Title: 20th Century Climate Change Data, Causation
120th Century Climate Change Data, Causation
2Current Climate Change Data and Causes
- This is how Ill group the slides in this
presentation - A. Global Temperatures
- B. Sea Level Changes
- C. Arctic Ocean Ice
- D. Glacier Retreats
- E. Permafrost and methane
3A. Global Temperatures
- Temperature rise in the Industrial Age in the
context of the past recent and geologic time
scales
4The Global Temperature Record for the past 150
Years Can Be Roughly Divided into 4 Regimes
51. Up to 1912
- Human generated GHGs are still fairly small.
Cars are a rarity, human population is a small
fraction of todays. - We are still in the general regime of the past
interglacial 6000 years, which shows little
trend in global temperatures - However, an unusually large number of major
volcanic eruptions added significant cooling
stratospheric aerosols Krakatoa 1883
(climatically strongest in modern record, see
especially Gleckler et.al. 2006), Santa Maria
(1902, one of the 5 biggest of the past 200
years), Katmai 1912 (largest of the 20th century) - The Katmai eruption set the minimum of global
temperatures for the 20th century (and very
likely beyond)
62. Period 1912 to 1942
- The long term solar cycles show a modulation such
that successive solar maxima are roughly similar,
and change slowly, over roughly century time
scales - Sunspot numbers are a fairly good proxy for solar
activity, and recall that there is a 0.1
modulation in the solar luminosity with the solar
cycle, and stronger solar cycles are associated
with higher solar luminosity of similar scale - During this period, solar sunspot maxima were
trending higher, and the inferred solar
luminosity (we have no direct measurements of
solar luminosity back in those days) was rising - Climate models show that in addition to rising
anthropogenic CO2, solar activity likely
accounted for a significant part of the
temperature rise seen at this time, with
deforestation and emergence from the Katmai
eruption cooling also being significant. - Also contributing, was a quiet period of no
significant volcanic eruptions to inject cooling
aerosols, compared to the 1883-1912 period. - See next slide.
7Climate modelling (e.g. Hansen 2005) shows
increasing solar activity and accompanying
luminosity rise likely accounts for a part of
1900-1945 global temperature rise. Forcing level
is not shown on these graphs. Timing is what is
being shown.
83. Period WWII to 1970
- Post WWII period of rapid rebuilding and rapid
industrialization - While CO2 levels are rising, what is rising
faster is the smoky, choking pollution of
aerosols associated with coal burning, rapidly
rising vehicle-miles, and power plants. - Unburned hydrocarbons combine with sunlight, and
water with sulfates to produce hydrosulfuric acid
droplets and other particles which reflect
incoming sunlight and cool the surface. - The so-called aerosol indirect effect - These
particles are also large enough to act as cloud
nucleation sites and increase low clouds (this
air pollution usually hangs low to the ground due
to temperature inversions). - (I grew up in L.A. in this period. You youngsters
cannot believe how bad it was back then. You were
lucky to be able to see 2 miles through the smog,
and seeing the San Gabriel Mountains 20 miles
away was a rarity.
9- At the same time, World War II destroyed a lot of
life and industrial capability, and it took some
time for this to be rebuilt. There was a period
of reduced growth in greenhouse gases at the
beginning of this period. - Also, the rising solar luminosity (as inferred
from the sunspot cycle) came to a top in mid
1950s and has been declining every since. - The combination of lowered rate of GHG emission
and much higher anthropogenic reflective
pollutants, and a halt to solar-induced
luminosity increases was enough to halt global
warming and keep temperatures roughly constant
during this 25 year period.
10The Pennsylvania Smog Attack of 1948
11London Smog 1952, killed 12,000 people
12London THE Smog Capital of that Time
13But L.A. Provided Strong Competition
14Los Angeles Famous then as the of Smog Capitol
of the United States
15New York Not Much Better
16The Smog Machine!
17Smog Particles from R. Healy (looks like a
couple of pollen grains at upper left as well)
184. 1970-Today
- Greenhouse gas emissions accelerate
- The Clean Air Act of 1970 and other air pollution
laws in the U.S. and Europe cause a significant
reduction in cooling aerosols, while China and
Asia make up for these improvements with large
post-Mao industrialization, largely coal-fired.
Net global aerosol effect is approximately a
wash, as can be seen in Hansen et.al. 2005. - Solar and other effects are negligible compared
to greenhouse gas emissions, primarily CO2 from
oil, gas, gasoline, and coal burning - Strong and accelerating greenhouse warming
dominates climate forcings
1914 sec video Worldwide Temps 1976-2012
- https//www.youtube.com/watch?featureplayer_embed
dedvZAp1o-669xc
20- Heating and Cooling Forcings to the Earths Heat
Budget (from Hansen et.al. 2005). Forcings
calibrated from observations. Combined with the
GISS Climate Model, they reproduce observed
global temperature in detail very well. See next
slide
21- (from Hansen et.al. 2005) Before 1900, the
observed curve is based on observations at
meteorological stations and the model is sampled
at the same points, whereas after 1900 the
observations include sea surface temperatures for
the ocean area, and the model is the true global
mean (Hansen et. al. 2001).
22Notes on Climate Forcings from Hansen et. al. 2005
- Effective forcings are derived from five-member
ensembles of 120-year simulations for each
individual forcing and for all forcings acting at
once see (9) and supporting online material.
The sum of individual forcings differs slightly
from all forcings acting at once because of
nonlinearities in combined forcings and unforced
variability in climate simulations. - This is the ozone forcing in our principal
IPCC simulations it decreases from 0.24 to 0.22
W/m2 when the stratospheric ozone change of
Randel and Wu (S1) is used - Ozone and black carbon forcings are less than
they would be for conventional forcing
definitions (11), because their efficacy is
only 75 (9)
23IPCC AR4 (2007) Climate Forcings Human and
Natural from 1750-present
242. Sea Level Changes
- Thermal, melt water, salinity, geoid changes and
relation to global temperatures
25On the 60 year time scale, sea level rises for
two reasons, both are climate-related
- 1. Thermal expansion of warmer water (simple
physics. Observe temperature profile of the
ocean, integrate, derive the thermal expansion) - 2. Melting of continental permanent ice
(glaciers, land ice caps) - While thermal expansion has provided most of the
total of the past 100 years continental melt is
rapidly increasing, and now contributing 1/3 of
the current sea level rise rate. - Sea Level Rise rate 1.8mm/year avgd over past
100 years, but is 3.3mm/year avgd over the past
20 years. - Note that sea ice melting contributes nothing to
sea level rise, since floating ice already
displaces water (Archimedes Principle). Thus,
melting of the Arctic Ocean ice happening now is
not contributing to sea level rise - On longer time scales, there is minor
contributions from slow rebound of the land from
the last Ice Age (loss of heavy glaciation causes
continental land to float a bit higher, and this
process is very slow). - On time scales of a few years and shorter, there
are many factors affecting sea level tides, El
Ninos, tsunamis, changing atmospheric pressure
associated with storms, floods and associated
salinity changes - 34 second video of Greenland areas of ice melting
(in red)
26(No Transcript)
27Sea Level Rise vs. Time and Place
- El Ninos tend to cause sharper rises in sea
level where the warm surface waters are, from the
thermal expansion of water - La Ninas (the cold surface water phase) does the
opposite - The height of the geoid (the gravitational
potential surface of the Earth a surface
parallel to sea level if all other factors are
ignored) changes near Greenland and Antarctica
especially, as glacial melt takes mass away from
these continental masses - Hence, the rate of sea level rise varies from
place to place at different times. Must take
account of geoid changes (straight-forward
gravity) and other data sampled widely in
location and time to get it right. - The following data shows the many tidal gauges
and satellite measurements are doing a good job
of tracking global sealevel rise
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30How does this rise rate compare with Ice Age
transitions? Red line is 1.8mm/yr 20th century
average. Recent rate is higher 1993-2003
satellite observed rate is 3.3mm/yr
31GRACE Satellite uses gravity to measure total ice
mass loss from Greenland. Ice loss is
accelerating.
32Estimates of total Antarctic land ice changes and
approximate sea level contributions using many
different measurement techniques. Adapted from
The Copenhagen Diagnosis. (CH Chen et al. 2006,
WH Wingham et al. 2006, R Rignot et al. 2008b,
CZ Cazenave et al. 2009 and VVelicogna 2009)
(Source here)
33- Ice mass changes for the Antarctic ice sheet
from April 2002 to February 2009. Unfiltered data
are blue crosses. Data filtered for the seasonal
dependence are red crosses. The best-fitting
quadratic trend is shown as the green line
(Velicogna 2009).
34- Monthly changes in Antarctic ice mass, in
gigatons, as measured by NASAs GRACE satellites
from 2003 to 2011. Results from five different
IMBIE team members using different methods. The
data have been adjusted to reflect new models of
post-glacial rebound.(Shepherd et.al. 2012).
35What about glaciers globally? Maybe its just
Greenland and Antarctic glaciers that are melting?
36Global Melt of Glaciers, in equivalent water
thickness (black boxes, m/yr), and cumulative
total thickness loss (red boxes, right scale,
meters). Glacier melt is clearly accelerating
rapidly
37Annual change in global glacier melting to sea
level rise (left axis, mm of water equivalent,
mm/yr) and cumulative value (right axis, mm),
based on surface area-weighted mass balance
observations. (source)
38The speed of melting (meters of glacier depth per
year) of 23 different Antarctic glaciers vs. the
temperature of the seawater into which they
contact, where 0 is the freezing point of (salt)
water. Clearly the rate of melting rises rapidly
with even small temperature differences above the
freezing point. Data from satellites and ground
surveys (Rignot Jones 2002)
39Arctic Ocean Ice Cover Dropping More Rapidly
than the 2007 IPCC AR4 models
40Arctic ice coverage is dropping in all seasons,
not just summer
41Not just ice coverage area, but ice volume is
dropping even more dramatically, as the permanent
ice rapidly disappears, leaving only thin
seasonal ice
42Summer Sea Ice Area past 1,450 years. In 2012, a
new record low of 3.5x106 km2. That is less
than half the value of the bottom point of this
curve. See the Latest data
43Lets Put Recent Global Warming in Context of the
Last 1000 Years
- From Mann et.al. 1999. The Hockey Stick made
famous in An Inconvenient Truth
44Temperature Proxies for Century, Millenium Time
Scales
- (See Mann et.al. 2008 and here, for more
details), but briefly - Foraminifora growth sensitive to temperature
different for different species. Preserved in
sediments - Tree rings show good correlation to other
proxies, until the 20th century (likely because
CO2 levels also affect tree rings and CO2 levels
now far above typical values of past 1000 years - Stalagmites annual growth ring thickness (water
from above) sensitive to temperature and climate
in general - Ice cores trapped air bubbles preserve
atmosphere, and isotope ratios are sensitive to
temperature. Also trap pollen, species sensitive
to temperature - Pollen species composition in sediments from
lakes, layering showing annual runoff, charcoal
shows major fires which can be cross correlated
with other data - Borehole temperatures surface temperatures
conduct downward through the ground, and deep
measurements contain information on ancient
temperatures. See NOAAs site on borehole science
45Given the importance, the work was re-done with a
wider range of temperature proxy assumptions and
additional care to avoid statistical
over-fitting. Still a Hockey stick. Note the
Medieval Warm period is actually a Northern
Hemisphere phenomenon, not global.
46Glacier length change from temperature proxies
Old photos, and written accounts. Still a hockey
stick
47Global surface temperature change over the last
five centuries from boreholes (thick red line).
Shading represents uncertainty. Blue line is a
five year running average of HadCRUT global
surface air temperature (Huang 2000). Borehole
data confirms the other temperature proxies.
48Jones and Mann (2004) temperature reconstructions
using proxies, now going back almost 2000 years,
with global temperatures at the bottom pane.
Actual instrumental temperatures shown in red.
Proxies and instruments both agree - still a
Hockey Stick
49Other Climate Change Effects
- Global phytoplankton has declined by an alarming
40 since 1950, as warmer, more stratified ocean
surface waters inhibit nutrient mixing from below
and thus limit growth - The stratosphere is cooling, as rising
stratospheric CO2 gets less IR from below but
radiates more IR because of collisional
excitation followed by radiative de-excitation.
We showed this earlier in the course.
50(No Transcript)
51Night Temperatures Rising Faster than Day
Temperatures
- causes a decrease in the daily temperature
range, which has been observed (Braganza 2004). - This too is a unique prediction of Greenhouse
Effect warming (Alexander 2006). Why? Because
temperatures reflect the integrated heating that
has already happened during the day, so that peak
temperatures occur in the late afternoon, not at
noon as you'd naively expect if there were no
lag. The hot ground can't efficiently radiate
away this heat because it is trapped by CO2, and
this keeps night-time temperatures warmer. - Daytime temperatures are warmer too, but not as
much at night time temps because it is not
increased incoming sunlight that is causing
Global Warming, it is human-caused greenhouse
gases inhibiting re-radiated cooling, which
happens mostly late evening, AFTER the incoming
solar heating. - A particularly dramatic demonstration of this can
be seen in the mid/late 20th century data, when
cooling by human-generated aerosol pollution
caused daytime temperatures to stay roughly
constant in spite of increasing CO2, while
nighttime temperature actually increased (Wild,
Ohmura, and Makowski 2007).
52Night-time minimum temps are rising faster than
are daytime maximum temps, although both are
rising. This is a unique signature of GHG-caused
warming
53Why is This Happening to Us!?
- Why?... Us! We human beings - were doing it!
Weve raised CO2 levels from 280ppm to 400ppm in
just the last 130 years, and its accelerating
rapidly. - How? By sheer number and dominance. As recently
as 1900, wild mammals made up 50 of the land
biomass. Now, only 3. Humans and their livestock
make up 97 of the vertebrate biomass on land
(Bodley 2008), and 72 of ALL vertebrate biomass
on land or sea. (90 of the large fish have
already been fished out, so that makes our
domination that much easier). - 36 of the primary productivity of the entire
planet has been diverted to humans (Haberl,
et.al. 2012)
54This 2008 graph is already out of date.
Population passed 7 Billion in 2012. Human
population is rising now at an amazing and
unsustainable rate of 1 billion additional people
every 13 years.
55- Were forcing CO2 into the atmosphere at a rapid
rate, taking the cumulative carbon sequestration
of hundreds of millions of years (the
Carboniferous Era) and burning it all at once
in a geologic instant.
56CO2 Levels from ice cores, for the past 1
million years
57Progressively expanded time scale needed to show
how incredibly rapid is the CO2 rise of today vs.
geologic past
58CO2 Levels - past 60 years
59(No Transcript)
60But maybe the CO2 is not from us, but instead
from volcanoes or something else?
- No. The CO2 is ours.
- Volcanoes put out only 1 of the CO2 that humans
inject annually into the atmosphere - How do we know that CO2 is ours? There are many
independent confirmations its ours, which Ill
number as follows.
611. Were injecting far more than enough CO2 into
the atmosphere to account for the observed rise
(some goes into the ocean, some into plants and
soil)
62 Global Temperatures vs Atmospheric CO2 vs CO2
Emissions by Humans Last 1000 Years.
632. Note how the growth rate of CO2 drops during
economic recessions. 10 year averages are the
unmarked bars. Ive added economic recessions
(Fed data) labeled with years. The oil shock
recessions of 74 (Arab oil embargo) and the 91
(Gulf War) are particularly obvious
64 65Methane Coming from domesticated cattle, and
from melting permafrost and peat, is 25x more
powerful as a greenhouse gas than CO2, per kg
(avged over 100 yrs)
- Melting Permafrost Accelerating Global Warming
methane trapped in melting Arctic Lakes is being
released - K. Anthony (U. Fairbanks) on Arctic lake methane
- Note, CH4 oxidizes to H2O CO2. The residence
time of a CH4 molecule in the atmosphere is about
10 years. Both H2O and CO2 are less powerful
greenhouse gases than methane.
66Fraction of total emission of carbon which (top
frame) remains in the atmosphere, (middle) taken
up by land biosphere, and (bottom) taken up by
ocean. Time period is 1960 2007. Note as the
ocean absorbs more CO2 and also warms, it is
becoming less effective at soaking up additional
CO2. The opposite is true on land (sorry for the
terrible repro of this tiny graph)
67Deforestation Human Fingerprint Since Dawn of
Civilization
- Tropical deforestation, as countries scramble to
sell off their timber and clear cut so they can
grow cattle (and soybeans, sugar), accounts for
nearly 20 of carbon emissions (Canadell et.al.
2007) - In Indonesias main island of Sumatra, home of
the last Sumatran Rhinos, deforestation destroys
5 football fields worth of rainforest per minute. - Forests remove 2.4 billion tons of carbon from
atmosphere per year (Canadell et.al. 2011) - Regrowth from cessation of tropical forest
clearing shows rapid carbon uptake into trees,
and also into root systems underground - But Slash / burn adds significant carbon to
atmosphere, as has been done for thousands of
years, and still goes on in the Amazon and other
places.
68Deforestation Produces about 1/3 as much CO2 per
year as fossil fuel burning
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71Causes of Amazon deforestation Cattle Ranches,
Mostly. Demand from rapid proliferation of fast
food outlets world wide
72(No Transcript)
73Deforested Land Shown in Red NASA image
74Effects of Deforested Land on Climate
- 1. Carbon burned or otherwise put back into the
atmosphere as CO2 - 2. Loss of photosynthesis loss of ability to
pull CO2 out of atmosphere - 3. Desertification of land this may actually
cause some cooling (although I cant find data),
via higher reflectivity of land vs. forest - 4. Healthy forest returns ¾ of rainfall back to
the atmosphere where it can rain out elsewhere.
Deforested land returns only ¼ of rain water back
to the atmosphere for further downwind
rainmaking, instead causing severe runoff,
erosion, loss of topsoil, and loss to the ocean
75Key Points Current Climate Change and Global
Warming (GW)
- Solar luminosity, cosmic ray modulation, show no
secular change since 1950s cannot be causing
GW - 20-21st Century climate 3 regimes and their
causes - Volcanic and human pollution aerosols net
coolant to climate by reflecting sunlight.
Volcanic CO2 production only 1 of
human-generated CO2. - Climate models (w/ high, low clouds, aerosols,
volcanics, GHGs, deforestation, solar) agree
closely with observed global temps. - Atmospheric CO2 is human-caused, as shown by
C13/C12 ratio changes. - Fossil fuel burning dominates climate forcing
- Sea level rises due to thermal expansion of
warmer seawater, and (rapidly increasingly)
melting land ice - Deforestation removes carbon sequestering trees,
altering carbon cycle equation. - Methane as greenhouse gas forces climate at 1/4
that of CO2. Methane levels have tripled from
human activities, since the pre-industrial times. - Night-time low temps are rising faster than are
day-time maximum temperatures. - Tropical deforestation goes mostly to cattle
ranches to satisfy fast-food restaurant demand