Equal Pay: Are we winning? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Equal Pay: Are we winning?

Description:

Equal Pay: Are we winning? Sandra Fredman Oxford University Old Square Chambers – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Sandra398
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Equal Pay: Are we winning?


1
Equal Pay Are we winning?
  • Sandra Fredman
  • Oxford University
  • Old Square Chambers

2
Gender Pay Gap 1997-2007
3
 Components of the pay gap per hour worked
Component of gap Years of full-time
employment experience 26 Interruptions
to the labour market due to family care
15 Years of part-time employment experience
12 Education 6 Segregation
13 Discrimination and other factors
associated with being female 29 Total
100    
4
Why arent we winning?
  • Equal pay
  • With a man in the same or comparable
    establishment
  • Doing like work
  • Work rated as equivalent
  • work of equal value
  • Unless justifiable
  • No proportionality
  • Job segregation, contracting out
  • Factors outside the market division of labour in
    the home
  • Part-time, precarious work
  • Education, experience

5
The Complaints Model Weaknesses
  • Reliance on individual complainant excessive
    strain on victim
  • Courts intervention random many cases
    unremedied
  • Fault-based employer responsibility
  • Individualised disrupts pay structures
  • Adversarial

6
Complexity through complaintsA potent combination
  • Each issue must be litigated
  • Pay protection (Redcar v Bainbridge )
  • Which terms to compare (Degnan v Redcar)
  • Do bonuses reflect productivity (Surtees)
  • Same employment Same employer not sufficient-
    from single body responsible (Robertson) to
    body setting pay (Armstrong)

7
Taking Individualisation to its extreme
  • 13,000 NHS equal pay claims 10, 000 local
    government
  • Against employers No-fee no win solicitors now
    joined by trade unions
  • Against trade unions Discriminatory collective
    agreements (SDA s.77 )
  • No collective approach - fear that agreements or
    settlements will lead to discrimination claims

8
Outside public sector
  • Equal pay 0.5 of claims in tribunals
  • Predominantly like work
  • Long process 11 years for Enderby
  • Low success rate
  • From 2000-2004, 25 private sector equal pay
    claims reached decision stage
  • 5 successful

9
Principles for change
  • Equal pay as a fundamental right
  • Duty to implement equal pay exists regardless of
    individual complaint
  • Art 141 Member states must ensure that principle
    of equal pay is applied
  • Holistic response address causes of unequal pay
  • Collective dimension
  • Private as well as public

10
Way forwardCollective and Proactive
  • Initiative with employer and trade union through
    collective approach
  • Change systematic rather than ad hoc
  • Responsibility with those who can bring about
    change no need to prove fault
  • Group remedies institutional change
  • Participation

11
Benefits of proactive duties
  • Comprehensive and systematic
  • Collective consider whole pay structure
  • Co-operative rather than adversarial
  • Incorporate trade union and employee
    representatives
  • Benefits to employers

12
Gender Duty
  • Duty to pay due regard to need to eliminate
    unlawful discrimination and promote equality of
    opportunity
  • Unlawful discrimination includes breach of equal
    pay act
  • Gender equality scheme consider need to have
    objectives that address cause of difference in
    pay
  • Put into effect actions in plan within three
    years unless unreasonable or impracticable.

13
Gender Duty
  • Benefits
  • Endorsement of proactive approach
  • Holistic
  • Policy-making and service provision as well as
    employment
  • Applies to contracting out
  • Private bodies with public functions (but narrow)
  • Weaknesses
  • Due regard (Elias)
  • Consider need to have objectives addressing
    causes
  • Equal pay reviews not mandatory
  • CF Art 141 Ensure principle is applied
  • Public sector

14
Building on the gender dutyA proposed proactive
duty
  • Duty to institute equal pay within given time
    frame not just pay due regard
  • Central role of trade unions information,
    negotiation, monitoring
  • Private employers
  • Hypothetical comparator

15
Equal pay reviews guidance
  • Transparent grading structures and analytic job
    evaluation
  • Ongoing monitoring
  • Role of red-circles
  • Gender impact assessments on new policies

16
Synchronising with individual claims
  • Individual claims derailing collective
  • Individuals role not individual claim but right
    to demand compliance with equal pay duty.
  • Key compliance with EU law
  • Synchrony with individual claim
  • Adjudication CAC
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com