Institutional Aggression - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Institutional Aggression

Description:

... increase the number of assaults in prisons Prison Guards tackle perceived prisoner indiscipline during the Stanford Prison ... issues as children ... gang members ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: stude2321
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Institutional Aggression


1
Institutional Aggression
  • Prisons

2
Importation model of Institutional Aggression
  • At the end of this session, you will be able to
  • Describe the importation model of institutional
    aggression relating to prison violence
  • Use other theories as evaluation
  • Describe evidence relating to the models
  • Discuss limitations of these models

3
The Importation Model
The notorious British Prisoner, Charles Bronson
(Michael Gordon Peterson), who has spent 35 years
in prison, 28 of these in solitary confinement,
after taking at least 50 prisoners and guards
hostage, starting numerous riots, arson attacks,
roof top protests and causing over 500,000
damage. He was convicted of armed robbery in
1974. He got away with 27. he has been dubbed
Britains most dangerous criminal
  • Violence is not a product of the institution
  • Inmates have certain predispositions for violence
  • These personal characteristics are imported into
    the prison
  • Violence is a product of the individual
    characteristics of the inmates

4
The Deprivation Model
A Solitary confinement cell at Abu Ghraib
detention centre, Iraq
  • Imprisonment deprives inmates of freedoms,
    normal relationships, comfort, privacy, control
    etc.
  • This deprivation causes stress and frustration
  • Frustration leads to violence towards other
    inmates and staff

5
The Managerial Model
  • The decisions made by prison managers can affect
    aggression in prisons
  • Inappropriate security measures, improper
    classification of prisoner, poor training and
    poor professionalism can increase the number of
    assaults in prisons

Prison Guards tackle perceived prisoner
indiscipline during the Stanford Prison
Experiment (Zimbardo, 1973)
6
Evidence Supporting the Importation Model
  • Many of the inmates behaviour are due to the
    cultural and personal characteristics brought in
    by the prisoners on arrival (Irwin and Cressey,
    1962)
  • The researchers suggest that younger inmates are
    more likely to be aggressive
  • They suggest that people from impoverished
    backgrounds will be more aggressive
  • They suggest that people from different ethnic
    background will display differing degrees of
    aggression, but this may be due to being from
    different socio-economic backgrounds

7
More Evidence Supporting the Importation Model
  • Keller and Wang (2005) reported that prison
    violence occurs in prisons which hold the most
    troublesome inmates
  • Facilities which holding maximum-security inmates
    had higher levels of assault on staff by inmates
    than those in lower-security facilities.
    Maximum-security prisoners are, by definition,
    considered violently dangerous, so the prisoners
    already have a pre-disposition to aggressive
    behaviour before they arrive
  • Earlier research from 4 different types of
    juvenile institutions found that
    pre-institutional violence was the best predictor
    for inmate aggression, regardless of the specific
    features of the institution. (Poole and Regoli,
    1983)

8
Statistics
  • Many critics point to prisons statistics to
    support the argument that aggression is imported
    into prisons
  • 26 of men and 19 of women are in prison because
    of violence against the person, so nearly a
    quarter of prisoners have a history of aggressive
    behaviour.
  • 41 of men and 30 of women were excluded from
    school, suggesting pre-existing behavioural
    issues as children.

9
Limitations of the Importation Model
  • This model suggests no practical application on
    how to manage violent offenders or how to reduce
    prison violence in general. (Mc Corkle et al.,
    1995)
  • A study on 800 violent gang members showed that
    they were no more or less likely to be violent
    once inside prison (DeLisi et al., 2004)

10
Comparisons
  • The importation model suggests that the issue is
    with the prisoner. How does this differ from the
    deprivation and managerial models?
  • Supporters of the deprivation and managerial
    models would suggest that the situation needs to
    change, where as the importation model suggests
    that the institution needs to change is
    aggression is to be controlled

11
Implications and Applications
  • Implications Some critics suggest that the
    importation model is a negative approach, in that
    very little can be done unless the prisoner
    characteristics are changed.
  • Applications The theory will lead to greater
    focus on the individual, maybe trying to change
    his/her behaviour through training or medication,
    although the risk is that this leads to abuse
    towards prisoners, and a negative attitude
    towards prisoners, perpetuating the violence

12
IDA
  • Point This theory is socially sensitive
  • Explain It has a negative view on prisoners,
    which can lead to labelling people as a certain
    type.
  • So what?
  • What do you think are the consequences of this
    type of labelling could be, both in and out of
    the prison setting?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com