Web Tools for Enrollment Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Web Tools for Enrollment Management

Description:

Web Tools for Enrollment Management By Ken Meehan, Research, Fullerton College Bob Hughes, I.S. NOCCCD Deborah Ludford, I. S. NOCCCD – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Deborah357
Learn more at: https://rpgroup.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Web Tools for Enrollment Management


1
Web Tools for Enrollment Management
  • By
  • Ken Meehan, Research, Fullerton College
  • Bob Hughes, I.S. NOCCCD
  • Deborah Ludford, I. S. NOCCCD

2
Agenda
  • Welcome and Introductions - Deborah
  • History and Development - Deborah
  • Demonstration of Product Ken
  • Technical Aspects of Development Bob
  • Questions and Answers Deborah

3
History Development
  • Identified a need to track FTES at the campus
    level Fullerton College
  • Identifying Essential Information
  • Defining the domain
  • Specification of Variables
  • Meeting with Information Services - 2001
  • Hired consultants to work with Information
    Services and campus researchers to develop a set
    of tools beginning with Current Enrollments

4
History and Development
  • Refinement of Current Enrollment
  • Cross-listed sections
  • Shared FTEF
  • Census enrollment
  • Enrollment Projection Report
  • Projecting positive attendance
  • Choice of appropriate terms
  • Five Year Comparison Report

5
Training
  • Presentation at Presidents Staff
  • Demonstration at Deans Council
  • Annual Updates and New Deans
  • Development of ER Light
  • Use by Deans and Chairs
  • Correction of Contact Hours
  • Evaluation at End of Term
  • Current Focus on Maximizing FTES

6
Demonstration
  • Current enrollment Report
  • https//www.banner-forms.nocccd.cc.ca.us/reports/r
    esearchers/currentenrollment/index.jsp
  • Projected enrollment Report
  • https//www.banner-forms.nocccd.cc.ca.us/reports/r
    esearchers/enrollmentprojection/index.jsp
  • Five Year Comparison Report
  • https//www.banner-forms.nocccd.cc.ca.us/reports/r
    esearchers/fiveyear/index.jsp
  • Capturing in Excel and SPSS
  • Daily Reporting to President and CIO

7
Current Enrollment
8
Current Enrollment
9
Enrollment Projections
10
Enrollment Projections
11
Five-Year Trends
12
Five-Year Trends
13
Project Timeline
  • April 2003 project design approved
  • July 2003 Current Enrollment in production
  • Nov 2003 Historical trends delivered
    (performance issues needed to be addressed)
  • April 2004 Historical Trends in production
  • May 2004 Projected Enrollment in production

14
Technical Details
  • PL/SQL procedures run to populate 3 tables
  • CurrentEnrollment
  • FiveYear
  • EnrollmentProjection
  • JavaServer Pages are used to display the results
  • PL/SQL functions provide aggregate data made up
    of elements within the underlying table

15
Current Enrollment
  • Up to 2 weeks of daily enrollment activity is
    captured per college, per term
  • PL/SQL procedure run automatically on a nightly
    basis to populate a single table
  • 86 columns, 104,827 rows (3 terms)
  • Data captured at the CRN (section) level

16
Enrollment Projection
  • Current term, 2 future terms, and 4 past terms
    are captured per college
  • PL/SQL procedure run automatically on a nightly
    basis to populate a single table
  • 86 columns, 20,884 rows
  • Data captured at the CRN (section) level

17
Five Year Comparison
  • One row per course for each college and term is
    stored following MIS reporting for the prior
    term
  • 84 columns, 61,604 rows (29 terms)
  • Data captured at the course level

18
Issue 1 Attendance Methods
  • Handling various attendance methods (Weekly,
    Daily, Positive Attendance)
  • Aggregate totals needed separate functions to
    keep PA courses from being calculated in FTES
  • Attendance methods for some courses changed from
    term to term

19
Issue 2 Cross Listed Courses
  • Some cross-listed courses would be entered with
    max seats at each CRN
  • Cross List group has 45 seats
  • Class 1 has 45 seats
  • Class 2 has 45 seats
  • Class 3 has 45 seats
  • Some cross-listed courses would be entered with
    counts unique to each CRN
  • Cross List group has 45 seats
  • Class 1 has 20 seats
  • Class 2 has 15 seats
  • Class 3 has 10 seats

20
Cross List Compromise
  • We ended up using the class in the cross-list
    group scheduled with the highest number of seats
  • Doesnt work well when courses cross departments

21
Issue 3 Projection Basis
  • Enrollment Projection report uses a projected
    FTES at the class (CRN) level
  • Populated by a function based on averages from
    previous terms
  • Which terms to include?
  • X number of prior terms?
  • X number of prior like terms?
  • Exclude unique terms due to construction, other
    issues?
  • How to project Summer?

22
Requested Future Enhancements
  • Ability to see historical trends alongside
    current enrollment
  • Display data graphically
  • Allow projections to be entered at the CRN level

23
Questions and Answers
  • Thank You for attending
  • Enjoy the conference!
  • kmeehan_at_fullcoll.edu
  • bhughes_at_nocccd.edu
  • dludford_at_nocccd.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com