Animating Explosions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Animating Explosions

Description:

Animating Explosions Abhinav Golas Akram Khan Under the guidance of Prof. Kalra & Prof. Kumar Outline The problem How we ve split the problem Current progress Some ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: CGM79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Animating Explosions


1
Animating Explosions
  • Abhinav Golas
  • Akram Khan
  • Under the guidance of Prof. Kalra Prof. Kumar

2
Outline
  • The problem
  • How weve split the problem
  • Current progress
  • Some comparison

3
The problem
  • Animating explosions Navier Stokes
  • Modeling the pressure wave
  • Issues
  • Large quantities
  • Large spatial temporal derivatives
  • Inherent shocks (speed of sound)
  • Large bulk transfer

4
How weve split the problem
  • Abhinav
  • Navier Stokes modeling
  • Focus on seeing impact of viscosity on simulation
    in different media
  • Models for different solver components applying
    known methods for incompressible flows to problem
  • Akram
  • Euler equation modeling inviscid Navier Stokes
  • Mostly first derivatives scope for linear
    algebra based solvers
  • Focus will be on modeling as sparse linear systems

5
Current Progress
  • Our implementation
  • Ready
  • Some methods for larger timestep simulation ready
  • Original paper implementation (Animating
    Explosions Yngve et al, SIGGRAPH 2000)
  • 2D version ready some parameter tuning required
  • Rendering
  • Renderman based particle systems renderer
  • Uses order of 100000 particles

6
Some comparison
  • Original implementation
  • 0.1 ms timestep for simple blast case
  • Our implementation
  • 1 ms timestep for simple blast case using
    multistep advection
  • 5 ms timestep for same case also done.

7
Modifications made
  • Staggered grid (vs. centralized grid)
  • Better accuracy of spatial derivatives
  • Semi-lagrangian based multi-step advecton(vs.
    donor acceptor method)
  • Much more stable guarantee of outputltinput
    (but slight dissipation)
  • Allows for larger timesteps
  • Step 1ms 5ms
  • Frame at 15ms

8
Future work
  • Complete comparison with earlier implementation
  • Improve methods to allow larger timesteps
  • Improve rendering
  • Experiment with ENO methods (CFD)
  • Develop solid interaction and fracturing models

9
Thanks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com