Title: 1 of 19
1Outline
- Background
- Channel Potential Test
- DC Gain Test
- Summary
R. Philbrick M. Blouke Ball Aerospace
Technologies Corp.
2Background
- Problem How to quickly and accurately qualify
scientific grade CCDs prior to integration into
complex packages and/or multi-chip focal plane
arrays (e.g. HiRISE and NPOESS-OMPS ?)? - Full functional (a.k.a. EO or AC)
characterization of incoming CCD detectors can
sometimes only be performed after expensive
package assembly steps have been completed - Discovering CCD tolerance issues after complex
packaging steps is expensive and can
significantly impact development schedules - EO testing alone does not adequately reveal all
potential problems - For example, if Yth and/or Vin for one clock
phase significantly differs from the other clocks
or inadequate tolerance range - Performing thorough DC characterization is an
effective way to quickly and accurately qualify
CCDs
HiRISE Multi-Detector FPA
NPOESS-OMPS FPA
3Background
- The DC tests of most interest in detector
screening are - Continuity ? Yields pin-to-pin resistance,
verifies process, checks for gross ESD - damage, and verifies detector arrived without
damage - Leakage Current ? Yields static current draw on
each gate, checks for subtle ESD - damage, and verifies detector arrived without
latent damage - Diode Breakdown ? Verifies process, and confirms
adequate operating margins on drain - biases (e.g. OD, RD, and ID)
- Diode / Opens ? Checks for open circuits (e.g.
bad/missing wirebonds), verifies diode - operation, and checks for intra-layer
continuity (e.g. poly 1 to poly 1) - Channel Potential ? Yields threshold potential
and inversion voltage for each gate, verifies - optimal clock and bias operating points, and
confirms tolerance ranges - DC Gain ? Verifies amplifier operating point and
voltage tolerance ranges
4Channel Potential Test
- Channel Potential (CP) testing yields the
threshold potential (Yth) and inversion voltage
(Vin) under many, sometimes all, gates on a CCD
detector - These two parameters are key for establishing
clock and bias operating levels and tolerances - The basic CP measurement requires a gate
surrounded by two drains - One drain is statically biased on (Source in
figure) - A small current is sourced into the other drain
(Drain in figure), which electrically floats
to the potential under the controlling gate - Voltage on gate of interest is swept and the
Drain voltage (i.e. the gate channel potential)
is measured - Channel potential testing yields the most
information on CCDs with 3 or 4 F architectures,
but CCDs with 2 F architectures can also yield
significant data - Channel Potential (CP) testing can be performed
to some extent on almost all CCD detectors - Most CCD vendors monitor CP test structures on
wafers but significant differences from actual
CCD data can exist
Basic channel potential measurement on a MOSFET
Typical channel potential curve
5Channel Potential Test
- All gates in between the measurement drains,
other than the gate being measured, must be
turned on so they dont influence results - Other measurement paths must be removed by
turning off some gates - e.g. If measuring SWA and using two RD drains on
either side of the serial register, the parallel
register clocks need to be off - Typical measurement current is 20 nA
- To high a value can induce a significant I.R
voltage drop
Channel potential setup for Summing Well A (SWA)
gate using two amplifier RD drains
6Channel Potential Test
- Using CP data and design tolerances, complete CP
diagrams for the entire CCD can be easily
generated - Example here uses /- 0.1 v design tolerance
- Accurately quantifying changes in Yth as a
function of radiation exposure level is needed
for space-based applications
Note the significant shift in serial phase 2 (R2)
CP from other serial phases
7DC Gain Test
- Test measures the small signal gain of each
on-chip amplifier by sweeping the reset drain
voltage (with reset gate on) and measuring the
resultant DC output voltage - Output MOSFET is biased using a constant current
load of typically 2 mA - Small signal gain is calculated using
- Typical DC gain values range between 0.5 and 0.8
depending on the amplifier configuration (e.g. 1,
2, or 3 stages) - DC gain or equivalent measurements are generally
not possible on CMOS based detectors since access
to the internal circuitry is limited
DC Gain Measurement Setup
DC gain test equivalent circuit
8DC Gain Test
- Any type of CCD charge-to-voltage amplifier can
be measured (e.g. single stage, dual stage, and
AC coupled stage) - Optimal operating point and adequate bias
tolerances can be quickly verified (both pre and
post radiation) - Bad MOSFETs can be quickly identified
Common CCD Output Amplifier Configurations (a)
Single-Stage Source Follower, (b) Two-Stage
Source Follower, (c) Two-Stage Source Follower
with Bias Control, and (d) AC Coupled, Two-Stage
Source Follower
9DC Gain Test
- A typical input (RD) versus output (OS) curve is
shown at right along with small signal gain - Slope of small signal gain curve around operating
point gives a measure of the low frequency
linearity response
Direction of Increasing Signal
Output Response and Small Signal Gain for a
typical DC coupled amplifier
- AC coupled amplifiers yield a slightly different
shaped DC gain curve due to the presents of the
line reset MOSFET - Two distinct cutoff points are observed
- Line reset MOSFET cut off point
- Reset MOSFET cut off point
- Gate of line reset MOSFET should be held off
during the entire scan
Example of DC gain curve for AC coupled two stage
amplifier
10Summary
- Some examples of problems identified during DC
testing - ESD damage occurring during packaging/shipping
- Processing problems (e.g. low diode breakdowns)
- Non-optimal amplifier operating point
- Non-optimal bias levels (e.g. OG, RD or OD)
- Inadequate bias tolerances
- To account for variability in electronics design,
within CCD population, or resulting from post
radiation shifts
Example of bad recommended DC operating point
Non-Optimal OD Operating Point
Range
Example of bad recommended OD bias point
Example of gate to gate channel potential
variability