Title: ADMINISTERING
1ADMINISTERING
2- These problemsfiscal imbalance, traffic
congestion, air pollution, the movement of jobs
away from minority groupsare susceptible to
rather precise formulation and study alternative
ways of coping with them can be conceived and
evaluated with a certain rigor the obstacles to
remedial action are primarily political (and to a
certain degree economic)what is most important,
something can be done. - -- James Q. Wilson (1970)
3After all
- How many homebuyers would be interested in cheap
houses without roads, water, sewers, schools,
parks and other urban amenities?
4What is growth management?
- Growth management is about affordable housingbut
it is also about environmental protection,
efficient provision of infrastructure,
coordinated patterns of land use and
transportation, adequate revenues to finance
development needs, and healthy preservation of
open space. - It is about doing each of the above in accordance
with goals that the public has chosen. - Close and well coordinated actions between land
use control (and planning) and capital
investment. - Distinguished from more traditional plans by
their intent and scope rather than by the
implementing techniques they use.
Ultimately, growth management is about regulating
the Amount, timing, location, character of
development
5Waves of growth management
- concern over how much growth would be allowed,
- where and when growth would be permitted, and who
would pay for it, - what kind of growth is allowed or encouraged.
6 Growth ManagementApproaches Levels
- Regulations
- Incentives
- Spending
- Information/education
- Federal
- State
- Regional
- Municipal
7Issues?
- Is growth management all motherhood and apple
pie? - Together, identify at least three instances in
which there may be negative consequences of
growth management programs.
8Costs of Growth Management
- Housing affordability
- Inflation?
- Artificial constriction of supply
- Other?
- Open space
- Diversion to other areas
- Exclusion of certain populations
- Other?
9Montgomery County, MD Motivation
- Desire for Adequate Public Facilities
- Limited Public Resources
- Congestion
- Balance Jobs Houses
- Focus Development Around Transit
- Constrain Growth in Corridor
- Later - Support Affordable Housing
10The Complexity of the Problem
- Infrastructure capacity absorption depends on
underlying technology and a developments - location,
- timing,
- density, and
- character
- Infrastructure serves multiple uses and users
- Multi-dimensional bundle of attributes
- A flow not a stock
- May have a capacity or a standard
11Planning Process
- Monitoring should be linked to
- Master plans
- Capital Improvement Programs
- Financing System
- Development Regulation
12Decision Frameworks
- Proactive vs. Reactive
- Categories vs. Continuum
- Single vs. Multi-Dimensional
- Incremental vs. Comprehensive
- Coordinated vs. Fragmented
13Map
14Historical Overview
- 1974 APFO, Report recommending Staging Policy
For Each Area - 1970s Series of Policy Reports
- 1980 Comprehensive Staging Plan ltfailedgt
- 1981-6 Comprehensive Planning Policies (Planning
Board) - 1986 Interim Growth Plan
- 1987-Present Annual Growth Policy (Planning
Board County Council) - 1997 Alternative Review Procedures
15Carrying Capacity Model
16Externality Theory
- An externality is a commodity bundle that is
supplied by an economic agent to another economic
agent in the absence of any related economic
transaction between the two agents. (Spulber). - Arise from lack of property rights.
- May be positive or negative. Positive include
consumption externalities and network
externalities. Negative include congestion,
pollution, accidents, etc. - First Best Solution Internalize Externality
Polluter Pays Principle. - Transactions costs may make internalization
difficult.
17Desired Outcomes of the Transportation System
18Measures of Effectiveness (MOE)
- Second-Best Solution Regulate Developer
- Infrastructure Has Multiple Attributes - A Doctor
Looks at More Than Temperature, Planners Should
Consider More Than Capacity - The Right MOEs Vary Based on Facility Being
Analyzed, - MOEs Should Consider Not Only Current Status of
System, but also Its Direction of Change.
19Attributes of Good MOEs
- Complete
- Aggregates Well
- Aligns with User Experience
- Measurable
- Predictable
- Useful in Regulatory Context
20Criteria for Selecting MOE
- It aids in identifying opportunities to increase
the systemwide net benefits through public
investment in improvements or changes in
management, - It minimizes the cost to achieve necessary
measurement accuracy, and - It produces the right incentives.
21Data Sources and Collection
- Supply Data
- Measured - Engineering Cost Study
- Predicted - Statistical Cost Study (Many
Projects) - Demand Data
- Measured - Operating Agency Utilization Data
- Predicted - Statistical Forecasts
22Setting Staging Ceilings
23Financing Alternatives
- Developer Funded Roads
- Trip Mitigation
- Impact Fees or Taxes
- Development Districts
- Development Approval Payment
24Model of Transportation and Land Use
25Second Best Development Regulation
- Minimizes the Cost of
- Prevention
- (Build) The cost of infrastructure required to
maintain the performance indicators (Engineering
or Statistical), or - (Manage) The cost of demand and supply management
to maintain the performance measures. - Damage
- (Accept) The cost to the community of worsening
the performance indicators in the absence of the
infrastructure.
26Lessons Learned
- Dividing Responsibility
- Categorizing the Continuous
- Single Dimensional Standards
- Measures of Effectiveness
- Rational Planning
- Bringing Distant Dangers Near
27Summary
- Externalities Provides Underlying Rationale for
Development Regulation - Unfortunately, First Best Solution (PMC) is
Not Always Feasible - Regulating Supply is a Second Best Solution
- Multiple Measures of Effectiveness are Required
to Understand Impact of Development on Capacity
Utilization
28Conclusions
- Select Measures of Effectiveness
- Collect and Forecast Data
- Establish Standards (Absolute or Relative)
- Open System to Peer Review and Public Scrutiny
- Answer Not Whether Development, But How
- Implement Monitoring System in Regulation
29Problems inherent to Talk of growth management
- Excessive talk about height, bulk, scale, or
volume-to-capacity ratios. Rather than experience
or quality of life. - Tend to talk in terms of incomes, mixing incomes,
and bringing more of "that" income into my
neighborhood. In turn we talk less of where the
school teacher is going to live? - We tend to talk in terms of regulationforcing
people to do things. Rather, can we not make
and do the right thing at the same time? - We tend to focus on the supply of public services
for me and my community. This in turn steers
conversations away from the supply of public
services for a more common good
30MOE for Transportation Consumers Surplus
31- Low density zoning
- Building permit caps
- UGBs
- APFO
- moratoria
Land use controls
Slower growth
Shift toward Single-family
Fewer rentals
Lower rental affordability
Racial exclusion
32Action taken Effect
Restrict/limit allowable uses Slows pace of development and diverts
Specify certain size restrictions Increase cost, make exclusionary
Restrict rate of development Diverts to other areas
One community adopts, another does not Inconsistency b/w jurisdictions
Regional growth management Spreads development outfurther dispersion
33What is land use planning?
- public sector planning for privately owned land
and privately managed land markets. The
preparation of plans for cities, city fringes,
and rural areas that indicate the future
development pattern of those areas. - also included is the development and management
of legal mechanisms such as zoning regulations,
subdivision controls, and differential tax
programs to induce and facilitate private land
owners to bring about the land use pattern
broadly outlined in the land use plans. (Harvey
Jacobs 89)