Title: INBU 4200 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
1INBU 4200 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
- Lecture 2
- The International Monetary System
- Foreign Exchange Regimes
2What is the International Monetary System?
- It is the overall financial environment in which
global businesses operate. - It is represented by the following 3 sub-sectors
- International Money and Capital Markets
- Banking markets
- Bond markets
- Equity markets
- Foreign Exchange Markets
- Currency markets (and foreign exchange regimes)
- Derivatives Markets
- Forwards, futures, options
3Concept of an Exchange Rate Regime
- The exchange rate regime refers to the
arrangement by which the price of countrys
currency is determined within foreign exchange
markets. - This arrangement is determined by individual
governments! - Foreign currency price is
- The foreign exchange rate (spot rate).
- Expresses the value of a countys currency as a
ratio of some other country. - Target currency (or common denominator) has
historically (since the 1940s) been the U.S.
dollar. - Look in Wall Street Journal under foreign
exchange quotes. - See Appendix 1 for a discussion of exchange rate
quotes.
4Why are Exchange Rate Regimes Important for
Global Firms?
- Exchange rate regimes will determine the pattern
and potential volatility of the movement of a
countrys exchange rate. - Exchange rate changes are important because they
- Affect the competitive position of global firms
- Especially true for exporting firms
- Affect the cost structure of global firms
- Especially true for importing firms and overseas
manufacturers - Affect the profit structure of global firms
- Overseas subsidiaries, exporters, and importers.
- In short affect the financial performance of a
global firm.
5Exchange Rate Regimes Today
- Current exchange rate regimes fall along a
spectrum as represented by a national
governments involvement in affecting (managing)
the exchange rate for their currency.
No Involvement by Government
Very Active Involvement by Government
Market forces are Determining Exchange rate
Government is Determining or Managing the
Exchange rate
6Exchange Rate Regimes Today
No Involvement by Government
Very Active Involvement by Government
Market forces are Determining Exchange rate
Government is Determining or Managing the
Exchange rate
Managed Rate (Dirty Float) Regime
Pegged Rate Regime
Floating Rate Regime
7Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes
- Floating Currency Regime
- No (or minimal) government involvement (i.e.,
intervention) in foreign exchange markets. - See Appendix 2 for a discussion of major central
bank intervention. - Market forces, i.e., demand and supply, determine
foreign exchange rates (prices). - Financial institutions (global banks, investment
firms), multinational firms, speculators (hedge
funds), exporters, importers, etc.
8Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes
- Managed Currency (dirty float) Regime
- High degree of intervention of government in
foreign exchange market. - Purpose to offset undesirable market forces
and produce desirable exchange rate. - Usually done because exchange rate is seen as
important to the national economy (e.g., export
sector or the price of critical imports).
9Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes
- Pegged Currency Regime
- Ultimate management by governments.
- Governments directly linking (pegging) their
currencys rate to another currency. - Occurs when governments are reluctant to let
market forces determine rate. - Exchange rate seen as essential to countrys
economic development and or trade relationships. - Unstable rate associated with potentially
unstable domestic financial and economic
situation. - Impact on inflation (cost of imports) or business
activity (exports) or foreign direct investment.
10Examples of Currencies by Regime
- Floating Rate Currencies
- U.S. dollar (1973), Canadian dollar (1970), Euro
(1999), British pound (1973), yen (1973),
Australian dollar (1985), New Zealand dollar
(1985), Thai baht (1997), South Korean Won
(1997), Argentina Peso (2002), Malaysian ringgit
(2005). - Managed Rate Currencies
- Singapore dollar, Egyptian pound, Israel shekel,
Indian rupee, Chinese Yuan (since July 2005) - Pegged Rate Currencies (to the U.S. dollar or
market basket) - Hong Kong dollar, since 1983 (7.8KGD 1USD),
Saudi Arabia riyal (3.75SAR 1USD), Oman rial
(0.385OMR 1USD) - Note For list of currency designations see
http//www.xe.com/symbols.htmlist
11Simplified Model of Floating Exchange Rates
(Market Determined Rates)
- The market equilibrium exchange rate at any
point in time can be represented by the point at
which the demand for and supply of a particular
foreign currency produces a market clearing
price, or - Supply (of a
certain FX) - Price
- Demand (for a
certain FX) -
- Quantity of FX
12Simplified Model Strengthening FX
- Any situation that increases the demand (d to d)
for a given currency will exert upward pressure
on that currencys exchange rate (price). - Any situation that decreases the supply (s to s)
of a given currency will exert upward pressure on
that currencys exchange rate (price). -
- s
s s - p p
- d d
d
- q q
13Simplified Model Weakening FX
- Any situation that decreases the demand (d to d)
for a given currency will exert downward pressure
on that currencys exchange rate (price). - Any situation that increases the supply (s to s)
of a given currency will exert downward pressure
on that currencys exchange rate (price). -
- s
s s - p p
- d d
d
- q q
14Factors That Affect the Equilibrium Exchange
Rate Floating Rate Regime
- Relative rates of (short-term) interest.
- Affects the demand for financial assets (high
interest rate currencies). - Carry trade strategies affect the supply of
currencies (low interest rate currencies) and the
demand for currencies (high interest rate
currencies) - Relative rates of inflation.
- Affects the demand for real (goods) and financial
assets hence the demand for and supply of
currencies - Relative economic growth rates.
- Affects longer term investment flows in real
capital assets (FDI) and financial assets (stocks
and bonds). - Relative political and economic risk.
- Markets prefer less riskier assets and less risky
countries. - Safe Haven phenomenon.
- Thailand since coup in 2006 (worse performing
stock market in Asia).
15Issues of Floating Currencies
- Presents the greatest ongoing risk for global
firms. - Why?
- Since it is difficult to predict changes in
demand and supply, it then becomes - Difficult to predict their long term trends (and
changes in trends) and shorter term movements. - What are the implications of long term trend
change for global companies? - They complicate the longer term FDI location
decision (impact on costs and revenues in home
currency). - Where should you set up your production
facilities? - International capital budgeting decision.
16Issues of Floating Currencies
- Data also show that these currencies are
potentially very volatile over the short term
(e.g., day to day basis). - These currencies are subject to large percentage
changes over the short run resulting from demand
and supply swings. - Especially now that governments are staying out
of the market. - Complicates doing business on an ongoing basis
for - Exporters, importers, global asset managers,
global commercial banks, overseas sales and
manufacturing subsidiaries. - What will be the costs and returns associated
with different markets and different investments? - Thus, global firms need to pay close attention to
their floating currency exposures and utilize
appropriate risk management tools.
17Observed Short Term Volatility of the British
Pound The last 91 days
18Managed Currencies (Dirty Float)
- Under this regime, governments manage their
currency to offset (i.e., counteract) market
forces. - They do this when market demand factors or supply
factors are seen as creating undesirable exchange
rate moves. - Exchange rate management may occur on
- a daily basis (e.g., China) or
- only when governments feel conditions warrant.
- Management involves either
- intervention action (buying or selling
currencies) or - interest rate adjustments (to make the currency
more or less attractive). - See Appendix 3 for a discussion of these two
approaches to managing a currency
19Who Manages and Why?
- Today, currency management is likely to be done
by the developing and emerging countries of the
world. - Recall, the major countries have stopped managing
their currencies. - Why do developing and emerging countries still
manage? - What is the potential issue of weak currency for
them? - Concern of the Government is that the price of
imported goods will rise may cause (or
intensify) domestic inflation. - What is the potential issue of a strong currency?
- Concern of Government is that its exports will
become too costly overseas and they may lose
overseas market share. - In addition, the slow down exports may reduce
domestic economic growth and result in higher
unemployment.
20Managed Currencies
- Over the long term, managed currencies are
somewhat risky for global firms, but not as risky
as floating currencies. - Reason since these currency moves are being
managed their trend moves are generally likely
to be more gradual than the currencies under
floating rate regimes. - However, these currencies are still subject to
trend moves and trend changes (similar to
floating rate currencies). - So, global companies need to assess currency
exposures and risk, over the intermediate term
and long term. - Trend changes will affect their FDI positions and
longer term export and import situations
21Managed Currencies
- Over the short term, these currencies are not
likely to be as volatile as floating currencies. - Reason Government management is aimed at
countering short term volatility (more so than
trends or trend changes). - Thus daily and weekly changes are not potentially
as great as with floating rate currencies. - Thus, there is some risk here, but not
potentially as great as with a floating rate
regime. - Potential issue
- If governments are managing their currencies
within ranges which markets feel are
inappropriate, these currencies may come under
attack. - Successful attacks can quickly alter a currencys
exchange rate. - Example British pound was managed in the ERM
until a speculative attack drove it out in 1992.
22Observed Short Term Volatility of the Singapore
Dollar The last 91 days
23Pegged Currency Regimes Ultimate Currency
Management
- Under a pegged currency regime, governments link
their national currency to a key international
currency (usually the U.S. dollar or some
combination of currencies). - Why do governments peg their currencies?
- A peg is seen as a necessary condition to promote
confidence in the currency and in the country and
promoting economic growth. - May encourage foreign direct investment and long
term capital inflows. - Hong Kongs rational behind its initial (1983)
peg. - Or by pegging the currency at an undervalued
currency this may support the countrys export
sector. - Chinas rational for its early peg.
- However, there are potential costs to governments
in holding a peg.
24Potential Costs to Holding a Peg
- If market forces push a pegged currency above its
peg (i.e., the currency becomes too strong or
overvalued) this happens because - The market is buying the currency, then
- Government management involves either selling the
pegged currency on foreign exchange markets
(thus, buying hard currency) or reducing domestic
interest rates. - Issues If the government sells its currency this
created to potential for expansion of its
domestic money supply and hence inflationary
pressures. - On the other hand, lowering domestic interest
rates can also stimulate domestic investment and
economic activity which may lead to inflationary
pressures.
25Potential Costs to Holding a Peg
- If market forces push a pegged currency below its
peg (i.e., the currency becomes too weak or
undervalued) this happens because - The market is selling the currency, then
- Government management involves either buying the
pegged currency on foreign exchange markets
(thus, selling hard currency or raising domestic
interest rates. - Issues Does the government want to give up its
hard currency (does it have potentially better
uses for this (e.g., buying oil or paying off
international debts) - On the other hand, raising domestic interest
rates can dampen economic activity and lead to
rising unemployment. - Note The last two slides summarize one reason
(i.e., the costs) why major central banks have
probably gotten out of the currency management
business.
26Pegged Currencies
- As long as the peg is maintained, this regime
presents the smallest risk to global firms
however there is the potential for enormous risk,
where - Governments either (1) abandon the peg for
another foreign currency regime or (2) adjust to
a new peg. - These changes occur either by
- An orderly change adopted by the government
(e.g., China). - Peg coming under successful market attack (e.g.,
Argentina). - These changes can have substantial impacts on the
financial situation (as well as the competitive
position) of a global firm when they do occur. - Especially if the firm did not take advanced
steps to protect itself. - Thus, Global firms must be on the alert for
changes - See Appendix 4 for a discussion of Chinas move
away from a peg to a managed exchange rate
regime.
27Observed Short Term Volatility of the Hong Kong
Dollar The last 91 days
28Argentina Peso Pegged Currency, 1996 to December
2001
29Argentina Abandoning the Peg Moving to a
Floating Regime Jan 2002
30Abandoning a Pegged Rate and the Currency
Weakens RISKS for Global Firms
- As noted, changes in exchange rate regimes pose
potential risks for global firms. - Using the Argentina example, discuss the
following - What do you think happened to foreign
multinationals located in and selling in
Argentina after the peso weakened? - For Example McDonalds U.S. dollar profits in
Argentina? - What do you think happened to foreign
multinationals exporting to Argentina after the
peso weakened? - For example Boeing ability to export airplanes
to Argentina?
31Abandoning a Pegged Rate and the Currency
Weakens OPPORTUNITIES for Global Firms
- However, changes in exchange rate regimes also
offer potential opportunities for global firms. - Again, using the Argentina example
- What do you think happened to foreign
multinationals importing from Argentina after the
peso weakened? - For Example Wal-Marts U.S. dollar cost
associated with importing goods from Argentina? - What do you think happened to foreign
multinationals considering expanding FDI into
Argentina after the peso weakened? - For Example The new U.S. dollar cost to Ford
Motor Company considering setting up a production
facility in Argentina?
32Web Sites for Foreign Exchange Rates
- Intra-day quotes (and charts)
- http//www.fxstreet.com/
- Historical Data (and charts)
- University of British Columbia
- http//fx.sauder.ubc.ca/
- More Historical Data
- Federal Reserve Board
- http//www.federalreserve.gov/releases/
- Daily commentary and analysis
- http//www.cnb.com/business/international/fxfiles/
fxarchive/fxarchive.asp
33Appendix 1 Quoting Currencies
- Currencies can be quoted in foreign exchange
markets in one of two ways American terms and
European terms. - The following slides provide examples of both.
34Foreign Exchange Rate Quotations
- There are two generally accepted ways of quoting
a currencys foreign exchange rate. - American terms and European Terms quotes
- American terms quote The amount of U.S. dollars
per 1 unit of a foreign currency. - For Example 1.90 per 1 British pound
- Or 1.30 per 1 European euro
- Or 0.78 per 1 Australian dollar
35Foreign Exchange Rate Quotations
- European terms quote The amount of a foreign
currency per 1 U.S. dollar - For Example 115 yen per 1 U.S. dollar
- Or 7.8 Hong Kong dollars per 1 U.S. dollar
- Or 1.54 Singapore dollars per 1 U.S. dollar
- Most of the worlds major currencies are quoted
on the basis of American terms, but the majority
of the worlds currencies are quoted on the basis
of European terms.
36Appendix 2 Intervention in Foreign Exchange
Markets
- While the worlds major central banks have
essentially gotten out of the business of foreign
exchange intervention, some developing and
emerging country central banks still do. In
addition, there is nothing preventing the worlds
major central banks from intervening if they so
desire.
37Monitoring FX Intervention
- Most major central banks provide timely
information regarding their intervention
activities in foreign exchange markets. - As on example see
- http//www.ny.frb.org/markets/foreignex.html
- This site provides a quarterly report on both the
U.S. dollar and intervention activities on behalf
of the dollar. - Go to archives, July 30, 1998 to view
intervention activity.
38Intervention by Major Central Banks
- Historically, central banks of the major
countries of the world did use intervention even
with their floating rate regimes. - However, they have done this in the past usually
only under extreme market forces circumstances. - Intervention occurred if a situation produced
exchange rate volatility which was seen as
potentially too disruptive to financial market
stability. - For example, U.S. intervened immediately after
the attempted assassination of President Reagan
on March 30, 1981. - But, interestingly enough, did NOT around the
9/11/2001 terrorist attack. - At the present time, it appears that the major
countries have gotten out of currency
intervention. - U.S. has been out of the intervention market for
a long time (only two interventions in the 1990s
last intervention in 1998) as has the U.K. - Japan recently moved away (March 2004).
39Why Have the Major Central Banks Stopped
Intervening?
- There are a couple of reasons why this is so
- (1) The record on central bank intervention with
regard to the major central banks of the world is
mixed at best. - See next two slides for intervention record since
1985. - (2) Intervention can be costly (see earlier
lectures slides on this subject). - (3) Not intervening is consistent with the
philosophy of many central bankers today that the
markets should function without government
interference or government manipulations and if
they do, the prices of currencies will be set
efficiently and correctly.
40Currency Intervention A Mixed Record
- Date Players Goal Result
- Sept 1985 U.S., U.K. Weaken
Success - Japan, France
falls 18 - Germany
within year - Feb 1987 G7 Stabilize
Failure -
falls 10 -
within year. - Sept 1992 UK Maintain
Failure -
in ERM out of ERM -
within days.
41Currency Intervention A Mixed Record
- Date Players Goal Result
- July 1995 Japan, U.S. Halt rising
Success -
drops 26 -
within a year. - June 1998 Japan, U.S. Strengthen
Success -
rises 17 -
within a year.
42Appendix 2 How Do Governments Manage their
Currencies?
- Governments (or central banks) using a managed
exchange rate regime can support their currencies
through two possible policies (1) direct
intervention and (2) interest rate adjustments.
The slides that follow discuss these. - Note that when major central banks of the world
were intervening in foreign exchange markets in
support of their currencies, they selected from
the same two policies.
43Managed Currencies Direct Intervention Policy
- Intervention policy when a currency becomes too
weak - Government will buy their currency in foreign
exchange markets - Create demand and push price up.
- Intervention policy when a currency becomes too
strong - Government will sell their currency in foreign
exchange markets - Increase supply to bring price down.
44Managed Currencies Interest Rate Adjustments
- Some countries also use interest rate adjustments
to manage their currencies. - When a currency become too weak
- Governments can raise short term interest rates
to attract short term foreign capital inflows. - Higher interest rates make investments more
attractive. - When a currency becomes too strong
- Governments can lower short term interest rates
to discourage short term foreign capital inflows. - Lower interest rates will make investments less
attactive.
45Empirical Findings on the Use of Intervention by
Emerging/Developing Countries
- Conclusion from studies Many emerging/developing
countries still intervene in foreign exchange
markets to influence currency values. - A survey of emerging/developing countries showed
that - One third intervene regularly (more than 50 of
trading days). - Most emerging/developing market central banks
felt that intervention was more effective in
influencing the foreign exchange rate over short
periods of time - 2 to three days to one week.
46Appendix 4 Chinas Old and New Exchange Rate
Regime
- On July 21, 2005, China surprised the world by
announcing that they were moving away from a peg
to the U.S. dollar. The following slides trace
the peg period, the new exchange rate regime
(which is a managed float), and the move of the
yuan since the introduction of the new currency
regime.
47Chinas Currency Regime 1978 -2005
- In late 1978, the Chinese government began moving
its economy from a centrally planned system to a
market-based system. - As part of this process, in 1994, China's central
bank pegged (i.e., linked) the Chinese currency,
the yuan (also known as the renmimbi, or
"people's money) to the U.S. dollar. - In 1994, the peg was set at 8.28 yuan to 1 U.S.
dollar.
48China Moves to a Managed Float
- July 21, 2005, the Chinese government announced
it was changing to a managed float regime with an
immediate adjustment of the rate to 8.11 yuan to
the dollar. - This represented an immediate strengthening of
the yuan, by 2.0 against the U.S. dollar. - Chinas currency regime is now a managed float
against a market basket of currencies (including
the U.S. dollar, Euro and Japanese yen although
we dont know all the currencies and their
weights). - Chinese Government now manages the yuan within a
daily trading range of 0.03 against this basket. - The 0.03 range is established each trading day
based on the previous close. - Thus, the yuan is now allowed to gradually move
in relation to market forces.
49Chinese Yuan Has Appreciated Since Moving to a
Managed Float