Objective FCM01

1
Objective FCM01

• ESSIP Plan 2013

Octavian CIOARA DSS/EIPR 13.09.2013
2
Objective FCM01

• Comprehensive Explanation
• What is new or has changed since LSSIP 2012
• Link to European ATM Master Plan
• Most important SLoA(s)
• Finalisation Criteria and Closed Questions
• ESSIP Report 2012
• Objective Coordinators Analysis,
  recommendations, tips tricks
• Conclusions
• Links and contacts

3
Comprehensive Explanation

• This Pan-European objective aims at enhancing
  tactical flow management services through the
  introduction of real-time aircraft position and
  meteorological data to optimise Air Traffic Flow
  and Capacity Management (ATFCM).
• Area of applicability All ECAC States
• Initial Operational Capability (IOC)
  08/2001Full Operational Capability (FOC)
  12/2006

4
What is new or has changed since LSSIP 2012

• Due to its relationship with the EUR ATM MP, the
  type of the objective has changed from ECIP to
  SESAR

5
Link to European ATM Master Plan

• OI Step IS-0102 Improved Management of Flight
  Plan after Departure

6
Most important SLoA(s)

• ASP01 Supply ETFMS with Basic Correlated Position
  Data
• ASP02 Supply ETFMS with Standard Correlated
  Position Data
• ASP03 Receive and process ATFM data from the CFMU
• ASP04 Inform CFMU of flight activations and
  estimates for ATFM purposes
• Each SLoA should be fulfilled in accordance with
  the relevant provisions of the CFMU Flight
  Progress Messages document

7
Finalisation Criteria and Closed Questions

• Reception by CFMU of CPRs (in ASTERIX Category
  062 format)
• ATFM messages received from the CFMU are
• automatically correlated to the ATC Flight Plan
  data
• presented to the Air Traffic Controllers
• Reception by CFMU of the FSA messages
• No closed questions available

8
ESSIP Report 2012

• Objective late, but with a good level of
  implementation of the priority SLoAs.
• The States yet to implement the priority SLoAs of
  this objective have shown a sound commitment to
  do so.
• However, the likelihood of implementing all SLoAs
  still remains very low.
• The main reason for delaying the implementation
  is of a technical nature and lack of operational
  justification. Implementation is mostly linked to
  the deployment of new systems or to major
  upgrades of existing ones, therefore the stand
  alone implementation of the objective was not
  considered beneficial.
• Sometimes the objective is perceived as not being
  operationally justified at local level. However
  the implementation decisions shall also take into
  account the network benefits.

9
Objective Coordinators Analysis,
recommendations, tips tricks

• Implement the most important SLoA(s)
• ASP01
• ASP02
• ASP03
• ASP04
• When reporting, be more specific on what has been
  completed and the prospects for the rest of the
  SLoAs.
• Ensure that there is an effective link with the
  NMD and the information on the implementation
  originates from a ODSG member.

10
Conclusions

• The implementation of this objective has a
  positive impact on
• The reduction of wasted capacity
• The reduction of delays
• The reduction of unexpected overload situations
• Note that the delivery to the NM of Correlated
  Position Reports containing the SSR transponder
  code assignments for GAT/IFR is an obligation on
  the Air Navigation Service Providers, under the
  NM IR (Commission Regulation (EU) No 677/2011)

11
Links and contacts

• Objective Coordinator Octavian Cioara 32 2 729
  3282
• octavian.cioara_at_eurocontrol.int
• NMD Objective Expert J. Koolen 32 2 729 9876
• johannes.koolen_at_eurocontrol.int