The assessment of working memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The assessment of working memory

Description:

The assessment of working memory in rodents Dr. Paul Dudchenko University of Stirling United Kingdom – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: pad106
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The assessment of working memory


1
The assessment of working memory in rodents
Dr. Paul Dudchenko University of Stirling United
Kingdom
2
outline
  • how is working memory defined?
  • how is working memory measured in the rodent?
  • neural substrates of working memory

3
How is working memory defined?
Baddeley and Hitch (1974) Working memory is
comprised of a visual-spatial sketchpad, an
episodic buffer, a phonological loop, all of
which are controlled by a central executive.
(humans)
Honig (1978) Working memory is a representation
of a cue over a delay period in which the cue is
not present, to be subsequently used to respond.
(pigeons)
Olton, Becker, and Handelman (1979) Spatial
working memory, but not reference memory,
depends on the hippocampus. (rats)
Goldman-Rakic (1980s Fuster, Kubota 1970s)
Working memory operationalised as the on-line
representation of a stimulus over a delay period
in the pre-frontal cortex. (monkeys)
Dudchenko (2004) Working memory is a short term
memory for an object, stimulus, or location that
is used within a testing session, but not
typically between sessions. (rats)
4
(No Transcript)
5
outline
  • what is working memory?
  • how is working memory measured in the rodent?
  • neural substrates of working memory

6
  • all spatial working memory tasks
  • all depend on the hippocampus/medial temporal
    cortex

From Hagan and Jones (2005) Predicting drug
efficacy for cognitive deficits in
schizophrenia Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(4)
830-853
7
How long after the determining stimulus can an
animal wait and still react correctly? (pg. 2)
1913
8
Hunter observed delay-dependent memory.
Rats could remember which light had been
illuminated after a delay of up to 10s.
Hunter (1913)
However The rat, when put into the release box
during the delayed reaction, oriented immediately
to the light with its entire body, and began a
series of attacks on that side of the box in
an effort to get out. (pg. 41)
9
Mediating behaviours during the delay between
the to-be-remembered stimulus and the response
has also been observed in operant delayed
non-matching to position tasks (Dudchenko
Sarter (1992) Chudasama Muir (1997)).
sample
delay
choice
  • So, one of the intrinsic challenges in
    developing valid rodent
  • memory tasks is ensuring that delays cant be
    bridged by a
  • behavioral response.

10
A simple way of testing short-term memory is the
delayed alternation task on a T-maze.
11
(No Transcript)
12
Performance on the T-maze is delay-dependent
number of correct responses
chance
memory delay
13
Working memory on the radial arm maze Olton and
Samuelson (1976)
Bolhuis et al (1996)
From Neuroscience exploring the brain, Bear,
Connors, Pardiso (2001)
14
outline
  • what is working memory?
  • how is working memory measured in the rodent?
  • neural substrates of working memory

15
Brain circuits implicated in neurocognitive
deficits in schizophrenia
Prefrontal Cortex
Amygdala
Striatum? VP
Temporal Cortex
BFCS
Midbrain DA neurons
Raphe 5HT neurons
slide from Dr. Holly Moore
16
(No Transcript)
17
A spatial span memory task
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Odor span memory in rodents is excellent, but
may not require the hippocampus.
  • The hippocampus is required for remembering the
    order in which odors are presented
  • (Fortin et al. 2002).
  • Humans with hippocampus damage are impaired on
    an odor span task (Levy et al.
  • 2006).

22
Odor span neural substrates
  • Removal of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons
    impairs performance on this task (Turchi
  • and Sarter, 2000).
  • Removal of cholinergic inputs to the entorhinal
    cortex does not impair memory for familiar
  • odors, but does impair memory for new ones
    (McGaughy et al. , 2005).
  • Mice without a7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
    are impaired on the odor span task
  • (Young et al. 2007).
  • Nicotine improves odor span memory scopolamine
    and mecamylamine impair it
  • (Young et al. 2006 Rushforth et al. , 2010).
  • Odor span also impaired in mice that
    over-express ß-amyloid (Young et al. 2009).

23
Neurons in the hippocampus fire with respect to
the rats future destination.
no reward
reward
no reward
reward
Ainge et al. (2007) Journal of Neuroscience
24
goal 2
goal 3
goal 4
goal 1
25
if food is found on every maze arm (so no memory
is required)
place cells no longer encode different maze arms
26
summary
  • notions of working memory have developed
    independently
  • in the human and non-human literatures
  • in rodents, working memory has been
    operationalized a
  • delay-dependent, short-term memory for a
    location, object,
  • or stimulus
  • in rodents, spatial working memory requires the
    temporal
  • cortex and hippocampus, and neurons in the
    hippocampus fire
  • with respect to future goal locations
  • as such, rodent spatial working memory tasks may
    reflect
  • the episodic buffer portion of Baddeleys
    human working memory
  • model

27
(No Transcript)
28
Differential activity was also seen before the
second choice point
29
B)
A)
first run
start box
goal box
second run
Dennis (1939)
Ladieu (1944)
30
Cue
6
No cue
5
Average Number Correct
4
chance
3
2
0 s
10 s
1 min
2 min
5 min
10 min
Memory Delay
31
(No Transcript)
32
sample
choice
Ennaceur Delacour (1988)
33
sample
delay (0-6 sec)
choice
34
Control
Hippocampus lesion
35
An olfactory span memory task
36
Distribution of correct choices on the odor span
task with 12 odors
100
80
60
correct
40
20
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
number of odors to remember (span)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Modified T-maze spatial alternation task
Do place cells that fire on the central stem of
the T-maze differentiate between left-turn and
right-turn trials?
Wood, Dudchenko, Robitsek, Eichenbaum
(2000) Neuron, 27 623-633
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com