Title: 4 Lectures on the
14 Lectures on the uropean crisis
- Lecture 3 Monetary Policies
2The philosophy of the EZ economic policy
- Independent CB with 2 inflation has its only
target (monetary policy ineffectual in the long
run) - Prohibition to use budget policy (fiscal
expansions compete with the private sector for
scarce resources) - Full employment is a national issue (total deny
that it is an international issue) - Issing
3Monetary policy the ECB and Eurosystem
- The European System of Central Banks (ESCB)
comprises - the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national
central banks (NCBs) of all 28 EU Member States. - The Eurosystem as the central banking system of
the euro area comprises - the ECB and the national central banks (NCBs) of
the 17 EU Member States whose common currency is
the euro. - The ECB has two main bodies which take all the
decisions the Governing Council, the Executive
Board, - The Governing Council of the ECB is the main
decision-making body of the Eurosystem. It
comprises all the members of the Executive Board
of the ECB, and the governors/presidents of all
the national central banks (NCBs) of the euro
area, i.e., those EU Member States that have
adopted the euro. - The Executive Board comprises the President of
the ECB, the Vice-President of the ECB, and four
other members (selected by the Heads of State on
recommendation from the EU Council).
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6Monetary policy objectives and pillars
- Two main characteristics of the ECB independence
with 2 inflation target no bail-out clause - Two pillars of the ECB monetary policy (?
determination of the interest rate) - M3 ? quantitative theory of money (less
important) - A variety of economic and financial indicators
(including indicators of the real activity,
current and expected inflation, exchange rate,
financial markets indicators, agents
expectations, labour market indicators)
7Monetary policy objectives and pillars
- It is not clear which monetary rule the ECB
adopts - Monetary targeting from MsV PYn we get
- And the rule is
- (whenever money is growing above target, the CB
increases i)
8Monetary policy monetary rules
- Taylor rule
- Inflation targeting
- (the CB changes the interest rate when expected
inflation is different from target inflation ?
the idea is that this stabilises output too) - Good criticism of IT Fontana Palacio-Vera
http//www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_430.pdf - Forward guidance
- (the CB tries to guide markets expectation about
the CB long term interest rate policy) - ECB not clear rule (but see again to next graph)
9Taylor rule? (studies suggest the ECB might have
followed the TR giving a higher weight to a
compared to the Fed). Difficulty for the ECB to
have a one fits all monetary policy
10Two aspects of the crisis banking crisis and
sovereign crisis
- The crisis has not a fiscal origin (with the
possible exception of Greece). - Once the housing bubbles exploded the crisis
became a banking crisis - Once banks were bailed out the crisis became a
sovereign crisis - The fiscal crisis magnifies the banking crisis
(given that banks own a lot of sovereign bonds). - ? doom loop between banking and sovereign crises.
- (particularly German banks were also plenty of
American toxic assets and they were bailed out by
the government). - The EZ crisis is also a balance of payment
crisis. - Can you have a BoP crisis in a CU? Yes, of course.
11The EZ crisis as a BoP crisis
- Any region, in a CU or not, can sustain a current
account deficit as long as it receives loans or
subsidies from other regions. - The EZ went through the typical pattern of a BoP
crisis (the This time is different story) - In the typical story, however, the crisis is
followed by the abandonment of pegged exchange
rates, default in the foreign obligations, IMF
intervention, austerity etc. - In the EZ we had a little of these things, but no
a Euro break up. - However, the EMU monetary arrangements prevented
the BoP crisis to explode as in a typical BoP
crisis. - When the sudden stop of capital flows took place,
a payment system called TARGET2 permitted the
repatriation of capitals, while the Eurosystem
monetary instruments permitted peripheral
countries to refill the lost reserves.
12TARGET2. What is it? (courtesy of Eladio Febrero)
- Acronym Trans European Automated Real- time
Gross settlement Express Transfer System. - TARGET2 has to be used for all payments involving
the Eurosystem. Operated by the Eurosystem. - TARGET2 mainly settles operations of monetary
policy and money market operations. - In essence, TARGET2 makes possible the transfer
of bank deposits and reserves between countries
within the Euro Zone.
13TARGET2. Implications for MP implementation
- Credits make deposits, and then, banks borrow
reserves from the central bank. The central bank
lends all demanded reserves, but it fixes the
interest rate at which it lends them.
14TARGET2. How does it work?
- When a bank deposit is transferred from Spain to
Germany, it has to be done with central bank
money. - At the end of the day, the Banco de España
acquires a liability against the Eurosystem (T2
liability) whilst it reduces the Reserve account
held by the Spanish bank. Simultaneously, the
Buba increasese the reserve account of the German
bank when it acquires a claim against the
Eurosystem.
15TARGET2. Implications for MP implementation
- After the deposit transfer, the Spanish bank does
not comply with the reserve requeriment (10
deposits). However, the German bank has excess
reserves, amounting to 9 monetary units.
16TARGET2. Implications for MP implementation
- The German bank will not lend in the interbank
money market its excess reserves at a rate below
the MLF. - The Spanish bank will not borrow in the interbank
market at an interest above the MCF. - Under normal circumstances, banks agree on an
intermediate interest rate, which is in the
middle of both facilities.
17TARGET2. Implications for MP implementation
- TARGET2 claims and liabilities (almost) cancel
each other out when the German bank lends its
excess reserves to the Spanish bank. - The Spanish bank complies with the reserve
requirement. - The interest rate that prevails at the interbank
market is that of MRO.
18TARGET2. Implications for MP implementation
- What happens when the German bank does not wish
to roll over its lending to the Spanish bank? - (Hyp the maturity of the loan granted by SPB is
longer than that of the loan granted by GPB to
SPB) - TARGET2 imbalances return, and
- The Spanish bank does not fulfil the reserve
requirement.
19TARGET2. Implications for MP implementation
- The Spanish bank needs 10 monetary units as the
reserve corresponding to its 100 m.u. of
deposits. - The demand for reserves is rather inelastic. A
deficit of reserves in Spain would lead to a
rocketing interest rate there. - If the interbank market has dried up, only the
Eurosystem can provide required reserves.
20TARGET2. Implications for MP implementation
- The Banco de España, part of the Eurosystem,
lends reserves to the Spanish banking system. It
has no other option if - NCBs have to contribute to the smooth working of
the payment system. - The interest rate has to be the same in the whole
Euro Zone. - All banks must have the same access to CB
funding. - N.B. MROs are implemented by National Central
Banks. - What happens with the excess reserve in Germany?
- The German bank can pay back prior liabilities to
the Buba. - It may try to lend them at an interest rate below
the MRO official rate, but this means that the
Eurosystem loses control of the interest rate.
21TARGET2. Some evidence.
- There is a large correlation between GIPS T2
liabilities and Germanys T2 claims. When we add
Italy to GIPS, the degree of correlation is a
little lower. This indicates financial capital
flights from the EZ periphery towards Germany.
22TARGET2. A stealth bailout?
- Hans Werner Sinn, president of the highly
influential CES Ifo, Munich based Economic
Research Institute, has pressed the alarm buttons
in the mass media, arguing that TARGET2
imbalances are a stealth bailout of the Euro Zone
(EZ) periphery by the ECB. - Sinn interprets the current crisis in the EZ as a
typical balance of payments crisis in a pegged
exchange rate system. - According to Sinn, peripheral countries (PIIGS)
are experiencing a BoP crisis (capital outflow)
and, therefore, they should adopt the usual
measures of economic policy to solve this
problem fiscal austerity cum- devaluation, with
temporary interest rate hikes. - In his view, T2 liabilities are Eurosystem loans
to the EZ periphery, providing them with some
relief in a protracted balance-of-payments
crisis.
23TARGET2. A stealth bailout? Sinn is not wrong
(although he had a number of silly considerations
aimed to depict Germany as the euro-victim)
- In a fixed exchange rate system (FERS) a country
can finance its current account deficit either by
depleting the Official Reserves or by foreign
loans. In case of sudden stops and once the OR
are depleted, it must adjust the CA by domestic
deflation and currency devaluation. - In a currency union, as seen, a country can
continue to finance a CA deficit by collecting T2
liabilities with its banks reserves re-created by
the Eurosystem. - In a FERS international payments lead to a loss
of reserves in a CU it is the same and the loss
is counted as a T2 liability (and the gain of
reserves as a T2 claim) while the lost reserves
are re-created by the ECB. - The Eurosystem has to lend reserves as the
logical consequence of fixing an interest rate
which has to be the same across the whole EZ.
Moreover, unless it lended reserves, German
investors could not repatriate their funds to
Germany. - Similarity with the currency/clearing union
proposed by Keynes in the 1940s in which the IMF
should automatically recycle the CA surpluses
that surplus countries do not want to lend.
24TARGET2. A stealth bailout? And a risk for
Germany?
- TARGET2 loans are a potential source of risk for
Germany in the case of a disorderly euro break
up. - Reserves gained in a CU are T2 claims, not
dollars or gold. Reserves lost in a CU are T2
liabilities, not dollars or gold. - TARGET2 claims yield an interest rate to the
holder, paid by the debtor to the Eurosystem
(GIIPS). And TARGET2 claims are part of the net
international investment position (financial
wealth) of a nation, like gold reserves. In the
event of a euro breakup, the Banco de España may
renege on its international debts (T2
liabilities) so that the Bundesbank will make a
capital loss. - Sinn suggests the ECB should stop lending to the
EZ periphery and cancel T2 liabilities with
marketable assetsm (gold etc).
25TARGET2. A critique.
- What are the true risks for Germany?
- In the event of a disintegration of the EZ, or if
non-performing loans increase in debtor
countries - Germany will lose the interest rate on its T2
claims (an ownership income paid by the rest of
the world). - Germany will lose part of its financial wealth
(net international investment position NIIP) if
debtor nations renege on their T2 liabilities
(i.e it is as if Germany had dropped its gold
bullion reserves into the ocean). - According to Sinn, German tax payers should pay
for the recapitalization of the Buba.
26TARGET2. A critique.
- Sinn is right when he claims that the German
economy will experience a loss, because the
income balance, in the current account balance,
will fall, due to a fall in the interest on T2
claims. And there will be a loss of financial
wealth as well. - But
- T2 claims change the composition of NIIP without
making it to rise German private banks reduce
their exposure to PIIGS banks whilst the Buba
increases its exposure to the Eurosystem (only
27). Dullien and Schieritz, 2012. - A capital loss may happen if loans are not paid
back in the EZ periphery. If the Eurosystem stops
providing liquidity, the banking systems will
collapse in the periphery and with them their
whole economies. Sinns recommendations are a
self- fulfilling prophecy. - The value of the Bubas reserves (denominated
in new Deutsche Mark, fiat money) is not backed
by its assets and the Buba can monetize as
much public spending as needed. - The real risk is that Germanys new D-mark shall
appreciate with regard to the already existing
currencies. This is a threat for an exporting
country.
27Target 2 references
- http//www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/mobu/mb201305en.pdf
(chapter on T2) - http//www.bruegel.org/nc/blog/detail/article/731-
sudden-stops-in-the euro-area - http//www.uclm.es/dep/daef/DOCUMENTOS20DE20TRAB
AJO/DT-2013/2013-220DT-DAEF.pdf - http//www.deps.unisi.it/it/ricerca/pubblicazioni-
deps/quaderni-deps/anno-2013/681the-implications-t
arget2-european-balance - http//www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/policy/Spezialt
hemen/Policy-Issues-Archive/Target.html - in particular
- http//www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/publications/do
cbase/details.html?docId19088305 - Now, back to monetary policy
28(No Transcript)
29ECB monetary policy instruments
- We focus upon
- OMO
- 1) MRO and LTRO
- 2) Structural operations ? outright purchases
- Standing facilities
- MLF and DF
- From 2008 the ECB (like the FED and BoE) widened
its balance sheet. - MRO, LTRO and Outright Purchases increased
liquidity this was used by banks to frontload
possible confidence crises (bank runs) and to
offset sudden stops and capital flows reversals.
Liquidity used to buy Gvt bonds ? diabolic doom
loop between bank and sovereign crisis (avoided
had the ECB directly/seriously sustained gvt
bonds) - Excess liquidity parked e.g in DF.
30Main monetary policy actions undertaken by the ECB
- Interest rate policy
- Fixed rate full allotment MRO and LTRO (2008)
- Covered bonds purchases (2008 and 2010)
- SMP (May 2010 and Summer 2011)
- 3y LTRO (beginning 2012)
- OMT (September 2012)
- Forward Guidance (June 2013)
- ?
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39Criticism to ECB and references
- Main criticism is the missed intervention to
sustain sovereign debt. - Bad equilibrium, absence of a sovereign CB (De
Grauwe Bindseil Wray/MMT) - LTRO ? doom loop (Bindseil)
- Monetary policy implementation references
- ECB 2011 http//www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/monetary
policy2011en.pdf?d51bad0288e53a9d35f77c3a3f6674df)
. - ECB 2012 http//www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/e
cbocp135.pdf - ECB http//www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/mobu/mb201305en.pd
f (chapter on T2) - http//www.bruegel.org/nc/blog/detail/article/731-
sudden-stops-in-the euro-area - DeGrauwe 2011 http//www.econ.kuleuven.be/ew/acade
mic/intecon/Degrauwe/PDG-papers/Discussion_papers/
Governance-fragile-eurozone_s.pdf
40In order not to be considered unfair, let me
report some opinions from an important German ECB
economist which is, de facto, very critical not
so much of the ECB (Draghi has done all he could)
but with the prohibitions the ECB meets in doing
what it should do
41Banking UnionIn June 2012, euro area leaders
affirmed, ?it is imperative to break the vicious
circle between banks and sovereigns. (IMF
2013 20).
- Banking Union in the US
- Pillars of an European BU
- SSM, SRM, SRF (self-sustaining)
- SSM ? ECB ? evaluation exercise (130 large banks)
Nov. 13 - Nov. 2014 Stress test. Problem ? lack
of a SRM and a SRF - Debate about the SRM and SRF.
- SRM (130 large banks), where to locate it?
- SRF ? single fund constituted by the banks
themselves bail-in before any bail-out role of
the ESM limited to systemic emergencies (power of
veto). The system fully operational only in 2018.
In the meantime countries must rely on bail-in,
national funds or loans from the EMS to national
governments (doom loop).
42Banking Union References
- http//www.economonitor.com/dolanecon/2013/03/22/b
ailouts-bail-ins-haircuts-and-all-that-program-not
es-for-the-cyprus-banking-drama/ - D. Gross http//www.voxeu.org/article/banking-unio
n-if-ireland-were-nevada - IMF http//www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2013/s
dn1301.pdf - Last news http//blogs.wsj.com/brussels/2013/11/15
/how-europe-plans-to-deal-with-bank-stress-test-re
sults/?modWSJBlogmodbrussels - http//www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/15/us-eu-ba
nk-backstops-idUSBRE9AE0T520131115