Authors

1
TITLE

• Authors

2
Introduction
3
Review of Literature

• Identify the main themes of your review of
  literature using articles to identify who said
  what and what it means.
• Use about 1 slide per idea

4
Review of Literature

• For example
• Brasile (1990) Investigated classification in
  wheelchair basketball and found Class Is
  differed from all other classes
• Hedrick (1997) investigated the difference
  between men and women on selected wheelchair
  basketball skills and found..

5
Purpose

• Purpose statement
• The purpose of the study was to

6
Hypothesis

• State your hypothesis as a null hypothesis
• There is not significant (difference or
  relationship) between (identify the levels of
  your independent variable) as measured by
  (dependent variable)

7
NULL HYPOTHESIS

• There is no significant difference in the
  attitudes and perceptions of spectators attending
  male collegiate wheelchair basketball games and
  those attending male collegiate running
  basketball games, as measured by the Disability
  Sport Survey.

8
Method
9
Participants (Subjects)

• Identify your sample.
• i.e. Participants were women attending the PVA
  Camp Wisconsin, March 2000
• i.e. Groups were randomly selected from Class I
  and Class II athletes attending the camp

10
Instrumentation

• State the nature of your dependent variable(s)
• Identify the psychometric properties of your
  instrument
• i.e. Selected wheelchair basketball skill tests
  from the Brasile (1986) test of wheelchair
  basketball skills.
• i.e reported reliability for the skill test
  wasValidity was

11
Procedure

• How did you collect your measures
• If appropriate identify testing protocols
• i.e. The Wingate test
• Or Subjects were tested as two separate groups in
  the order recommended by Brasile
• Other procedural safeguards

12
Statistical Analysis

• Restate null hypothesis(ses)
• Independent Variable(s)
• Dependent Variable(s)

13
Statistical Analysis
Cell Diagram
Name IV Name DV
Group 1 X1
Group 2 X2
14
Statistical Analysis

• Identify your statistical procedure
• E.g. One-way between groups ANOVA
• State your alpha level
• Identify post-hoc procedures (only if post-hoc
  is necessary)
• Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0

15
Results
16
Demographic Variables
17
Performance Variables
18
Statistical Analysis

• F4, 216 9.04, p lt .001
• (If appropriate post-hoc here)
• Where there is significance identify the means
• i.e. Group 1 mean
• i.e. Group 2 mean
• Therefore Group X scored significantly greater,
  or higher, or lower etc.

19
Discussion
20
Conclusion

• Identify the main elements of the results
• i.e. ANOVA revealed a a significant difference (p
  lt. 001) between group x and group y on selected
  basketball skill tests
• i.e. An examination of the means indicated that
  Group X performed more than Group Y.

21
Discussion

• Relate your results to the main points from the
  introduction
• i.e. That Class 1s performed less well than
  Class 2s confirms (contradicts) the findings of
  Brasile (1987)
• i.e. This result supports the findings of Slock
  (1976)

22
Recommendations

• This area is still to be clarified
• It is recommended that this study be replicated
• Further studies should examine the skill
  differences between Class 2s and Class 3s
• Also the differences in male wheelchair
  basketball performance should be examined

23
References

• Burgdorf, R. (2002). The Americans with
  disabilities policy brief series Righting the
  ADA. The National Council on Disabilities.
• Coakley (Ed.) (2004). Sport and society Issues
  and controversies (8th ed.). New York
  McGraw-Hill.
• Evaggelinou, C., Grekinis, D. (1998). A survey
  of spectators at the international Stoke
  Mandeville Wheelchair Games. Adapted Physical
  Activity Quarterly, 15, 25-35.
• Malone, L., Lienert, C., Yilla, A.B. (2002)
  Item analysis of the Disability Sport Survey. 6th
  North American Federation of Adapted Physical
  Activity (NAFAPA) Symposium. Oregon State
  University, Corvallis, OR.