Social Cognition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Cognition

Description:

Social Cognition AP Psychology – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:336
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: BBO47
Category:
Tags: cognition | social

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Cognition


1
Social Cognition
  • AP Psychology

2
Social Psychology
  • The scientific study of how peoples thoughts and
    feelings influence their behavior toward others,
    and how the behavior of others influences
    peoples own thoughts
  • Social Cognition mental processes associated
    with the ways people perceive and react to other
    individuals and groups

3
Social Influences on the Self
  • Self-concept the beliefs we hold about who we
    are and what characteristics we have
  • Self-esteem the evaluations we make about how
    worthy we are as human beings

4
Social Comparison
Leon Festinger people make two types of
comparisons
Temporal Comparison Considering your present
condition in relation to how you were in the past
Social Comparison Evaluating yourself in
comparison to others - using others as a basis
for evaluating your attributes
5
Social Comparison
  • Reference Groups categories of people to which
    you see yourself as belonging and to which you
    compare yourself
  • Downward social comparison strategy of choosing
    someone as the target of comparison to oneself
    who is not as good on some dimension of
    importance
  • Upward social comparison comparing yourself to
    people who do much better
  • Relative deprivation the belief that no matter
    how much you are getting, it is less than you
    deserve

6
Social Identity
  • Our beliefs about the groups to which we belong,
    and thus is a part of our self-concept
  • A group identity helps people to feel part of a
    larger whole (may foster an us versus them
    mentality) http//www.youtube.com/watch?vgZ_qXmxd
    gGM

7
Self-Schemas
  • Mental representations of peoples beliefs and
    views about themselves
  • Unified self-schemas regard their attributes as
    stable across every situation and role
  • Differentiated self-schemas regard their
    attributes as changing in different roles or
    situations

8
Social Perception
  • The processes through which people interpret
    information about others, form impressions of
    them, and draw conclusions about the reasons for
    their behavior
  • Schemas a coherent, organized set of beliefs
    and expectations we use schemas we already have
    to perceive and interpret new information

9
Impressions
  • First Impressions quickly formed, difficult to
    change, long-lasting influence
  • People are confident about their judgment
  • Easier to remember
  • Behavior is often consistent with impression
  • Forming Impressions schemas create a tendency
    to infer a great deal about a person on the basis
    of limited information
  • Lasting Impressions difficult to change,
    long-lasting influence

10
Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
  • Without our awareness, schemas cause us to subtly
    lead people to behave in line with our
    expectations
  • 4 steps
  • Adopting an attitude concerning a person
  • Behave as though your attitude is correct
  • Others react to your attitude
  • Your prophecy comes true, not because you were
    right, but because your behavior/attitude caused
    the prophecy to come true

11
Attribution
  • The process people go through to explain causes
    of behavior
  • People tend to attribute behavior in a particular
    situation either to primarily internal
    (characteristics of a person) or primarily
    external (situational) cases

12
Sources of Attributions
  • Harold Kelleys 3 Elements
  • Consensus the degree to which other peoples
    behavior is similar to that of the actor. Ex if
    it is similar, it has high consensus. If it is
    dissimilar, it has low consensus
  • Consistency the degree to which the behavior
    occurs repeatedly in a situation. Ex if it
    always occurs, it has high consistency. If it
    occurs intermittently, it has low consistency
  • Distinctiveness the extent to which similar
    stimuli draw the same behaviors from the actor.
    Ex if it is highly predictable, then it has low
    distinctiveness. If it is not predictable, it has
    high distinctiveness.
  • An internal attribution is most likely when there
    is low consensus, high consistency, and low
    distinctiveness. External attributions are made
    in response to other information patterns.

13
Attributions
14
Biases in Attribution
  • Fundamental Attribution Error a tendency to
    over-attribute others behaviors to internal
    factors, such as personality traits
  • Actor-observer bias tendency to attribute
    others behavior to internal causes but attribute
    your own behavior to external causes
  • Self-serving bias tendency to take credit for
    success (internal) but to blame failure on
    external causes

15
Attitudes
  • The tendency to think, feel, or act positively or
    negatively towards objects in our environment
  • 3 Components
  • Cognitive set of beliefs about attributes of
    the attitude object
  • Affective feeling about the object (emotional)
    a like or dislike
  • Behavioral involves a way of acting toward the
    object

16
3 Components of Attitude
17
Forming Attitudes
  • Modeling children learn from their parents what
    one should believe and feel about certain objects
  • Classical Conditioning people are more likely
    to form a positive attitude toward an object when
    it is paired with stimuli that elicit good
    feelings
  • Mere-exposure effect attitudes toward an object
    tend to become more positive as people are
    exposed to that object more often

18
Changing Attitudes
  • According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model,
    there are two routes to attitude change
  • Peripheral route attitude changes respond to
    peripheral persuasion cues, rather than to
    central content (appearance, confidence, etc)
  • Central route attitude changes respond to the
    message and validity of its claims. People
    rationally analyze the content of the persuasive
    message

19
Changing Attitudes
20
Changing Attitudes
  • Cognitive Dissonance people want their thoughts
    and beliefs to be consistent with one another.
    When their cognitions are inconsistent, people
    become anxious and are motivated to make them
    consistent
  • Self-perception theory people are not sure
    about their attitude so they look back to their
    behavior and then infer what their attitudes must
    have been

21
Cognitive Dissonance
22
Prejudice and Stereotypes
  • Prejudice positive or negative attitude toward
    an individual based on his or her membership in
    some group
  • Stereotypes Perceptions, beliefs, and
    expectations a person has about members of some
    group schemas about the entire groups of people

23
Theories of Prejudice
  • Roots of Prejudice
  • Social inequalities the haves vs. the have
    nots
  • Blame-the-victim dynamic if the circumstances
    of poverty breed a high crime rate, someone can
    use the high crime rate to justify discrimination
    against those living in poverty
  • Us vs. Them Ingroup vs. Outgroup (ingroup bias)
  • Scapegoat Theory finding someone to blame when
    things go wrong can provide a target for ones
    anger (9/11)
  • Other-race effect (other-race bias) to those in
    one ethnic group, members of another group often
    seem more alike than they really are in
    appearance, personality, and attitude

24
Just World Phenomenon
  • Good is rewarded and evil is punished
  • Hindsight bias (she should have known better.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com