Title: Methodologies and Research Design in the Social Sciences
1A Political Sociology of European Democracy
2A Political Sociology of European Democracy
Week 4 Lecture 2 Lecturer Paul Blokker
2
3Governo Locale
Introduction
- The Democratic Deficit Formal and Informal
Aspects - Input democracy and output democracy
- Civil society involvement in the EU
3
4Governo Locale
Introduction
4
5Governo Locale
Introduction
Announcement Examination - The student will be
evaluated at the end of the course by means of a
written essay, to be handed in at the end
(deadline 30 May, to be handed in by e-mail, by
1700 pm) - The written essay will be of a
minimum of 3.000 words, and needs to contain a
bibliography with at least 10 academic resources.
5
6Governo Locale
Introduction
- Announcement Examination
- The essay needs to address a theme related to
democracy in or of Europe. - The essay needs to be set up in a clearly
structured way, with a clear introduction with an
outline of the paper, a convincing argument in
the middle part, and succinct conclusions
(including own opinion).
6
7Governo Locale
Introduction
- Announcement Workshop
- In the first week of June, we will hold a
half-day workshop on Postnational Democracy. - Invited speakers are
- - prof. Jiri Priban, Cardiff University prof.
William Outhwaite, Newcastle University. - The workshop will substitute for normal class
hours. Probable date is Tuesday 5 June.
7
8Governo Locale
Introduction
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The increased emergence of a Political Europe has
made a democratic deficit more visible - Output democracy seems insufficient to stem the
critique on a democratic deficit - Input democracy if understood as representative
politics through parliaments suffers from the
declining standing of parliaments and party
politics, and a lack of direct civic engagement.
8
9Governo Locale
Introduction
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Before the late 1990s, the European project was
legitimated by a permissive consensus, that is,
citizens given the political elites a mandate for
issues of problem-solving - Most researchers therefore analysed societal
participation in EU governance from a
functional, output-oriented point of view
investigating interest groups contribution to
effective problem-solving and governance for the
people (Finke 2007 4)
9
10Governo Locale
Introduction
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The increasingly perceived democratic deficit
has led to a shift of attention towards
input-oriented views, based on the idea of
authentic participation and governance by the
people - On this view, the parliamentarization of the EU
would not be sufficient for a democratization of
European structures
10
11Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Civil society involvement is now understood as a
significant way to counter the democratic
deficit - Civil society involvement is indeed the professed
purpose of strategies of good governance and
deliberative method.
11
12Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- One definition of civil society is
-
- Civil society refers to the realm of
interaction, institutions, and social cohesion
that sustains public life outside the spheres of
the state and economy (Encyclopedia of Social
Theory)
12
13Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- There is, however, no consensus on the exact
meaning of civil society -
- 1. An oppositional perspective that identifies
civil society with autonomous and distinct
spheres of state and civil society, locating
civil society opposite to the state (Locke) - 2. An integrative approach emphasizes the
associative relation between society and the
state. Involvement of civil society has a
legitimizing and controlling function
(Montesquieu, Hegel).
13
14Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Civil society generally involves
- - a tripartite framework of civil society, the
state, and the economy - - individual rights as a protection of
citizenship (private and public autonomy) - - social solidarity
- - social plurality
- - the public sphere and political participation.
(Cohen Arato 1988)
14
15Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- On the European level, the virtue of civil
society is supposed to lie in - its potential to connect a diversity of
interests and groups to European policy-making - the enhancement of political participation by
non-political actors
15
16Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Since the mid-1990s, EU-society relations are
increasingly discussed - The ECs White Paper on Governance explicitly
promoted improvements of European governance - The European Convention included civil society
representation in the deliberative process
16
17Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Today, political leaders throughout Europe are
facing a real paradox. On the one hand, Europeans
want them to find solutions to the major problems
confronting our societies. On the other hand,
people increasingly distrust institutions and
politics or are simply not interested in them. - (White Paper on Governance, 2001)
17
18Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The problem is acknowledged by national
parliaments and governments alike. It is
particularly acute at the level of the European
Union. Many people are losing confidence in a
poorly understood and complex system to deliver
the policies that they want. The Union is often
seen as remote and at the same time too
intrusive. - (White Paper on Governance, 2001)
18
19Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The White Paper proposes opening up the
policy-making process to get more people and
organisations involved in shaping and delivering
EU policy. It promotes greater openness,
accountability and responsibility for all those
involved. This should help people to see how
Member States, by acting together within the
Union, are able to tackle their concerns more
effectively. - (White Paper on Governance, 2001)
19
20Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- - The White Paper emphasized strongly the role
of civil society in the implementation of good
governance, that was to function by openness,
participation, accountability, effectiveness and
coherence - - The White Paper, and particularly its focus on
participatory democracy and civil society, has
since been widely perceived and intensely debated
in a scientific debate of civil society
involvement in the EU.
20
21Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Two approaches in scholarly debates to civil
society involvement - Output-oriented approaches focus on governance
and problem-solving - Input-oriented approaches focus on civic
participation and voice.
21
22Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The output-oriented governance approach sees
governance as a process and state whereby public
and private actors engage in international
regulation of societal relationships and
conflicts (Kohler-Koch and Rittberger 2006). - - The emphasis is on the inclusion of non-state
actors in policy-making - - The objectives are to contribute to more
effective policy-making.
22
23Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Output-oriented governance approach
- - The emphasis is on participatory governance
- - Groups or stakeholders to be included are
business, social partners, welfare organizations,
consumer, women, and environmental groups. - - The rationale lies in intelligent democracy
enhancement of information on the willingness to
comply, consideration of citizens motives.
23
24Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- 2. Input-oriented governance approach
- - An emphasis on civic participation and
authentic governance by the people as a good
in its own right - - An emphasis on issues of popular legitimacy
and popular representation.
24
25Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- (Kohler Koch 2010)
- The main emphasis in European governance is,
however, on output-oriented participation of
different groups and stakeholders - Less attention is paid to representation
- Whom are the participating groups/collective
actors actually representing?
25
26Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The discourse of the European Commission is
oscillating between input- and output-oriented
conceptions of civil society - The White Paper seems to explicitly try to
resolve issues of effective policy-making and
problem-solving - The Commission has increasingly sought to include
groups for this purpose (common market,
migration, social policy)
26
27Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The issue of representation of societal actors is
less at stake. After all, European politics
disposes already of various forms of
representation - member states in the Council,
- the electorate in the EP,
- functional interests in the European Economic and
Social Committee, - subnational interests in the Committee of Regions
(Kohler-Koch 2010 102).
27
28Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The governance approach promoted by the
Commission was attractive for two reasons - A commitment to the improvement of governance
would enhance the legitimacy of the European
Commission - Governance and civil society were fashionable
concepts (governance addressing malfunctioning
governance, civil society addressing
malfunctioning democracy).
28
29Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The White Paper on Governance
- - Deep skepticism towards the problem-solving
capacity of expert-based policy-making call for
more open government - - Growing dissatisfaction with parliamentary
democracy call for direct participation of
stakeholders
29
30Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The White Paper on Governance (2001)
- - Stakeholders were to include target
groups, civil society actors, experts - - a new mode of governance was to guarantee
wider involvement, redress inequalities, increase
collective learning, and enhance vertical and
horizontal articulation in the policy process
(Kohler-Koch 2010 103)
30
31Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The White Paper on Governance (2001)
- - The White Paper put stakeholders at the
forefront, and endorsed a - reasoned discourse between experts and lay
people to support the effectiveness and
legitimacy of policy-making and a wider public
debate on European issues to erase the deficit
of mutual awareness between civil society and
public authorities (Kohler Koch 2010 103)
31
32Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- Kohler Koch argues there are however durable
tensions in the governance approach in particular
with democratic representation - This comes through in particular with regard to
two dimensions, that is, the division of power,
and direct deliberative polyarchy (DDP)
32
33Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- - Two dimensions show that popular representation
is not of importance - Division of powers The Commission is not a
representative institution, and its consultation
of stakeholders is merely in the area of
initiating and executing policy, not legislation - Directly deliberative polyarchy (DDP) a system
of direct involvement of stakeholders, in which
emphasis is on experimentation, but no attention
is paid to power differences, irreconcilable
interests, the safeguarding of citizens
democratic rights.
33
34Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- The representativeness of the stakeholders
involved is then largely unclear - Two criteria seem important
- Descriptive (e.g., from different member states)
- Substantive (the representation of distinct
interests, groups, minorities, etc.)
34
35Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
35
36Governo Locale
Civil Society
- European Democracy and Civil Society
- - According to Kohler-Koch in the Commissions
approach, key problems remain unresolved - - participation
- - problems of collective action
- - absence of clear benchmarks for
representativity and selectivity in the
interaction between EU institutions and
interest groups.
36