Title: Aging and Social Policy: An International Perspective
1Aging and Social PolicyAn International
Perspective
- Andrew Mason
- Sang-Hyop Lee
- Ronald Lee
- Chong-Bum An
2Outline
- Background National Transfer Accounts
- Estimating the Economic Lifecycle
- Consumption and labor income by age for Korea
- Comparison with Taiwan and the US
- The Age Reallocation System
- Estimates for Korea
- Comparison to Taiwan and the US
- Conclusions
3National Transfer Accounts
- System for measuring economic flows across age
groups in a manner consistent with National
Income and Product Accounts - Comprehensive
- Asset-based reallocations
- Public and private saving
- Public and private credit
- Public transfers
- Private transfers
- Inter vivos inter-household
- Intra-household
- Bequests
4National Transfer Accounts
- Issues being explored
- How do economic support systems evolve within
countries and differ across countries? - How do economic support systems interact with age
structure to influence macro-economic performance
and generational equity? - How should policies with respect to public
pensions, health care, and education change over
time? - What are the appropriate roles of the family and
the state in providing support to children and
the elderly?
5NTA Project Organization
- Coordination
- Ronald Lee (UC Berkeley)
- Andrew Mason (East-West Center/UH)
- Core support National Institute on Aging
- Website www.ntaccounts.org
- Countries currently participating in the project
- Korea An Chong-Bum (SungKyunKwan University)
- Taiwan Andrew Mason and An-Chi Tung (Academia
Sinica, Taipei) - US Ronald Lee
- 14 other countries are members of the project
6(No Transcript)
7II. The Economic Lifecycle
8The Economic Lifecycle of Korea, Annual Aggregate
Flows, Nominal Values, 2000
Surplus
Labor Income
Consumption
Deficits
9Features of the Economic Lifecycle
- Age refers to people not household heads.
- Consumption
- Includes all public and private consumption
- Age allocation is based on consumption surveys
(private) and administrative records (public) - Labor income includes
- wages and salaries
- labors estimated share of mixed income
- taxes paid by employers on behalf of employees
including a portion of indirect taxes
10Lifecycle of Korea (2000), Per Capita Values
Labor Income
Female LFPRs
C declines with age
Consumption
Education Spending
11Lifecycle of Taiwan (1998) and Korea (2000), Per
Capita Values
Labor Income
T
K
Lower C in ROK
Consumption
T
K
Higher LFPRs In ROK
12Lifecycle of US (2000) and Korea (2000), Per
Capita Values
US LFPRs gt ROK LFPRs
US
Labor Income
US
K
High US C is health care
Consumption
K
ROK LFPRs gt US LFPRs
13Some Implications
- A given rise in the older population has a much
greater impact in the US given current LC.
However, aging is much more rapid in ROK. - Importance of female employment.
- Reducing the LC deficit at old ages is not simply
a matter of higher LFPRs among the elderly. High
productivity jobs needed. - Rising health care costs is the Achilles heel if
US experience is any guide.
14The Age Reallocation System
Table 1. A Classification of NTA Reallocations (revised 1/13/06). Table 1. A Classification of NTA Reallocations (revised 1/13/06). Table 1. A Classification of NTA Reallocations (revised 1/13/06). Table 1. A Classification of NTA Reallocations (revised 1/13/06).
Asset-based Reallocations Asset-based Reallocations Transfers
Capital and Other Non-Financial Assets Credit Transfers
Public Public infrastructure Public land and sub-soil minerals Public debt Student loans Money Public education Public health care Unfunded pension plans
Private Housing Consumer durables Factories, Farms Private land and sub-soil minerals Inventories Consumer credit Familial support of children and parents Bequests Charitable contributions
Source Adapted from Lee 1994. Source Adapted from Lee 1994. Source Adapted from Lee 1994. Source Adapted from Lee 1994.
15The Transfer Option
Tax workers. Provide cash and in-kind payments to
the elderly
Consumption
Labor Income
16The Saving Option
Labor Income
Invest
Consumption
Asset Income Dissaving
17Transfers vs. Saving
- Both can satisfy reallocation objectives.
- Transfers can do so immediately saving only with
a delay. - Saving is pro-growth.
- Other research shows that aging can lead to
substantial capital deepening if transfer
programs are kept in check.
18Age Reallocations, Korea, 2000, Per Capita Annual
Flows
Total Inflows
Total Outflows
19How are Taiwan, Korea, and the US financing
old-age consumption?
Asset-based reallocations much greater in the US!
Total transfers much greater in Korea
Large public transfers in US
Note. Familial transfers do not include bequests.
20Why are asset-based reallocations so low in Korea
and Taiwan?
- Did familial transfers crowd out saving?
- Did familial transfers fill a gap that saving
could not meet? - High rates of growth in Korea and Taiwan led a
6-fold increase in lifetime earnings each
generation. - Unlikely that saving rates could be high enough
to achieve the flat age profiles of consumption.
21Lesson to Draw
- Familial transfers served East Asia well by
maintaining generational equity during a period
of very rapid economic growth. - Slower economic growth and population aging ?
shift to asset-based reallocations. - High saving rate and shift away from familial
support systems are welcome developments.
22The End
23NT Flow Account Identity
- Inflows
- Labor income
- Capital income
- Interest income
- Transfer inflows
- Outflows
- Consumption
- Investment
- Accumulation of credit
- Transfer outflows
24NT Flow Account Identity
Lifecycle Deficit
Age Reallocations
Capital-based Reallocations
Credit-based Reallocations
Net Transfers
25NT Flow Account, Aggregate. Taiwan, 1998 (NT billion), nominal NT Flow Account, Aggregate. Taiwan, 1998 (NT billion), nominal NT Flow Account, Aggregate. Taiwan, 1998 (NT billion), nominal NT Flow Account, Aggregate. Taiwan, 1998 (NT billion), nominal NT Flow Account, Aggregate. Taiwan, 1998 (NT billion), nominal NT Flow Account, Aggregate. Taiwan, 1998 (NT billion), nominal NT Flow Account, Aggregate. Taiwan, 1998 (NT billion), nominal
Age Age Age Age Age
 Total 0-19 20-29 30-49 50-64 65
Age Reallocations 832 1894 6 -1569 -25 526
Asset-based reallocations 861 -16 -210 605 299 184
Asset Income 2,456 3 139 1492 585 237
Less Saving 1,595 19 349 887 286 54
Transfers -29 1910 216 -2174 -323 342
Public, current 2 579 76 -692 -138 176
Private, current -31 1330 65 -1568 -95 236
Capital transfers 0 0 75 86 -91 -70
Lower panel measures the reallocation systems
employed to satisfy the lifecycle deficits and
surpluses at each age. Asset-based reallocations
combine capital, other non-financial assets, and
credit.
Source Mason, Lee, Tung, Lai, and Miller,
forthcoming.