Title: Economics Workshop
1Economics Workshop Better Regulation Executive
2006
s.kapur_at_bbk.ac.uk
2WORKSHOP AIMS
- To provide rigorous but non-mathematical
training in economics, enabling BRE staff to - develop a simple but reliable toolkit for
economic analysis - practise its application using concrete
regulatory problems - explore the application of simple economic theory
to their own work
3Objectives Day 1
- To understand
- how markets work, and their efficiency
- why markets sometimes fail to be efficient and
how various regulatory instruments can improve
efficiency - how regulation can improve on other aspects of
market outcomes, such as inequity - how, in practice, regulatory interventions carry
the risk of government failure
4Objectives Day 2
- To
- review the standard rationale for regulation
- the basics of regulatory impact assessment
- understand how good regulatory design can cope
with risk and uncertainty, informational
imperfections, and minimise distortion of
incentives - rationale for and implementation of RPI-X
regulation - the link between regulation and productivity
growth
5Introduction to EconomicsSome Concepts and Tools
6Markets vs. Command
- The central questions given existing resources
- what goods and service to produce?
- how to produce?
- for whom?
- Alternative mechanisms
- COMMAND ECONOMY direct control, as in Soviet
economy, or firms internal decisions - FREE MARKET ECONOMY
- outcome determined by private transactions in
markets, based on prices, incomes, wealth
7Degree of government intervention differs..
Hong Kong
- China - Denmark - UK - USA -
Cuba
- Most countries have mixed economies with both
- markets, which are regulated to different extent
- public production and provision
8Scale of government
Spending as share of national income ()
1880 1930 1960 2004
Japan 11 19 18 37
USA 8 10 28 36
UK 10 24 32 43
Germany 10 31 32 47
France 15 19 35 53
Sweden 6 8 31 57
9The policy question
- Markets are generally considered to be efficient
- If so, why not leave things to the market?
- Governments care about both equity and efficiency
- Free markets rarely deliver equitable outcomes,
so some redistributive intervention is
unavoidable - Free markets do not always lead to efficient
outcomes, so some interventions are motivated by
efficiency considerations - To understand this, we must look at how markets
work
10(No Transcript)
11How Markets WorkDemand, Supply, and Price
Adjustment
12 Market
- MARKET
- any arrangement in which prices adjust to
reconcile buyers and sellers intentions - DEMANDquantity buyers wish to buy at each price
- SUPPLYquantity producers wish to sell at each
price - EQUILIBRIUM PRICEthe price at which market
clears (i.e. quantity demanded quantity
supplied)
13Price Adjustment
Supply curve
price
Equilibrium Price
Demand curve
Equilibrium Quantity
quantity
PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Equilibrium price clears market
14Suppose government sets minimum price above
market clearing price
Price
Supply curve
Controlled price
Equilibrium price
Demand curve
- Examples include
- Minimum wages
- Rent control
- Common Agricultural Policy
Quantity
excesssupply
15What does price controls do?
- Price controls interfere with the adjustment
process - minimum wages are good for equity they boost the
income of some low-skill workers - But such interventions may not be good for
efficiency if employers are unwilling to hire as
many at regulated minimum wage, some potential
workers are deprived of the chance to work
16Economic Efficiency
- An intervention is said to improve efficiency if
it makes someone better off and nobody worse off - Economic efficiency an outcome where no one can
be made better off without hurting someone else - The key question do free, unregulated markets
always lead to efficient outcomes?
17Markets and Choice
- In markets
- consumers buy up to the point the marginal
benefit equals price - competitive firms sell as long as price covers
marginal cost of production (this is the
opportunity cost of producing another unit of the
good)
18The Efficiency of Markets
- Thus, in competitive markets
- prices align marginal benefit with marginal cost
- all possible gainful exchanges are carried out
- PUNCH LINE Free, unregulated markets lead to
efficient outcomesThis is the so-called
Invisible Hand Theorem
19But free markets are not always efficient..
- Market failure a circumstance in which free
markets fails to achieve an efficient outcome - Many interventions are designed to correct market
failures, and thus to increase efficiency
20In sum why intervene?
- Economic regulation
- Aims to correct market failures, and make the
market outcome more efficient - (when the invisible hand does not work, the
government can provide a helping hand) - Social regulation
- To prevent undesirable social outcomes inherent
in market outcomes
21Group Work Efficiency and Equity
- Government intervention in the economy is
pervasive. For each intervention listed below
identify the possible rationale. Is it primarily - efficiency considerations?
- equity consideration?
- something else?
- Income tax
- Taxation of petrol
- Regulating gas prices
22(No Transcript)
23Group Work
- Regulating discharge of sewage in the Thames
- Legislation against insider trading
- Banning the use of cocaine
- Making primary school compulsory
- Regulating financial advisors
- Regulating length of the working week
- Compelling citizens to carry identity cards
- Minimum wage legislation
- Regulating taxi fares
24(No Transcript)
25Market Failures Why intervene?How to
intervene?
26Sources of Market Failure
- Externalities
- Public goods
- Imperfect competition
- Imperfect information
- Coordination problems
- We will look at each of these in turn
27MARKET FAILURE Externalities
- EXTERNALITY
- A circumstance in which an individual's choices
affects others' utility or productivity - the effect is direct (not through market or
prices)
28Examples
- Adverse externalities smoking, pollution
- Since costs are partly borne by others,
self-interested decision-making might lead to
excess - Beneficial externalities bees and orchards,
personal hygiene - Since benefits partly accrue to others,
self-interested choices lead to sub-optimal
quantities
29Adverse Production Externality
- For social optimum, we want
- marginal social cost marginal social benefit
- At free market equilibrium E, output Q is higher
than social optimum Q
30Why Externalities Matter
- THE ESSENTIAL PROBLEM
- Market mechanism aligns private costs and
benefits - Externalities imply divergence between social and
private costs (or social and private benefit) - If divergences exist, should not expect socially
efficient allocations
31Correcting externalities
- Quantitative regulation or direct government
action e.g. pollution quota - Pigou Taxes or subsidies to correct prices
e.g. pollution tax - Coase Create markets assign property rights
and enable trade in pseudo-marketse.g. carbon
trading
32Coasean Solution
- Assign property rights and let people trade these
rights in specially-created market - Initial assignment of rights affects distribution
but get an efficient outcome regardless - This solution does not work if there are high
transactions costs
Efficient quantity is Q
33MARKET FAILURE Public Goods
- Examples defence, broadcast TV signal
- Characteristics
- Non-rival consumption my consumption does not
diminish what is available for you - Non-excludability impossible or too costly to
prevent people from consuming it
34Public goods the problem and solutions
- If you cannot exclude, people will free ride.
But if no one pays, there is nothing to free-ride
on (this is the paradox of free riding) - In fact, exclusion is not efficient either
- In general, markets cannot provide public goods
- SOLUTIONS
- public provision
- compulsion
- Government needs to ensure right quantity, but
need not produce itself
35MARKET FAILURE Imperfect competition
- The essential problem of monopoly
- Firms with market power can charge prices that
exceed marginal cost - which restrains consumption below efficient level
- other problems resources wasted in securing
monopoly power (rent-seeking), and in
maintaining it
36Solutions to monopoly problem
- Solution 1. Nationalize and finance losses
through taxes - politically not very feasible
- Solution 2. Break monopoly e.g. anti-trust
legislation in US - However, no good for natural monopoliesIndustri
es with severe economies of scale, so having one
producer avoids duplication of costs - And in some sectors monopoly is good for RD, or
for internal coordination
37More solutions to the monopoly problem
- Solution 3. Regulate Prevent abuse of monopoly
power through price and non-price controls - Practical issues when is regulation necessary?
What form? How frequently? - Solution 4. Nurture competition Encourage new
entrants, (but will they enter and will it only
lead to cream skimming?) - Important to get the right mix of remedies
38(No Transcript)
39MARKET FAILURE Imperfect information
- Information in markets is imperfect. Often there
is asymmetry of information between buyer and
seller leading to problems of - adverse selection people who know themselves
to be risk-prone are more likely to buy insurance
- moral hazard once you have insurance,
incentive to be careful is weakened - these distortions may result in incomplete
markets or even missing markets e.g. low-risk
people may not find appropriate insurance
40SOLUTIONS Imperfect information
- mitigate informational problems
- mandating provision of information (regulate
financial advisors) - providing information directly (publish league
tables) - reduce the possibility of opportunistic behaviour
- consumer protection
- government provision of the good or service
41Inefficiency due to strategic interaction
Individual choices do not always result in the
best collective outcomes
Country 2
No nukes Nukes
No nukes 8, 8 1, 12
Nukes 12, 1 2, 2
Country 1
SOLUTION coordinate individual choices through
agreements or regulation
42Regulating technological standards
- Problem uncertainty about new technological
standards may slow down adoption - VHS vs Betamax
- Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD
- Should regulation aim to guide technological
choices? - GSM in mobile telephony
43Lessons for Policy Makers
- Market failures makes a potential case for
corrective intervention - However, we must beware of the possibility of
government failure. If so, the net effect may be
to replace market failure with government failure
44- Well-intentioned regulation may
- end up being ineffective
- have perverse, unintended consequences
- persist beyond its purpose
- be vulnerable to regulatory creep, with high
cumulative burden - The scope for successful regulatory intervention
is limited by - informational constraints
- agency problems
- lack of correction
45Group Work Pollution control
- As the National Rivers Regulator, you must
tackle the problem of a chemical firm that is
polluting the Thames - If everything could be quantified and valued,
show in a diagram how a pollution tax can induce
the firm to behave in a socially efficient manner.
46Group Work Pollution control
- Instead of the tax you offer the firm a pollution
quota (specifying the maximum pollution it can
discharge in any year). Show the size of the
quota in the diagram. What difference does it
make to the efficient quantity of pollution?
47Group Work Pollution control
- Now suppose information is harder to come by. As
the regulator, you are not entirely certain about
the firm's cost curve. Does this affect your
choice between tax and quotas?
48Group Work Pollution control
- Lastly, suppose there are two chemical firms
discharging into the river, one cleaner than the
other. Is it better to - set a pollution tax? (same rate per unit polluted
for both?) - auction pollution quotas?