Improved Crosstalk Modeling for Noise Constrained Interconnect Optimization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Improved Crosstalk Modeling for Noise Constrained Interconnect Optimization

Description:

... to 0 Optimization Rules ... Design rules established to reduce noise EE 201A Modeling and Optimization for VLSI Layout Jeff Wong and Dan ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Jack3189
Learn more at: http://eda.ee.ucla.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improved Crosstalk Modeling for Noise Constrained Interconnect Optimization


1
Improved Crosstalk Modeling for Noise Constrained
Interconnect Optimization
  • Jason Cong, David Zhigang Pan Prasanna V.
    Srinivas
  • Department of Computer Science, UCLA
  • Magma Design Automation, Inc.
  • 2 Results Way, Cupertino, CA 95014

2
Motivation
  • Deep sub-micron net designs have higher aspect
    ratio (height /width )
  • Height is not reducing not same as width is
    reducing
  • Make a simple and accurate modeling to calculate
    noise analysis in circuit
  • Increased coupling capacitance between nets
    compared to previous process
  • Longer propagation delay or Shorter propagation
    delay
  • Increased logic errors --- Glitch Analysis

3
Motivation
  • Reduced noise margins
  • Lower supply voltages
  • Dynamic Logic
  • Lower Vt
  • Crosstalk cannot be ignored
  • It can cause low yield and low performance

4
Aggressor / Victim Network
  • Assuming idle victim net
  • Ls Interconnect length before coupling
  • Lc Interconnect length of coupling
  • Le Interconnect length after coupling
  • Aggressor has clock slew tr

5
2-p Model
  • Victim net is modeled as 2 p-RC circuits
  • Rd Victim drive resistance
  • Cx is ased to be in middle of Lc,
  • Cx is decreasing as distance is increasing

6
2-p Model Parameters
7
Analytical Solution
8
Analytical Solution part 2
  • s-domain output voltage
  • Transform function H(s)

9
Analytical Solution part 3
  • Aggressor input signal
  • Output voltage

10
Simplification of Closed Form Solution
  • Closed form solution complicated
  • Non-intuitive
  • Noise peak amplitude, noise width?
  • Dominant-pole approximation method

11
Dominant-Pole Simplification
12
Intuition of Dominant Pole Simplification
  • vout rises until tr and decays after
  • vmax evaluated at tr

13
Extension to RC Trees
  • Similar to previous model with addition of lumped
    capacitances
  • Extended to a victim net in general RC tree
    structure

14
Results
  • Average errors of 4 comparing to HSPICE in peak
    noise and noise width.
  • Devgan model 589
  • Vittal model 9
  • 95 of nets have errors less than 10

15
Spice Comparison
  • peak noise noise width

16
Effect of Aggressor Location
  • As aggressor is moved close to receiver, peak
    noise is increased

Ls varies from 0 to 1mm Lc has length of 1mm Le
varies from 1mm to 0
17
Optimization Rules
  • Rule 1
  • If RsC1 lt ReCL
  • Sizing up victim driver will reduce peak noise
  • If RsC1 gt ReCL and tr ltlt tv
  • Driver sizing will not reduce peak noise
  • Rule 2
  • Noise-sensitive victims should avoid
    near-receiver coupling

18
Optimization Rules part 2
  • Rule 3
  • Preferred position for shield insertion is near a
    noise sensitive receiver
  • Rule 4
  • Wire spacing is an effective way to reduce noise
  • Rule 5
  • Noise amplitude-width product has lower bound
  • And upper bound

19
Conclusions
  • 2-p model achieves results within 6 error of
    HSPICE simulation for crosstalk noise model.
  • Dominant node simplification gives intuition to
    important parameters
  • Design rules established to reduce noise
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com