Title: Classical Canon
1Classical Canon
2Nature of Rhetoric(Aristotle)
- counterpart (ANTISTROPHE) to dialectic and ethics
3ARISTOTLE'S LAYOUT OF THE PERSON
- BODY (MATERIAL)
- SOUL (IMMATERIAL)
- psyche, anima, pneuma
4Intuitive reason (nous)
Grasp first principles
Human Nature
Philosophic Reason (Sophia)
Demonstration from first principles
Theoretical reason
Scientific Knowledge (Episteme)
Necessary (certain)
Production Techne (art)
Calculative Reason (deals With
contingent) (Pragma) (doxa)
Action
Practical Wisdom (Phronesis)
Animal Nature
Feelings Desires
Vegetable Nature
Nutrition Growth
5Rhetoric--ethics
- Rhetor
- The good man speaking well
- Quintillion
6Nature of Rhetoric(Aristotle)
- Definition faculty of observing, in any
situation, the available means of persuasion.
7Situations
Paradigm Focus Purpose
Forensic Law court Past Seek justice
Deliberative Legislature Future Determine what should be done
Epidictic Ceremonial Present Praise and blame
8Proofs (pistuein)
Artistic/ inartistic Speaker made Evidencepropositions the audience establishes are relatively free of speaker bias
Ethos Sagacity, virtue, benevolence
Pathos (devices designed to put the audience in the proper state of mind for the reception of the speaker's arguments)
Logos enthymemes examples (paradeigma) signs (fallible, infallible)
9OFFICES
- Perspectives
- In general, the canon was present in the
Rhetorica, but the form in which we know it is
largely the result of later rhetoricians
particularly Cicero
10INVENTION
- topoi
- common (universal) possible, impossible, past
fact, future fact, size. - special (associated w/ special subjects such as
ethics and politics.) - lines of argument
- (methods of reasoning)
- more or less,
- opposites,
- etc.
11- stasis
- (stock issue--turning point) Aristotle (III 17)
- 1. Was the act committed?
- 2. Did the act cause harm?
- Was the harm more or less than alleged?
- 4. Was the act justified?
12Hermagoras of Temnos
- conjecture
- from a consideration of the motive of accused
- from a consideration of the character of accused
- 3. from a consideration of the act itself
(signs and general evidence pointing to the
accused) - Definition
- (murder, theft, treason, etc.)
- Quality
- 1. pleas of justification (no harm admitted)
- 2. counterproposition (harm admitted but...)
- 3. counterplea (claim of benefit rendered)
- 3. shifting of blame
- to a person or circumstance capable of liability
- to a person or circumstance incapable of
liability - objection
- (to the trial on procedural grounds)
13Disposition
- Macrostructure
- Proem (introduction)
- Statement (thesis)
- proof (body)
- epilogue (conclusion)
- Microstructure
- statement,
- proof
14Style
- Elevated, middle, low
- virtues
- Clarity
- use common words but put them together so the
whole bears a subtle air of strangeness. - Avoid using elevated language when young and for
talking about trivial matters - use metaphors and similes (tropes, figures
of speech thought later) Appropriateness - conveys the states of feeling (pathe) describes
character (ethe) and is proportionate to the
subject matter. - Purity (hellenism)
- Dignity (weight)(opposite is conciseness)
- Vices
- Frigidities
- overcompounding (beggar-poet-toady)
- using archaic or dialect words (the baleful
criminal) - Overwriting with long, untimely or crowded
epithets (not laws,m but laws the rules of states
we the people - Inappropriate metaphors (events fresh and full of
blood)
15Cicero on Style
- virtues
- clarity,
- correctness,
- appropriateness,
- embellishment (tropes and figures of thought and
speech)
16Memory
- mnemonics--association with topics (places)
17Delivery
- Delivery can be treated scientifically--has to do
with management of the voice to express each of
the pathe. The voice varies in volume, pitch and
rhythm.