Title: NEW ECONOMIC POLICY (I)
1NEW ECONOMIC POLICY (I)
- Lenin replaced War Communism with New Economic
Policy (NEP) in 1921 - Never saw it as permanent policy but as a
temporary retreat from socialism that would give
Russia a chance to recover economically and
socially
2NEW ECONOMIC POLICY (II)
- Provisions
- State retained ownership of large industry
- Private enterprise allowed in small industries
and retail trade - Peasants freed from forced requistions
- Had to pay tax in kind to government but were
otherwise free to sell rest on free market - Given strong incentive to produce more
- NEP was tremendous success and it quickly revived
the Russian economy
3DANGERS OF THE NEP
- 75 of all retail trade fell into private hands
during NEP - Caused rise of Nepmen
- Numerous and prosperous
- Fear was that they would become new bourgeoisie
- Caused rise of kulaks
- Peasants grown wealthy because of private
enterprise provisions of NEP - Debate over NEP would become linked to power
struggle after Lenins death
Nepmen
4BAN ON FACTIONS
- In response to criticisms of NEP, Lenin and
Politburo ban all factions in 1922 - Any party member who joined others to oppose or
criticize any party policy would be expelled - Stalin would later use policy to eliminate rivals
- Leaders who would later suffer because of this
policy all voted for it in 1922
5TWO MISTAKES
- Lenin suffers from a series of increasingly
series strokes between late 1921 and 1924 - Left him speechless and paralyzed
- Made two tragic mistakes during this period
- Supported ban on factions
- Appointed Josef Stalin General Secretary of
Communist Party
6LENIN MOVES TO GET RID OF STALIN
- Lenin discovers Stalin had used terror and murder
to stifle peaceful opposition of local communist
leaders in Georgia - Criticized Stalins Moscow chauvinism and began
to meet with Trotsky to kick Stalin out of party - Stalin learned of meeting and berated Lenins
wife, Krupskaya, when she would not let him meet
with Lenin
7LENINS LAST TESTAMENT
- Began in December 1922
- Did not name successor and instead offered his
personal evaluation of all possible candidates - Stalin should be replaced with someone more
patient, more loyal, more courteous, and less
capricious - Trotsky most pre-eminent member of party but
suffered from excessive self-confidence and
highhandedness - Barely mentioned Zinoviev and Kamenev
- Highly praised Nicholas Bukharin and Felix
Pyatokov
8LENINS CONCLUSION
- No one was fit to succeed him
- Wanted Trotsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev to form
caretaker government until Bukharin and Pyatokov
were ready to take over
9DEATH OF LENIN
- Lenin takes final steps to eliminate Stalin
- Final stroke on March 10, 1924 completely
paralyzes Lenin before he could get rid of Stalin - Dies in early 1924 at age 54
10JOSEF STALIN
- Born in Georgia in 1879
- Real name was Iosif Djugashuili
- Joined seminary to study to become a priest
- Expelled and drifted from job to job
- Gradually drawn into revolutionary movement and
became Social Democratic agitator in Georgia by
his early 20s - Eventually came to the attention of Lenin and
came to Petrograd after February Revolution - Named Commissar of Nationalities after October
1917 and made member of Politburo and Council of
Peoples Commissars - Named General Secretary of Communist Party in
1922
11GENERAL SECRETARY
- Used position to build powerful power base
- Controlled the appointment and dismissal of all
party bureaucrats - Set agenda for Politburo
- Sole provider of information for Politburo
- Packed Central Committee with flunkies
- All rival factions in party courted him after
Lenins death - Because he could deliver votes on Central
Committee and hence determine outcome of any
debate
12POWER STRUGGLE BEGINS
- Stalin stood out in rituals surrounding Lenins
funeral - Trotskys position weakened by
- He had joined party late
- Never bothered with day-to-work of ordinary
politics - Talents as intellectual critic and engineer of
policies not as valuable with Lenin gone - Trotsky made tactical errors
- Voted for proposal that Lenins Last Testament be
kept secret
13LEFT POSITION
- Proposed by Trotsky and supported by Zinoviev and
Kamenev - Socialism in Russia was doomed without worldwide
communist revolution - Soviet Union should therefore support
revolutionary movements abroad and pursue a
militant and pure socialism at home - Get rid of NEP
Kamenev
14RIGHT OPPOSITION
- Led by Nicholas Bukharin
- Agreed that socialism in Russia depended on
world revolution for its ultimate success - But he didnt see this happening soon
- Therefore he argued that Soviet government should
not push too far ahead of the rest of the world
by pursuing militant socialism - Wanted to continue compromise between socialism
and capitalism embodied in NEP
15CENTER POSITION
- Even though world revolution had failed to
materialize, socialism could still succeed in the
Soviet Union - Because of huge population, huge territory, and
tremendous resources - All effort should be dedicated to exploiting
these advantages to make socialism strong in
Russia and Russia strong in the world - Then the Soviet Union would be ready to ignite a
world revolution
16STALIN WINS
- Power struggle after Lenins death was not merely
over personal power - It was over the future of Russia
- Stalin eventually won the day
- Used variety of tactics
- Accused opponents of factionalism
- Accused them of deviating from party line and
trying to split the party - Used General Secretary position to pack party
congresses with his supporters
17ULTIMATE TRIUMPH
- Final victory came at 15th All-Russian Congress
of the Communist Party - Prohibited all deviation from the general party
line as interpreted by Stalin - All opponents forced to publicly apologize for
their errors - Trotsky kicked out of party and, in 1929,
expelled from Russia - Murdered in 1940 on Stalins orders in Mexico
City
18SOCIALISM IN ONE COUNTRY
- Stalins victory also had an ideological
component - Of the three views, only his had the most
attraction for rank-and-file party members - The Right merely told people to bide their time
- The Left made Russia and its Revolution seem
ineffective and unimportant - Only Stalin offered a program and goal that could
be achieved by Soviet efforts alone without
dependence on developments elsewhere - To underline this point, the 15th Party Congress
also adopted measures that ended NEP and began a
new era of Five-Year Plans
19FIVE YEAR PLANS OVERVIEW
- Made Russia a great industrial nation
- Rose from 5th in industrial production in 1928 to
neck-and-neck with United States in 1980 - New system of collective farming introduced
- A vast social transformation accompanied the
economic changes created by the Five Year Plans
20REASONS FOR GIVING UP NEP
- NEP was viewed as a temporary retreat from
socialism - Unacceptable to most communists
- Industry had gained prewar levels but future
growth depended on massive investment--from
peasants in the difference between what
agricultural products were worth and what the
state actually paid for them - Peasants felt state prices were too low and
refused to sell and felt prices for manufactured
products were too high and refused to buy - Five-Year Plans would fix situation by insuring
steady supply of food at low prices and squeezing
necessary capital for industrial growth out of
peasants - Stalin knew war with Germany and Japan was
inevitable - Victory depended on absolute control of
population and industrial strength - Five-Year Plans would collectivize agriculture
and put peasants in centralized areas where they
could be watched and would increase industrial
production
21FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN
- Projected that industrial production would
increase by 200 - Emphasis on heavy industry
- Investment capital would come from collective
farms
22COLLECTIVE FARMS
- 20 of all agricultural production would be
performed on collective farms - Large consolidated blocs of land made up of
formerly independent peasant smallholdings - Peasants would live and work together on these
farms and equally share income derived from it
23COLLECTIVE FARMS ADVANTAGES (I)
- Would halt growth of petty capitalist mentalities
among peasants - Would consolidate scattered peasant population
and make it easier to watch and educate them - Would promote improved productivity because large
farms would be more amenable to use of machinery
24COLLECTIVE FARMS ADVANTAGES (II)
- Would create large industrial workforce since,
with machines, fewer peasants would be needed to
run collective farms - Would provide capital for industrial development
- State would pays farms 1/8 market value for
products - Difference would be diverted into industry
- Farmer would also pay sales tax and this would be
invested into industry
25COLLECTIVIZATION GETS ROUGH
- Collectivization was supposed to be voluntary
- Soon became clear that peasants would not
voluntarily give up their small parcels of land - Stalin then abruptly announced the abandonment of
his 20 collectivization goal and stated that all
peasants would be collectivized, by force if need
be - Also announced his intention to liquidate all
kulaks
26COERCIVE COLLECTIVIZATION
- Thousands of kulaks had their property and
possessions confiscated - Many sent to labor camps or deported to Siberia
- Any peasant who resisted collectivization was
labeled a sub-kulak and punished as though he
was a real kulak - All this done with a great deal of armed force
27PRICE OF COLLECTIVIZATION (I)
- 98 of all farmland collectivized by 1941
- Very high price
- Peasants slaughtered livestock, causing huge drop
in number of sheep, cattle, and hogs - Urban communist party members sent to manage
farms - Ignorant of agriculture
- Combined with peasant resistance, contributed to
huge drop in agricultural production
28PRICE OF COLLECTIVIZATION (II)
- Famine hits Russia again in 1932-33
- Crime of pilfering imposed on starving peasants
who stole their own grain - At least 5 million people died during
collectivization campaign
29INDUSTRY
- Industrial labor force doubled during First Five
Year Plan - Due to peasants who moved to cities
- Uncooperative factory managers who argued goals
were too high were imprisoned and replaced with
more enthusiastic men and women - Stalin declared plan fulfilled in 1932
- All targets were actually underfulfilled but
production had increased dramatically - Coal and iron production increased by 200
(although goal had been 300)
30FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN
- Most glaring shortfalls occurred in consumer
goods - Targets had been low to begin with but they still
were not met - Textile production actually declined
- Urban housing went from bad to abysmal
- Waste, chaos, and mismanagement accompanied rapid
industrialization - Expensive equipment was ruined by trying to
produce too much too fast or by untrained workers - Blame was put on saboteurs
- Often technically educated men of pre-1917
generation
31SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN
- (1933-1937)
- Had to be scaled down after one year
- Realization that a limit had been reached as to
what the economy could do and what people could
take - Emphasis placed on improvement of efficiency and
improving living standards - Things got better for three years and then
leveled off - Due to increased emphasis on military production
and chaos of the Great Purges
32THIRD FIVE YEAR PLAN
(1938-1942) Projected 200 increase in
production and increase in consumer
products Neither goal fufilled Due to outbreak of
WWII, oil shortage, and severe labor
shortage Main goal had been achieved by
1941 Although demoralized and exhausted, the
Soviet Union had become one of the worlds great
industrial superpowers
33PROBLEMS
- Involved creating of huge planning bureaucracy
- Main job was to produce tons of paperwork
- Stalin interfered with planning process and
caused problems - Hired flunkies who gave him the numbers he wanted
- No one would point out mistakes in the planning
process, thereby guaranteeing that when a mistake
was made, it would be a giant one - Centralized planning failed to make the Soviet
Union competitive in the world marketplace