Building Common Assessments in Mathematics Everett Public Schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Building Common Assessments in Mathematics Everett Public Schools

Description:

Building Common Assessments in Mathematics Everett Public Schools Mary Ann Stine Director, Curriculum & Instruction Judi Caudle Elementary Math Facilitator – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: 0776
Learn more at: https://www.wera-web.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building Common Assessments in Mathematics Everett Public Schools


1
Building Common Assessments in MathematicsEverett
Public Schools
  • Mary Ann Stine
  • Director, Curriculum Instruction
  • Judi Caudle
  • Elementary Math Facilitator
  • Rita Husby
  • Middle School Math Facilitator
  • Jana Wilson
  • Middle School Math Facilitator

2
History of Math in Everett
  • Everett adopted CMP in 2002.
  • Prior to that it was the Julie Andrews
    approach.
  • In 2002, 29 of students met/exceeded standard on
    the WASL at 7th grade.
  • In 2006 2007, 57.5 of students met/exceeded
    standard on the WASL in 7th grade.
  • There was on-going CMP training and professional
    development.
  • Expectation and accountability to use CMP
    supported through a pacing calendar.

3
The Need For Aligning Instruction Assessment
  • Frustrated with the assessment results
  • Hard to measure the learning
  • Lots of great mathematics, hard to know what to
    focus on
  • Needed to begin at the end and identify the
    mathematical big ideas as well as the necessary
    skills

4
Building the Teams
  • Grade-Level teams with representatives from each
    middle school and the middle school math
    facilitators
  • Teams were released 6 days throughout the year
  • Set the stage for the work
  • Goal was to work on the unit they were currently
    teaching, or about to teach
  • Reality was we revisited a lot of our work

5
Our Process
  • MathematicsBig Ideas and Skills
  • Marriage of CMP, GLEs, Test and Item Specs
  • Learning Targets
  • Aligning Assessment Items to Learning Targets
  • Match to Learning Targets
  • Item Accuracy
  • Freedom from Bias
  • Field Test Assessments
  • Reflection Sheet for Students
  • Next Steps
  • Develop Rubrics
  • Common Scoring of Assessments
  • Select Anchor Papers

6
Example Shapes Designs
  • Identified Big Mathematical Ideas
  • Aligned Learning Targets to the GLEs
  • Used Test Item Specs as a Guide

7
Shapes Designs
Learning Targets
  • Processes
  • I use geometric properties to sort, label,
    and classify polygons.
  • 1- Below Standard 2-Approaches
    Standard 3-Meets Standard 4-Exceeds Standard
  • I solve problems using geometric
    properties.
  • 1- Below Standard 2-Approaches
    Standard 3-Meets Standard 4-Exceeds Standard
  • Skills
  • Reasonably estimate angle measures and
    accurately measure angles with tools.
  • Reasonably Estimate
  • Need More Study Almost There Got
    It!
  • Accurately Measure
  • Need More Study Almost There Got
    It!
  • Determine the angle sum of any regular
    polygon.
  • Need More Study Almost There Got
    It!

8
Sample Assessment Items
  • 1) a. List the characteristics of a regular
    polygon below.
  • 3) Determine whether or not the following side
    length combinations make a triangle. Explain how
    you know
  • 6) Name each triangle according to its sides and
    angles. a. b.
    c.

SideA Side B Side C Make a Triangle? Yes or No
2 2 2
7 10 3
10 11 12
13 12 5
9
How Did I Do?
  • Processes I use geometric properties to sort,
    label, and classify polygons.

Test Items Got It! Missed it Missed it Evaluation Score
Test Items Got It! Calc. Error Needs More Study Evaluation Score
1a
3
6a
6b
6c
10
Practical ExperienceWriteLearning Targets
  • Data About Us
  • Determine Learning Targets using Big Ideas of
    CMP, Test and Item Specs
  • Separate into Process and Skills

11
Practical ExperienceMatching Test Items
  • Matching Test Items
  • Match the Learning Targets
  • Does the item measure the important aspects of
    the target?
  • Is the level of difficulty appropriate?
  • Accuracy
  • Is the content of the item accurate?
  • Is the terminology appropriate?
  • Are all parts of the item clear in their meaning?
  • If there is a graphic, is it accurate and
    relevant to the item?
  • If multiple choice, do the distractors represent
    plausible alternatives?
  • Freedom from Bias
  • Does the context or scenario exclude certain
    groups based on the content, lack of prior
    experience, etc.

12
Lessons Learned
  • Uncovered the mathematics
  • Addressed blind spots
  • Accessed new content process learning
  • Opportunity to question current practices
  • Continued collaboration

13
Q A
  • Contact Information
  • Mary Ann Stine
  • mstine_at_everettsd.org
  • Judi Caudle
  • jcaudle_at_everettsd.org
  • Rita Husby
  • rhusby_at_everettsd.org
  • Jana Wilson
  • jwilson2_at_everettsd.org
  • Variables Patterns documents will be on our
    website for two weeks.
  • http//www.everett.k12.wa.us/math
  • Click on Teachers-Secondary, Middle School, CMP
    Resources, Variables Patterns
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com