Title: Tackling Inequalities, Meeting Real Needs
1Tackling Inequalities,Meeting Real Needs
Oral Care Conference 23rd September 2011 The
Node Conference Centre
- Sue Gregory OBE
- Deputy Chief Dental Officer (England)
2Overview
- Oral health and inequalities in England
- Changing context of the NHS
- Commissioning changes
- Government commitments to oral health
- Dental Contract Reform and prevention in practice
- OHA and pathways
- Dental Quality and Outcomes Framework
- Collaborative/Community approaches
- Whats in it for you?
3Oral Health in 12 year olds
4Average number of dentinally decayed, missing and
filled teeth in 12 year old children 2008/09 by
PCT
Lowest 0.23 England mean 0.74 Highest
1.48 BUT 66.7 of children had no
experience Average of those affected 2.21
5Average number of dentinally decayed, missing and
filled teeth in 5 year old children 2007/08 by
PCT Lowest 0.48 England mean 1.1 Highest
2.5 BUT 69.1 of children had no
experience Average of those affected 3.45
6Source Childrens Dental Health in the United
Kingdom Social factors and oral health in
children. Office for National Statistics
7(No Transcript)
8Adult Oral Health
Source Adult Dental Health Survey 2009-
Executive Summary, NHS Information Centre
9Adult Dental Health Survey 2009 headline figures
- 86 of dentate adults had 21 or more natural
teeth - 72 adults had no visible coronal caries
- The average number of decayed or unsound teeth
was 1.0, with only small variations across the
age ranges - Only 6 of adults were edentate
10 Source NHS Information Centre Outcome and
impact a report from the Adult Dental Health
Survey 2009
11- Oral Health Impacts
- Just under two-fifths of all adults (39 per cent)
experienced one or more of the problems included
in OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile-14 scale)
occasionally or more often in the previous 12
months. - Most commonly reported OHIP-14 problems physical
pain (30 per cent) and psychological discomfort
(19 per cent) - Between 1998 and 2009 the proportion of dentate
adults in England who reported having experienced
one or more problem on the OHIP-14 scale
occasionally or more often in the previous 12
months, fell by 12 percentage points 51 per cent
in 1998 to 39 per cent in 2009. - A third of all adults (33 per cent) said they had
difficulty performing at least one element of the
OIDP (Oral Impacts on Daily Performance).
Overall, the more prevalent oral impacts among
adults were difficulty eating (21 per cent),
smiling (15 per cent), cleaning teeth (13 per
cent) and relaxing (10 per cent).
12Reform of the NHS
- White Paper published July 2010 for
consultation - Places patients at the heart of services, enabled
by easy access to the information they need and
want, and involved in decisions about their care - Places a focus on relentlessly improving the
clinical outcomes of care moving away from
measurement of process - Empowers professionals and trusts in their
clinical judgment, and - Achieves efficiency gains and reduces bureaucracy
13Supporting consultative papers
- Local democratic legitimacy in health
- Transparency in outcomes a framework for the
NHS - Regulating healthcare providers
- Commissioning for patients
- Developing the healthcare workforce
14Public Health White Paper
- Publication 30th November 2010
- A coherent national framework across Government
with outcome goals - National Public Health Service, with strong
evaluation strategy, to be fully operational by
April 2012 - Directors of Public Health in LAs
- Ring-fenced public health budget
- Empowering individuals, families and local
communities a new relationship between
government and people
15Reference to dental public health
- the dental public health workforce will increase
its focus on effective health promotion and
prevention of oral disease, provision of
evidence-based oral care and effective dental
clinical governance. It will concentrate
particularly on improving childrens oral health,
because those who have healthy teeth in childhood
have every chance of keeping good oral health
throughout their lives. It will also make a vital
contribution to implementation of a new contract
for primary care dentistry, which the Government
is to introduce to increase emphasis on
prevention while meeting patients treatment
needs more effectively.
16Outcomes Frameworks
- NHS Outcomes framework 3 domains- effectiveness
of treatment and care, measured by clinical and
patient reported outcomes- safety of treatment
and care- broader patient experienceAvailable
from April 2011, implementation April 2012 - Separate public health outcomes
frameworkincluding - Rate of dental caries in children aged 5 years
(decayed, missing or filled teeth)
17The Reformed System
- The White Paper envisages that power and
responsibility for commissioning most services
will be devolved to local consortia of GP
practices. - NHS dentistry will be one of a number of services
that will not be devolved. - An autonomous NHS Commissioning Board will be
established
18Functions of NHS Commissioning Board
- Providing national leadership on commissioning
for quality improvement - Promoting and extending public and patient
involvement and choice - Ensuring the development of GP commissioning
consortia - Commissioning certain services that cannot solely
be commissioned by consortia, including dentistry - Hosting of clinical networks and clinical senates
- Allocating and accounting for NHS resources
19Timeline
- The Board will be established in shadow form as a
Special Health Authority from October 2011 - It will go live in October 2012 as a separate
statutory body, taking on full functions April
2013 - It is anticipated that all consortia will be
fully functioning by 2013 - SHAs and PCTs will be abolished by April 2013
- The sub national arrangements of the Board will
reflect the SHA and PCT clusters
20Changes to Dental Commissioning
- Currently PCTs commission Primary Secondary
Care Dentistry using a number of contract types.
From 2013 these services will be commissioned by
the NHS Commissioning Board. The benefits of a
nationally commissioned dental service include - The ability to address overlap between the
primary secondary care sectors - The opportunity to move care from secondary to
primary sectors - The opportunity to develop centralised
commissioning dental expertise - The opportunity to share clinical best practice
more widely.
21Emerging proposals Dental, Pharms, Optoms
Health and well being boards
Provider skills networks
Consortia
Informing needs, demand, supply in primary,
community and secondary care
Peer support, peer review and benchmarking
Local professional networks
Maximising performance
Local intelligence, clinical expertise,
innovation and development of integrated care
pathways
NHS CB field force
Implementation and development plans to reflect
local circumstances
NHSCB national
Aggregation of need and assurance of performance
Strategy, policy, contract, procedure and
assurance of achievement of outcomes
22central
central
central
outsourced
outsourced/central
field
place
23Local v national
- If contract management was undertaken once
nationally, with agreed standard approaches to
common issues and routine contract monitoring and
performance management done centrally what key
tasks would need to be undertaken locally? - What are the key clinical/professional elements
that could be undertaken once nationally and what
would need to be undertaken locally?
24What is local?
- Identifying health needs of local communities
- Ensuring patient choice and patient involvement
- Identifying gaps in access to services
- Producing oral health strategies for local
communities - Preventive programmes
- Enabling/supporting democratic/community input
and accountability in commissioning decisions - Forum for clinicians
- Local face to face interaction in contract
management - Development of local professional networks?
25Strength of local professional networks?
- Local knowledge and expertise, enables-
- - meaningful, intelligent interpretation of
data - - local investigation
- - local action
- - local relationships
26Government Commitments on Oral Health
- In the Coalition Agreement the government stated
their intention to - Introduce a new contract based on registration,
capitation and quality - Increase access to primary dental services
- Improve the oral health of the population,
particularly children.
27Steele Review- NHS Dental Services in England
- 22nd June 2009
- Just as health is the desired outcome of the rest
of the NHS, so health should now be the desired
outcome for NHS dentistry
28(No Transcript)
29What does a public health approach in practice
mean to you?
- A sandal wearing prevention agent of a nanny
state?
30Dental Contract Reform
Unmet Need Met Need
Appropriate Use Avoidable Use
NEED
Need to achieve met need Appropriate use of
services
DEMAND
31I cant sleep!
Manufacturers of poor oral health Sugar,
smoking, lack of Fluoride, poor plaque control
ILLNESS FACTORIES
Oh my tooth!.
Tobacco Sweets Beer
Help!
Help!
Adapted from Mc Kinley (1979) by Makiko Nishi
32?F THE 8760 H?URS IN ?NE YEAR
H?UR BY H?UR CARE ?F a Chronic Condition
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35Public Health in Clinical Practice
- Understand practice population and identify
individual need - Think upstream and pathway interventions
- - like following a musical score!
- Communicate risk transfer responsibility
- Celebrate and record improved outcomes
36Benefits of Outcomes Focus
- Key development in NHS reform agenda
- Focus on promoting health and well being not on
repair and treatment - Stronger focus on outcomes to reduce
inequalities and prevent disease - Emphasises on effectiveness
- Recognises potential of clinical engagement and
using whole team to deliver care pathway
37Pilot Contract Types
- Type 3
- Weighted capitation quality model, with
separate budget for higher cost treatments
Type 2 Weighted capitation quality model
Pilot practices will be guaranteed their contract
value (their remuneration in the current contract
year) and required to deliver the same NHS
commitment whilst adhering to the new pathway.
These pilots will test the implications of
applying a national weighted capitation model
where capitation payments vary for different
patients depending on the factors on which the
national capitation model is based.
These pilots will test the implications of
applying a national weighted capitation model but
the capitation payment will be for preventative
and routine care only and complex care will be
funded separately.
38Capitation potential variables
39New patient visits dentist
Routine care
Urgent care
Definitive care relief
Assessment of oral health
Accept
Recommend assessment of oral health
Disease prevention and management
Decline
Continuity of care and routine management
Proposed patient Pathway (Steele)
Advanced care
40Clinical pathways in primary dental care
Quality Indicators
Patient Assessment
Patient Assessment
Risk Screening
Patient self-care plan
Patient self-care plan
Care Pathways
Recall intervals
Entry criteria
Complexity Assessments
41Overview of risk screening process
Risk screening
Patient Assessment
Risk Category
Prevention
Recall
Domains
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
C
Patient actions
T1
Caries
T2
P
Dentist actions
T3
C
Patient actions
T1
Perio
T2
Dentist actions
P
T3
C
Patient actions
T1
Soft tissue
T2
P
Dentist actions
T3
C
Patient actions
T1
T2
TSL
P
Dentist actions
T3
Self care plan, preventive and treatment plans
C
Clinical Factors
KEY
P
Patient Factors
Time interval
T
42Determining the clinical and patient
factors for CARIES
Domain
Caries
Actions (pathways)
Clinical factors
Patient factors
Risk
Professional
Patient
Age
Teeth with carious lesions
Symptoms
Diet Excess sugar Frequent sugar
No teeth with carious lesions
Poor plaque control
Sibling experience
Patient Communication
43Assigning risk The patients risk status for each
domain is determined as follows
Allocated if there is a red clinical factor,
this cannot be modified by patient factors.
Red risk status
Amber risk status is allocated if there is an
amber clinical factor, or if there is a green
clinical factor but a co-existing patient factor
which increases risk e.g. a patient with no
caries would still be classed amber if there was
poor plaque control
Amber risk status
Green risk status is allocated to those with
green clinical factors and no patient factors
which increase risk.
Green risk status
44Prevention in practice
- Simple messages
- Concise advice
- Evidence based with strength of evidence
- Practical and easy to use
- Good reference for sugar free medicines and
fluoride concentration in toothpaste - Links with healthy eating
45Pilot Dental Quality Outcomes Framework
- Quality is a necessary part of future dental
contracts and it will take time to get a quality
system that is solely outcome based. Quality is
defined as covering three domains - Clinical effectiveness
- Patient experience
- Safety
Continual development and raising the bar
Measures ready for contract pilots
Measures ready for contract implementation
Longer term development of quality indicators
Pathway Development
Work on quality indicators, and in particular
outcome indicators, is relatively new in the NHS
and even more so in dentistry. The DQOF will
therefore continue to be developed over the
coming years. The framework will be underpinned
by the development of a comprehensive set of
accredited clinical pathways.
46The Development of DQOF
The DQOF working group followed the process
outlined below working back from first principles
to define indicators that support the consensus
within dentistry that good oral health is the
ideal clinical outcome
The patients view of being free from pain and
good functionality should be covered by patient
experience and PROMS domain rather than clinical
effectiveness
Outcomes (patient view)
Measures
Clinical components of the OHA
Improvement
Maintenance
- The clinical view is covered in this domain
- and focuses on
- Improvement in oral health
- Maintenance of good oral health
Caries Perio
Outcomes (clinical view)
(World Health Organisation 1982)
47Elements of PDCPA for DQOF
Patient Assessment
Utility of PDCPA for DQOF measure
Measured at Review
Clinical Domains
Maintenance/improvement 3 categories
?
C
- - - - - - -
x
Caries
P
Maintenance/improvement 2 categories
?
C
Perio
x
P
x
C
Soft tissue
x
P
x
C
TSL
x
P
Key
C
P
Patient Factors
Clinical Factors
48Clinical Effectiveness Outcome Indicators for
payment (60)
The following outcome indicators are derived from
the clinical elements of the assessment based on
the standardised NHS primary dental care patient
assessment (PDCPA) and the associated risk
screening process. The indicator information will
be captured at review and achievement of the
indicator is described as either maintaining or
improving a patients condition.
Measure Points MAX600
Active decayed teeth (dt) aged 5 years old and under, reduction in number of carious teeth/child 50 Under 5s active decay (dt) improved or maintained 150
Active Decayed Teeth (DT) aged 6 years old and over, reduction in number of carious teeth/child 75 over 6s improved or maintained 150
Active Decayed Teeth (DT) reduction in number of carious teeth/dentate adult 75 improved or maintained 150
75 patients with BPE improved or maintained at oral health review 75
50 patients with BPE 2 or more with sextant bleeding sites improved at oral health review 75
49Patient Experience Indicators for payment (30)
Measure Points - Max300
Are you able to speak and eat comfortably? of patients reporting that they are able to speak eat comfortably MAX 30 Level 1 45-54 15 Level 2 55-100 30
How satisfied were you with the cleanliness of the practice? of patients satisfied with the cleanliness of the dental practice MAX 30 Level 1 80-89 15 Level 2 90-100 30
How helpful were the staff at the practice? of patients satisfied with the helpfulness of practice staff MAX 30 Level 1 80-89 15 Level 2 90-100 30
Did you feel sufficiently involved in decisions about your care? of patients reporting that they felt sufficiently involved in decisions about their care MAX 50 Level 1 70-84 25 Level 2 85-100 50
Would you recommend this practice to a friend? of patients who would recommend the dental practice to a friend MAX 100 Level 1 70-79 50 Level 2 80-89 75 Level 3 90-100100
How satisfied are you with the NHS dentistry received? of patients reporting satisfaction with NHS dentistry received MAX 50 Level 1 80-84 20 Level 2 85-89 40 Level 3 90-100 50
How do you feel about the length of time taken to get appointment? of patients satisfied with the time to get an appointment MAX 10 Level 1 70- 84 5 Level 2 85-100 10
50Safety Indicators for payment (10)
- Safety quality measures will fall under the remit
of CQC and work with professional bodies such as
the GDC. The dental profession and commissioners
are committed to ensuring that clinical practice
remains safe and that safety is a fundamental
part of the service that is delivered. - Consequently, patient safety overall is not
something that should be rewarded through a
quality payment as all dentists should adhere to
safe practices. However clinical aspects of
patient safety can be monitored and rewarded
through payment and payment will be made on the
following indicator
Measure Points MAX100
90 of patients for whom an up-to-date medical history is recorded at each oral health review MAX 100
51Indicators for monitoring overall quality (no
payment)
It is proposed that the following quality
indicators are monitored throughout the pilots to
understand the impact of the change of system on
clinical behaviour and patient perception.
Measure Domain
of children aged 11 who have had an assessment of unerupted canines Clinical effectiveness
of children aged 18 and under who have had fluoride varnish in the last year. Clinical effectiveness
Was the cost of treatment explained to you before your treatment started? Patient Experience
Do you understand what you personally need to do to maintain and improve your oral health? Patient Experience
Do you understand how healthy your teeth and gums are? Patient Experience
52Advanced care pathways
- Indirect restorations
- Metal based partial dentures
- Endodontic treatment
- Advanced periodontal careNow starting work on
minor oral surgery and intend then to look at
paedodontics
53Decision making cascade
54Indirect Restorations (Veneers, Inlays, Crowns
Bridges)
Teeth that can be restored and made functional
Risk Screening
Teeth with good prognosis
and entry
Patients co
operation does not preclude indirect restorations
criteria to be
determined
The patients Medical History does not preclude
crown and/or bridge work i
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Restorations not involved in anterior Guidance,
where there are adequate Sound or restored teeth
to predictably Maintain the existing
occlusion (conformative approach)
Restorations that contribute to anterior guidance
where there are sufficient sound or restored
teeth to predictably maintain the existing
occlusion (conformative approach)
Extra coronal restoration of the complete
anterior guidance including pontic units
Extra coronal restoration of opposing sextants
(all teeth)
Extra coronal restoration of any one posterior
sextant (all teeth), not involved in anterior
guidance where a terminal unit is involved
Restoration that are supported by osseointegrated
implants
No more than 3 units of crown or bridge work
Significant re
-
organisation of occlusion
More than 3 units of crown or bridge work
Evidence of significant parafunction
Slight limitation of mouth opening
Significant/severe limitation of mouth opening
Work to be carried out by a GDP who
Work to be carried out by GDP
has additional competencies
Work to be referred to Specialist Services
(
-
crowns which are produced in a lab)
Page
5
55Learning from the Pilots
- Qualitative
- the experiences and impact on
- Dentists
- PCTs
- Patients
- Quantitative
- Clinical data set from Oral Health Assessment
- PCR ??
56Next steps
- Develop proposals for the new contract, and for
reforms to the patient charging system to fit in
with the new contract. - The changes will require legislation, which will
be introduced to Parliament in a Bill timing to
be confirmed. - Public consultation on the changes
- Leading toLegislation to introduce new contract
57Windsor Dental Practice, Salford
Extended duties dental nurse
Hygienist
Smoking cessation adviser
Therapists
58Specialisation and the Workforce
- Need to look at those areas of care outside of
mandatory services, including-- orthodontics-
domiciliary- sedation - Piloting within salaried services
- Impact of skill-mix
59(No Transcript)
60Background
- Local Area Agreement (LAA) identified
- childrens oral health as a local priority
- Lancashire County Council funded a LAA Oral
Health Lead to work with NHS colleagues - Children and Young Peoples Oral Health Strategy
developed and approved by the LA/NHS partnership
Be Healthy Theme Group
61and enables Early Years Foundation Stage settings
to demonstrate and be recognised for their oral
health improvement activity through the
Smile4Life Award Scheme
62Politics of the Smile4Life Programme
- Is consistent with the Coalition direction of
travel - Focus on public health and prevention
- Focus on encouraging healthy behaviours
- Focus on collaboration with local authorities
responsibility for outcomes - Focus on oral health
- of school children and
- increased access
63Implementation of Smile4Life Programme
- Salaried Service OHI team to act as experts and
advisors - Local Childrens Centres to identify Oral Health
Champion - Dental practice staff to link with local settings
64Whats in it for you?
- Primary/Secondary care interface
- Clinical leadership
- Networks
- Training and development
- QIPP