RADIOSONDE TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, AND PRESSURE RESPONSE AT LOW TEMPERATURES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

RADIOSONDE TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, AND PRESSURE RESPONSE AT LOW TEMPERATURES

Description:

RADIOSONDE TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, AND PRESSURE RESPONSE AT LOW TEMPERATURES Stephen R. Hudson, Michael S. Town, Von P. Walden, and Stephen G. Warren – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Stephen904
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RADIOSONDE TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, AND PRESSURE RESPONSE AT LOW TEMPERATURES


1
RADIOSONDE TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, AND
PRESSURERESPONSE AT LOW TEMPERATURES
  • Stephen R. Hudson, Michael S. Town,
  • Von P. Walden, and Stephen G. Warren
  • 24 June 2003

2
Introduction
  • Vaisala RS80 and AIR 4A and 5A radiosondes were
    tested during summer and winter at South Pole.
  • Their response to sudden, large changes in
    temperature and humidity was characterized.
  • Some data were collected with the RS80s to
    characterize their response to smaller, more
    gradual changes in temperature, humidity and
    pressure.

3
Large, Sudden Changes
  • Moved sondes from inside to outside and recorded
    response of reported temperature (T), humidity
    (RH) and pressure (P).
  • Usually building was heated, with an indoor T of
    5 to 25C.
  • A couple tests were done with an unheated
    building, with indoor T between 43 and 56C.
  • Outside T ranged from -24 to 71C.
  • Range of T differences was 11 to 94 K.

4
RS80 Temperature Response
5
RS80 Temperature Response
  • Reported temperature responded with a simple
  • exponential decay.

Minimum 2.6 s
Median 5.4 s
Mean 5.9 s
Maximum 10.9 s
  • Exponential-decay time
  • constants ranged from 2.6
  • to 10.9 seconds, with a
  • mean of 5.9 seconds.
  • There was no apparent difference in the
  • character or time of the response between
  • summer and winter.

6
RS80 Humidity Response
7
RS80 Humidity Response
  • When moved outside, reported RH initially
    decreased, then
  • increased with an exponential decay towards
    the outside value.
  • The exponential decay began between 5 and 120
    seconds after
  • being moved outside.
  • E-folding time constants were between 13 and 420
    seconds.
  • Response was significantly slower in winter
    (Tlt-40C) than in
  • summer (T near 25C).
  • Response in unheated winter cases (DT 17 K)
    was similar to
  • winter cases using a heated building.

Summer Winter Unheated winter
of Tests 5 24 2
Outside T (C) -24 to -25 -45 to -71 -60
t1 (sec) 5-30 (30) 5-120 (33) 60-90
t (sec) 13-20 (15) 30-420 (146) 50-120
8
RS80 Pressure Response
9
RS80 Pressure Response
  • When moved outside, the sonde initially reported
    increasing P,
  • followed by a slow exponential decay back to
    the correct P.
  • Reported P increased by 0.4 to 10.0 mb over a
    period of 175 to
  • 450 seconds.
  • E-folding time constants were between 230 and
    600 seconds.
  • Magnitude of maximum error increased with
    increasing thermal
  • shock.

Summer Winter Unheated Winter
of Tests 1 24 2
Outside T (C) -25 -45 to -71 -60
t1 (sec) 450 175 to 450 (300) 275 to 400
dP (mb) 3.3 3.5 to 10.0 (6.0) 0.4 to 1.6
t (sec) N/A 230 to 600 (380) N/A, 1500 to recover
10
Small, Gradual Changes
  • After equilibrating to conditions outside, sonde
    was raised and lowered on a 22 m tower at speeds
    of 0.4 to 1.0 ms-1.
  • At the top of the tower, the temperature was 3
    to 5 K warmer, the relative humidity was 3 to 5
    higher, and the pressure was about 2 mb lower
    than at the surface.

11
Tower Tests
  • Pressure responded to within the noise level by
    the time descent was completed. Change (about
    2.2 mb) is approximately correct, according to
    hypsometric eqn.
  • Temperature responded fully within 8 to 15
    seconds of completion of descent.
  • Relative Humidity took 15 to 20 seconds after
    descent to fully equilibrate. The sonde was able
    to correctly report the supersaturation with
    respect to ice.

12
Conclusions
  • Radiosondes should be stored and prepared at
    ambient temperatures
  • If sondes must be prepared inside, they should be
    given at least 30 minutes to equilibrate to cold
    environments before launching
  • Problems can arise even from small temperature
    differences, so unheated buildings should be
    avoided unless well ventilated

13
Conclusions (continued)
  • Tests on the tower indicate that the sondes are
    capable of providing better data in cold
    conditions when given time to equilibrate to
    shock of being moved outside
  • Further work should be done in more controlled
    environments, and with proper ventilation
  • Radiosonde instrumentation still remains sluggish
    at low temperatures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com