Methodologies and Research Design in the Social Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Methodologies and Research Design in the Social Sciences

Description:

A Political Sociology of European Democracy – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: PaulB270
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Methodologies and Research Design in the Social Sciences


1
A Political Sociology of European Democracy
2
A Political Sociology of European Democracy
Week 4 Lecture 2 Lecturer Paul Blokker
2
3
Governo Locale
Introduction
  • The Democratic Deficit Formal and Informal
    Aspects
  • Input democracy and output democracy
  • Civil society involvement in the EU


3
4
Governo Locale
Introduction

4
5
Governo Locale
Introduction
Announcement Examination - The student will be
evaluated at the end of the course by means of a
written essay, to be handed in at the end
(deadline 30 May, to be handed in by e-mail, by
1700 pm) - The written essay will be of a
minimum of 3.000 words, and needs to contain a
bibliography with at least 10 academic resources.

5
6
Governo Locale
Introduction
  • Announcement Examination
  • The essay needs to address a theme related to
    democracy in or of Europe.
  • The essay needs to be set up in a clearly
    structured way, with a clear introduction with an
    outline of the paper, a convincing argument in
    the middle part, and succinct conclusions
    (including own opinion).


6
7
Governo Locale
Introduction
  • Announcement Workshop
  • In the first week of June, we will hold a
    half-day workshop on Postnational Democracy.
  • Invited speakers are
  • - prof. Jiri Priban, Cardiff University prof.
    William Outhwaite, Newcastle University.
  • The workshop will substitute for normal class
    hours. Probable date is Tuesday 5 June.


7
8
Governo Locale
Introduction
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The increased emergence of a Political Europe has
    made a democratic deficit more visible
  • Output democracy seems insufficient to stem the
    critique on a democratic deficit
  • Input democracy if understood as representative
    politics through parliaments suffers from the
    declining standing of parliaments and party
    politics, and a lack of direct civic engagement.


8
9
Governo Locale
Introduction
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Before the late 1990s, the European project was
    legitimated by a permissive consensus, that is,
    citizens given the political elites a mandate for
    issues of problem-solving
  • Most researchers therefore analysed societal
    participation in EU governance from a
    functional, output-oriented point of view
    investigating interest groups contribution to
    effective problem-solving and governance for the
    people (Finke 2007 4)


9
10
Governo Locale
Introduction
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The increasingly perceived democratic deficit
    has led to a shift of attention towards
    input-oriented views, based on the idea of
    authentic participation and governance by the
    people
  • On this view, the parliamentarization of the EU
    would not be sufficient for a democratization of
    European structures


10
11
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Civil society involvement is now understood as a
    significant way to counter the democratic
    deficit
  • Civil society involvement is indeed the professed
    purpose of strategies of good governance and
    deliberative method.


11
12
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • One definition of civil society is
  • Civil society refers to the realm of
    interaction, institutions, and social cohesion
    that sustains public life outside the spheres of
    the state and economy (Encyclopedia of Social
    Theory)


12
13
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • There is, however, no consensus on the exact
    meaning of civil society
  • 1. An oppositional perspective that identifies
    civil society with autonomous and distinct
    spheres of state and civil society, locating
    civil society opposite to the state (Locke)
  • 2. An integrative approach emphasizes the
    associative relation between society and the
    state. Involvement of civil society has a
    legitimizing and controlling function
    (Montesquieu, Hegel).


13
14
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Civil society generally involves
  • - a tripartite framework of civil society, the
    state, and the economy
  • - individual rights as a protection of
    citizenship (private and public autonomy)
  • - social solidarity
  • - social plurality
  • - the public sphere and political participation.
    (Cohen Arato 1988)


14
15
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • On the European level, the virtue of civil
    society is supposed to lie in
  • its potential to connect a diversity of
    interests and groups to European policy-making
  • the enhancement of political participation by
    non-political actors


15
16
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Since the mid-1990s, EU-society relations are
    increasingly discussed
  • The ECs White Paper on Governance explicitly
    promoted improvements of European governance
  • The European Convention included civil society
    representation in the deliberative process


16
17
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Today, political leaders throughout Europe are
    facing a real paradox. On the one hand, Europeans
    want them to find solutions to the major problems
    confronting our societies. On the other hand,
    people increasingly distrust institutions and
    politics or are simply not interested in them.
  • (White Paper on Governance, 2001)


17
18
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The problem is acknowledged by national
    parliaments and governments alike. It is
    particularly acute at the level of the European
    Union. Many people are losing confidence in a
    poorly understood and complex system to deliver
    the policies that they want. The Union is often
    seen as remote and at the same time too
    intrusive.
  • (White Paper on Governance, 2001)


18
19
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The White Paper proposes opening up the
    policy-making process to get more people and
    organisations involved in shaping and delivering
    EU policy. It promotes greater openness,
    accountability and responsibility for all those
    involved. This should help people to see how
    Member States, by acting together within the
    Union, are able to tackle their concerns more
    effectively.
  • (White Paper on Governance, 2001)


19
20
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • - The White Paper emphasized strongly the role
    of civil society in the implementation of good
    governance, that was to function by openness,
    participation, accountability, effectiveness and
    coherence
  • - The White Paper, and particularly its focus on
    participatory democracy and civil society, has
    since been widely perceived and intensely debated
    in a scientific debate of civil society
    involvement in the EU.


20
21
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Two approaches in scholarly debates to civil
    society involvement
  • Output-oriented approaches focus on governance
    and problem-solving
  • Input-oriented approaches focus on civic
    participation and voice.


21
22
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The output-oriented governance approach sees
    governance as a process and state whereby public
    and private actors engage in international
    regulation of societal relationships and
    conflicts (Kohler-Koch and Rittberger 2006).
  • - The emphasis is on the inclusion of non-state
    actors in policy-making
  • - The objectives are to contribute to more
    effective policy-making.


22
23
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Output-oriented governance approach
  • - The emphasis is on participatory governance
  • - Groups or stakeholders to be included are
    business, social partners, welfare organizations,
    consumer, women, and environmental groups.
  • - The rationale lies in intelligent democracy
    enhancement of information on the willingness to
    comply, consideration of citizens motives.


23
24
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • 2. Input-oriented governance approach
  • - An emphasis on civic participation and
    authentic governance by the people as a good
    in its own right
  • - An emphasis on issues of popular legitimacy
    and popular representation.


24
25
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • (Kohler Koch 2010)
  • The main emphasis in European governance is,
    however, on output-oriented participation of
    different groups and stakeholders
  • Less attention is paid to representation
  • Whom are the participating groups/collective
    actors actually representing?


25
26
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The discourse of the European Commission is
    oscillating between input- and output-oriented
    conceptions of civil society
  • The White Paper seems to explicitly try to
    resolve issues of effective policy-making and
    problem-solving
  • The Commission has increasingly sought to include
    groups for this purpose (common market,
    migration, social policy)


26
27
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The issue of representation of societal actors is
    less at stake. After all, European politics
    disposes already of various forms of
    representation
  • member states in the Council,
  • the electorate in the EP,
  • functional interests in the European Economic and
    Social Committee,
  • subnational interests in the Committee of Regions
    (Kohler-Koch 2010 102).


27
28
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The governance approach promoted by the
    Commission was attractive for two reasons
  • A commitment to the improvement of governance
    would enhance the legitimacy of the European
    Commission
  • Governance and civil society were fashionable
    concepts (governance addressing malfunctioning
    governance, civil society addressing
    malfunctioning democracy).


28
29
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The White Paper on Governance
  • - Deep skepticism towards the problem-solving
    capacity of expert-based policy-making call for
    more open government
  • - Growing dissatisfaction with parliamentary
    democracy call for direct participation of
    stakeholders


29
30
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The White Paper on Governance (2001)
  • - Stakeholders were to include target
    groups, civil society actors, experts
  • - a new mode of governance was to guarantee
    wider involvement, redress inequalities, increase
    collective learning, and enhance vertical and
    horizontal articulation in the policy process
    (Kohler-Koch 2010 103)


30
31
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The White Paper on Governance (2001)
  • - The White Paper put stakeholders at the
    forefront, and endorsed a
  • reasoned discourse between experts and lay
    people to support the effectiveness and
    legitimacy of policy-making and a wider public
    debate on European issues to erase the deficit
    of mutual awareness between civil society and
    public authorities (Kohler Koch 2010 103)


31
32
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • Kohler Koch argues there are however durable
    tensions in the governance approach in particular
    with democratic representation
  • This comes through in particular with regard to
    two dimensions, that is, the division of power,
    and direct deliberative polyarchy (DDP)


32
33
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • - Two dimensions show that popular representation
    is not of importance
  • Division of powers The Commission is not a
    representative institution, and its consultation
    of stakeholders is merely in the area of
    initiating and executing policy, not legislation
  • Directly deliberative polyarchy (DDP) a system
    of direct involvement of stakeholders, in which
    emphasis is on experimentation, but no attention
    is paid to power differences, irreconcilable
    interests, the safeguarding of citizens
    democratic rights.


33
34
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • The representativeness of the stakeholders
    involved is then largely unclear
  • Two criteria seem important
  • Descriptive (e.g., from different member states)
  • Substantive (the representation of distinct
    interests, groups, minorities, etc.)


34
35
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society


35
36
Governo Locale
Civil Society
  • European Democracy and Civil Society
  • - According to Kohler-Koch in the Commissions
    approach, key problems remain unresolved
  • - participation
  • - problems of collective action
  • - absence of clear benchmarks for
    representativity and selectivity in the
    interaction between EU institutions and
    interest groups.


36
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com