Compensation For Victims of Trafficking in Persons - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Compensation For Victims of Trafficking in Persons

Description:

Compensation For Victims of Trafficking in Persons UNODC Perspective and State Practice Expert Consultation of the Special Rapporteur on Trafficking in Persons ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: Testu158
Learn more at: https://www.ohchr.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Compensation For Victims of Trafficking in Persons


1
Compensation For Victims of Trafficking in
Persons UNODC Perspective and State Practice
Expert Consultation of the Special Rapporteur
on Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and
Children, Ms. Joy Ngozi Ezeilo, onThe Right to
an Effective Remedy for Trafficked Persons
Bratislava, 22 November 2010Simone Heri,
Organized Crime Branch, UNODC Vienna
2
Purposes of Compensation
  • Societal level Awarding compensation
    acknowledges that trafficking is a crime
  • Individual level Victims pain and suffering are
    acknowledged and compensation can constitute a
    first step towards overcoming trauma inflicted
    and abuse suffered
  • Practical level Compensations can assist victims
    to rebuild their lives
  • Retributive level Compensation paid by
    traffickers can constitute a form of punishment
    and deter other traffickers

3
Compensation in UNTOC and TIP Protocol
  • Each State Party shall establish appropriate
    procedures to provide access to compensation and
    restitution for victims (Article 25(2) UNTOC)
  • Each State Party shall ensure that its domestic
    legal system contains measures that offer victims
    of trafficking in persons the possibility of
    obtaining compensation for damage suffered
    (Article 6(6) TIP)

4
Compensation Legislative Guides to UNTOC
  • Protocol does not specify any potential source
    of compensation, which means that any of the
    following general options that States have
    developed would suffice to meet the requirement
    of the Protocol
  • (a) Provisions allowing victims to sue offenders
    or others under statutory or common-law torts for
    civil damages
  • (b) Provisions allowing criminal courts to award
    criminal damages (that is, to order that
    compensation be paid by offenders to victims) or
    to impose orders for compensation or restitution
    against persons convicted of offences
  • (c) Provisions establishing dedicated funds or
    schemes whereby victims can claim compensation
    from the State for injuries or damages suffered
    as a result of a criminal offence.
  • (Legislative Guides for the Implementation of
    the United Nations Convention Against
    Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols
    Thereto (pp. 285-286, para. 60)

5
Recommendations Adopted by Open-ended Interim
Working Group on Trafficking in Persons
  • With regard to the compensation for victims of
    trafficking, States parties should consider the
    possibility of establishing appropriate
    procedures to allow victims to obtain
    compensation and restitution. (CTOC/COP/WG.4/2009
    /2, para. 14)
  • States parties should endeavour to ensure the
    availability of a compensation fund or similar
    mechanism for victims of crimes, including
    trafficking in persons. (CTOC/COP/WG.4/2010/6,
    para. 56)

6
Proposed Recommendations for Adoption at the
Third Session of the TIP Working Group
  • Chair of the Working Group proposed
    recommendations interpreting or adding to
    Protocol obligations such as States parties
    should provide legal assistance and information
    regarding legal assistance to victims of
    trafficking to represent his or her interests in
    criminal investigations, including the obtaining
    of compensation.
  • States parties did not arrive at consensus in the
    three hours scheduled for the Working Group at
    its 3rd Meeting
  • Compensation will most likely be taken up again
    at the 4th TIP Working Group Meeting on 14-16
    December 2011

7
The 5th Conference of the Parties to the United
Nations Convention against Transnational
Organized Crime
  • Welcomed the work of the Working Group on
    Trafficking in Persons, including the Groups
    recommendations, resulting from its meeting on 14
    and 15 April 2009, 27 and 29 January 2010, and 19
    October 2010 (CTOC/COP/2010/L.5/Rev.1, para. 5)

8
Cross-cutting Issues Article 6(2) TIP Protocol
  • Article 6 (2) Each State Party shall ensure that
    its domestic legal or administrative system
    contains measures that provide to victims of
    trafficking in persons, in appropriate cases
  • (a) Information on relevant court and
    administrative proceedings
  • (b) Assistance to enable their views and
    concerns to be presented and considered at
    appropriate stages of criminal proceedings
    against offenders, in a manner not prejudicial to
    the rights of the defence.

9
Cross-cutting Issues Status of Victims of
Trafficking in Persons in Receiving States
  • States Party shall consider adopting legislative
    or other appropriate measures that permit victims
    of trafficking in persons to remain in its
    territory (Article 7)
  • However The immigration status or the return of
    the victim to his or her home country or other
    absence of the victim of trafficking from the
    jurisdiction shall not prevent the court from
    ordering payment of compensation (UNODC Model Law
    against Trafficking in Persons, Article 27(2) and
    28(6)).

10
Cross-cutting issues Financial Investigations,
Freezing, Seizing and Confiscation of Assets
  • Criminal justices measures such as proactive
    financial investigations and early confiscation
    of proceeds necessary for the execution of
    compensation order
  • States Parties shall, to the extent permitted by
    domestic law and if so requested, give priority
    consideration to returning the confiscated
    proceeds of crime or property to the requesting
    State Party so that it can give compensation to
    the victims of the crime (Article 14 (2))

11
Cross-cutting issues Financial Investigations,
Freezing, Seizing and Confiscation of Assets
  • Noting the low rate of convictions for
    trafficking in persons globally, as reported in
    the Global Report on Trafficking in Persons
    published by UNODC in 2009, States parties should
    increase their efforts to investigate and
    prosecute cases involving trafficking in persons,
    including by making timely use of financial
    investigation techniques, special investigative
    techniques and other tools designed to combat
    other forms of organized crime.
    (CTOC/COP/2010/6, para. 35)

12
Cross-cutting Issues Financial Investigations,
Freezing, Seizing and Confiscation of Assets
  • States parties should utilize the Organized
    Crime Convention and other multilateral legal
    instruments to develop and strengthen
    international judicial cooperation, including
    with regard to extradition, mutual legal
    assistance and confiscation of the proceeds of
    trafficking in persons. (CTOC/COP/2010/6, para.
    28(b))
  • States parties should increase cross-border
    criminal justice action through enhanced use of
    joint investigations, information-sharing and
    confiscation of assets, in line with their
    domestic legislation. (CTOC/COP/2010/6, para. 36)

13
State Practice Regional Action Plans
  • BSEC Regional Action Plan for Strengthening the
    Criminal Justice
  • Response to Trafficking in Persons (Black Sea),
    states that States should implement measures that
    offer victims of trafficking in human beings the
    possibility of obtaining compensation (para. 20).
  • ECOWAS Initial Plan of Action Against Trafficking
    in Persons
  • stipulates that States shall adopt legal
    provisions for the protection of victims of
    trafficking, and ensure that their domestic legal
    systems contain measures that offer victims of
    trafficking in persons the possibility of
    obtaining compensation for damage suffered (para.
    6).
  • The OSCE Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in
    Human Beings
  • Asks participating States to consider
    establishing a fund based on the confiscated
    proceeds of trafficking to be used for the
    benefit of trafficking victims including the
    establishment of a compensation fund for them
    (section III, para. 1.5).

14
State Practice I Compensation Funds/Tribunals
  • Bulgaria Assistance and Compensation to Crime
    Victims Act (18 December 2006)
  • Provides for compensation of victims of crime
  • Authorities responsibility of informing victims
    of such rights
  • New South Wales Victims Compensation Tribunal
  • Established under Victims Support and
    Rehabilitation Act (1996)
  • In May 2007 Tribunal awarded compensation to a
    Thai woman who was trafficked to Australia as a
    child for the purpose of sexual exploitation
  • Nigeria Trafficking in Persons Law Enforcement
    and Administration Act 2003
  • The Act establishes a Trust to provide victims
    with compensation for economic, physical and
    psychological damage

15
State Practice II Compensation Funds/Tribunals
  • Egypt Law No. (64) of 2010 regarding Combating
    Human Trafficking, Article 27
  • A fund shall be established to assist victims of
    human trafficking, which shall have a public
    juristic personality under the Prime Minister to
    provide financial assistance to the victims who
    have suffered harm resulting from any of the
    crimes stipulated in this law.
  • A decision by the President of the Republic
    shall regulate this fund and determine its
    jurisdiction, resources and the sources of its
    funding.
  • The proceeds of the fines sentenced for the
    crimes stipulated in this law, as well as the
    properties, objects, and means of transportation
    forfeited shall be allocated directly to the
    fund, which may also accept contributions,
    grants, and donations from national and foreign
    entities.

16
State Practice Right to Initiate Civil Action
  • Serbia Victims are able to file civil suits
    against traffickers and are entitled to temporary
    residence permits
  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
    Victims may initiate civil proceedings for
    damages or compensation arising form injuries
    sustained as a result of being trafficked

17
State Practice Cyprus
  • Cyprus Combating of Trafficking in Persons and
    Sexual Exploitation of Children, Law No. 3(1),
    2000
  • Article 8 gives victim right to sue for special
    and general damages
  • The Court may take into consideration the
    following for general damages
  • a. the extent of the exploitation and the
    benefit the liable derived from such
    exploitation,
  • b. the future prospects of the victim and the
    extent to which such prospects were affected by
    the exploitation,
  • c. the culpability of the offender,
  • d. the relationship or the dominating position
    or influence of the offender with regard to the
    victim. (Article 8(2))
  • The Court, in the award of special damages, takes
    into consideration every item of expense which
    resulted from exploitation including costs for
    repatriation in the case of foreigners. (Article
    8(3))

18
State Practice Israel
  • Israel Legislation enables Governments to seize
    traffickers assets for use in the rehabilitation
    of victims and for compensation
  • Jane Doe vs. Alexander Lifshin and Armen Ben
    Anatoly Reidler (Tel Aviv Yafo District Court ,
    25 January 2010)
  • 500,000 NIS for clients fees withhold
  • 1,000,000 NIS for the non-material damages which
    harmed the victims autonomy, freedom, body and
    soul. The court emphasized the duration of
    suffrage, and noted that this sum should also be
    seen as punitive damages that highlight the need
    to punish the defendant beyond the sentencing
    under criminal law
  • All expenses incurred by the victim, incl.
    150,000 NIS for victims lawyer
  • (100 NIS 27 USD)

19
State Practices Kenya and Portugal
  • Kenya Counter-Trafficking in Persons Act 2010
  • Convicted trafficker is mandated to restitute his
    victim
  • Law also estblishes the National Assitsance Trust
    Fund for Victims of Trafficking
  • Portugal
  • Criminal courts to award criminal damages
  • Advance payment of compensation by State-fund

20
State Practices Norway
Victim options
Government compensation scheme victims of
violent crime
Civil action against perpetrator
Civil claim in criminal case against perpetrator
21
State Practice Norway (continued)
  • Information about rights
  • Consultation with a lawyer
  • Legal representation in criminal cases
  • Assistance from lawyer in preparing civil claim
    in criminal case
  • Confiscation vs. Compensation
  • Confiscated proceeds are not available to victims
  • Case June 2010 Confiscated NOK 32 000. Damages
    NOK 50 000.

22
State Practice Norway (continued)
  • Government Compensation
  • Compensation for Victims of Violent Crime Act
  • Victims of violent crime includes trafficking
  • Administered by Norwegian Criminal Injuries
    Compensation Authority
  • The criminal act must be reported to the police
  • Compensation even when the criminal case is
    dropped
  • Criminal act must have been committed in Norway
  • Practical Use The Compensation Authority will
    often pay the victim according to a conviction,
    and will seek recovery from the convicted person.

23
State Practice Norway (continued)
  • Example Albanian victim
  • NOK 200 000 in damages for non-economic loss
  • NOK 350 000 for permanent injury
  • NOK 120 000 future expenses
  • NOK 290 000 loss of personal income
  • NOK 1.300.000 future loss of personal income
  • (100 NOK 16 USD)

24
State Practice Argentina
  • Law 26.364 (29 April 2008) Prevention and
    Sanction of Trafficking in Persons and
    Assistance to its Victims
  • Provides for compensation and victims receive
    legal aid
  • One method of compensation ordered by the judges
    was to confiscate all the equipment from the
    traffickers and hand them to the victims of
    trafficking for them to start a small business.

25
State Practice United States of America
  • Two Mechanisms
  • Private Lawsuit
  • Restitution Following Criminal Prosecution
  • Mandatory restitution
  • The court shall order restitution for any human
    trafficking offense.
  • There must be a criminal conviction.
  • No other prerequisites for the victims to receive
    restitution
  • Discretionary restitution available for other
    offenses

26
State Practice United States (continued)
  • Funding Restitution
  • Solely Offender Funded
  • Can apply seized and forfeited assets
  • Court cannot consider Defendants financial
    situation
  • Practical Realities
  • United States v. Webster (2009)
  • 3.6 million
  • United States v. Kalimlin (2006)
  • 916,000

27
State Practice United States (continued)
  • Measuring Restitution
  • Full amount of the victims losses
  • Includes
  • medical expenses, physical and psychological
  • physical therapy/rehabilitation
  • necessary transportation, temporary housing,
    child care
  • lost income
  • attorneys fees
  • any other losses proximately caused by
    trafficking
  • Plus
  • The greater of the gross income or value to the
    defendant of the victims services, or
  • the value of the victims labor as guaranteed by
    minimum wage and overtime laws.

28
  • Thank you!
  • Questions?
  • CONTACT
  • ahtmsu_at_unodc.org
  • www.unodc.org
  • Tools and Publications
  • www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/publicati
    ons.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com