Title: Institutional Aggression
1Institutional Aggression
2Importation model of Institutional Aggression
- At the end of this session, you will be able to
- Describe the importation model of institutional
aggression relating to prison violence - Use other theories as evaluation
- Describe evidence relating to the models
- Discuss limitations of these models
3The Importation Model
The notorious British Prisoner, Charles Bronson
(Michael Gordon Peterson), who has spent 35 years
in prison, 28 of these in solitary confinement,
after taking at least 50 prisoners and guards
hostage, starting numerous riots, arson attacks,
roof top protests and causing over 500,000
damage. He was convicted of armed robbery in
1974. He got away with 27. he has been dubbed
Britains most dangerous criminal
- Violence is not a product of the institution
- Inmates have certain predispositions for violence
- These personal characteristics are imported into
the prison - Violence is a product of the individual
characteristics of the inmates
4The Deprivation Model
A Solitary confinement cell at Abu Ghraib
detention centre, Iraq
- Imprisonment deprives inmates of freedoms,
normal relationships, comfort, privacy, control
etc. - This deprivation causes stress and frustration
- Frustration leads to violence towards other
inmates and staff
5The Managerial Model
- The decisions made by prison managers can affect
aggression in prisons - Inappropriate security measures, improper
classification of prisoner, poor training and
poor professionalism can increase the number of
assaults in prisons
Prison Guards tackle perceived prisoner
indiscipline during the Stanford Prison
Experiment (Zimbardo, 1973)
6Evidence Supporting the Importation Model
- Many of the inmates behaviour are due to the
cultural and personal characteristics brought in
by the prisoners on arrival (Irwin and Cressey,
1962) - The researchers suggest that younger inmates are
more likely to be aggressive - They suggest that people from impoverished
backgrounds will be more aggressive - They suggest that people from different ethnic
background will display differing degrees of
aggression, but this may be due to being from
different socio-economic backgrounds
7More Evidence Supporting the Importation Model
- Keller and Wang (2005) reported that prison
violence occurs in prisons which hold the most
troublesome inmates - Facilities which holding maximum-security inmates
had higher levels of assault on staff by inmates
than those in lower-security facilities.
Maximum-security prisoners are, by definition,
considered violently dangerous, so the prisoners
already have a pre-disposition to aggressive
behaviour before they arrive - Earlier research from 4 different types of
juvenile institutions found that
pre-institutional violence was the best predictor
for inmate aggression, regardless of the specific
features of the institution. (Poole and Regoli,
1983)
8Statistics
- Many critics point to prisons statistics to
support the argument that aggression is imported
into prisons - 26 of men and 19 of women are in prison because
of violence against the person, so nearly a
quarter of prisoners have a history of aggressive
behaviour. - 41 of men and 30 of women were excluded from
school, suggesting pre-existing behavioural
issues as children.
9Limitations of the Importation Model
- This model suggests no practical application on
how to manage violent offenders or how to reduce
prison violence in general. (Mc Corkle et al.,
1995) - A study on 800 violent gang members showed that
they were no more or less likely to be violent
once inside prison (DeLisi et al., 2004)
10Comparisons
- The importation model suggests that the issue is
with the prisoner. How does this differ from the
deprivation and managerial models? - Supporters of the deprivation and managerial
models would suggest that the situation needs to
change, where as the importation model suggests
that the institution needs to change is
aggression is to be controlled
11Implications and Applications
- Implications Some critics suggest that the
importation model is a negative approach, in that
very little can be done unless the prisoner
characteristics are changed. - Applications The theory will lead to greater
focus on the individual, maybe trying to change
his/her behaviour through training or medication,
although the risk is that this leads to abuse
towards prisoners, and a negative attitude
towards prisoners, perpetuating the violence
12IDA
- Point This theory is socially sensitive
- Explain It has a negative view on prisoners,
which can lead to labelling people as a certain
type. - So what?
- What do you think are the consequences of this
type of labelling could be, both in and out of
the prison setting?