Measurement and Computation of Molecular Potential Energy Surfaces - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Measurement and Computation of Molecular Potential Energy Surfaces

Description:

Measurement and Computation of Molecular Potential Energy Surfaces Polik Research Group Hope College Department of Chemistry Holland, MI 49423 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Willi393
Learn more at: http://www.chem.hope.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measurement and Computation of Molecular Potential Energy Surfaces


1
Measurement and Computation of Molecular
Potential Energy Surfaces
  • Polik Research Group
  • Hope College
  • Department of Chemistry
  • Holland, MI 49423

2
Measurement and Computation of Molecular
Potential Energy Surfaces
  • Jennica Skoug, David Gorno, Eli Scheele
  • Polik Research Group
  • Hope College
  • Department of Chemistry
  • Holland, MI 49423

3
Outline
  • Potential Energy Surfaces
  • Dispersed Fluorescence Spectroscopy
  • Molecular Beam
  • Lasers
  • Monochromator
  • Resonant Polyad Model
  • Harmonic and Anharmonic Terms
  • Vibrational State Mixing
  • Computation of PESs and Vibrational Levels

4
Potential Energy Surfaces
  • A Potential Energy Surface (PES) describes how a
    molecules energy depends on geometry
  • Chemical structure, properties, and reactivity
    can be calculated from the PES

5
Measuring PESs Vibrational States
  • Measuring highly excited vibrational states
    allows characterization of the PES away from the
    equilibrium structure of the molecule

6
Molecular Beam for Sample Preparation
  • A molecular beam cools the sample to 5K
  • Molecules occupy the lowest quantum state and
    simplify the resulting spectrum

7
Lasers for Electronic Excitation
  • Laser provide an intense monochromatic light
    source
  • Lasers motes molecules to an excited electronic
    state

8
Monochromator for Detection
  • A monchromator disperses molecular fluorescence
  • Evibrational level Elaser Efluoresence

9
Dispersed Fluorescence Spectrum
31 HFCO
10
Summary of Assignments
Molecule Previous Current Energy Range(cm-1) Year
H2CO 81 279 0 - 12,500 1996
D2CO 7 261 0 - 12,000 1998
HFCO 44 382 0 - 22,500 2002
H2COH2CO dissociation barrier 28,000
cm-1 HFCOHFCO dissociation barrier 17,000 cm-1
11
Harmonic and Anharmonic Models
  • A harmonic oscillator predicts equally spaced
    energy levels
  • Anharmonic corrections shift vibrational energy
    levels as the PES widens

12
Polyad Model
2265 k26,5 215164 k26,5 5263
? k44,66 ? k44,66 ? k44,66
224263 k26,5 21425162 k26,5 425261
? k44,66 ? k44,66
224461 k26,5 214451
  • Groups of vibrational states interacting through
    resonances are called polyads
  • Resonances mix vibrational energy levels
  • Energy levels are calculated from the Schrodinger
    Eqn

13
Matrix Form of Schrödinger Equation
Diagonal Elements Off-Diagonal Elements
HarmonicEnergy
AnharmonicCorrection
Resonant Interactions
14
H2CO Anharmonic Polyad Model Fits
Parameter Fit 1 Fit 2 Fit3 Fit 4
?1 2818.9 2812.3 2813.7 2817.4
? ? ? ? ?
?6 1260.6 1254.8 1251.5 1251.9
x11 -40.1 -29.8 -30.7 -34.4
? ? ? ? ?
x66 -5.2 -2.8 -2.1 -2.2
k26,5 148.6 146.7 138.6
k36,5 129.3 129.6 135.1
k11,55 140.5 137.4 129.3
k44,66 21.6 23.3
k25,35 18.5
Std Dev 23.4 4.34 3.34 2.80
15
Model Fits to Experimental Data
16
Polyad Quantum Numbers
  • H2CO
  • D2CO
  • HFCO

k36,5 Noop v4 (destroyed by
k44,66) k26,5 Nvib v1v4v5v6 (destroyed by
k1,44 and k1,66) k11,55 Nres 2v1v2v3v42v5v6
(remains good!)
k1,44 Nvib v2v3v5 (ultimately
destroyed) k44,66 NCO v2 (remains
good!) k36,5 Nres 2v12v2v3v42v5v6
(remains good!)
k2,66 Npolyad 2v2v6 others? v1, v3, v4, v5 may
remain good
17
Polyad Quantum Numbers
  • H2CO
  • D2CO
  • HCCH

k36,5 Noop v4 (destroyed by
k44,66) k26,5 Nvib v1v4v5v6 (destroyed by
k1,44 and k1,66) k11,55 Nres 2v1v2v3v42v5v6
(remains good!)
k1,44 Nvib v2v3v5 (ultimately
destroyed) k44,66 NCO v2 (remains
good!) k36,5 Nres 2v12v2v3v42v5v6
(remains good!)
many Nstr v1v2v3 (ultimately
destroyed) reson- Nl l4l5 (ultimately
destroyed) ances Nres 5v13v25v3v4v5
(remains good!)
18
Computation of PESs
  • The Potential Energy E can be represented by a
    Taylor series expansion of the geometry
    coordinates qi
  • A quartic PES requires computation of many
    high-order force constants (partial derivatives)
  • Force constants predict vibrational energy level
    shifts and mixing

19
Parallel Computing
  • Force constants are computed as numerical
    derivatives, i.e., by calculating energies of
    displaced geometries
  • PES calculation takes hours instead of weeks with
    parallel computing

20
Computation of PES and Vibrations
21
Conclusions
  • DF spectroscopy is a powerful technique for
    measuring excited states (general, selective,
    sensitive)
  • Resonances shift and mix vibrational states
  • The anharmonic polyad model accounts for
    resonances and assigns highly mixed spectra (w,
    x, k)
  • Polyad quantum numbers remain at high energy
    (Nres always conserved)
  • High level quartic PES calculations and polyad
    model accurately predict excited vibrational
    states

22
Acknowledgements
  • H2CO
  • Rychard Bouwens (UC Berkeley - Physics), Jon
    Hammerschmidt (U Minn - Chemistry), Martha
    Grzeskowiak (Mich St - Med School), Tineke
    Stegink (Netherlands - Industry), Patrick Yorba
    (Med School)
  • D2CO
  • Gregory Martin (Dow Chemical), Todd Chassee (U
    Mich - Med School), Tyson Friday (Industry)
  • HFCO
  • Katie Horsman (U Va - Chemistry), Karen Hahn
    (Med School), Ron Heemstra (Pfizer - Industry),
    Ben Ellingson (U Minn Chemistry)
  • Funding
  • NSF, Beckman Foundation, ACS-PRF, Research
    Corporation, Wyckoff Chemical, Exxon,
    Warner-Lambert
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com