Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 1

1
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 1
2
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 2
3
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 3
4
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 4
5
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 5
6
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 6
7
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 7
8
Pilot Results from Math Screener-Spring 2006,
Grade 8
9
Fall Implementation

• Manila envelope provided to each pilot teacher
• Directions for Administration
• Instructions for Scoring
• Student Response Sheets
• Test Key
• Copies of student response forms provided to each
  teacher
• Every student grades 2-10 were administered the
  screener

10
Screening Test Scoring Directions
11
2006 Fall Data Grades 2 3
12
2006 Fall Data Grades 4 5
13
2006 Fall Data Grades 6 7
14
2006 Fall Data Grades 8 9
15
2006 Fall Data Grade 10
16
2006 Fall Data All Grades
17
2007 Winter Data Grades 1 2
18
2007 Winter Data Grades 3 4
19
2007 Winter Data Grades 5 6
20
2007 Winter Data Grades 7 8
21
2007 Win Data Grade 9
22
2007 Win Data Grade 10
23
2007 Win Data All Grades
24
(No Transcript)
25
Differences Between Fall and Winter Results

• Same students, different test
• Increase or decrease in the median rate (50th
  percentile)
• First grade-No fall data
• Second grade
• Decrease of 16 in computation score
• Decrease of 16 in application score
• Decrease of 14 in total score
• Third grade
• Decrease of 12 in computation score
• Fourth grade
• Decrease of 22 in computation score
• Decrease of 26 in total score

26
Differences Between Fall and Winter Results

• Same students, different test
• Increase or decrease in the median rate (50th
  percentile)
• Fifth grade
• Decrease of 42 in computation score
• Decrease of 33 in total score
• Sixth grade
• Decrease of 33 in computation score
• Decrease of 20 in total score
• Seventh grade
• Decrease of 16 in computation score
• Decrease of 20 in total score
• Eight grade
• Decrease of 33 in computation score
• Decrease of 66 in application score
• Decrease of 44 in total score

27
Differences Between Fall and Winter Results

• Same students, different test
• Increase or decrease in the median rate (50th
  percentile)
• Ninth grade
• Decrease of 50 in computation score
• Decrease of 37 in total score
• Tenth grade
• Increase of 25 in computation score
• Increase of 50 in application score
• Increase of 30 in total score

28
2007 Spring Data Grades 1 2
29
2007 Spring Data Grades 3 4
30
2007 Spring Data Grades 5 6
31
2007 Spring Data Grades 7 8
32
2007 Spring Data Grade 9
33
2007 Spring Data Grade 10
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Use of the data

• What Has Developed This Year With The Assessment
• Assessment Designed to be a Predictor of Success
  on the WASL
• Our hope was to find a diagnostic tool to be the
  next step
• Teachers were interested in doing an item
  analysis for their students
• At GMS we took it one step farther we did the
  analysis then split our students into like groups
  by what problems they missed.
• During PACE (Practice, Activity, Choice,
  Enrichment) class we the Skill Supplement to our
  math curriculum all students are getting extra
  math support at different levels based on this
  assessment
• Groups
• Whole numbers
• Fraction concepts
• Fraction application
• Geometry
• Measurement

37
Next Steps

• Research a diagnostic assessment that will help
  w/ developing a program to help students to
  improve in specific concepts of mathematics
• Is it out there?
• Try to develop one?
• What would this assessment model look like

38
Resources

• DIBELS-http/dibels.uoregon.edu
• www.aimsweb.com -Web based CBM system. Passages
  can be purchased individually at 39 per grade.
  30 progress monitoring passages maybe purchased
  for 139. The entire system can be purchased for
  4 per student.
• CBM Warehouse http//interventioncentral.org/htmd
  oc./interventions/cbmwarehouse.shtm
• Research Institute on Progress Monitoring
• http//www.progressmonitoring.net/RIPMProducts2.ht
  mlearly