Title: Chapter Eleven: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics Review
1Chapter ElevenAnimal Rights andEnvironmental
Ethics Review
- Applying Ethics A Text with Readings (10th ed.)
- Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry
- Cengage Learning/Wadsworth
2What are traditional approaches to animal rights?
- Judeo-Christian tradition
- Animals put here for our purposes
- Some exceptions St. Francis of Assisi
- Philosophical tradition (Descartes, Kant)
- Traditionally excludes nonhuman animals from
rights of persons - We have no moral obligations to animals
- Social contract theory
- Agreement among persons
- Excludes rights for animals
3What are contemporary approaches to animal
rights?
- What is the utilitarian approach? (Singer)
- As animals feel pleasure and pain, just as human
animals, we have moral obligations to them - We should maximize pleasure and minimize pain for
all animals, both human and nonhuman - What is the Kantian approach? (Regan)
- Rejects utilitarianism
- Nonhuman animals should be treated with respect
and dignity, just like human animals
4What is speciecism?
- What is Speciesism?
- a prejudice or attitude of bias toward interests
of ones own species and against those of other
species - What is the conventional view?
- morality is dependent on persons and social
contract among them - What is criticism of the conventional view?
- all animals have inherent value, even if they are
not moral agents
5What are major environmental problems today?
- Ozone depletion
- Global warming
- Acid rain
- Trash
- Extinction of species
6What is anthropocentrism?
- Approaching all environmental issues solely in
terms of how they impact persons - Human actions are right (or wrong) by
- Consequences to human well-being (utilitarian)
- Consistent with norms protecting human rights
(Kantian) - Responsibilities with regard to natural
ecosystems, but only as they further realization
of human values and/or human rights - No obligation to promote or protect good of
nonhuman living things
7What is the difference between holistic and
individualistic environmental ethics?
- Holistic (Leopold) The good of the biotic
community as a whole is the morally fundamental
good - Individualistic (Taylor) The good of the
individuals in the biotic community is the
morally fundamental good (including both humans
and nonhuman life)
8All Animals are Equal . . . Or why Supporters of
Liberation for Blacks and women should Support
Animal Liberation Too Peter Singer
- Why is speciesism wrong?
- for the same reasons sexism and racism are wrong
- What is the principle of equal consideration?
- the pain that nonhuman animals feel is of equal
moral importance to the pain that humans feel - What does utilitarianism show?
- shows that we owe moral obligations to nonhuman
animals
9The Case for Animal RightsTom Regan
- Why does he reject utilitarianism for animal
rights? - How does he support rights for nonhuman animals?
- Using Kantian respect for nonhuman animals
10Do Animals Have Rights?Carl Cohen
- How does he argue that animals cannot possess
rights? - Only humans are moral agents with rights
- Challenges Regans Kantian analysis attributing
rights to animals - Is the use of animals in medical research
justifiable? - What obligations do we have to animals, even
though animals do not have rights?
11The Ethics of Respect for NaturePaul W. Taylor
- What is his approach to environmental ethics?
- Individualist (not holistic)
- What is the principal concern of individualists?
- Individual organisms, not biotic community as a
whole - What is his life-centered system?
- Kant-like respect for all of nature
- All living things have inherent worth