Economics Workshop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Economics Workshop

Description:

Title: For BRE Author: sk Last modified by: dummy2 Created Date: 12/2/1999 10:42:43 PM Document presentation format: A4 Paper (210x297 mm) Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: sk61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economics Workshop


1
Economics Workshop  Better Regulation Executive
2006
  • Sandeep Kapur

s.kapur_at_bbk.ac.uk
2
WORKSHOP AIMS
  • To provide rigorous but non-mathematical
    training in economics, enabling BRE staff to
  • develop a simple but reliable toolkit for
    economic analysis
  • practise its application using concrete
    regulatory problems
  • explore the application of simple economic theory
    to their own work

3
Objectives Day 1
  • To understand
  • how markets work, and their efficiency
  • why markets sometimes fail to be efficient and
    how various regulatory instruments can improve
    efficiency
  • how regulation can improve on other aspects of
    market outcomes, such as inequity
  • how, in practice, regulatory interventions carry
    the risk of government failure

4
Objectives Day 2
  • To
  • review the standard rationale for regulation
  • the basics of regulatory impact assessment
  • understand how good regulatory design can cope
    with risk and uncertainty, informational
    imperfections, and minimise distortion of
    incentives
  • rationale for and implementation of RPI-X
    regulation
  • the link between regulation and productivity
    growth

5
Introduction to EconomicsSome Concepts and Tools
6
Markets vs. Command
  • The central questions given existing resources
  • what goods and service to produce?
  • how to produce?
  • for whom?
  • Alternative mechanisms
  • COMMAND ECONOMY direct control, as in Soviet
    economy, or firms internal decisions
  • FREE MARKET ECONOMY
  • outcome determined by private transactions in
    markets, based on prices, incomes, wealth

7
Degree of government intervention differs..
Hong Kong
- China - Denmark - UK - USA -
Cuba
  • Most countries have mixed economies with both
  • markets, which are regulated to different extent
  • public production and provision

8
Scale of government
Spending as share of national income ()
1880 1930 1960 2004
Japan 11 19 18 37
USA 8 10 28 36
UK 10 24 32 43
Germany 10 31 32 47
France 15 19 35 53
Sweden 6 8 31 57
9
The policy question
  • Markets are generally considered to be efficient
  • If so, why not leave things to the market?
  • Governments care about both equity and efficiency
  • Free markets rarely deliver equitable outcomes,
    so some redistributive intervention is
    unavoidable
  • Free markets do not always lead to efficient
    outcomes, so some interventions are motivated by
    efficiency considerations
  • To understand this, we must look at how markets
    work

10
(No Transcript)
11
How Markets WorkDemand, Supply, and Price
Adjustment
12
Market
  • MARKET
  • any arrangement in which prices adjust to
    reconcile buyers and sellers intentions
  • DEMANDquantity buyers wish to buy at each price
  • SUPPLYquantity producers wish to sell at each
    price
  • EQUILIBRIUM PRICEthe price at which market
    clears (i.e. quantity demanded quantity
    supplied)

13
Price Adjustment
Supply curve
price
Equilibrium Price
Demand curve
Equilibrium Quantity
quantity
PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Equilibrium price clears market
14
  • Price Controls

Suppose government sets minimum price above
market clearing price
Price
Supply curve
Controlled price
Equilibrium price
Demand curve
  • Examples include
  • Minimum wages
  • Rent control
  • Common Agricultural Policy

Quantity
excesssupply
15
What does price controls do?
  • Price controls interfere with the adjustment
    process
  • minimum wages are good for equity they boost the
    income of some low-skill workers
  • But such interventions may not be good for
    efficiency if employers are unwilling to hire as
    many at regulated minimum wage, some potential
    workers are deprived of the chance to work

16
Economic Efficiency
  • An intervention is said to improve efficiency if
    it makes someone better off and nobody worse off
  • Economic efficiency an outcome where no one can
    be made better off without hurting someone else
  • The key question do free, unregulated markets
    always lead to efficient outcomes?

17
Markets and Choice
  • In markets
  • consumers buy up to the point the marginal
    benefit equals price
  • competitive firms sell as long as price covers
    marginal cost of production (this is the
    opportunity cost of producing another unit of the
    good)

18
The Efficiency of Markets
  • Thus, in competitive markets
  • prices align marginal benefit with marginal cost
  • all possible gainful exchanges are carried out
  • PUNCH LINE Free, unregulated markets lead to
    efficient outcomesThis is the so-called
    Invisible Hand Theorem

19
But free markets are not always efficient..
  • Market failure a circumstance in which free
    markets fails to achieve an efficient outcome
  • Many interventions are designed to correct market
    failures, and thus to increase efficiency

20
In sum why intervene?
  • Economic regulation
  • Aims to correct market failures, and make the
    market outcome more efficient
  • (when the invisible hand does not work, the
    government can provide a helping hand)
  • Social regulation
  • To prevent undesirable social outcomes inherent
    in market outcomes

21
Group Work Efficiency and Equity
  • Government intervention in the economy is
    pervasive. For each intervention listed below
    identify the possible rationale. Is it primarily
  • efficiency considerations?
  • equity consideration?
  • something else?
  1. Income tax
  2. Taxation of petrol
  3. Regulating gas prices

22
(No Transcript)
23
Group Work
  1. Regulating discharge of sewage in the Thames
  2. Legislation against insider trading
  3. Banning the use of cocaine
  4. Making primary school compulsory
  5. Regulating financial advisors
  6. Regulating length of the working week
  7. Compelling citizens to carry identity cards
  8. Minimum wage legislation
  9. Regulating taxi fares

24
(No Transcript)
25
Market Failures  Why intervene?How to
intervene?
26
Sources of Market Failure
  • Externalities
  • Public goods
  • Imperfect competition
  • Imperfect information
  • Coordination problems
  • We will look at each of these in turn

27
MARKET FAILURE Externalities
  • EXTERNALITY
  • A circumstance in which an individual's choices
    affects others' utility or productivity
  • the effect is direct (not through market or
    prices)

28
Examples
  • Adverse externalities smoking, pollution
  • Since costs are partly borne by others,
    self-interested decision-making might lead to
    excess
  • Beneficial externalities bees and orchards,
    personal hygiene
  • Since benefits partly accrue to others,
    self-interested choices lead to sub-optimal
    quantities

29
Adverse Production Externality
  • For social optimum, we want
  • marginal social cost marginal social benefit
  • At free market equilibrium E, output Q is higher
    than social optimum Q

30
Why Externalities Matter
  • THE ESSENTIAL PROBLEM
  • Market mechanism aligns private costs and
    benefits
  • Externalities imply divergence between social and
    private costs (or social and private benefit)
  • If divergences exist, should not expect socially
    efficient allocations

31
Correcting externalities
  • Quantitative regulation or direct government
    action e.g. pollution quota
  • Pigou Taxes or subsidies to correct prices
    e.g. pollution tax
  • Coase Create markets assign property rights
    and enable trade in pseudo-marketse.g. carbon
    trading

32
Coasean Solution
  • Assign property rights and let people trade these
    rights in specially-created market
  • Initial assignment of rights affects distribution
    but get an efficient outcome regardless
  • This solution does not work if there are high
    transactions costs

Efficient quantity is Q
33
MARKET FAILURE Public Goods
  • Examples defence, broadcast TV signal
  • Characteristics
  • Non-rival consumption my consumption does not
    diminish what is available for you
  • Non-excludability impossible or too costly to
    prevent people from consuming it

34
Public goods the problem and solutions
  • If you cannot exclude, people will free ride.
    But if no one pays, there is nothing to free-ride
    on (this is the paradox of free riding)
  • In fact, exclusion is not efficient either
  • In general, markets cannot provide public goods
  • SOLUTIONS
  • public provision
  • compulsion
  • Government needs to ensure right quantity, but
    need not produce itself

35
MARKET FAILURE Imperfect competition
  • The essential problem of monopoly
  • Firms with market power can charge prices that
    exceed marginal cost
  • which restrains consumption below efficient level
  • other problems resources wasted in securing
    monopoly power (rent-seeking), and in
    maintaining it

36
Solutions to monopoly problem
  • Solution 1. Nationalize and finance losses
    through taxes
  • politically not very feasible
  • Solution 2. Break monopoly e.g. anti-trust
    legislation in US
  • However, no good for natural monopoliesIndustri
    es with severe economies of scale, so having one
    producer avoids duplication of costs
  • And in some sectors monopoly is good for RD, or
    for internal coordination

37
More solutions to the monopoly problem
  • Solution 3. Regulate Prevent abuse of monopoly
    power through price and non-price controls
  • Practical issues when is regulation necessary?
    What form? How frequently?
  • Solution 4. Nurture competition Encourage new
    entrants, (but will they enter and will it only
    lead to cream skimming?)
  • Important to get the right mix of remedies

38
(No Transcript)
39
MARKET FAILURE Imperfect information
  • Information in markets is imperfect. Often there
    is asymmetry of information between buyer and
    seller leading to problems of
  • adverse selection people who know themselves
    to be risk-prone are more likely to buy insurance
  • moral hazard once you have insurance,
    incentive to be careful is weakened
  • these distortions may result in incomplete
    markets or even missing markets e.g. low-risk
    people may not find appropriate insurance

40
SOLUTIONS Imperfect information
  • mitigate informational problems
  • mandating provision of information (regulate
    financial advisors)
  • providing information directly (publish league
    tables)
  • reduce the possibility of opportunistic behaviour
  • consumer protection
  • government provision of the good or service

41
Inefficiency due to strategic interaction
Individual choices do not always result in the
best collective outcomes
Country 2
No nukes Nukes
No nukes 8, 8 1, 12
Nukes 12, 1 2, 2
Country 1
SOLUTION coordinate individual choices through
agreements or regulation
42
Regulating technological standards
  • Problem uncertainty about new technological
    standards may slow down adoption
  • VHS vs Betamax
  • Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD
  • Should regulation aim to guide technological
    choices?
  • GSM in mobile telephony

43
Lessons for Policy Makers
  • Market failures makes a potential case for
    corrective intervention
  • However, we must beware of the possibility of
    government failure. If so, the net effect may be
    to replace market failure with government failure

44
  • Well-intentioned regulation may
  • end up being ineffective
  • have perverse, unintended consequences
  • persist beyond its purpose
  • be vulnerable to regulatory creep, with high
    cumulative burden
  • The scope for successful regulatory intervention
    is limited by
  • informational constraints
  • agency problems
  • lack of correction

45
Group Work Pollution control
  • As the National Rivers Regulator, you must
    tackle the problem of a chemical firm that is
    polluting the Thames
  • If everything could be quantified and valued,
    show in a diagram how a pollution tax can induce
    the firm to behave in a socially efficient manner.

46
Group Work Pollution control
  1. Instead of the tax you offer the firm a pollution
    quota (specifying the maximum pollution it can
    discharge in any year). Show the size of the
    quota in the diagram. What difference does it
    make to the efficient quantity of pollution?

47
Group Work Pollution control
  1. Now suppose information is harder to come by. As
    the regulator, you are not entirely certain about
    the firm's cost curve. Does this affect your
    choice between tax and quotas?

48
Group Work Pollution control
  • Lastly, suppose there are two chemical firms
    discharging into the river, one cleaner than the
    other. Is it better to
  • set a pollution tax? (same rate per unit polluted
    for both?)
  • auction pollution quotas?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com