Title: Testing survey resolution using
1 2 Testing survey resolution using Spectral
Analysis Authors Markham, S.L., Kivior, I.,
Vaughan, F.V., Yates, S. and Barnden S. EAGE
Workshop on The Future of Non-Seismic
Methods 12-15 October 2008, Manama, Bahrain
3 Table of Contents
Introduction Theoretical Models One layer Two
layer Case Study Central San Luis Basin MWT
examples Conclusions
4 Theoretical Models One and Two Layers One
Layer 50x50m, 100x100m and 500x500m grid
spacing Two Layers 100x100m, 200x200m and
500x500m grid spacing
5 One layer model Basement
6 Profile view of one layer model
7Simple one layer model Basement at 1km and 5km
8 MWT plots for 50x50m grid
Manual Multi-Window Test Grid Resolution 50x50m
Source Depth 1km
10
30
50
70
90
0
500
Depth m
1000
Window Size
1500
9 MWT plot for 50x50m grid, source depth 5km
5000m
10Simple one layer model Basement at 1km and 5km
11 MWT plots for 500x500m grid, source depth 1km
1000m
12 MWT plot for 500x500m grid, source depth 5km
5000m
13Two layer model Sedimentary layer
14 Profile view of 2 layer model
15Two layer model 100x100m grid, source depths 1
2km
1000m
2000m
16Two layer model 100x100m grid, source depths 4
5km
4000m
5000m
17Two layer model 200x200m grid, source depths 1
2km
1000m
2000m
18Two layer model 200x200m grid, source depths 4
5km
4000m
5000m
19 Two layer model 500x500m grid, source depths 1
2km
1000m
2000m
20 Two layer model 500x500m grid, source depths 1
2km
1000m
2000m
21 Two layer model 500x500m grid, source depths 4
5km
4000m
5000m
22 Case study using survey acquired on behalf of
USGS in Central San Luis Basin, Colorado, U.S.A.
23 Central San Luis Basin survey (USGS) Examples
using the 200m line spacing dataset (40x40m
grid) Traverse lines removed to simulate 400m
line spacing (80x80m grid) 800m line spacing
(160x160m grid) 2000m line spacing (400x400m
grid)
24Location of test area
25Location of MWT profile and manual stations
1
2
3
4
26MWT Auto-ESA (40x40m)
27MWT Depth vs. Window Size at 4 points along
profile (40x40m)
2
1
3
4
28MWT Example of spectrum at 417000mE (2)
29MWT Auto-ESA (80x80m)
30MWT Depth vs. Window Size at 4 points along
profile (80x80m)
1
2
4
3
31MWT Auto-ESA (160x160m)
32MWT Depth vs. Window Size at 4 points along
profile (160x160m)
1
2
4
3
33MWT Auto-ESA (400x400m)
34MWT Depth vs. Window Size at 4 points along
profile (400x400m)
1
2
3
4
35Cross-section derived from Seismic data
36 Examples of manual MWT at well locations in
Middle East
37MWT example at well location 1
38Spectrum example at well location 1
39MWT example at well location 2
40Spectrum example at well location 2
41Conclusions
- The resolution of the survey data has significant
impact on ability to accurately define depths
using spectral analysis - High resolution surveys with line spacings of 200
and 400m are needed to image subtle
intersedimentary horizons - Widely spaced surveys of 1600 and 2000m are
unlikely to resolve shallow features
42References
- Bankey, V., Grauch, V., J., S., Webbers, A., and
PRJ, Inc. (2005). Open File Report 2005-1200,
USGS - Kivior, I., Boyd, D., Shi, Z. and McClay, K., R.,
1993, Exploration Geophysics, 24, 603-608. - Spector, A. and Grant, F., 1970, Geophysics, 35,
293-302. - Yates, S., Kivior, I., Damte, S., Markham, S., L.
and Vaughan, F., 2008, in press.
43Acknowledgements
The data used for this study was made available
for research purposes by the USGS.
The data used for this study was made available
for research purposes by the USGS.