Debate V: Cross-examination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Debate V: Cross-examination

Description:

Assertions or unstated premises that are false or without common presumption. Logical fallacies (of form or relevance). Inadmissible or insufficient evidence. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Dori174
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Debate V: Cross-examination


1
Debate V Cross-examination
  • Doris L. W. Chang

2
Outline (Johnston 92-98 99-126)
  • Refutation Review
  • The Purpose of Cross-examination
  • The Goals of Cross-examination
  • Guidelines for the Cross-examiner
  • Guidelines for the Cross-examinee
  • Using the Results of Cross-examination
  • Planning Organizing Strategy
  • Samples
  • Practice Time

3
Refutation Review
  • What is Refutation?
  • Issues for Refutation
  • How to Organize Your Refutation

4
What Is Refutation?
  • Refutation means using argumentation to show
    that the opposing position cannot be established
    (Johnston 92).

5
Issues for Refutation
  1. Refute those contentions which are basic to our
    opponents case
  2. Refute those contentions which your opponent
    spends much time trying to establish.
  3. Refute those contentions your opponent claims are
    major issues.

6
Refute Contentions Basic to Opponents Case
  • Aff.
  • Refute arguments that may damage your prima
    facie case? predict how the neg. will challenge
    your position on stock issues.
  • Neg.
  • Refute the stock issues that form the aff. Prima
    facie case. ?predict the aff. position on the
    stock issues

7
Refute Key Contentions/Issues
  1. Challenge the relevance of the contention to the
    debate proposition.
  2. Challenge the evidence or argument that supports
    the contention

8
Organize the Refutation
  • Briefly state the position you intend to refute/
  • State the nature of the problem in your
    opponents case.
  • Present your reasoning/evidence to support your
    refutation.
  • Show the effect of your refutation on your
    opponents case (or on your case.)

9
The Nature of the Problem in Your Opponents Case
  • Failing to address an important issue.
  • Unsupported assertion which is false, or at least
    lacks common presumption.
  • Argumentation containing a logical fallacy
  • Conclusion not following from premises
  • Conclusion irrelevant to premises
  • In-admissible evidence, evidence irrelevant to or
    insufficient to establish conclusion
  • A position that cant be discussed for its
    supported only by a vague or unverifiable
    statement.

10
The Purpose of Cross-examination
  1. To discover information to be used as a basis of
    your refutation in a later speech
  2. To discover information to be used as a basis of
    argumentation for your own contentions.

11
The Goals of Cross-examination
  1. To explore, clarify, and better understand your
    opponents assertions, arguments, or position on
    stock issues. To seek out or confirm items (1-6).
  2. To expose items above by asking questions
    according to a prepared strategy or refutation
    model.
  3. To expose irrelevant issues so as to narrow the
    debate and focus on key issues.
  4. To get your opponent to admit or concede points
    to be used to support or strengthen your own
    arguments.

12
Items 1-6
  • Any weakness of the opponents case regarding
    stock issues or issues you raised.
  • Assertions or unstated premises that are false or
    without common presumption.
  • Logical fallacies (of form or relevance).
  • Inadmissible or insufficient evidence.
  • Un-resolvable vagueness and ambiguity
  • Avoid distorting opponents assertion and
    attacking a straw man.

13
6 Guidelines for Cross-examiner
  • Control your time by asking questions requiring a
    simple YES/NO answer.
  • Politely interrupt when your opponent
  • Tries to say more than is needed to answer Q
  • Isnt answer the Qs you asked
  • Starts speaking without being asked a Q
  • Starts to argue or give reasons for his answer

14
6 Guidelines for Cross-examiner
  • 3. Ask Questions, dont present arguments.
  • If the opp. provides absurd or obviously false
    answers or refuses to admit a position, the
    x-exam. is successful. Just remind the judges in
    a later speech.
  • Dont explain the results of your questioning
    during the x-exam. time, explain and draw
    conclusions in a later speech

15
6 Guidelines for Cross-examiner
  • 4. You must allow your opponent to answer your
    question.
  • You may ask Qs that require a YES/NO answer
  • You may not insist on a YES/NO answer if it
    distorts your opponents position.
  • Avoid complex Q fallacies that distort their
    position.
  • 5. Be polite and gentle.
  • 6.Be sincere and fairavoid using sophisticated
    strategems to trick them into saying what they
    dont really mean.

16
4 Guidelines for Cross-examinees
  1. You must answer all Qs honestly and without
    wasting time.
  2. You may qualify your answergive direct and
    honest answers that express your position, but
    you dont need to accept your opponents
    conditions if they distort your position.
  3. You may not consult other team members.
  4. You may ask the x-examiner to clarify/explain the
    meaning of a question which you honestly dont
    understand.

17
5 Guidelines to Use X-exam. Results
  • Use the most effective x-exam. results in later
    speeches for better refutation.
  • Use the weaknesses in your opponents case that
    were exposed in x-exam. to refute their position
    on stock issues.
  • When your opp. responds to your x-exam. results,
    use their responses for future x-exam. or
    refutation.

18
5 Guidelines to Use X-exam. Results
  • Prepare and organize your case as a team so as to
    use each others x-exam. results in later
    speeches.
  • A good, organized x-exam./refutation strategy
    begins in x-exam. and ends in the final speech.
  • 5. Follow guidelines 1-4 for organizing your
    refutation.

19
8 Steps to Plan X-exmination
  • Make a list of arguments your opponent may
    present to
  • support his position on each of the stock issues
  • attack your position
  • Analyze the arguments. Find
  • Ambiguities
  • Unsupported assertions
  • Unstated premises
  • Incorrect evidences
  • Logical fallacies

20
8 Steps to Plan X-exmination
  • 3. Decide whether to use x-examination as a
    starting point of refutation or just rely on your
    speeches.
  • 4. Plan your line of Qs (write the 1st Q) to
    force your opponent to take a definite position
    that you can refute.
  • 5. Follow your opponent around with Qs until he
    has no place to go except taking a definite
    position.

21
8 Steps to Plan X-exmination
  • 6.Do your homework to predict your opponents
    possible answers and position
  • prepare a refutation argument no matter what
    position your opponent takes
  • 7. Plan to continue x-exam. to expose your
    opponents fallacy,
  • or end your x-exam. on that issue and complete
    refutation in a later speech, after your opponent
    is forced to take a definite position
  • 8.Be patient and dont give up.

22
Reference
  • Johnston, Greg. The Logic and Language of
    English Debate A Practical Guide for Chinese
    Students of EFL. Taipei Bookman, 1994.

23
Have Fun Debating!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com