Methodological%20Issues%20in%20Survey%20Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Methodological%20Issues%20in%20Survey%20Research

Description:

Methodological Issues in Survey Research Jeremy McMillen, James Randy McBroom, Barbara Langham, Texas A&M University-Commerce Survey Research Methods Mail Surveys ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:131
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Randy325
Learn more at: https://texas-air.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Methodological%20Issues%20in%20Survey%20Research


1
Methodological Issues in Survey Research
  • Jeremy McMillen,
  • James Randy McBroom,
  • Barbara Langham,
  • Texas AM University-Commerce

2
Survey Research Methods
  • Mail Surveys (postal service, campus
    alternatives)
  • E-Surveys (e-mail initiated, mail initiated)
  • Telephone
  • On-Site Variations
  • Hybrid and Combination (example, mail survey with
    internet response option)

3
Graduating Student Survey Internet
  • Purposes
  • Support Strategic Planning
  • SACS Accreditation
  • Program, Department Review
  • Student Services Review
  • Customer Satisfaction Report Component
  • Retention, Graduation Issues

4
Graduating Student Survey-Internet
  • Population All Students Graduating in Spring,
    2001 (N646)
  • Initial Contact Letter from University
    President Containing
  • Request to Complete Questionnaire
  • Web-Site of Questionnaire
  • Instructions, Including Password, Implied Consent
    Notice, and Incentive Notice (100 Savings Bond)

5
Graduating Student Survey-Internet
  • Questionnaire 52 Item Instrument on Web-Site
    with Direct Data Entry
  • Case-Control Minimal
  • Follow-Up Letter After 3 Weeks to All
  • Cost
  • Monetary 200
  • Personnel Hours 10
  • Response Rate 19.2
  • Time Frame 6 weeks

6
Graduate Student Engagement Survey-Mail
  • Purposes
  • Outgrowth of National Survey of Student
    Engagement
  • Large, Diverse Graduate Student Population
    (Masters and Doctoral)
  • Lack of Information on Graduate Students
  • SACS Accreditation
  • Support Strategic Planning

7
Graduate Student Engagement Survey-Mail
  • Population All Degree Seeking Graduate Students
    (Masters and Doctoral) Enrolled in Spring, 2001
    (N1,648)
  • Sampling Procedure Stratified Random Sampling,
    Doctoral Students Weighted
  • Final Sample Size 666 Total (548 Masters, 118
    Doctoral)

8
Graduate Student Engagement Survey-Mail
  • Initial Contact Mailed Package from Researcher
    Containing
  • Cover Letter with Instructions, Implied Consent
    Notice
  • 83 Item Questionnaire
  • Stamped, Addressed Return Envelope
  • Coded Case-Control Postcard

9
Graduate Student Engagement Survey-Mail
  • Questionnaire 83 Item Instrument
  • Case-Control Coded Post Card
  • Follow-Up Entire Package to Non-Respondents
    After 3 Weeks
  • Cost
  • Monetary 1,200
  • Personnel Hours 120 Hours (Approximately)
  • Response Rate 50
  • Time Frame 9 Weeks

10
Comparison of Methods
  • Internet
  • Incentive (100)
  • Minimal Case-Control
  • Follow-Up 3 Weeks
  • Cost
  • 200
  • 10 Hours
  • Time Frame 6 Weeks
  • Response Rate 19.2
  • Mail-Out
  • No Monetary Incentive
  • Good Case-Control
  • Follow-Up 3 Weeks
  • Cost
  • 1,200
  • 120 Hours
  • Time Frame 9 Weeks
  • Response Rate 50

11
Conclusion
  • Internet
  • Advantages and Disadvantages
  • Mail-Out
  • Advantages and Disadvantages

12
Contacts
  • Jeremy McMillen, Director of Institutional
    Research
  • jeremy_mcmillen_at_tamu-commerce.edu
  • (903)886-5509
  • Randy McBroom, Assistant to the President for
    Planning and Institutional Effectiveness
  • randy_mcbroom_at_tamu-commerce.edu
  • (903)886-5926
  • Barbara Langham, Assistant Data Analyst, Office
    of Institutional Research
  • barbara_langham_at_tamu-commerce.edu
  • (903)468-3149
  • Texas AM University-Commerce
  • P.O. Box 3011
  • Commerce, TX 75429-3011
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com