Behavioral Interpretation of Memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 78
About This Presentation
Title:

Behavioral Interpretation of Memory

Description:

Title: Behavioral Interpretation of Memory Author: Eb & Amy Blakely Last modified by: Eb Blakely Created Date: 3/14/2003 12:12:29 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 79
Provided by: Eb61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Behavioral Interpretation of Memory


1
Conditioning novel block design construction
2
Conditioning Novel Behavior in Porpoises
3
Behavioral Interpretation of Memory
  • David C. Palmer

4
Experimental analysis vs. Interpretation
  • Experimental analysis
  • Manipulation of independent variables and study
    effect on DV
  • Interpretation
  • Explaining a phenomenon using known principles
  • Helpful in complex arrangements that may be
    impossible to analyze

5
Memory?
  • Storage metaphor
  • Traditional theories of memory appeal to
    experiences stored in memory banks, etc.
  • Then, we recall a memory by retrieving the
    experience from our memory
  • Memories are sometimes stored as copies

6
Memory?
  • Behavioral view
  • Memory is a behavioral phenomenon
  • Memories are stimulus control relations that
    survive across time
  • For example, child learns to name pencil is
    then able to name it the next day
  • Forgetting therefore is the weakening of a
    behavioral relation over time

7
Memory?
  • Another angle The behavior of remembering
    may also be a result of problem solving
  • Problem
  • Responses are in the repertoire
  • SDs are present that signal reinforcement is
    forthcoming and EO is present
  • The response is not under direct control of
    current stimuli

8
Memory?
  • Example What did you have for breakfast
    yesterday?
  • Pancakes is in the repertoire as a tact
  • Reinforcement is scheduled for the answer
  • But, pancakes has not been conditioned
    directly to What did you have for breakfast
    yesterday not an intraverbal
  • To emit the response, two elements must obtain
    1) Person must get supplementary stimuli to evoke
    response, and 2) must recognize it as correct

9
Memory?
  • Exploratory VB self probes
  • What did I do yesterday? Hmm got up, took a
    shower, and then oh yes, I made some cereal
  • Conditioned seeing
  • Assume that perceptual behavior (seeing) is
    conditioned as we emit it and can be evoked by
    accompanying stimuli
  • That is, we may see ourselves coming out of the
    shower, going to the kitchen, and getting the
    cereal

10
Memory?
  • Conditioned seeing (contd)
  • Note that conditioned seeing is evoked by current
    stimuli that may be associated with the seeing
    Now what did I do this AM ?Wesee the kitchen
    and some of the stimuli that were present
  • How do we recognize that it is correct?
  • We may respond to its strength I am sure that
    I had cereal
  • The conditioned seeing may evoke other vivid
    conditioned seeing that is strong to confirm

11
Memory?
  • Main point to remember is to provide
    supplementary stimuli to yourself using
    exploratory VB and conditioned seeing

12
End
13
Comps (Faux)
14
  • You are discussing a case with a VE teacher who
    is taking her first course in the ABA sequence at
    FIT. The issue at hand is a kids tantrums. The
    teacher explains the tantrums in the following
    way He is having these tantrums because of
    frustration.
  • What kind of faulty explanation is this?
  • Please describe the feedback that you would
    provide to her.

15
You decide to work on the case described above.
The descriptive analysis information suggests
that the tantrums occur because in the past, such
behavior has been followed by attention. Design
an FA that would test this hypothesis.
16
Critique the followingThe data shows that the
behavior has improved quite dramatically.
17
  • You have a client who is taking Valium for
    anxiety. The mother has decided that the drug
    causes too much sedation, and immediately
    terminates the drug administration.
  • What are the main effects of drug?
  • Withdrawal syndrome?
  • Possible risk events?
  • How does Valium work?

18
Uh Oh
  • Personality trait
  • I wanna be sedated
  • ½ life of drug
  • DOE
  • FCN
  • Extinction
  • COD
  • Self control (Lab)
  • Conc superstition
  • RTE
  • Spontaneous recovery
  • Functional equivalence
  • Operant
  • Most to least
  • Memory
  • EO
  • Conditioned seeing
  • Problem
  • Emotion
  • Meaning
  • Anxiety
  • Self control (Skinner)
  • Rate
  • Epigentics
  • Punctuated equilibrium
  • Pairwise FA
  • Diphtheria
  • 3 levels of selection

19
Behaviorists Think That We Dont Have Emotion!
Bad Behaviorists!
20
End of Faux Comps 1
21
Comps (Faux) 2
22
Behaviorists Dont Deal with Thinking!
23
  • You are working with a teacher who is teaching
    the letters of the alphabet. She is using cards
    with the letter and a picture of an item that if
    spelled out, would start with the letter in
    question. For example, the A card has an
    apple on it, the B card has a bat on it, etc.
    The kids are responding well to each card. The
    teacher asks you one day Hey I wonder if the
    kids are attending to the letter or the picture
    of each card?
  • First, explain to her what attention means.
  • Then, design an experiment that will answer her
    question.
  • Finally, what EAB study provides the basis for
    your experiment?

24
Behaviorists Dont Consider Feelings!
25
  • You are working with a 40 year old male who
    exhibits aggression and property destruction.
    There is a behavior program in place to address
    the behaviors, and there is a full complement of
    medications. One of the meds is Risperdol.
  • What class is the drug?
  • You are discussing the med with staff, and wish
    to alert them about possible side effects. What
    are these?
  • What NT is involved?

26
  • You design a Tx package that involves a DRI
    schedule in which attention is delivered for
    staying on task for a period of time (e.g., 5
    minutes).
  • How is the DRI interval set?
  • Set up an experiment that would show the Tx is
    effective
  • Set up an experiment that disentangles the
    attention from the contingency between staying on
    task and attention

27
Uh Oh
  • Emotional operations
  • Taste aversion
  • AO
  • Tact private events
  • Inductive reasoning
  • Values
  • Correlational study
  • 4 humours
  • Measure following directions
  • Positive contrast
  • IRT
  • Constructional approach
  • Resp extinction
  • Time delay prompt fading
  • PR 50
  • Reversal design
  • Projection
  • Formal probe
  • Dependent variable
  • Verbal summator
  • Punishment contrast
  • Conditioned suppression
  • Creativity source
  • Projective tests
  • Operant seeing
  • Wit
  • Exact count IOA
  • Behavior momentum

28
End Faux Comps 2
29
Comps (Faux) 3
30
IOA vs Accuracy
31
Critique the following The criteria for the
experiment was changed, and it was modified by
the experimenter.
32
Elements of program organized by function
33
Critique the following The experimenter
re-designed the study quickly, and then began
anew.
34
Case 1 There is a case on which you are
consulting. The client is a 25 year old female
who frequently throws items in the house. The
have been many functional analyses of the
behavior over the years, but there are no
conclusive results. However, one hypothesis is
that the behavior produces automatic
reinforcement in the form of the sight/sound of
the item hitting the floor. Design an FA to test
this hypothesis. Do not try and separate the
effects of the sight vs the sound of the item
hitting the floor. Only test whether or not that
event, the sight/sound of the item hitting the
floor, is maintaining the behavior.
35
Explanations You are working on a case with
another graduate student in ABA. A particularly
difficult situation is being discussed, and the
behavior involves some elopement. Your friend
explains the behavior with statements such as
this She is running away to get some PVC pipes
that her neighbor has in his garage. Critique
this explanation of behavior, and offer an
alternative explanation.
36
Critique the following The data were graphed by
the behavior analyst very precisely.
37
Factors that influence RTE
38
Yikes
  • Rights
  • Reinforcement trap
  • Brief FA
  • Drug as AO
  • Behavioral view of drug abuse
  • Conc FR 50 VI 1
  • Pairwise FA
  • Resurgence
  • 3 characteristics of graphed data
  • Relationship
  • Multiple probe
  • Endorphin theory of SIB
  • Siegel morphine tolerance
  • We feel free when
  • Pattern in FR 50
  • FI 1
  • Holz Azrin view of pun
  • Conditioned suppression
  • Hold responsible
  • Drug as EO
  • 3 levels of selection
  • When we give credit
  • 4 facts about drugs
  • Draw negative contrast
  • Im in need of some restraint
  • Mean count per interval IOA
  • Drug as a positive reinf

39
The End
40
Comps (Faux) 4
41
Case 1 You are working in a vocational training
center with several staff who are charged with
implementing a behavior program. You are
interested in treatment fidelity (or integrity).
You have a procedure that you think will improve
fidelity that involves feedback and incentives.
Design an experiment that will test the efficacy
of the treatment on Tx fidelity.
42
Real life respondent conditioning Diagram an
example of respondent conditioning using the
relevant terms.
43
Why do people get depressed?
44
Case 2 There is a case on which you are
consulting. The client is a 25 year old female
who frequently throws items in the house. The
have been many functional analyses of the
behavior over the years, but there are no
conclusive results. However, one hypothesis is
that the behavior produces automatic
reinforcement in the form of the sight/sound of
the item hitting the floor. Design an FA to test
this hypothesis. Do not try and separate the
effects of the sight vs the sound of the item
hitting the floor. Only test whether or not that
event, the sight/sound of the item hitting the
floor, is maintaining the behavior.
45
Behavior analysts dont believe in freedom
46
I knew this would happen
  • Intrinsic motivation
  • Anger
  • Repression
  • Encourage maintenance
  • Back chaining
  • MSWO
  • PSI
  • Momentary DRO
  • Interdependent group
  • DRL x 2
  • Reactivity
  • Systematic replication
  • Trigger analysis
  • Nominal fallacy
  • Divided attention
  • NCR mechanism of effect
  • Diff between neg pun ext
  • Diff between EO and SD
  • 2 repertoires in problem
  • Program generalization
  • DRH x 2
  • Concept formation
  • Adjusting ratio
  • Escape/avoid hierarchy
  • 3 characteristics of behavior
  • Sequence analysis
  • Independent group
  • Behavioral analyst
  • SDP
  • Reification

47
Design a reinforcer assessment of attention from
parent
48
  • One of the key concepts in behavior analysis is
    the operant. Do the following
  • Give an example of an operant using all 4 terms.
  • Give an example of a given response that belongs
    to more than one operant.

49
Sensory defensiveness
50
Behavior analysts deny the existence of the
mind
51
Behavior analysts cant explain creative
achievements
52
The End
53
Comps (Faux) 5
54
You are collecting rate data on a problem
behavior (e.g., aggression), and a 2nd observer
is also collecting data. Demonstrate (draw the
bins, etc) the mean count-per-interval method to
compute the IOA. You dont have to use a large
number of intervals, as 5 will suffice.
55
You are in a discussion of reinforcement. The
discussant informs you that the use of artificial
reinforcers is ill-advised. Indeed, he argues
that reinforcers devalue intrinsic motivation.
Your response to this is
56
Behaviorists are all wrong. Their data and
procedures are based on studying rats and
pigeons, for goodness sake!
57
Mand training Therapist holds up a food item and
asks What do you want?
58
Ready, set, go
  • Mix FR 50 FI 2
  • Pyramid model of training
  • Staff training Procedures
  • Counter control
  • 2 targets of monitoring
  • How to get maintenance
  • VT
  • Between subject yoking
  • Reflexivity
  • Metaphor
  • Stimulus generalization
  • Simultaneous prompts
  • Shadowing
  • Schedule induced behavior
  • Ratio strain
  • Relationship
  • Coercion
  • Tan FT 3 DRO 1
  • Celeration
  • Latency
  • Competency based training
  • Within subject yoking
  • Transitivity
  • Task interspersal
  • Superstitious behavior
  • Spatial fading
  • Delayed prompts
  • Lab example of self control
  • Response differentiation
  • Modeling

59
The End
60
Comps (Faux) 6
61
Social Validity
62
Group contingencies
63
Ready, set, go
  • Chain FR 50 FR 100
  • Agonist
  • General case analysis
  • MDRO
  • DRH x2
  • Direct instruction
  • Contingent effort
  • Informed consent
  • Fair pair
  • Celeration computation
  • PIR IOA
  • Permanent product
  • Analysis vs interpretation
  • Conditioned seeing
  • Incidental teaching
  • Atypical anti-pychotics
  • W/D from alcohol
  • Pattern of FI
  • Teach point to A vs B errorlessly
  • Differential reinforcement
  • Behavioral momentum
  • Functional goals
  • WIR
  • Response class co-variation
  • Intermingle of contingencies of reinf and
    survival
  • Operant seeing

64
Treatment of self stimulatory behavior
65
Behavioral interpretation of memory
66
Assessment of high intensity problem behavior
67
(No Transcript)
68
(No Transcript)
69
Techniques of governmental control
70
The End
71
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • Advantages of VB
  • Extends senses of listener
  • Extends action possibilities of speaker

72
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • A full account of VB must include covert verbal
    behavior
  • Covert VB is involved in problem solving,
    thinking, etc.
  • Why is VB sometimes covert?
  • May avoid punishment
  • Less effort
  • Controlling variables may be weak

73
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • Thinking
  • Is behavior!
  • Can be overt or covert
  • Involves speaking and listening by the same
    person
  • Is behavior that produces its own reinforcement

74
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • Example
  • Someone tells you that your client is having some
    major tantrums. You observe the tantrums and
    engage in some thinking.

75
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • Visualize the tantrums, the antecedents, and
    consequences that you just saw.
  • Tacts of what you are seeing hmm, the kid was
    in taskand the therapist put him in timeout

76
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • Intraverbals arise from tacts Now if he is in
    timeout, maybe that is reinforcing tantrums
  • The intraverbals evoke visualizations of previous
    cases of tantrums in task in which escape
    extinction was used

77
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • You ask yourself out loud Hey, is there any
    other evidence of tantrums that escape tasks with
    this kid?
  • You respond with Yep, I saw a couple in his
    classroom
  • These behaviors end with These tantrums produce
    escape!

78
Chapter 19 Thinking
  • Main point Thinking is behavior and has NO
    special properties that set it apart from other
    behavior.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com