Frontogenesis Forcing and Banded Precipitation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Frontogenesis Forcing and Banded Precipitation

Description:

Title: Mesoscale Organization of Wintertime Precipitation Author: pbanacos Last modified by: PBANACOS Created Date: 9/20/2001 12:02:09 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: pba82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Frontogenesis Forcing and Banded Precipitation


1
Frontogenesis Forcingand Banded Precipitation
  • Peter Banacos
  • NOAA/NWS/NCEP/SPC
  • WDTB Winter Weather Workshop
  • 09 October 2002

2
Presentation Outline
  • Ingredients based methodology for winter
    precipitation
  • Elements of frontogenesis
  • Favorable synoptic patterns
  • Case study examples / inferring frontogenesis
  • Summary

3
Ingredients Based Forecasting
Purpose to focus the forecaster on the necessary
conditions (ingredients) needed for a specific
meteorological event to take place.
4
Making Forecast Assessments
  • Diagnose three ingredients first
  • Moisture sufficiency, potential for evaporation
    in boundary layer, dry slots.
  • Thermal Stratification precipitation type,
    melting/evaporative cooling/other diabatic
    effects.
  • Lift examine forcing for assent.
  • Lastly, assess microphysical aspects and
    instability for possible enhancement to
    precipitation rate

5
5 Lift Mechanisms Commonly Assessed for Winter
Precip.
  • Traditional,large-scale QG forcing (temperature
    advection / isentropic lift, differential
    vorticity advection) precipitation trends often
    mesoscale
  • Convective mechanisms lake-effect or snow
    squalls in cold advection regimes, elevated
    instability
  • Orographic lift requires knowledge and
    familiarity of local terrain influences
  • Jet Streaks/coupled jets cellular mesoscale
    areas of assent
  • Frontogenesis forcing linear/mesoscale areas of
    assent
  • ? Frontogenesis Forcing is the focus of this
    talk.

6
Frontogenesis (definition)
  • The 2-D frontogenesis function (F) quantifies
    the change in (potential) horizontal temperature
    gradient following air parcel motion
  • Fgt0 frontogenesis, Flt0 frontolysis
  • Conceptually, the local change in horizontal
    temperature gradient near an existing front,
    baroclinic zone, or feature as it moves.

7
Kinematics of Frontogenesis
  • Examine separate contributions of
  • horizontal divergence, deformation,
  • and vorticity to the field of
  • frontogenesis.

8
Horizontal Divergence
  • Divergence (Convergence) acts frontolytically
    (frontogenetically), always, irrespective of
    isotherm orientation.

Flt0
Fgt0
9
Horizontal Deformation
Fgt0
  • Flow fields involving deformation acting
    frontogenetically are prominent in many cases.

10
Horizontal Deformation (cont.)
Flt0
Need to consider orientation of isotherms
relative to axis of dilatation.
11
Horizontal Vorticity
F0
  • Acts to rotate isotherms, cannot tighten or
  • weaken them.

12
Other Contributing Factors to Frontogenesis
  • The kinematic field, and deformation in
    particular, plays an important role in
    frontogenesis.
  • Other processes such as diabatic heating and
    tilting effects may also contribute in an
    important way to frontogenesis.
  • Examples differential solar heating
  • Latent heating with convective motions
    (documented in coastal frontogenesis process).

13
Dynamics of Frontogenesis (vertical circulation)
Flow field dominated by deformation.
14
Dynamics of Frontogenesis (cont.)
Ageostrophic circulation develops as a response
to increasing temperature gradient.
15
Dynamics of Frontogenesis (cont.)
When we talk about frontogenesis forcing, its
the resulting ageostrophic circulation we are
most interested in for precipitation forecasting.
16
Use of Frontogenesis in Forecasting
  • Presence of F in 800-600mb layer can help
    diagnose and predict areas of heavy banded
    precipitation.
  • Fgt0 contributes toward symmetric instability
    (SI), but heavy precipitation can occur without
    the presence of SI.
  • F DOES NOT require a strong surface cyclone, only
    a baroclinic zone (this fact can lull the
    forecaster into neglecting heavy snow potential
    (see Moore and Blakley, 1988). This is also why F
    rarely plays an important role as a forcing
    mechanism in the warm season.

17
Frontogenesis and Symmetric Instability
18
Common Synoptic Patterns
  • Generally, look for situations leading to a
    strong baroclinic zone in the low to middle
    troposphere.
  • Although F can manifest itself in many ways,
    there are a few common synoptic patterns that
    occur relatively frequently.

19
NE of Weak Surface Cyclonewith Southward Moving
Cold Front
  • This synoptic pattern is examined in detail in
    case 1.

20
NW of Strong Cyclonewrap around precipitation
21
NW of Strong Cyclone 1/6/02
22
North of Strong E-W Frontal Zone
23
North of Strong E-W Frontal Zone3/13/02
24
Example Case of Frontogenesis and Banded
Precipitation
  • Date 15 October 2001 (Case 1)
  • Narrow band (1-2 counties wide) of moderate to
    heavy rainfall from eastern KS to central IL.
  • Associated with weak surface features but a
    moderately strong baroclinic zone and
    frontogenesis forcing.

25
700mb 00z 15 OCT 01
26
Surface 15 OCT 2001
12z
00z
27
925mb 12z 15 OCT 01
Large-scale deformation field - eastern
KS/western MO
28
18z 15 OCT 01
18z mosaic base reflectivity and surface
observations
18z 600mb Frontogenesis
29
  • Rainfall rates between 0.10 and 0.25 occurred
    for a 6 hour period from 15-20z.
  • Moderate to heavy precipitation can persist
    longer (12 hours) with slower moving systems or
    mature extratropical cyclones.

30
Topeka, KS 12z 15 OCT 01
31
700mb Frontogenesis / Base Reflectivity
0 hr ETA 12z
6 hr ETA 18z
1150z
1805z
  • Organization of precipitation increases as F
    orientation becomes aligned with lower levels.

32
Sloped Continuity of F
6hr ETA forecast valid 18z 15 OCT 01
600mb
700mb
850mb
  • Presence of parallel axes of positive
    frontogenesis sloping upward toward colder air is
    a common aspect of heavy banded precipitation
    areas.

33
Sloped Continuity of Frontogenesis Forcing (cont.)
  • The previous two slides have several important
    implications
  • Several levels should be assessed for spatial
    continuity and orientation of F, to see if
    banding is likely to occur at a given time.
  • Vertical averaging should probably be avoided.
  • The sloped continuity tells us something about
    the structure of the wind field we can use to
    infer frontogenesis from single sounding
    (observed or model derived), VAD, or wind
    profiler data, and large-scale flow fields.

34
Role of Deep-Layer Shear Profile
Nature of environmental wind profile may be
conducive to seeder-feeder mechanism and rapid
precipitation generation / elongation of bands
during initial development phase.
35
Role of Deep-Layer Shear (cont.)
Martin (1998)
  • Note banding orientation (parallel to isotherms).

36
Case 2 9 NOV 00
Montgomery Co. ?
INX 0903Z
Unlike Case 1, this case shows narrow multiple
banded precipitation. Lower stability likely
played a role.
37
9 NOV 00 CASE
  • A stripe of snow in se KS on Nov 9th with
    accumulations of 6-12" in
  • 3 hours. The stripe was oriented n-s and was
    about 4 miles wide between
  • the two 6" contours. We had one place that got 2
    inches and about 2 to 3
  • miles away they got 9-12 inches. We didnt even
    know it occurred until I
  • placed about 30 phone calls into that county from
    the rural directory
  • telephone book. The 00z ETA had the 20C 500 temp
    bullseye to the
  • south over se Oklahoma. But the 12z raobs
    verified it much further north
  • at SGF. Looks like the inversion was around 700mb
    with neutral lapse
  • rate at SGF above 700. I have a feeling the snow
    was convective. The
  • snow fell from 8-11z right as the 700-500mb
    trough was moving through
  • that area. One guy told me it was the biggest
    snow in over 20 years. The
  • area only covered about 10 of Montgomery
    county!
  • - Forecaster, WFO ICT

38
00z 9 NOV 2000 Intense Baroclinic Zone
Surface
925mb
39
00z 9 NOV 2000
700mb
850mb
40
700-500mb Lapse Rates
SGF 12z 11/09/00
TOP 12z 10/15/01
7.8 C/km
4.5 C/km
Near neutral or unstable lapse rates (with
respect to a moist adiabat) implies sharp/narrow,
stronger, and multiple banded precipitation
organization. Resulted in 2-3/hr snowfall rates
on Nov 9, 2000.
41
Modulation of Band Intensity by Instability for a
constant value of F
As gravitational or symmetric stability
decreases, the horizontal scale of the band
decreases while the intensity of the band
increases. Multiple bands become established in
an unstable regime.
42
Case 3 00z 25 Feb 01
Deformation zones associated with strong cyclones
43
Unidirectional Shear Profile
ABR 00z
BIS 00z
H7-H5 lapse rate 6.4 C/km
H7-H5 lapse rate 4.5 C/km
44
ABR VAD WIND PROFILE
45
Upper-Air 00z 25 FEB 2001
500 mb
700 mb
46
Upper-Air 12z 25 FEB 2001
700 mb
500 mb
47
INL 12z 25 FEB 01
48
Anticipation of Banded Precip
ALB 1/7/02 0242Z
leads to more accurate prediction of heavy
precipitation.
KALB 070451Z 35007KT 1/4SM SN FZFG OVC008
M01/M01 A2952 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 1/2 SLP998 SNINCR
4/011 P0020 T10061006 400391011 RVRNO
49
SUMMARY
  • When applied within the context of ingredients
    based forecasting, frontogenesis is useful for
    assessing potential for banded winter
    precipitation, which is generally a good
    candidate for SPC mesoscale discussions.
  • Doesnt require a strong cyclone, only a strong
    baroclinic zone, often developed through
    horizontal deformation and associated largely w/
    unidirectional vertical shear in the low to mid
    levels.
  • Sloped continuity in time and space of F leads
    most directly to strong banded precipitation.
  • Examine lapse rates in precipitation generating
    layer to assess modulating role of instability
    (upright/symmetric).

50
References
Bosart, L. F., 1981 The Presidents Day
snowstorm of 18-19 February 1979 A
subsynoptic-scale event. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109,
1542-1566. Keyser D., M. J. Reeder, and R. J.
Reed, 1988 A generalization of Petterssens
frontogenesis function and its relation to the
forcing of vertical motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116,
762-780. Martin, J. E., 1998 The structure and
evolution of a continental winter cyclone. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 126, 329-348. Moore, J. T., and P. D.
Blakley, 1988 The role of frontogenesis forcing
and conditional symmetric instability in the
Midwest snowstorm of 30-31 January 1982. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 116, 2155- 2171. Sanders, 1986
Frontogenesis and symmetric stability in a major
New England snowstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev.,
114,1847-1862. Schultz D. M., 2001 Reexamining
the cold conveyor belt. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129,
2205-2225. Schultz D. M., and P. N. Schumacher,
1999 The use and misuse of conditional symmetric
instability. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127,
2709-2732. Steigerwaldt, H., 1986 Deformation
zones and heavy precipitation. NOAA Technical
Memorandum, NWS CR-83. 15pp.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com