relations of welfare
between the state and the citizen.
- Restructuring of 1990s largely as a result of
legislation - 1989 Children Act
- And NHS and Community Care Act of 1990
23Community Care
- 1989 White Paper Caring for People
- NHS Community Care Act 1990
- Foundamental change in was community care would
be provided - Promotion of community care rather than
institutional care and not a new phenomena. E.
g. Mental Health services movement toward
community care began in the 1930s (Barnes,1998)
24Social work practice
- Growing view that problems associated with
childhood were rooted in social or familial
problems rather than individual pathology. - Problems of childrens relationship with parents
or siblings best dealt with in a family setting.
25Reorganisation of social services in 1970s
- Seebolm Report 1968 argued that a unified system
of state social services would lead to a more
integrated approach for children and their
families.
26The 1989 Children Act
- Based on Principles of Partnership and retaining
measures to safeguard childrens interests. It
also embraced the philosophy of family support. - Research indicated that family support work is
valued but ought to be multi-faceted and openly
available. - Access has become confined to those children
defined as at Risk.
27The Black Committee
- In 1979 a Children and Young Persons Review
Groups was set up with Sir Harold Black as chair
it was reported that - the primary determinant of childrens behaviour.
. . Is the social moral and economic
climate(DHSS 1979)
28The Strategy For Help
- The Black committee Report proposed a Strategy
for Help which emphasised prevention and the
meeting of children and young peoples needs
through resourcing the family and other formal
and informal child care institutions and networks.
29Models of Child Welfare
- Health Care
- Education
- Social Services Provision
30Child Protection Investigations
- Child Protection Investigations separates out the
deserving and undeserving poor. - The undeserving poor are drawn into a system of
social control and monitoring which may fail to
address their primary needs for employment, good
housing and adequate educational opportunities.
31A Continuum of Services
- Services for children at home in the community
- Services for children looked after away from home
- Services for children after they have left
accommodation or care
32Social Service Provision
- In the 1970s child welfare services in the UK
took on an in increasing pre-occupation with
child protection. - Media campaigns and public inquiries in the UK
were instrumental in changing the focus of child
care social work from attempting to support and
resource families to a major concern to police
families for child abuse and and neglect.
33Targeting of Resources
- By focussing resources on families with children
who are defined as at risk many other needy
families are discriminated against. - Narrow interpretations of the category in need
and resource constraints have contributed to this
more restricted access to family support that was
hoped for by the Children Act.
34CARE PLANNING AS PROCESS