Galaxy Assembly in a Hierarchical Universe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Galaxy Assembly in a Hierarchical Universe

Description:

Feedback from AGN during Galaxy Mergers T. J. Cox Phil Hopkins Lars Hernquist + many others (the Hernquist Mafia) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: LarsH155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Galaxy Assembly in a Hierarchical Universe


1
Feedback from AGN during Galaxy Mergers
T. J. Cox
Phil Hopkins Lars Hernquist many others (the
Hernquist Mafia)
2
projected stellar distribution
projected gas distribution
3
Generic Outcome of Gas-Rich Galaxy Mergers
  • Tidal torques ? large, rapid gas inflows (e.g.,
    Barnes Hernquist 1991)
  • Triggers starburst (e.g., Mihos Hernquist 1996)
  • Feeds BH growth (e.g., Di Matteo et al. 2005)
  • BH Feedback disperses gas and reveals optical QSO
  • Merging stellar disks grow spheroid
  • Requires
  • Major (?31) merger
  • supply of cold (i.e., rotationally supported) gas

4
Proposed Chronology of a Galaxy Merger
Cox et al. (2006)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Types of Feedback During Gas-Rich Galaxy Mergers
1. Merger/Gravitational Feedback collisional
heating of gas owing to the interaction
itself 2. Star Formation Feedback energy/mass
input from high-mass stars 3. QSO Feedback
energy input from high Eddington rate BH
accretion. Note that this is separate from, but
a necessary precursor to, Radio-mode feedback.
7
Feedback from Star Formation and Black Holes
  • Basic energetics suggest that Efb,SN Efb,BH
  • Timescale for energy injection is NOT equivalent
    ?SP lt ?SF
  • ? The power can be very different
  • Location of energy injection is different quasar
    feedback is deposited in the galactic center,
    star formation feedback is spread throughout the
    galactic disk

8
Relative Feedback During Active Phase
  • gt5x more feedback energy from the BH

9
Relative Feedback During Active Phase
  • BH feedback during the active phase
    becomes increasingly dominant for systems of
    larger (total) mass

10
BH Feedback During Active Phase
  • BH feedback during the active phase
    regulates the mass of the black hole, and leads
    to the MBH-? relation.

Di Matteo et al. (2005), Springel et al. (2005)
11
BH Feedback During Active Phase
  • BH feedback during the active phase
    regulates the mass of the black hole, and leads
    to the MBH-? relation.

The tight scatter in the MBH- The BH
fundamental plane (the BH mass is fundamentally
related to the bulge binding energy)
Hopkins et al. (2007)
12
Which Feedback Influences the Structure of Merger
Remnants?
  • Stellar feedback!
  • (it regulates the conversion of gas into stars
    and therefore determines the structure of the
    remnant galaxy)

w/ BH
w/o BH
13
Color Evolution of Merger Remnants
  • Star formation quenched by black hole feedback,
    remnant reddens quickly

Springel et al. (2004), Di Matteo et al. (2005)
with black hole
without black hole
14
Color Evolution of Merger Remnants
Do we really NEED BH feedback to produce red
remnants? only for very
gas-rich mergers
moderate gas content (initially 40, nearly all
gas is consumed during merger)
high gas content (initially 100, a large amount
left after merger)
15
  • BH feedback likely regulates its own mass,
    but does it really need to be so violent (i.e.,
    lead to a massive superwind)?

16
A Typical Galaxy Merger (take 2)
(on a larger scale)
projected gas distribution
Mass-weighted gas temperature
17
The Influence on Gas in the Merger Remnant
  • Significant coronae of hot gas is produced
  • Mass and metals are ejected

explosion doesnt remove everything
18
The Influence on Gas in the Merger Remnant
  • Emits X-rays (consistent with E scaling
    relations)
  • Cooling time and entropy are increased (Small
    systems may never cool and large systems are
    primed and ready for radio-mode feedback)
  • but, SN-driven winds dominate the ejection of
    mass and metals

19
Signatures of BH Feedback?
  • Outflows visible in absorption (Christys talk
    yesterday)
  • CO spectra (Appleton et al. 2002, Narayanan et
    al. 2006, Iono et al. 2007)
  • SZ (Evans talk?)

Narayanan et al. (2006)
Tremonti et al. (2006)
NGC 6240 (Iono, et al., 2007, see also Appleton,
et al. 2002 in NGC 985)
20
Conclusions
  • Star Formation Feedback
  • energy/mass input from high-mass stars
  • dominant source of feedback, regulates star
    formation galaxy properties
  • very likely to dominate the integrated mass
    and metal ejection
  • QSO Feedback energy input from high Eddington
    rate BH accretion. Note that this is separate
    from, but a necessary precursor to, Radio-mode
    feedback.
  • very brief, but powerful
  • regulates black hole mass
  • contributes to heating of remaining gas
  • contributes to metal ejection
  • contributes to color evolution in massive,
    high gas content mergers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com