Title: 4.5 Using Congruent Triangles
14.5 Using Congruent Triangles
2Objectives
- Use congruent triangles to plan and write proofs.
- Use congruent triangles to prove constructions
are valid.
3Planning a proof
- Knowing that all pairs of corresponding parts of
congruent triangles are congruent can help you
reach conclusions about congruent figures.
4Planning a proof
- For example, suppose you want to prove that ?PQS
? ?RQS in the diagram shown at the right. One
way to do this is to show that ?PQS ? ?RQS by the
SSS Congruence Postulate. Then you can use the
fact that corresponding parts of congruent
triangles are congruent to conclude that ?PQS ?
?RQS.
5Ex. 1 Planning Writing a Proof
- Given AB CD, BC DA
- Prove AB?CD
- Plan for proof Show that ?ABD ? ?CDB. Then use
the fact that corresponding parts of congruent
triangles are congruent.
6Ex. 1 Planning Writing a Proof
- Solution First copy the diagram and mark it
with the given information. Then mark any
additional information you can deduce. Because
AB and CD are parallel segments intersected by a
transversal, and BC and DA are parallel segments
intersected by a transversal, you can deduce that
two pairs of alternate interior angles are
congruent.
7Ex. 1 Paragraph Proof
- Because AD CD, it follows from the Alternate
Interior Angles Theorem that ?ABD ??CDB. For the
same reason, ?ADB ??CBD because BCDA. By the
Reflexive property of Congruence, BD ? BD. You
can use the ASA Congruence Postulate to conclude
that ?ABD ? ?CDB. Finally because corresponding
parts of congruent triangles are congruent, it
follows that AB ? CD.
8Ex. 2 Planning Writing a Proof
- Given A is the midpoint of MT, A is the
midpoint of SR. - Prove MS TR.
- Plan for proof Prove that ?MAS ? ?TAR. Then
use the fact that corresponding parts of
congruent triangles are congruent to show that ?M
? ?T. Because these angles are formed by two
segments intersected by a transversal, you can
conclude that MS TR.
9Given A is the midpoint of MT, A is
themidpoint of SR.Prove MS TR.
- Statements
- A is the midpoint of MT, A is the midpoint of SR.
- MA ? TA, SA ? RA
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?M ? ?T
- MS TR
10Given A is the midpoint of MT, A is
themidpoint of SR.Prove MS TR.
- Statements
- A is the midpoint of MT, A is the midpoint of SR.
- MA ? TA, SA ? RA
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?M ? ?T
- MS TR
- Reasons
- Given
- Definition of a midpoint
11Given A is the midpoint of MT, A is
themidpoint of SR.Prove MS TR.
- Statements
- A is the midpoint of MT, A is the midpoint of SR.
- MA ? TA, SA ? RA
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?M ? ?T
- MS TR
- Reasons
- Given
- Definition of a midpoint
- Vertical Angles Theorem
12Given A is the midpoint of MT, A is
themidpoint of SR.Prove MS TR.
- Statements
- A is the midpoint of MT, A is the midpoint of SR.
- MA ? TA, SA ? RA
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?M ? ?T
- MS TR
- Reasons
- Given
- Definition of a midpoint
- Vertical Angles Theorem
- SAS Congruence Postulate
13Given A is the midpoint of MT, A is
themidpoint of SR.Prove MS TR.
- Statements
- A is the midpoint of MT, A is the midpoint of SR.
- MA ? TA, SA ? RA
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?M ? ?T
- MS TR
- Reasons
- Given
- Definition of a midpoint
- Vertical Angles Theorem
- SAS Congruence Postulate
- Corres. parts of ? ?s are ?
14Given A is the midpoint of MT, A is
themidpoint of SR.Prove MS TR.
- Statements
- A is the midpoint of MT, A is the midpoint of SR.
- MA ? TA, SA ? RA
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?MAS ? ?TAR
- ?M ? ?T
- MS TR
- Reasons
- Given
- Definition of a midpoint
- Vertical Angles Theorem
- SAS Congruence Postulate
- Corres. parts of ? ?s are ?
- Alternate Interior Angles Converse.
15Ex. 3 Using more than one pair of triangles.
- Given ?1??2, ?3??4.
- Prove ?BCE??DCE
- Plan for proof The only information you have
about ?BCE and ?DCE is that ?1??2 and that CE
?CE. Notice, however, that sides BC and DC are
also sides of ?ABC and ?ADC. If you can prove
that ?ABC??ADC, you can use the fact that
corresponding parts of congruent triangles are
congruent to get a third piece of information
about ?BCE and ?DCE.
2
4
3
1
16Given ?1??2, ?3??4.Prove ?BCE??DCE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- ?1??2, ?3??4
- AC ? AC
- ?ABC ? ?ADC
- BC ? DC
- CE ? CE
- ?BCE??DCE
17Given ?1??2, ?3??4.Prove ?BCE??DCE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- ?1??2, ?3??4
- AC ? AC
- ?ABC ? ?ADC
- BC ? DC
- CE ? CE
- ?BCE??DCE
- Reasons
- Given
- Reflexive property of Congruence
18Given ?1??2, ?3??4.Prove ?BCE??DCE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- ?1??2, ?3??4
- AC ? AC
- ?ABC ? ?ADC
- BC ? DC
- CE ? CE
- ?BCE??DCE
- Reasons
- Given
- Reflexive property of Congruence
- ASA Congruence Postulate
19Given ?1??2, ?3??4.Prove ?BCE??DCE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- ?1??2, ?3??4
- AC ? AC
- ?ABC ? ?ADC
- BC ? DC
- CE ? CE
- ?BCE??DCE
- Reasons
- Given
- Reflexive property of Congruence
- ASA Congruence Postulate
- Corres. parts of ? ?s are ?
20Given ?1??2, ?3??4.Prove ?BCE??DCE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- ?1??2, ?3??4
- AC ? AC
- ?ABC ? ?ADC
- BC ? DC
- CE ? CE
- ?BCE??DCE
- Reasons
- Given
- Reflexive property of Congruence
- ASA Congruence Postulate
- Corres. parts of ? ?s are ?
- Reflexive Property of Congruence
21Given ?1??2, ?3??4.Prove ?BCE??DCE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- ?1??2, ?3??4
- AC ? AC
- ?ABC ? ?ADC
- BC ? DC
- CE ? CE
- ?BCE??DCE
- Reasons
- Given
- Reflexive property of Congruence
- ASA Congruence Postulate
- Corres. parts of ? ?s are ?
- Reflexive Property of Congruence
- SAS Congruence Postulate
22Ex. 4 Proving constructions are valid
- In Lesson 3.5 you learned to copy an angle
using a compass and a straight edge. The
construction is summarized on pg. 159 and on pg.
231. - Using the construction summarized above, you can
copy ?CAB to form ?FDE. Write a proof to verify
the construction is valid.
23Plan for proof
- Show that ?CAB ? ?FDE. Then use the fact that
corresponding parts of congruent triangles are
congruent to conclude that ?CAB ? ?FDE. By
construction, you can assume the following
statements - AB ? DE Same compass setting is used
- AC ? DF Same compass setting is used
- BC ? EF Same compass setting is used
24Given AB ? DE, AC ? DF, BC ? EF Prove
?CAB??FDE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- AB ? DE
- AC ? DF
- BC ? EF
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
25Given AB ? DE, AC ? DF, BC ? EF Prove
?CAB??FDE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- AB ? DE
- AC ? DF
- BC ? EF
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
26Given AB ? DE, AC ? DF, BC ? EF Prove
?CAB??FDE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- AB ? DE
- AC ? DF
- BC ? EF
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- Reasons
- Given
- Given
- Given
27Given AB ? DE, AC ? DF, BC ? EF Prove
?CAB??FDE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- AB ? DE
- AC ? DF
- BC ? EF
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- Reasons
- Given
- Given
- Given
- SSS Congruence Post
28Given AB ? DE, AC ? DF, BC ? EF Prove
?CAB??FDE
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- AB ? DE
- AC ? DF
- BC ? EF
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- ?CAB ? ?FDE
- Reasons
- Given
- Given
- Given
- SSS Congruence Post
- Corres. parts of ? ?s are ?.
29Given QS?RP, PT?RT Prove PS? RS
4
2
3
1
- Statements
- QS ? RP
- PT ? RT