Title: Compensation For Victims of Trafficking in Persons
1Compensation For Victims of Trafficking in
Persons UNODC Perspective and State Practice
Expert Consultation of the Special Rapporteur
on Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and
Children, Ms. Joy Ngozi Ezeilo, onThe Right to
an Effective Remedy for Trafficked Persons
Bratislava, 22 November 2010Simone Heri,
Organized Crime Branch, UNODC Vienna
2Purposes of Compensation
- Societal level Awarding compensation
acknowledges that trafficking is a crime - Individual level Victims pain and suffering are
acknowledged and compensation can constitute a
first step towards overcoming trauma inflicted
and abuse suffered - Practical level Compensations can assist victims
to rebuild their lives - Retributive level Compensation paid by
traffickers can constitute a form of punishment
and deter other traffickers
3Compensation in UNTOC and TIP Protocol
- Each State Party shall establish appropriate
procedures to provide access to compensation and
restitution for victims (Article 25(2) UNTOC) - Each State Party shall ensure that its domestic
legal system contains measures that offer victims
of trafficking in persons the possibility of
obtaining compensation for damage suffered
(Article 6(6) TIP)
4Compensation Legislative Guides to UNTOC
- Protocol does not specify any potential source
of compensation, which means that any of the
following general options that States have
developed would suffice to meet the requirement
of the Protocol - (a) Provisions allowing victims to sue offenders
or others under statutory or common-law torts for
civil damages - (b) Provisions allowing criminal courts to award
criminal damages (that is, to order that
compensation be paid by offenders to victims) or
to impose orders for compensation or restitution
against persons convicted of offences - (c) Provisions establishing dedicated funds or
schemes whereby victims can claim compensation
from the State for injuries or damages suffered
as a result of a criminal offence. - (Legislative Guides for the Implementation of
the United Nations Convention Against
Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols
Thereto (pp. 285-286, para. 60)
5Recommendations Adopted by Open-ended Interim
Working Group on Trafficking in Persons
- With regard to the compensation for victims of
trafficking, States parties should consider the
possibility of establishing appropriate
procedures to allow victims to obtain
compensation and restitution. (CTOC/COP/WG.4/2009
/2, para. 14) - States parties should endeavour to ensure the
availability of a compensation fund or similar
mechanism for victims of crimes, including
trafficking in persons. (CTOC/COP/WG.4/2010/6,
para. 56)
6Proposed Recommendations for Adoption at the
Third Session of the TIP Working Group
- Chair of the Working Group proposed
recommendations interpreting or adding to
Protocol obligations such as States parties
should provide legal assistance and information
regarding legal assistance to victims of
trafficking to represent his or her interests in
criminal investigations, including the obtaining
of compensation. - States parties did not arrive at consensus in the
three hours scheduled for the Working Group at
its 3rd Meeting - Compensation will most likely be taken up again
at the 4th TIP Working Group Meeting on 14-16
December 2011
7The 5th Conference of the Parties to the United
Nations Convention against Transnational
Organized Crime
- Welcomed the work of the Working Group on
Trafficking in Persons, including the Groups
recommendations, resulting from its meeting on 14
and 15 April 2009, 27 and 29 January 2010, and 19
October 2010 (CTOC/COP/2010/L.5/Rev.1, para. 5)
8Cross-cutting Issues Article 6(2) TIP Protocol
- Article 6 (2) Each State Party shall ensure that
its domestic legal or administrative system
contains measures that provide to victims of
trafficking in persons, in appropriate cases - (a) Information on relevant court and
administrative proceedings - (b) Assistance to enable their views and
concerns to be presented and considered at
appropriate stages of criminal proceedings
against offenders, in a manner not prejudicial to
the rights of the defence.
9Cross-cutting Issues Status of Victims of
Trafficking in Persons in Receiving States
- States Party shall consider adopting legislative
or other appropriate measures that permit victims
of trafficking in persons to remain in its
territory (Article 7) - However The immigration status or the return of
the victim to his or her home country or other
absence of the victim of trafficking from the
jurisdiction shall not prevent the court from
ordering payment of compensation (UNODC Model Law
against Trafficking in Persons, Article 27(2) and
28(6)).
10Cross-cutting issues Financial Investigations,
Freezing, Seizing and Confiscation of Assets
- Criminal justices measures such as proactive
financial investigations and early confiscation
of proceeds necessary for the execution of
compensation order - States Parties shall, to the extent permitted by
domestic law and if so requested, give priority
consideration to returning the confiscated
proceeds of crime or property to the requesting
State Party so that it can give compensation to
the victims of the crime (Article 14 (2))
11Cross-cutting issues Financial Investigations,
Freezing, Seizing and Confiscation of Assets
- Noting the low rate of convictions for
trafficking in persons globally, as reported in
the Global Report on Trafficking in Persons
published by UNODC in 2009, States parties should
increase their efforts to investigate and
prosecute cases involving trafficking in persons,
including by making timely use of financial
investigation techniques, special investigative
techniques and other tools designed to combat
other forms of organized crime.
(CTOC/COP/2010/6, para. 35)
12Cross-cutting Issues Financial Investigations,
Freezing, Seizing and Confiscation of Assets
- States parties should utilize the Organized
Crime Convention and other multilateral legal
instruments to develop and strengthen
international judicial cooperation, including
with regard to extradition, mutual legal
assistance and confiscation of the proceeds of
trafficking in persons. (CTOC/COP/2010/6, para.
28(b)) - States parties should increase cross-border
criminal justice action through enhanced use of
joint investigations, information-sharing and
confiscation of assets, in line with their
domestic legislation. (CTOC/COP/2010/6, para. 36)
13State Practice Regional Action Plans
- BSEC Regional Action Plan for Strengthening the
Criminal Justice - Response to Trafficking in Persons (Black Sea),
states that States should implement measures that
offer victims of trafficking in human beings the
possibility of obtaining compensation (para. 20). - ECOWAS Initial Plan of Action Against Trafficking
in Persons - stipulates that States shall adopt legal
provisions for the protection of victims of
trafficking, and ensure that their domestic legal
systems contain measures that offer victims of
trafficking in persons the possibility of
obtaining compensation for damage suffered (para.
6). - The OSCE Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in
Human Beings - Asks participating States to consider
establishing a fund based on the confiscated
proceeds of trafficking to be used for the
benefit of trafficking victims including the
establishment of a compensation fund for them
(section III, para. 1.5).
14State Practice I Compensation Funds/Tribunals
- Bulgaria Assistance and Compensation to Crime
Victims Act (18 December 2006) - Provides for compensation of victims of crime
- Authorities responsibility of informing victims
of such rights - New South Wales Victims Compensation Tribunal
- Established under Victims Support and
Rehabilitation Act (1996) - In May 2007 Tribunal awarded compensation to a
Thai woman who was trafficked to Australia as a
child for the purpose of sexual exploitation - Nigeria Trafficking in Persons Law Enforcement
and Administration Act 2003 - The Act establishes a Trust to provide victims
with compensation for economic, physical and
psychological damage
15State Practice II Compensation Funds/Tribunals
- Egypt Law No. (64) of 2010 regarding Combating
Human Trafficking, Article 27 - A fund shall be established to assist victims of
human trafficking, which shall have a public
juristic personality under the Prime Minister to
provide financial assistance to the victims who
have suffered harm resulting from any of the
crimes stipulated in this law. - A decision by the President of the Republic
shall regulate this fund and determine its
jurisdiction, resources and the sources of its
funding. - The proceeds of the fines sentenced for the
crimes stipulated in this law, as well as the
properties, objects, and means of transportation
forfeited shall be allocated directly to the
fund, which may also accept contributions,
grants, and donations from national and foreign
entities. -
16State Practice Right to Initiate Civil Action
- Serbia Victims are able to file civil suits
against traffickers and are entitled to temporary
residence permits - Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
Victims may initiate civil proceedings for
damages or compensation arising form injuries
sustained as a result of being trafficked
17State Practice Cyprus
- Cyprus Combating of Trafficking in Persons and
Sexual Exploitation of Children, Law No. 3(1),
2000 - Article 8 gives victim right to sue for special
and general damages - The Court may take into consideration the
following for general damages - a. the extent of the exploitation and the
benefit the liable derived from such
exploitation, - b. the future prospects of the victim and the
extent to which such prospects were affected by
the exploitation, - c. the culpability of the offender,
- d. the relationship or the dominating position
or influence of the offender with regard to the
victim. (Article 8(2)) - The Court, in the award of special damages, takes
into consideration every item of expense which
resulted from exploitation including costs for
repatriation in the case of foreigners. (Article
8(3))
18State Practice Israel
- Israel Legislation enables Governments to seize
traffickers assets for use in the rehabilitation
of victims and for compensation - Jane Doe vs. Alexander Lifshin and Armen Ben
Anatoly Reidler (Tel Aviv Yafo District Court ,
25 January 2010) - 500,000 NIS for clients fees withhold
- 1,000,000 NIS for the non-material damages which
harmed the victims autonomy, freedom, body and
soul. The court emphasized the duration of
suffrage, and noted that this sum should also be
seen as punitive damages that highlight the need
to punish the defendant beyond the sentencing
under criminal law - All expenses incurred by the victim, incl.
150,000 NIS for victims lawyer - (100 NIS 27 USD)
19State Practices Kenya and Portugal
- Kenya Counter-Trafficking in Persons Act 2010
- Convicted trafficker is mandated to restitute his
victim - Law also estblishes the National Assitsance Trust
Fund for Victims of Trafficking - Portugal
- Criminal courts to award criminal damages
- Advance payment of compensation by State-fund
20State Practices Norway
Victim options
Government compensation scheme victims of
violent crime
Civil action against perpetrator
Civil claim in criminal case against perpetrator
21State Practice Norway (continued)
- Information about rights
- Consultation with a lawyer
- Legal representation in criminal cases
- Assistance from lawyer in preparing civil claim
in criminal case - Confiscation vs. Compensation
- Confiscated proceeds are not available to victims
- Case June 2010 Confiscated NOK 32 000. Damages
NOK 50 000.
22State Practice Norway (continued)
- Government Compensation
- Compensation for Victims of Violent Crime Act
- Victims of violent crime includes trafficking
- Administered by Norwegian Criminal Injuries
Compensation Authority - The criminal act must be reported to the police
- Compensation even when the criminal case is
dropped - Criminal act must have been committed in Norway
- Practical Use The Compensation Authority will
often pay the victim according to a conviction,
and will seek recovery from the convicted person.
23State Practice Norway (continued)
- Example Albanian victim
- NOK 200 000 in damages for non-economic loss
- NOK 350 000 for permanent injury
- NOK 120 000 future expenses
- NOK 290 000 loss of personal income
- NOK 1.300.000 future loss of personal income
- (100 NOK 16 USD)
24State Practice Argentina
- Law 26.364 (29 April 2008) Prevention and
Sanction of Trafficking in Persons and
Assistance to its Victims - Provides for compensation and victims receive
legal aid - One method of compensation ordered by the judges
was to confiscate all the equipment from the
traffickers and hand them to the victims of
trafficking for them to start a small business.
25State Practice United States of America
- Two Mechanisms
- Private Lawsuit
- Restitution Following Criminal Prosecution
- Mandatory restitution
- The court shall order restitution for any human
trafficking offense. - There must be a criminal conviction.
- No other prerequisites for the victims to receive
restitution - Discretionary restitution available for other
offenses
26State Practice United States (continued)
- Funding Restitution
- Solely Offender Funded
- Can apply seized and forfeited assets
- Court cannot consider Defendants financial
situation - Practical Realities
- United States v. Webster (2009)
- 3.6 million
- United States v. Kalimlin (2006)
- 916,000
27State Practice United States (continued)
- Measuring Restitution
- Full amount of the victims losses
- Includes
- medical expenses, physical and psychological
- physical therapy/rehabilitation
- necessary transportation, temporary housing,
child care - lost income
- attorneys fees
- any other losses proximately caused by
trafficking - Plus
- The greater of the gross income or value to the
defendant of the victims services, or - the value of the victims labor as guaranteed by
minimum wage and overtime laws.
28- Thank you!
- Questions?
- CONTACT
- ahtmsu_at_unodc.org
- www.unodc.org
- Tools and Publications
- www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/publicati
ons.html