Title: E-commerce, competition policy, and development
1E-commerce, competition policy, and development
- Andrea Goldstein
- OECD Development Centre
- Workshop on Electronic Commerce Business Impacts
Project (EBIP), Rome, 29-30 October 2001
2Internet, the Great Equalizer?
- makes the whole economic system, nationally and
internationally, more competitive - prices of well-specified goods and services
available on-line - buyers can shop for the best deal over a wide
geographic area - sellers can reach a larger group of buyers
- textbook model of perfect competition
- large numbers of buyers and sellers
- market with perfect information
- lower profit margins
- more efficient production
- greater consumer satisfaction
3Commissioner Montis Opinion
- The Internet is a wonderful enabling technology,
which will in principle increase competition in
many markets. Nevertheless, that does not mean
that it is immune from competition problems. Can
competition law that was designed to deal with
bricks and mortars deal with clicks and portals?
4General competition concerns
- "gate-keeper" effects and vertical integration
(between portals and sites/products, or ISPs and
multimedia companies) --gt ensure that control
over telecom networks does not lead to
distortions of competition - removal of geographical barriers to competition
--gt avoid speculative, discriminatory and abusive
registration or management of Internet domain
names
5Does e-commerce create new markets for the
purposes of competition policy?
- The answer will differ from market to market
- will partly depend on
- whether and how firms in traditional channels
become involved in B2C and B2B "e-marketplaces" - on-line deliverability of a product
- In OECD countries it is more likely to be a new
sales channel - in non-OECD countries, where traditional sales
channels are less well-developed, e-commerce
creates new markets (eg, car parts in India)
6May product markets be made narrower as a result
of increased scope for price discrimination?
- e-commerce makes it easier to
- quote different prices to different buyers
- use information about consumer buying habits to
identify those willing to pay higher prices - take advantage of the fact that higher income
consumers, i.e. those with a greater ability to
pay higher prices, place a higher value on time - ?
- evidence points to persistence of price
dispersions across Internet markets
7Will geographical mkts be widened?
- Forces mitigating against there being a truly
global market in many products - Language barriers
- taxation quandaries
- regulatory barriers (differences in national laws
concerning things like discounts, comparative
advertising, resale price maintenance and
exclusive territories) - physical delivery problems
- absence of secure payment systems
- difficulties identifying actors and enforcing
contractual rights
8Assessing market power
- Lower entry barriers
- lower search and selection costs on the buyer
side - lower transaction costs
- reduced need for physical assets
- rapid mkt growth
- Higher entry barriers
- sunk costs of establishing customer loyalty
(so-called neural real estate) - network effects --gt markets are tippy,
especially when liquidity and proprietary SCMSs
are important
9Reducing first-mover advantages
- Sunk costs
- customers ability to port their own database
entries - effective consumer protection legislation
- Tippy markets
- ability of mkt participants to monitor different
marketplaces and to switch between them (see AOL
5.0 interoperability example)
10Business-to-Business trading systems
- Will sensitive information be exchanged between
competitors? - Can these systems be used to exclude individual
companies from the most efficient virtual market
place? - Can the concentration of buyer power be a cause
for concern?
11E-commerce and consumer policy
- consumers minimum rights
- previous information
- obtain necessary documentation
- resolve a contract
12Guidelines for Consumer Protection in the Context
of E-commerce
- approved on 9 December 1999 after 18 months of
discussion by the OECD CCP - help ensure that consumers are no less protected
when shopping online than they are when they buy
from store or order from a catalogue - reflect existing legal protection available to
consumers in more traditional forms of commerce - encourage private sector initiatives that include
participation by consumer representatives - emphasise the need for co-operation among
governments, businesses and consumers
13A quote from John Vickers
- The growth of e-commerce can be hugely beneficial
to consumers, businesses and the economy. It
gives consumers the ability to shop around far
more easily than in the past and so encourages
price competition and innovation among suppliers.
Part of our job is to help make it a more secure
channel by ensuring suppliers fulfil their
obligations. Implementation of the
distance-selling regulations and our role in the
creation of the TrustUK approvals body for
e-commerce codes are just two ways we are doing
this.
14Unfortunately ...
- only 44 percent of e-businesses complied with the
basic requirements of the Data Protection Act of
1998 - Web sites inform visitors how information that
visitors provide will be used - Web sites keep data secure and refrain from
sharing it with third parties without permission - 52 percent of the 637 businesses visited by OFT
failed to comply with the UK's Distance Selling
Regulations - businesses must provide full disclosure of
refund, exchange and order cancellation policies
15Competition policy and e-commerce in non-OECD
countries
- State ownership
- multi-industry conglomerates
- large MNCs vs little SMEs
- small markets
- income and endowments inequality
- institutional weakness
- information asymmetries
16Trade and Competition Policy
- need for
- enhanced competition in telecoms to facilitate
lower priced access to the Internet - greater competition in international parcel
delivery services - streamlined customs procedures
17Sources
- Goldstein OConnor, E-commerce for development,
OECD Devt Ctr, Oct 2000 - OECD, Competition Issues in Electronic Commerce,
DAFFE/CLP(2000)32 - Office of Fair Trading, E-commerce and its
implications for competition policy, Aug 2000