Title: OVERCROWDING
1OVERCROWDING A Solution-oriented Approach
- PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND
CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF
PROVINCES - By the Departments of Correctional Services,
Justice and Constitutional Development, NPA,
Legal Aid Board, Safety and Security and Social
Development - 20 October 2004
2STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION
- The current situation
- Facilities
- State of overcrowding
- Some causes of overcrowding
- Approaches and Initiatives by various departments
- IJS effectiveness
- SAPS
- DOJ CD and NPA
- LAB
- DSD
- CS
- Other aspects
- 1. Policy Gap on Awaiting Trial Detainees
- 2. Managing Incarceration of Children as ATD
Sentenced - 3. Appropriate sentencing - Management of Levels
of Sentenced Inmates - 4. Coordination of Facilities Planning
Management - 5. Restorative Justice, Community liaison, crime
prevention overcrowding
3The current situation
- State of overcrowding
- It is acknowledged by all role players that our
detention facilities (police cells, prison cells
and secure care facilities are overcrowded. - Everyone is partly to blame everyone has part of
the solution
4IMPACT OF OVERCROWDING
- Consequences for inmates
- Consequences for DCS / police staff / DSD
- Consequences for DCS / police delivery / DSD
- Consequences for IJS effectiveness
- Human rights infringements
- Overcrowding also
- Disrupts penal reformation and rehabilitation
programs - Creates security risks and
- Encourages subversive activities amongst
prisoners - The interaction between hardened criminals and
less hardened criminals nurtures perceptions
that prisons are breeding chambers of criminal
discourse.
5The current situation
- Focus on Correctional Services
- State of overcrowding
- There are 244 prisons
-
- 2 are private prisons
- 4 are closed for repair
- 4 New generation facilities being planned/built
- (to house 3000 detainees each)
6The current situation as on 30 June 2004
- Sentenced prisoners 136 436
- AWT 49 373 (26, 5)
- Total 185 809
- (Capacity 114 787)
- Overcrowding 71 022 (161,87)
7APPROVED ACCOMMODATION VERSUS PRISONER POPULATION
PER REGION 30 June 2004
Regions Capacity Unsentenced Sentenced In Custody Total Occupation
EASTERN CAPE REGION 13 358 6 102 16 852 22 954 171.84
GAUTENG REGION 26 709 17 682 32 114 49 796 186.44
KWAZULU/NATAL REGION 20 179 9 486 21 205 30 691 152.09
LIMPOPO, MPUMALANGA NORTH WEST REGION 18 420 3 814 24 562 28 376 154.05
NORTHERN CAPE FREE STATE REGION 16 725 5 119 18 982 24 101 144.10
WESTERN CAPE REGION 19 396 7 170 22 721 29 891 154.11
Total 114 787 49 373 136 436 185 809 161.87
8The current situation as on 30 June 2004
- CHILDREN IN PRISON (Between 14 18)
- Sentenced Children 1 731 (1,2 of total sent
prisoners) - AWT Children 1 705 (3, 45 of total
awt) - TOTAL 3 436 (1,8 of
total number of persons in prison) - and 2059 children awt in secure care facilities
9GENDER OF PRISON POPULATION 2004
10TRENDS
- Sentenced Prisoners steadily increasing (mostly
because of more prisoners serving sentences of
10 years and more and life imprisonment) - Accommodation however increasing only by 20
between 1995 and 2004 against 63 increase in
same period of prisoners. - Regarding AWT AWT numbers are steadily
declining - Between 1995 to 1999 the number of unsentenced
detainees increased dramatically from 22 021 to
55 523 (152 increase) - Then steadied to a more moderate increase with
average of 56 497 over following three years. - Since then a moderate decline currently nearly
on 1998 level -
11PRISONERS SERVING SENTENCE OF MORE THAN 10 YEARS
45000
40196
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
12PRISONERS SERVING LIFE SENTENCES
6000
5505
5000
4542
4000
3708
3228
3121
3042
2951
3000
2000
1000
0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
13Comparative Graph 1995 - 2004
14Comparison 1995 -2004
1995 1998 2000 2002 2003 2004
Unsent 22 021 44 138 57 538 50 758 48 433 49 373 49 373 49 373
sentenced 91 835 88 302 111 948 126 862 131 240 136 436 136 436 136 436
Total 113 856 132 440 169 486 177 620 179 673 185 809 185 809 185 809
Accom 95 695 110 175 112 863 114 787 114 787
15Awaiting trial detainees2004
- Of the 150 Correctional Centres which have
Awaiting Trial detainees 21 are overcrowded.
16Awaiting trial detainees
- The statistics of Correctional Services show that
there are on average 50 000 awaiting trial
prisoners per month in custody. - If one take the approx number of 200 000 accused
before our courts in consideration, the awaiting
trial figure of 50 000 is not so alarming. Only
26 of all accused persons before court are
therefore awaiting trial in custody.
17Awaiting trial detainees
- It is further evident that the courts are in any
event releasing accused on bail, which accused
should never have been released. The Regional
Courts alone have over a 5-month period issued
approximately 4000 warrants for accused who
failed to appear before the courts during April
to August 2004. - In the District Courts the figure is even more
alarming. A total of 68 140 warrants were issued
during the same period (this figure does not
include the thousands of warrants issued for
traffic offences). The cost impact must be
enormous for all the stakeholders concerned.
18 POLICE CELLS
The South African Police Service has detention
cells at most of it's police stations to
temporary accommodate the thousands of arrested
persons that are taken into police custody on a
daily basis. These cells also become
overcrowded at times due to the daily arrests
made, but is alleviated when awaiting trial
prisoners are transferred to the Department of
Correctional Services after court appearance.
19UNDERSTANDING CAUSES OF OVERCROWDING
- IJS Incarceration Trend Research Project was
established to develop a proactive approach
identify magnitude significance of various
blockages within system, to provide indication of
possible solutions to increasing prison numbers. - In process of building model to predict prison
numbers, with commitment to build capacity of
Depts to continue data on ongoing basis - With above information being provided,
participation additional contributions from all
role players, blockages possible solutions
within system will be more easily identified.
20IJS Incarceration Trend Research Project
- List of number of key variables is being
developed - Number of sentenced unsentenced prisoners
- Crime trends sentenced unsentenced prisoners
will be categorized by crime ( five categories of
crime currently used by department) - Level of overcrowding prison numbers relative to
accommodation capacity - Alternative sentencing number parolees
probationers under correctional supervision,
released to reform schools converted sentences - Early exit from prison number of deaths
(including both natural unnatural deaths) - Sentencing policy proportion of prisoners
sentenced in court to less than up to 2 years,
5 years, 10 years, 20 years, 20 years life
sentences - Separate categories information will be provided
regarding children under 18 years of age in prison
21Causes of overcrowding cont.
- Some of the factors that are contributing to
the increase in prison occupancy include - SAPS
- Due to the disturbing crime incidents in the
country, the SAPS introduced various
crime-combating operations in order to
destabilize these incidents. Police strategies
such as Operation Crackdown, focusing on
large-scale arrests As a result an increase in
arrests in the various crimes was experienced.
The offenders had to be held in police
cells/custody and some are being held in
Correctional Services facilities depending on the
risks and progress in the prosecution. - This operation is ongoing and is likely to
increase the number of people arrested and held
in prison while awaiting trial. The targets set
in the Presidents State of the Nation Address,
will also have an impact in our prison population
in time to come. -
22Causes cont
- Bail
- As a result of a public outcry over a release of
accused on bail that have allegedly committed
serious offences, the Criminal Procedure Act has
been amended (1995, 1997 and 1998) to make it
more difficult for some accused to obtain bail
the offences listed in Schedule 5 and 6 of the
Criminal Procedure Act, Act 51 of 1977. - Most of the total of 46 434 cases currently
outstanding in the Regional and High Courts fall
within the ambit of Schedule 5 and 6 Offences.
23CAUSES OF OVERCROWDING IN CENTRES FOR SENTENCED
OFFENDERS
- The introduction of minimum sentences for certain
categories of crime. - Offenders who are unable to pay their fines.
- Unavailability of verifiable addresses.
- Non consideration of other alternative sentences
by courts for short sentences.
24CAUSES TO OVERCROWDING OF AWAITING TRIAL DETAINEES
- Delays in finalizing cases by courts
- Awaiting trial Detainees who cannot afford to pay
bail set by the court - Failure by Heads of Correctional Centres to
encourage courts to apply diversion methods - Failure by magistrates to apply diversion methods
sentencing options
25IJS INTERVENTIONS
26IJS Initiatives
- IJS fora at National, Provincial and Area levels
starting to pay off There are also monthly
meetings with the SAPS, Directorate Public
Prosecutions, Magistrates and the High Court
President regarding the overcrowding situation. - Alignment availability of information between
various departments are receiving attention with
as objective developing implementing
information alignment between departments to
enable visibility of information on operational
level to inform day-to-day decisions on all
levels of management - Sound relations is in place between the courts
and role players such as the Law Society and the
Legal Aid Board to speed-up applications for
representation. - The Legal Aid Board now has specific contract
persons for each Correctional centre. - Monitoring of children that accommodates children
awaiting trail happens on a monthly basis. This
process is vital for planning purposes to provide
alternatives for children in detention. The
monthly statistics also fulfil the obligations in
terms of the Integrated Justice System.
27DAY TO DAY MANAGEMENT OF ATD LEVELS
- Implementation of Checklist by Prov Area is
key challenge - Bail Under R1000 back to court 11824 reduced to
9488 in two weeks in an exercise by the NPA
2336 released - Encouraging greater use of s62f community
corrections for bail conditions - Use of s63a Heads of Prison application on
basis of prison overcrowding 4346 applications
nationally only 1150 successful in 2002/3 - Plea Bargaining, Admission of guilt, payment of
fines - Inmate Tracking pilot in Dbn, JHB ready to
begin pilot project
28SAPS INTERVENTIONS
29SAPS- Perspective into Overcrowding in Prisons
- The South African Police Service is not apathetic
towards the problems surrounding overcrowding in
our prisons as the consequences of this results
in a host of serious problems for all departments
concerned and for the country as a whole. - The SAPS recognises that the crime combating
operations and law enforcement initiatives in the
current high crime environment will continue to
result and arrests and place pressure on the
criminal justice system as a whole to deal with
suspects and convicted offenders. - The need for crime prevention initiatives to
reduce the incidence of crime and hence the need
for arrests is therefore prioritised in SAPS and
the JCPS cluster. Following the May 2004 Cabinet
Lekgotla government adopted for all clusters the
priority to reduce contact crimes on the
prioritised police station areas by 7 to 10 per
annum from 2004 to 2014
30MEASURES TAKEN BY THE SAPS TO ALLEVIATE PRISON
OVERCROWDING
The JCPS cluster has through its JOINTS structure
mobilise provincial and local counterparts to
assist in the development of station level
profiles that identify the causes and
contributing factors for contact crime per area.
These profiles are now being used to develop
crime prevention programmes for each of these
stations areas with input from and
responsibilities assigned to all relevant
stakeholders. The JCPS Cluster at national level
will receive these costed plans and consider how
to mobilise resources to support the programme.
The SAPS has taken cognizance of the fact that
the awaiting trail prisoners is a contributing
factor to the problem encountered in the
overcrowding of prisons.
31- In order to address AWT burning issue the
following action steps are in the process of
being implemented or has already been
implemented - The Detective Service is mandated to investigate
all cases reported to the S.A. Police Service.
All detectives are sensitized to investigate to
arrest perpetrators, and not to just arrest
perpetrators in order to investigate reported
cases. - The opposing of bail for reasons other than that
which will prejudice the course of justice must
not be a deciding factor during bail
applications. - A module on the granting and opposing of bail has
also been developed and is included in the new
Detective Learning Program. This will equip law
enforcement officers better in the procedures to
be followed during the granting of bail, which
would obviously contribute in the reduction of
awaiting trial prisoners.
32- Investigators have been instructed to ensure that
witnesses are timeously summonsed to be at court
on the requested dates. This will prevent cases
being postponed as a result of non attendance of
witnesses at court. - All existing operational police officers,
detectives and visible policing members are
currently receiving additional training in the
taking of proper statements. It is envisaged
that this will enable public prosecutors at court
to make immediate decisions without having to
clarify issues in cases which will prevent
delays in the judicial process.
33- A further step in this direction includes the
training of Detectives in investigative
interviewing techniques in order to elicit
maximum information from witnesses and suspects.
- The interaction between members of the SAPS and
Senior Public Prosecutors ensures that
shortcomings are identified and addressed in
this training program which ensures that its
intended purpose is achieved. - Where suspects are arrested for more serious
charges, such as Reckless and Negligent Driving
and Drunken Driving, and these suspects have
fixed address and workplaces they can be released
by means of SAPS 496- warning to appear in court
to ensure their appearances in court and to
eliminate overcrowding of police cells. - In cases where suspects have been arrested for
less serious crimes such as Drinking in Public or
Drunkenness these persons can be released by
means of a J534-written notice to appear in court
to ensure that overcrowding of police cells do
not take place.
34- In terms of section 56 of the Criminal Procedure
Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977), a peace officer
(including a member of the Police Service) may,
if he or she believes on reasonable grounds that
a magistrates court, on convicting an accused of
that offence, will not impose a fine exceeding
the amount determined by the Minister of Justice
and Constitutional Development, such peace
officer may, whether or not the accused is in
custody, hand a written notice to the accused
that calls on the accused to appear at a place
and on a date to answer a charge of having
committed the offence in question and which
contain an endorsement that the accused may admit
his or her guilt in respect of the offence and
may pay a fine without appearing in court. - The said Minister increased the amount of the
fine that may be imposed from R 1 500 to R 2
500 with effect from 14 February 2003. As a
result of this, a person who is in custody of the
Police Service may be released on a written
notice by a member before his or her first
appearance in the case where the member has
reasonable grounds to believe that a magistrate
will not impose a fine exceeding R 2 500 upon the
conviction of the accused of that offence.
Furthermore, persons who previously had to be
detained for offences in respect of which a
member had reason to believe that a fine of more
than R 1 500 but less than R 2 500, will be
imposed, could now be issued with a written
notice to appear in court without arresting and
detaining them. The increase of the fine has
resulted in a decrease in the number of persons
in detention awaiting trial.
35- In terms of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act,
2000 (Act No. 62 of 2000) Part II of Schedule 2
of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977, was amended.
In terms of section 59 of the Criminal Procedure
Act, 1977, a police official may release a person
on bail before his or her first appearance in the
lower court if that person is in custody in
respect of an offence not mentioned in Part II or
Part III of Schedule 2. This has resulted in the
release of persons on bail for property offences
where the value involved exceeds R 200 but is
below R 2 500 and for certain minor offences
relating to the possession of dependence
producing drugs, which they could not do before
the amendment. This amendment has resulted in a
further decrease in the number of persons in
detention awaiting trial. - In the case of Centre for Child Law v Minister of
Home Affairs and Eight Others, the High Court,
during September 2004, issued an order that
unaccompanied foreign children who are arrested
in terms of the Immigration Act, 2002 (Act No. 13
of 2002) may not be dealt with in terms of the
Criminal Procedure Act, 1977, but must be dealt
with in terms of sections 12 to 14 of the Child
Care Act, 1983 (Act No. 74 of 1983). This means
that such children will be dealt with, as
children in need of care and the Childrens Court
will decide how they will be dealt with in
accordance with the provisions of the Child Care
Act, 1983. Such children will therefore, after
their arrest, no longer be detained in police
custody or in a correctional facility, but will
rather be placed in a place of safety pending the
outcome of the proceedings before the Childrens
Court. All members of the South African Police
Service as well as the relevant staff from the
Department of Home Affairs have been instructed
to comply with the directives contained in this
Court Order.
36The Probations Officers Amendment Act, 2002 (Act
No. 35 of 2002) (hereinafter referred to as the
Act) came into operation on 7 November 2002 and
has as objective to have every child, who has
been arrested and who is likely to be detained
until his or her first appearance in court,
assessed by a probation officer. Section 4B of
the Act provides that such a child, who has not
been released after the arrest, must, as soon as
reasonably possible, but before his or her first
appearance in court, be assessed by a probation
officer. In order to enable the probation
officer to assess a child in detention, the
probation officer must be notified of the fact
that a child has been arrested and is likely to
remain in custody until his or her first
appearance in court. Accordingly, whenever a
child is arrested and he or she is not released
on warning, in the care of his or her parents or
guardian, or released on bail, the community
service centre commander must ensure that the
relevant probation officer is, as soon as is
reasonably possible, notified of the arrest and
detention and when and in which court the child
will appear. In terms of a circular issued to
all members, the Provincial Commissioner of every
province has to ensure that every police station
is provided with the relevant particulars of the
nearest probation officer within that station
area. Every station commissioner must also ensure
that probation officers who arrive at a police
station to assess a child in detention, is
assisted to perform the assessment. Children
that are arrested and must by order of a
magistrate be detained for longer than 24 hours
can be removed to a secure care facility or place
of safety or can be released in the care of their
parents/guardian to reduce overcrowding of police
cells.
37The SAPS has developed a new Detective Learning
Program (DLP) to equip detectives to carry out
their functions in an effective and professional
manner. This program is competency based and on
completion continues in the workplace where
assessments are carried out to determine the
practical application of the theoretical
contents of the training program. This training
program is outcome-based and is presented over a
period of twelve weeks.
38In order to supplement the detective services
with additional members, police management has
allocated 30 of all new police recruits to the
detective service after basic training. The
Investigative Interviewing program has now been
drafted into the existing basic training
curriculum of all police recruits. A further
two-week introductory detective course is
presented to the additional 30 of police
recruits. The South African Police Service
Division Crime Prevention compiled a Code of
Practice Code of Compliance and Due Diligence on
Custody Management which will address aspects
such as escapes from lawful custody and
overcrowding of police cells
39- Another milestone for the SAPS is the
implementation of the Automatic Fingerprint
Identification System (AFIS) at the Criminal
Record Centre which drastically speeds-up results
on previous convictions of offenders.
Previously the manual system provided 7 769
results over a 20-working day period whereas the
AFIS produces 152 686 results over the same
period. These results minimizes the time delay
in the finalization of cases. - A further directive was issued to all commanders
to inspect dockets to and from court in order to
ensure that instructions of Public Prosecutors
are complied with timeously in order to prevent
delays in finalization of cases.
40- One of the inhibiting factors in the management
of detained persons in police custody is the lack
of online management information. The results of
this lack of online information are - Swapping of identity take place within the
holding facilities that allow for the escape of
detained persons. Lack of crime intelligence - Lack of management capabilities to ensure the
timely reporting of children that are being
detained for longer than 24 hours. - Prisoner Population Prediction Model system need
to be updated manually and is extremely time
consuming. - To eliminate these short comings the IJS-Board
has approved the implementation of a Detention
Management System for the SAPS as part of the IJS
system. The development and implementation of
this system is on track and it is the objective
of the IJS-Program to start with the
implementation of this system during the 2006/7
financial year.
41DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
42Department of Social Development
- The transformation of probation service
necessitated the amendment of the Probation
Services Act (116 of 1991). The Probation
Services Amendment Act ( Act 35 of 2002) makes
provision for amongst others the following
Certain definitions, assessment, diversion, early
intervention, family finder, family group
conferencing, home based supervision, reception
assessment and referral, pre-trial report,
pre-sentence report and restorative justice.
These amendments are in line with the proposed
Child Justice Bill and make certain that
probation officers will be able to fulfill their
new functions. DSD has initiated a process to
publish the regulations to the Probation Services
Act and will consult with relevant role-players.
DSD also plans to rewrite the Probation Services
Act during 2004/5, to bring it in line with other
pieces of legislation viz Child Justice Bill. - There are approximately 600 probation
practitioners doing probation work The Department
has sub-contracted with Dept Social Development
University Cape Town, to train all current
probation officers by March 2005. Training has
started and Mpumalanga and KZN probation officers
have already benefited. - The Department has sub-contracted with the
Restorative Justice Centre in Pretoria to train
probation officers in restorative justice and
family group conferencing by March 2005. The
project is on track.
43- The Probation Services Amendment Act makes
provision for the duties and appointment of
assistant probation officers as well as the
notion of home-based supervision. - The Department has obtained donor funding for the
appointment of assistant probation officers
(apos) and for replication of home-based
supervision programmes in all provinces. This
model has proved to very successful and cost
effective and the Department proposes it as a
viable alternative to children being in detention
in prison. - There are 92 apos at present and 27 more are to
be appointed - Practical training of apos is done in each
province at a place of safety/secure care where
institutionalized children awaiting trial are
reassessed by a training team together with
probation officers and apos of the province.
These cases are assessed for possible home-based
supervision the aim being to have fewer
children awaiting trial in residential and
correctional facilities.
44- The NPA has initiated a process to complete a
database of programmes from the NPA provincial
perspective. As part of the costing exercise for
the implementation of the Child Justice Bill the
DSD has identified diversion programmes as a
major cost driver and all provinces have made
provision for additional programmes. This
information will feed into a database and will be
captured in a GIS format - This will be used as a reference point for
criminal justice practitioners and will serve as
a basis for availability of programmes per region
and for the registration process of diversion
programmes. - The Department has contracted with NICRO to
develop minimum standards for diversion (Donor
funding R1,2 m). This will be utilized by
national and provincial departments to monitor
and fund programmes. - The replication of home-based supervision
programmes in every province has gained
significant momentum in the recent few months,
especially with the appointment of additional
APOs. DSD believes that if this program is
implemented in all regions it will alleviate the
pressure on DCS and DSD to keep awaiting trail
children in detention.
45- Family group conferencing was piloted by the
Department with donor funding during 1996/7 and
proved to very successful. Therefore it was
included in the Child Justice Bill. Family group
conferencing is currently defined in Probation
Services Act (116 0f 1991) and forms part of
duties of probation officers. As part of the
implementation of the Child Justice Bill the
Department has contracted with the Restorative
Justice Centre to train probation officers in
restorative justice and family group
conferencing. The project has produced excellent
results so far. - RECEPTION, ASSESSMENT AND REFERRAL
CENTRES/SERVICES The provincial Departments have
collectively established 54 RAR centers
46- Secure Care Facilities
- At present there are bed capacity for 2131
children 1981 male and 78 girls are in secure
care as at end July 2004 - DSD is planning new secure care facilities with
as a total for South Africa 2425 additional new
beds at a cost of R 340 million for
infrastructure and R187.7 million running costs - Draft minimum standards for residential care
facilities were developed. Current draft minimum
standards for Secure Care needs to be reviewed.
Norms and standards for secure care need to be
developed including ratio of child and youth care
workers per number of children. Ratios for day
and night staff may be different. During a
meeting with provincial representatives in August
2003 norms and standard were developed. This
include possible secure care centers with no
more than 60 beds in a unit but up to four units
per campus. Thus a center will be able to house
up to 240 children in a center whilst sharing
administration facilities and buildings
47Correctional Services Initiatives to reduce
overcrowding
48INITIATIVES TO REDUCE OVERCROWDING OF SENTENCED
OFFENDERS
- Conversion of sentences into Correctional
Supervision - Assisting offenders to obtain money to pay fines.
- Ensuring that support systems are in place for
all offenders who are to be released on parole or
correctional supervision - Speedy placement of offenders with fines or
correctional supervision
49INITIATIVES TO REDUCE OVERCROWDING OF SENTENCED
OFFENDERS
- Ensuring that offenders who qualify for parole
are placed out as soon as possible. - Increased focus on programmes addressing
offending behaviour to prevent re-offending. - Focus on training, education and social
development programmes. - Expanding accommodation through the construction
of four new correctional centres to accommodate
12 000 offenders.
50LEGAL CLAUSES NOT OPTIMALLY USED
- Sec 62(Æ’) of the C P Act, (Act no 51 of 1977)
makes provision for placement of ATDS under the
supervision of a Correctional Official as a
condition of bail. - Sec 63 of the C P Act, (Act no 51 of 1977) makes
provision for the accused or prosecutor to apply
to the court to reduce the amount of bail that
was set by the relevant court.
51LEGAL CLAUSES NOT OPTIMALLY USED
- Sec 63A of the C P Act, (Act no 51 of 1977) makes
provision for the Head of Correctional Centre to
approach the relevant court to release an accused
person on warning in lieu of bail or to amend the
bail conditions imposed by the court if the
offender population of a particular correctional
centre is reaching such proportions that it
constitutes a material and imminent threat to the
human dignity, physical health or safety of an
accused.
52LEGAL CLAUSES NOT OPTIMALLY USED
- Sec 71 of the C P Act, (Act no 51 of 1977) makes
provision for placement of ATDS under the age of
18 years who are in custody, instead of being
released on bail, be placed under the supervision
of a correctional official. - Sec 72(1) of the C P Act, (Act no 51 of 1977)
makes provision for ATDS to be released and
placed under the supervision of a correctional
official in terms of Section 62 (Æ’) and warns
them to appear before the court instead of bail.
53BEST PRACTICES IN SOME REGIONS
- Pretoria Local Prison has a Magistrate who deals
with cases on daily basis successfully - Sound relations with the Legal Aid Board which
now has specific contract persons for each
Correctional centre.
54BEST PRACTICES IN SOME REGIONS
- Monthly statistics to Regional Office.
- Monthly statistics on successes in terms of
sections 62(f), 63, 63A, 71 and 72 - Namelists of ATDs longer than 3 months is
delivered (within a radius of 50 km) to the
Senior Public Prosecutor, Senior Magistrate,
Judges and Registrar of the High Court and the
Station Commissioner of the SAPS.
55SOCIETAL RESPONSIBILITY
- Municipal authorities do something about the
number of offending suspects from their areas - Local Govt must promote restoration of community
institutions vital to promotion of social
responsibility prior to conviction imprisonment
56SOCIETAL RESPONSIBILITY
- Citizens their Community institutions not
SAPS must be seen as the first line of promoting
social responsibility (fighting offending
behaviour). - Let families communities be nurseries of social
responsibility not of criminality. - Honourable MPs help promote social
responsibility in their constituencies
57CRIMINAL JUSTICE CO-ORDINATION
- Improve information sharing and goodwill at
operational level among affected structures - Judiciary notes impact of (sentencing) decisions
on existing Correctional Services capacity - Wider utilization of Prosecutors and Clerks of
Courts for admission of guilt and payment of fine
without appearing in court.
58DCS IMPROVEMENT AREAS
- DCS notes best practices from its own ranks
reproduce them nation-wide - Improve accountability of Heads of Correctional
Centres on their legal obligations - Optimal utilisation of existing facilities to
relieve the most overcrowded facilities - Building of planned new facilities
59DOJ CD initiatives
- Re aga Boswa
- Improved Case Flow Management - Monitoring of
duration of ATD - Improved assistance by investigating officers to
prosecutors - Specialised courts such as commercial crime
courts with emphasis on plea bargaining - Visits by Judges, Magistrates and Prosecutors to
the facilities to see the effect of overcrowding.
60Positive interventions
- The implementation of the plea-bargaining
approach as well as the legal provisions such as
granting of bail by police for minor offences. - The Saturday Court project also played a critical
role in the finalization of cases and reduction
of awaiting trial prisoners. Unfortunately this
project has been terminated due to financial
constraints. - Other initiatives such as the Child Justice Bill
and restorative justice approach should also have
a positive impact on the number of people
detained over the long term. These programmes
recognise the need for early intervention
programmes that attempt to steer young offenders
away from prison and attempt to correct their
behaviour. The objective being to intervene early
in the lives of children when they get into
trouble to prevent them from committing more
serious crimes and even becoming repeat and/or
violent offenders. Similar approaches can be used
for adults who commit less serious crime.
61NPA Interventions
- The NPS has recognised the importance of the
alleviation of overcrowding as a strategic
enabler and force multiplier in the achievement
of its vision. Specific focus on the reduction of
awaiting trial prisoners was therefore
incorporated in our Strategic Plan - Awaiting trial accused must only be detained in
custody where the interest of the administration
of criminal justice so requires - Matters must continuously be re-assessed where
the accused has failed to pay bail, especially of
a thousand Rand or less and - The number of awaiting trial prisoners must be
reduced through the proper screening of cases. A
strict policy of no case, no enrolment must at
all times be enforced.
62NPA interventions
- In addition to these strategic enablers, the NPS
also envisaged improved co-operative
relationships with other stakeholders in the
criminal justice system. For this purpose the
following indicators, which also assist in the
management of ATD, were incorporated in the
Strategic Plan - A list of prisoners awaiting trial for six months
or more must be obtained and those listed cases
must be prioritised. - An increased consideration to the payment of
fines as admission of guilt as envisaged in
section 57A of the Criminal Procedure Act, to
expedite the finalisation of cases. - Furthermore a policy, that unless it is necessary
to detain the accused before completion of the
investigation, the investigation should first be
completed, must at all times be enforced. In
less serious cases summons should be the method
to secure the accuseds attendance before court
and dockets should be brought to the SPP for
decision instead of arresting the accused. (This
policy resulted in an increase in decision
dockets, from 485 780 received during the
financial year 2002/2003 to 512 761 dockets
received during 2003/2004).
63- The NPS has embarked on several projects to
address the overcrowding in our prisons. - In pursuit of the strategic objectives relating
to ATD, the NPS has embarked on a national
initiative to review cases where bail was granted
of R 1000 or less. - We have also requested the support of the
Judiciary in the Case Flow Management process.
Discipline in the courts will definitely enhance
case management, which will reduce the numbers of
ATD. - The IJS Court Centers were implemented and rolled
out to 46 offices. It is important to extend
these centers to more places countrywide. The
valuable information provided on cycle times by
the IJS centers has been found to be a handy
management tool when monitoring cycle times of
cases. The latest statistics received from these
centers, indicate that the number of children
younger than 18 years as a percentage of accused
on the outstanding roll has increased from 9.5
to 9.6.
64- The NPS has also determined suitable new targets
for all Lower Courts to improve the cycle times
of cases. 90 of all District Court cases should
not be older than 6-month, 75 of all Regional
cases should not be older than 6-months, and
12-months in High Court cases. Cases where the
accused is in custody must be prioritised. These
case cycle times are monitored by the NPS, from
August 2004, on a monthly basis (previously on a
6-month basis). The previous audit determined
that only 11 of District Court cases and 40 of
Regional Court cases were older than 6 months.
65- The Cycle time of High Court cases is also
continually monitored by the NPS. Various
initiatives, to reduce the delays, have been
implemented. Positive results have already been
obtained from those Divisions where the docket is
forwarded to the DPP Office, immediately after
the first appearance in the Lower Court, in order
for the DPP to effectively manage the outstanding
investigation.
66- The NPS has taken the initiative in the project
to postpone cases of awaiting trial prisoners via
electronic medium. We are currently awaiting the
promulgation of an amendment to the Criminal
Procedure Act. A pilot project will then be
initiated at Pretoria and Durban.
67- Since January 2003, the NPS has also commenced
with the collation of Lower Court statistics of
cases wherein the accused was diverted away from
the criminal justice system. A total of 40262
cases were diverted to date. If the Diversion
program is successfully completed by the accused,
the case against him/her will be withdrawn. In
this regard the establishment of the Community
Courts assisted greatly due to the fact that
cases, which would have been postponed by your
main courts, are now expedited and effectively
finalised in the Community Courts. In the
Hatfield Community Court, 128 cases were thus far
diverted. The Community Courts in Hatfield and
Bloemfontein have also managed to finalise a
total of 678 and 506 cases, respectively.
68The President, in his State of the Nation
Address, required an improvement in the quality
and cycle times of investigations and
prosecutions. In order to address this matter,
the NPS has, in execution of the Presidents
instruction and in conjunction with SAPS,
embarked on a project to determine the reasons
for the high rate of withdrawals and
postponements in our courts. The project mainly
entails an audit conducted on all cases withdrawn
and postponed over a period of three months
(July, August and September). Ten of the bigger
court centres have been identified for this
purpose. The data should enable us to identify
emerging trends and indicate specific areas where
some intervention is required. Members of SAPS
are assisting us with the collection of the
required data. A matter of grave concern is the
number of postponements per case, which impacts
negatively on our case cycle times. From total
number of 13 676 cases that were postponed, 365
cases have already been postponed for more than
15 times per case, with some cases exceeding 50
postponements per case!
69- All Prosecutors, but especially the Control and
Senior Prosecutors, should ensure that cases are
not postponed without good reason. Realistic
dates should be set for a postponement and the
practise of routinely postponing cases for two
weeks, even if it is clear that the investigation
will not be completed, should be discontinued.
Clear instructions should be issued on all
outstanding investigations and the Investigating
Officer should be held accountable on the return
date.
70LAB
- The essence of the Legal Aid Boards awaiting
trial prisoners project is that the Board has
identified those prisons at which a large numbers
of awaiting trial prisoners are held. Particular
attention is given to prisons at which high
numbers of children are awaiting trial and/or at
which large numbers of prisoners have been
awaiting trial for longer than 6 months - The Legal Aid Board has 57 Justice Centres
nationwide each of which is responsible for the
provision of legal aid in a certain number of
magisterial districts. The staff of these
Justice Centres visit the prisons within their
areas which have been identified in accordance
with the above criteria. Where possible such
prisons are visited twice a month. All
identified prisons holding a high number of
awaiting trial prisoners are visited at least
once a month.
71LAB cont
- During prison visits the staff of the Legal Aid
Board explain the Constitutional right to legal
representation in terms of Section 35(3) of the
Constitution, the reasons why accused persons
should be legally represented and the fact that
such services are provided free of charge by
professional legal practitioners operating
independently of the State. Awaiting trial
prisoners are afforded an opportunity to apply
for legal aid and arrangements are made to
consult. - Where possible plea bargaining is presented as an
option. - If and when the necessary resources become
available the Legal Aid Board plans to extend the
service, firstly to all prisons, and thereafter
to persons being held in police detention cells.
72POLICY PROBLEM STATEMENT ATDS
- Cabinet identified policy gap re responsibility
for incarceration of awaiting trial accused
persons. - Cabinet noted that SA legal system presumes
innocence until proof of guilt, yet awaiting
trial detainees are accommodated in facilities of
correctional system, which facilities are
designed primarily for sentenced prisoners. - Unsentenced detainees have unique status - set of
rights requirements different from those of
sentenced  - Lack of coherent policy i.r.t service provision
to responsibilities for ATDs - Draft policy statement regarding detention of
unsentenced persons is being developed
inadequate responses from Departments - Aim to draft medium to long term policy for
Cabinet that will then inform strategic planning
of all departments - On basis of consensus approach - migration plan
would be put in place for medium term.
73POLICY PROBLEM STATEMENT ATDS
- Purpose of correctional services, to enforce
sentences of courts, to ensure humane detention,
promote social responsibility human
development, principles on which South
African legal system is based, are compromised by
current accommodation of awaiting trial
detainees in correctional centres. - Apart from being in contradiction with principles
of legal system, practice utilises DCS
resources inappropriately, particularly staff who
are trained in rehabilitation correction.
74BACKGROUND
- DCS saddled with housing range of detainees
- SA prisons have following categories of
unsentenced detainees in custody - Awaiting trial detainees granted bail that they
cannot pay - Awaiting trial detainees denied bail
- Awaiting trial children
- Detainees on warrant from bailiff/sheriff in
relation to debt - Illegal immigrants detained while awaiting
repatriation facing no charges - Persons awaiting transfer to other institutions
e.g. Children awaiting transfer to reform
schools, Presidents Patients awaiting transfer
to psychiatric institutions.
75BACKGROUND
- Legacy from Dept of Prisons under Min of J
- DoP perceived to have sole custodial mandate.
- Legislative policy developments over last 10
years apparent this perception cannot be
sustained. - Capacity of DCS not kept on par with other JCPS
depts - If unsentenced detainees removed from DCS still
seriuosly overpoulated - Places DCS at distinct disadvantage when
resources which are meant for corrections are
utilised for detention purposes.
76INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
- Person arrested facing charges is innocent
until proven guilty shall be treated as such. - Reason for detention to ensure due process in
court of law where they are to be tried, not in
any sense for punishment or correction. Â - Clear separation of functions between agencies
responsible for investigating crimes custodial
administration. - Accused person is detained may assist
investigating authorities in their work, but
conditions of imprisonment should never be an
element of investigation. - No unsentenced detainee may be compelled to wear
prison clothes provided to sentenced prisoners. - To be held separately as far as practicable.
77CONSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
- Lays down range of rights that impact on rights
of unsentenced detainees in relation to their
incarceration their passage through cjs - 12(1) Everyone has right to freedom security
of person - 35 Arrested, detained accused persons
- (1) Everyone who is arrested for
- (2) Everyone who is detained, including every
sentenced prisoner, has right- - (3) Every accused person has right to fair
trial, which includes right - (4) Whenever this section requires information to
be given to person, that information must be
given in language that person understands.
78ARRANGEMENTS BY SAPS
- at station where there is gaol, arrangement
shall be made that prisoners who have been
charged detained, be sent there, pending their
appearance in court, ...... for detention, rather
than be kept at station, unless, of course, it
would, owing to distance to gaol, time factor or
for any other sufficient reason, be more
economical or more convenient to keep them at
station - SAPS Standing Order (General) 345.2
79GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS TO UNSENTENCED DETAINEES
- Presumed innocence of unsentenced detainees
obliges very limited restriction on human rights
is justifiable. - While right to movement is curtailed by warrant
that empowers detention, continuity of basic
human rights is obligatory on Government. - Only basis on which rights can be curtailed is
presumed threat to society, /or likelihood of
escape that legal process has identified, or on
basis of what is practicably feasible.
80GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS TO UNSENTENCED DETAINEES
- Should be subjected only to restrictions
necessary for maintenance of security good
order in prison must, where practicable, be
allowed all amenities to which they could have
access outside prison. - Range of services must be available to
unsentenced detainees in line with general Govt
policy - Continuity in ed training
- Safety of person
- Access to social welfare services Accessibility
to state provided health care Accessibility to
visits, communication correspondence with
family friends - Accessibility to recreational reading resources
- Accessibility to legal representation
81HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
- Without presuming guilt, given socio-economic,
familial educational backgrounds of many of
ATDs, is NB niche for promotion of human
development while awaiting trial. - life skills social development, including
understanding of legal justice system
82DURATION OF AWAITING TRIAL
- Constitution stipulates period of ATD to be as
short as possible - In practice many incarcerated for extended
periods of time, - Provision of involvement in productive activity
that promotes recreation human development is
crucial - Length of stay of ATDs varies considerably might
also negatively affect administering of these
programmes.
83SUMMARY OF GOVT RESPONSBILITIES
- Government obliged to provide facilities for
unsentenced detainees that allow for - Minimal limitation of individuals rights,
- Ensuring secure safe custody,
- Staffing of facilities with appropriate
personnel responsible for ensuring delivery by
range of govt agencies on rights of unsentenced
detainees. - Training of personnel in
- Promotion of human development
- Rights of persons in legal/judicial process
- Effective secure safe custody
84POLICY PROPOSAL RE ATDS
- Long-term policy should confirm that DCS
- should not accommodate unsentenced in
correctional facilities - should not utilise correctional officials to
secure care for, awaiting trial detainees. - Policy should state services facilities for
incarceration of awaiting trial detainees - policy should define appropriate design
resourcing of facilities in which awaiting trial
detainees should be accommodated.
85POLICY PROPOSAL RE ATDS
- Custodial responsibility for ATDs hence
administration of holding or remand facilities
should be reconsidered - Prime responsibility must lie with DoJ
- Allocation of responsibilities to IJS Depts
support roles of various departments should be
defined. - Necessary budgetary provisions for AT custodial
responsibility be made to relevant department(s)
86MIGRATION TO APPROPRIATE HANDLING OF ATDS
- Migration system required to shift from current
status quo to desired handling of ATDs by
appropriate agency in cjs. - Immediate separation of unsentenced from
sentenced, accommodation of ATDs on basis of
categories determined on basis of previous
convictions, status nature of alleged offence
NB principles to inform short medium term
management of ATDs.
87MIGRATION TO APPROPRIATE HANDLING OF ATDS
- Immediate provision of services such as health,
continuing education training, social work
intervention to be defined according to mandates
of relevant govt depts, not be responsibility
of DCS. - DCS Staff only to be utilised to manage
administration of AT prison/section,
facilitating access of personnel from other Govt
Depts to render relevant services. - Payment for accommodation feeding of ATDs to be
made by DoJ to DCS. - Delivery of payment for other services by Govt
Depts according to SLA between DoJ relevant
Dept.
88MIGRATION TO APPROPRIATE HANDLING OF ATDS
- Solution may include handing over of some of
older prisons, more appropriate for shortterm
incarceration of ATDs than as correctional
centres - Will involve both financial human resource
provisioning, training of necessary custodial
capacity in another department, transitional
arrangements will be necessary.
89MIGRATION TO APPROPRIATE HANDLING OF ATDS
- Govt to address rights of ATDs being compromised
by backlogs in court cases, length of their
remand period, conditions that they have to
endure in prisons. - Situation tends to increase criminality of
awaiting trial detainees hardening of
anti-social attitudes behaviour. - In prisons over 200 full, current percentage of
ATDs is about 45, - In prisons 100 full, current level of ATDs is
about 20 of total population - Ongoing IJS monitoring of ATDs levels and
duration in order to utilize IJS processes to
speed up processing of court cases, /or utilise
range of options for alternatives to
incarceration.
90DETENTION OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AWAITING
DEPORTATION
- DHA is responsible for illegal immigrants
Legislation empowers DG to cause illegal
immigrants awaiting deportation to be detained,
but without specifying where or how. - DHA currently lacks expertise, structures
funds to run its own detention facilities, has
one privately run facility that it utilises
oversees management. - Held in following types of facilities in
different regions of country - Increase in illegal immigrants levels of
overcrowding forced policy dilemma to surface.
91POLICY PROPOSALRE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
- Clear guidelines on custodial responsibility for
illegal immigrants facing deportation are
required. - Detention facilities required for illegal
immigrants substantially different from those
facing criminal charges court proceedings. - is tendency for escape from deportation
- cannot be presumption of threat to safety of
society or - Cannt be assumption of justifiable basis for
rights to be severely limited
92POLICY PROPOSALRE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
- Detention facilities have to provide for family
accommodation. - Staff require an understanding of diverse
cultures of illegal immigrants, of domestic
international law relating to treatment of
illegal immigrants refugees, range of
appropriate languages, be trained in providing
guidance to such people in relation to their
deportation.
93MANAGEMENT OF LEVELS OF SENTENCED OFFENDERS
- Sentenced Admissions from Courts
- From 1995 until 2000 number of admissions has
shown slight increase but has been reasonably
stable with average of 116 568 over 6 year
period. - In 2001 increased dramatically to high of 159
641. - 2002 showed marked decrease to 98 909 - lowest
over period since 1995 (decrease of 62 from
previous year).
94SENTENCED ADMISSIONS
- Sentence Categories 1995-2003
- lt2years numbers have decreased