Title: Psychology and Illness: Patient Information, Satisfaction and Adherence
1Psychology and Illness Patient Information,
Satisfaction and Adherence
2Important announcement about the assessment
- Prose question will be on the material covered in
the 3rd theme in the module psychology of
illness and treatment (i.e. sessions 8-11) - SAQ questions will cover the whole module
3Objectives
- Evaluate the importance of providing information
for patients - Begin to recognise the importance of patient
satisfaction as an outcome of care and treatment - Examine the problem of non adherence and the
factors influencing adherence
4Patient satisfaction
- An evaluation of a received service by a patient,
contains cognitive and emotional reactions - Why is it important?
- Draws attention to the patients experience of
care - Important as a measure of quality of care
- ? Concept has value in its own right
5What is patient satisfaction?
- Multi-dimensional (Cleary McNeil 1988)
- Technical quality
- Accessibility
- Convenience
- Finance
- Physical environment
- Availability
- Continuity
- Outcome
- The art of care
6What is the art of care?
7What is the art of care?
- Health professionals interpersonal skills
- Communication skills
- Sensitivity/empathy for patients concerns
- These valued as much as technical skills by
patients
8Why is patient satisfaction important (again)?
- Adherence
- Re-attendance
- Change of health care provider
- Use of complementary therapies
- Health status and well being
- o      Cleary et al (1991) patients who reported
poor health reported 2x more problems with care
than those who rated their health as excellent - ? Concept has value because of its association
with important outcomes
9What influences patient satisfaction?
- Communication, communication, communication
- And
- Interpersonal skills
10What influences patient satisfaction?
- Roter (1989) most important influence was
doctors information giving and interpersonal
skills - Effective information giving is bi-directional
depends on identifying patients main concerns
11Information and Patient Satisfaction
- Survey by Bruster 1994 of over 5000 patients
attending 36 NHS hospitals - Main source of dissatisfaction was communication
- 16 reported receiving no explanation of
condition - Not given important information about
hospital/routine and treatment - Discharge planning and pain management also gave
rise to complaints
12Patient information
- French physician Samuel de Sorbiere (1672) argued
that telling patients the truth - Might seriously jeopardise medical practice
- Would not catch on!
- He was right
- Oken (1961) 90 of US surgeons would not
routinely discuss cancer diagnosis with their
patients - Thomsen et al (1993) survey of European
gastroenterologists 60 did not routinely tell
patients of their cancer diagnosis
13Why is information important?
- (Most) patients want it and have a right to it
(informed consent) - Meredith (1996) 96 of patients attending an
oncology clinic wanted to know if their illness
was cancer 75 wanted as much information as
possible - Ajaj (2001) 88 of older people (65-94 years)
wanted to be told if they had cancer 62 wanted
as much information as possible - Patients feel they have a right to information
and that they the patient should have a say in
who else is told
14Why is information important?
- Reduced distress, analgesia, pain, hospital stay
- Improved recovery, quicker resumption of normal
activities - Improved physiological outcomes (e.g. blood
pressure, heart rate)
15Why is information important?
- Information important for decision-making and
patient self management - Patients need to understand what is happening to
them so they can make sense of their
experiences - Important for trust and the doctor-patient
relationship
16What do patients want to know?
- A disease label or name
- Causes
- Prognosis
- Symptoms
- Diagnosis/ further tests
- Treatment sensory information
- Treatment procedural information
- Treatment efficacy/outcomes/risks
- Other (practical/ emotional information/ needs)
17Important issues in giving information
- Individual differences in patients preferences
for information - E.g. cultural differences linked to age, gender,
ethnicity, social class, - Differences in coping strategies (monitorers v
blunters) - Differences over time
- Complexity
18Complexity of giving information
- Mismatch between patient needs and doctor views
- Need to avoid harming vulnerable patients (e.g.
highly anxious, children) - Time constraints
- You dont know what you dont know patients need
to be supported in making their needs known
19Complexity of giving information
- Unvoiced concerns
- But if your hearts damaged does it deteriorate
more over the years or does it remain at that
level? Do you know what I mean? - Is it terminal?
- Barriers
- Even my own doctor and the doctor before that
they dont take you into their confidence Either
they think you are stupid or else not
interested
20Complexity of giving information
- Despite its importance to patients, information
giving may be perceived as non technical
delegated to inexperienced staff - Difficulty of finding out how much information
individual patients want need for continual
assessment of patients cues
21Complexity of giving information
- If the breaking of bad news is done badly,
patients and their families may never forgive us,
but if it is done well they will never forget us
- Robert Buckman (1996) Medical oncologist
22Compliance (adherence/concordance)
- Haynes the extent to which a persons behaviour
(taking medications, following diets, or changing
lifestyle) coincides with medical or health
advice. - Compliance following doctors orders
- Concordance negotiation over treatment regimes
23(No Transcript)
24Rates of Non Adherence
- Reported medication non adherence varies between
4-92 - In chronic illness 30-50 of patients are non
adherent
25Measuring adherence Indirect
- Patient self report
- Pros easy, inexpensive
- Cons prone to disadvantages
- Second hand reports (doctors, relatives)
- Pros and cons similar to self reports
- Depends on familiarity with patient
- Health profs. over estimate adherence
- Pill counts
- Pros more objective
- Cons prone to inaccuracies and bias
26Measuring adherence Indirect
- Mechanical or electronic to record dose dispensed
- Pros objective, most accurate indirect method
- Cons does not measure whether medication has
been taken -
27Measuring adherence Direct
- Blood or urine tests
- Pros direct information on consumption/adherence
to advice - Cons
- Expensive and invasive limits use
- Affected by metabolism
- Non adherence may be masked
- Observation (of consumption of medication)
28Understanding non adherence
- Patient characteristics
- Not associated with any major socio-demographic
variables (Haynes et al 1979) except age - Adherence lower in preschool children,
adolescents, older infirm patients on complex
drug regimes - Adherence varies in individuals over time and
between different aspects of treatment regime
29- She wouldnt allow any of the treatment I sat
down with her one day and I said You do know
that unless you let the doctors give you your
treatment youll die. She sat quietly and she
sat there and she thought about it and from then
on she changed I was getting frustrated because
she wouldnt allow any of the treatment I was
just desperate, desperate and nobody else could
give me any advice because Id tried everything -
- Mother of 5 year old girl who had leukaemia
30Reasons for non adherence
- Illness severity and adherence
- Non adherence is common even in severe illness
- Greenstein Siegal (1998) 22 of adult renal
patients were non adherent - Rovelli (1989) 91 of renal patients who fail to
take their medication experience organ rejection
or death (18 of adherent patients)
31Treatment characteristics
- Side-effects
- Complexity importance of how well treatment fits
patients routine (Myers Branthwaite, 1992) -
32Treatment characteristics
33Treatment characteristics
- Patient experience and efficacy of medications
- Are symptoms relieved?
- Asymptomatic conditions, delayed efficacy
-
34Information/ Knowledge
35Information/ Knowledge
- Basic awareness of how and when to take
medication is essential for adherence - Beyond this associations between knowledge and
adherence are small
36Memory
- Remembering that you have medicine to take
- Remembering when and how to do it
- Information and memory are necessary but not
sufficient for adherence - Non-adherence may be intentional
37Understanding intentional non adherence
- Doctor-patient relationship and communication
- Patient satisfaction with doctor and with
information/ explanation - Dissatisfaction diminishes the motivation to
adhere
38Intentional non adherence
- For the prescriber to reaffirm the views of
medical science and to dismiss or ignore the
patients beliefs is to fail to prescribe
effectively - Royal Pharmaceutical Society
39Intentional non adherence
- Patients beliefs and cognitions (Horne 1997)
- Specific Necessity beliefs about efficacy of
medication - Specific Concerns beliefs about the potential
for harm - General Harm beliefs about intrinsic
properties of medicines - General Overuse beliefs about whether
medicines are over used
40Intentional non adherence
- Discrepancies between doctor and patient beliefs
(e.g. about risk of not taking medication) - Misunderstandings in prescribing because of lack
of patient participation in the consultation
(Britten et al 2000) - Patients beliefs about medicines go unvoiced
(i.e. their expectations and preferences) - Doctors need to check whether their
understandings about patients are correct - Ask patients what they think of taking their
medicines
41Patient Prof. Disease Treatment
Adherence
42Summary
- Importance of patient satisfaction
- Need for patient information
- Distinguish between intentional and unintentional
non adherence - Importance of d-p relationship and patients
beliefs about medicines
43Steps to improve adherence
- Discuss the patients beliefs
- Simplify the treatment/tailor to the patient
- Make sure the patient is satisfied
- Check patient understanding and your
communication - Provide written information
- Consider involving significant others
- Regular follow-up - ask about problems with
treatment - Consider using reminder devices
- Reminder research project on prioritising health
care, with Katherine. This lunchtime at 1245 in
room 208 C.