Additive Spanners for k-Chordal Graphs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Additive Spanners for k-Chordal Graphs

Description:

Title: Tree Spanners on Chordal Graphs: Complexity, Algorithms, Open Problems Author: Dragan Last modified by: Dragan Created Date: 11/18/2002 6:08:48 AM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Drag54
Learn more at: https://www.cs.kent.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Additive Spanners for k-Chordal Graphs


1
Additive Spanners for k-Chordal Graphs
  • V. D. Chepoi, F.F. Dragan, C. Yan

University Aix-Marseille II, France Kent State
University, Ohio, USA
2
Sparse t -Spanner Problem
  • Given unweighted undirected graph G(V,E) and
    integers t, m.
  • Does G admit a spanning graph H (V,E) with E
    ? m such that

(a multiplicative t-spanner of G) or
(an additive t-spanner of G)?
G multiplicative 2-
and additive 1-spanner of G
3
Sparse t -Spanner Problem
  • Given unweighted undirected graph G(V,E) and
    integers t, m.
  • Does G admit a spanning graph H (V,E) with E
    ? m such that

(a multiplicative t-spanner of G) or
(an additive t-spanner of G)?
G multiplicative 2-
and additive 1-spanner of G
4
Applications
  • in distributed systems and communication
    networks
  • synchronizers in parallel systems
  • Close relationship were established between the
    quality of spanners for a given undirected graph
    (in terms of the stretch factor t and the number
    of edges E), and the time and communication
    complexities of any synchronizer for the network
    based on this graph
  • topology for message routing
  • efficient routing schemes can use only the edges
    of the spanner

G
2-spanner for G
5
Applications
  • in distributed systems and communication
    networks
  • synchronizers in parallel systems
  • Close relationship were established between the
    quality of spanners for a given undirected graph
    (in terms of the stretch factor t and the number
    of edges E), and the time and communication
    complexities of any synchronizer for the network
    based on this graph
  • topology for message routing
  • efficient routing schemes can use only the edges
    of the spanner

G
2-spanner for G
6
Some Known Results
(multiplicative case)
  • general graphs PelegSchaffer89
  • given a graph G(V, E) and two integers t, m?1,
    whether G has a t-spanner with m or fewer edges,
    is NP-complete
  • chordal graphs PelegSchaffer89
  • G is chordal if it has no chordless cycles
    of length gt3
  • every n-vertex chordal graph G(V, E) admits a
    2-spanner with O(n1.5) edges
  • there exist (infinitely many) n-vertex chordal
    graphs G(V, E) for which every 2-spanner
    requires ?(n1.5) edges
  • every n-vertex chordal graph G(V, E) admits a
    3-spanner with O(n logn) edges
  • every n-vertex chordal graph G(V, E) admits a
    5-spanner with at most 2n-2 edges

7
Some Known Results
(multiplicative case)
  • general graphs PelegSchaffer89
  • given a graph G(V, E) and two integers t, m?1,
    whether G has a t-spanner with m or fewer edges,
    is NP-complete
  • chordal graphs PelegSchaffer89
  • G is chordal if it has no chordless cycles
    of length gt3
  • every n-vertex chordal graph G(V, E) admits a
    3-spanner with O(n logn) edges
  • every n-vertex chordal graph G(V, E) admits a
    5-spanner with at most 2n-2 edges
  • tree spanner BDLL2002
  • given a chordal graph G(V, E) and an integer
    tgt3, whether G has a t-spanner with n-1 edges
    (tree t-spanner), is NP-complete

8
Some Known Results
(multiplicative case)
  • general graphs PelegSchaffer89
  • given a graph G(V, E) and two integers t, m?1,
    whether G has a t-spanner with m or fewer edges,
    is NP-complete
  • chordal graphs PelegSchaffer89
  • G is chordal if it has no chordless cycles
    of length gt3
  • every n-vertex chordal graph G(V, E) admits a
    3-spanner with O(n logn) edges
  • every n-vertex chordal graph G(V, E) admits a
    5-spanner with at most 2n-2 edges ? 2-appr.
    algorithm for any t ? 5
  • tree spanner BDLL2002
  • given a chordal graph G(V, E) and an integer
    tgt3, whether G has a t-spanner with n-1 edges
    (tree t-spanner), is NP-complete

9
This Talk
  • From multiplicative to additive
  • every chordal graph admits an additive 4-spanner
    with at most 2n-2 edges which can be constructed
    in linear time
  • every chordal graph admits an additive 3-spanner
    with O(n logn) edges which can be constructed in
    polynomial time
  • Extension to k-chordal graphs
  • G is k-chordal if it has no chordless cycle of
    length gtk
  • Every k-chordal graph admits an additive
    (k1)-spanner with at most 2n-2 edges which can
    be constructed in O(n?km)
  • Better bounds for subclasses of 4-chordal graphs
  • Every HH-free graph (or chordal bipartite graph)
    admits an additive 4-spanner with at most 2n-2
    edges which can be constructed in linear time
  • Note that any additive t-spanner is a
    multiplicative (t1)-spanner

10
MethodConstructing Additive 4-Spanner
  • Given a chordal graph G(V, E) and an arbitrary
    vertex u

u
11
BFS-Ordering and BFS-Tree up-phase
  • We start from u and construct a BFS tree. The red
    edges are tree edges.
  • First layer.

16
17
15
u
18
12
BFS-Ordering and BFS-Tree up-phase
  • Second layer

13
14
11
12
16
17
15
u
18
13
BFS-Ordering and BFS-Tree up-phase
  • Third layer

5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
u
18
14
BFS-Ordering and BFS-Tree up-phase
  • Fourth Layer

4
3
2
1
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
u
18
15
Constructing Spanner down-phase
  • Start from the last layer. For vertices of each
    connected component in the layer create a star
    for the fathers.

4
3
2
1
connected components
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
u
18
16
Constructing Spanner down-phase
  • Third Layer

4
3
2
1
connected components
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
u
18
17
Constructing Spanner down-phase
  • Second layer

4
3
2
1
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
connected components
16
17
15
u
18
18
Final Spanner
  • The final spanner is showed in red

4
3
2
1
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
u
18
19
Final Spanner
  • The final spanner is showed in red

4 vs 5
4
3
2
1
1 vs 3
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
u
18
20
Analysis Of The Algorithm
  • Given a chordal graph G(V, E), we produce a
    spanning graph H(V,E) such that
  • H is an additive 4-spanner of G
  • H contains at most 2n-2 edges
  • H can be constructed in O(nm) time

21
Analysis Of The Algorithm
  • Given a chordal graph G(V, E), we produce a
    spanning graph H(V,E) such that
  • H is an additive 4-spanner of G
  • H contains at most 2n-2 edges
  • H can be constructed in O(nm) time

y
x
Layer i
Layer i-1
c
u
22
Constructing Additive 3-Spanner
  • G is a chordal graph with n vertices and with a
    BFS ordering (started at u)
  • Take all the edges of the additive 4-spanner
  • in each connected component S induced by layer r,
    we run the algorithm presented in
    PelegSchaffer89, to construct a
    multiplicative 3-spanner for S

4
3
2
1
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
18
23
Constructing Additive 3-Spanner
  • G is a chordal graph with n vertices and with a
    BFS ordering (started at u)
  • Take all the edges of the additive 4-spanner
  • in each connected component S induced by layer r,
    we run the algorithm presented in
    PelegSchaffer89, to construct a
    multiplicative 3-spanner for S

4
3
2
1
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
14
11
12
16
17
15
18
24
Analysis Of The Algorithm
  • Given a chordal graph G(V, E) with n vertices
    and m edges, we produce a spanning graph H(V,E)
    such that
  • H is an additive 3-spanner of G
  • H contains O(n logn) edges
  • H can be constructed in polynomial time

25
MethodConstructing Additive (k1)-Spanner
Given a k-chordal graph G(V, E) and an arbitrary
vertex u
u
26
BFS-Ordering and BFS-Tree up-phase
  • We start from u and construct a BFS tree. The red
    edges are tree edges.

2
1
6
5
4
3
7
9
8
10
11
12
u
27
Constructing Spanner down-phase
  • Start from the last layer. For vertices of each
    component,choose
  • the smallest one. Then try to connect others to
    it or its ancestor.

2
1
6
5
4
3
3
a component on layer 3
7
9
8
10
11
12
u
28
Constructing Spanner down-phase
  • Start from the last layer. For vertices of each
    component,choose
  • the smallest one. Then try to connect others to
    it or its ancestor.

2
1
6
5
4
3
5
3
a component on layer 3
7
7
9
9
8
edge used to connect 3 and 5
10
11
12
u
29
Constructing Spanner down-phase
  • Start from the last layer. For vertices of each
    component,choose
  • the smallest one. Then try to connect others to
    it or its ancestor.

2
1
6
5
4
3
a component on layer 3
7
9
8
edge used to connect 3 and 5
10
11
12
u
30
Final Spanner
  • Final spanner is shown in red.

2
1
6
5
4
3
7
9
8
10
11
12
u
31
Analysis Of The Algorithm
  • G is k-chordal if it has no chordless cycles of
    length gtk
  • The spanner constructed by the above algorithm
    has the following properties
  • It is an additive (k1)-spanner
  • It contains at most 2n-2 edges
  • It can be constructed in O(knm) time

32
Open questions and future directions
  • Can these ideas be applied to other graph
    families to obtain good sparse additive spanners?
  • Can one get a constant approximation for the
    additive 3-spanner problem on chordal graphs?
  • so far,
  • only a log-approximation for t3
  • 2-approximation for tgt3
  • What about t2 (additive)?
  • so far, (from PelegSchaffer89)
  • a log-approximation for multiplicative 3-spanner
  • for t1, the lower bound is ?(n1.5) edges (as
    multiplicative 2-spanner)

33
  • Thank You

34
Layering
  • Given a graph G(V, E) and an arbitrary vertex
    u?V, the
  • sphere of u is defined as
  • The ball of radius centered at u is defined
    as
  • A layering of G with respect to some vertex u
    is a partition
  • of V into the spheres

35
BFS Ordering
  • G(V, E) is a graph with n vertices
  • In Breadth-First-Search (BFS), started at vertex
    u, we number the vertices from n to 1 as follows
  • u is numbered by n and is put on an initially
    empty queue
  • a vertex v is repeatedly removed from the head of
    the queue and the neighbors of v which are still
    unnumbered are consequently numbered and placed
    onto the queue
  • we call v the father of those vertices which are
    placed onto the queue when v is removed from the
    queue. We use f(v) to denote the father of v
  • An ordering generated by BFS is called
    BFS-ordering

36
Layering and BFS-ordering, an example
  • The vertices are numbered in BFS-ordering and the
    BFS tree is shown in red

Layer 3
1
2
6
Layer 2
5
4
3
7
Layer 1
8
9
Layer 0
10
37
Constructing Additive 4-Spanner
  • Method of constructing spanner H(V, E)
  • let be arbitrary vertex of G and
    , we use Breadth-First-Search
    (BFS) rooted at to label all the vertices of
    G.
  • start from the layer of , for each vertex
    we add into
  • start from the layer and for each connected
    component induced by we find its
    projection on layer and make
    it star and put all the edges in the star into

38
Example
  • The following is an example. The think red lines
    consists
  • the spanners for the chordal graph

4
3
2
1
5
7
8
6
9
10
13
11
14
12
16
17
15
18
39
Definitions and Symbols for k-chordal graph
  • G is k-chordal if it has no chordless cycles of
    lengthgtk
  • Let u be an arbitrary vertex of G. We define a
    graph with the lth sphere as a vertex
    set. Two vertices are adjacent in if and
    only if they can be connected by a path outside
    the ball . We use to
    denote all the connected component of
  • Also we define

40
Constructing Spanners
  • G is k-chordal if it has no chordless cycles of
    lengthgtk
  • Method of constructing a spanner H(V, E)
  • for each vertex , we add into E
  • for each connected component we identify a
    vertex such that is the minimum in
    BFS-ordering among all vertices in
  • check if then we add to
  • check if then we add
    to
  • If none of the above is true, we let
    and repeat 3 and 4
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com