PCWA MFP Operations Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

PCWA MFP Operations Model

Description:

Operations Model All Models are Wrong But Some Models are Useful What is a Model? A Simulation Model is a mathematical representation of a physical system that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: pcw98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PCWA MFP Operations Model


1
PCWA MFP Operations Model
  • All Models are Wrong
  • But
  • Some Models are Useful

2
What is a Model?
  • A Simulation Model is a mathematical
    representation of a physical system that
    includes
  • Rivers
  • Reservoirs
  • Conveyance and Release Facilities
  • Tunnels, Penstocks Powerhouses,
  • Streamflow release valves
  • Operating Rules, Licenses and Agreements

3
What is a Model?
  • The Model routes water (Input Hydrology) through
    the System (mathematical representation of the
    physical world) according to Rules

4
What is a Model?
  • A model chooses how water is routed through the
    system in order to meet certain criteria and
    goals.
  • A model allows us to measure the impact that
    changes to the input set will have on the output
    set.

5
What are the Rules?
  • Rules are inputs to the Model
  • Rules represent decisions made by the operators
  • Rules fix operating parameters that can vary from
    run to run

6
Examples of Rules
  • Instream flow requirements
  • Storage level requirements and targets
  • Use of discretionary water supplies
  • Meet Consumptive Demands
  • Generate Power
  • Provide Recreation

7
Other Model Inputs
  • Flow (Hydrology) - PCWA believes that it has a
    reasonably accurate record of Project flows since
    the project began operation in 1968
  • For each different set of inputs, we intend to
    generate output using the same identical set of
    historic hydrology

8
Other Model Inputs
  • Fixed Criteria - project parameters that cannot
    be changed without physical alteration of the
    Project. Fixed Criteria include
  • Tunnels and Turbine capacities
  • Outlet capacities
  • Elevations

9
Other Model Inputs
  • Water Supply Demands - special class of Rules
  • Consumptive demands at Folsom Reservoir
  • Consumptive demands at Auburn Pump Station
  • Environmental Demands (Water Forum Agreement)

10
Model Outputs
  • Tables to verify that the Rules are met
  • Rules guide the operation of the model, but may
    not be met 100 of the time. For example, minimum
    instream releases will not be met if a reservoir
    runs dry. Having the flexibility to violate rules
    helps provide information.

11
Model Outputs
  • Reservoir Level Trace
  • Identify excursions from preferred operation -
    too high (spills and loss of generation) or too
    low (risk of failure to meet consumptive demand)
  • Power Generation

12
Benchmark and Baseline
  • A Benchmark Run is used to verify that the model
    reasonably represents actual historic operations
  • The Baseline Run is the run against which all
    Alternative Model Runs are compared to determine
    the impacts of proposed conditions on the MFP
    operation

13
Benchmark and Baseline
  • PCWA proposes that the difference between the
    Benchmark and the Baseline Runs is that the
    Benchmark Run uses historic consumptive water
    demands and the Baseline Run uses buildout
    consumptive water demands

14
Using the Model
Alternative Study
Baseline Study
Hydrology
Hydrology
Consumptive Demands
Consumptive Demands
Input
Input
Fixed Criteria
Fixed Criteria
Operating Rules
Operating Rules (Changes)
Model
Model
Verification Tables
Verification Tables
Output
Output
Reservoir Levels
Reservoir Levels
Generation
Generation
Inside Model
Assess Impacts
Assess Impacts
Outside Model
Compare
15
Assessing Impacts
  • The Model Does Not assess environmental impacts
  • The model only provides comparative information
    on water supply and power generation for Alt
    Model Runs
  • Assessment of the full impacts of any Model Run
    is done by people

16
Assessing Impacts
  • An analysis of the benefits and costs of each
    alternative may be viewed differently by each
    person
  • To develop alternatives based upon environmental
    parameters requires completion of the 1st year of
    field studies. March 2009.

17
Alternative Model Runs
  • The desire to create a given environmental
    condition leads stakeholders to suggest changes
    to the rules
  • The resulting model run shows the impact of the
    rule change on water supply and power generation

18
Where are we now?
  • The Model is operational
  • Benchmark input set has been assembled for
    testing
  • A draft users manual has been prepared

19
What do we do until 2009?
  • Verification
  • Education
  • Development (betterments, hourly)
  • Investigate physical limitations
  • Find our sideboards Dry year issues, Ralston
    Afterbay flexibility

20
How do we get there?
  • Process We need good process around our group
    understanding of how Modeling Alternatives are
    developed, run and assessed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com