Informatics Breakout Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Informatics Breakout Group

Description:

Informatics Breakout Group IC GS – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: wybo4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Informatics Breakout Group


1
Informatics Breakout Group
2
Informatics Breakout topics discussed
  • How will 1G integrate with topographic data?
  • Centralized, distributed, or hybrid model?
  • How will authorship be communicated?
  • Will we use GeoSciML for WFS schematic
    interoperability?
  • Linguistic base of 1G project?
  • 6) A detailed timetable. What precisely is the
    next step for surveys?

3
1. How will 1G integrate with topographic data
  • Recommendations
  • When we serve the web maps (OGC WMS,WFS), WGS 84
    (lat/long) is the default projection and the
    software offers other options as well e.g. the
    national projection
  • That by default a topographic layer can be
    accessed from the GlobalMap 11M or the SRTM base
    in real time as a web service but a nation can
    serve its geology with integral topography if it
    wants to
  • For bathymetry we can use GEBCO derivatives
  • For Antarctica we have been offered SCAR

4
2) Centralised or distributed model?
  • Recommendations
  • A hybrid whereby those that can make their data
    accessible from their website as a web service do
    so, and then we have regional data centres that
    host the web services for for those agencies that
    do to have the technical capability
  • OneGeology can be accessed through the OneGeology
    portal which will lead people to the OneGeology
    services
  • The portal will also provide, registry, technical
    reference and conformance tests and management
    services which will (only) need to be resourced
    sustainably
  • By having a registry, OneGeology services can be
    accessed through other portals/web clients

5
3. How will authorship of data be communicated
  • Recommendations
  • You can have the logo of each organisation that
    is serving the data within their piece of the
    jigsaw
  • The One Geology specification will require that
    the web services returning the data will include
    reference to the data provider and a link back to
    their home website to allow viewing of other data
    offerings

6
4. Do we use GeoSciML?
  • Recommendations
  • Yes, it is already endorsed in Australia, Canada,
    US and proposed to be used in INSPIRE and AEGOS.
    It will be an IUGS endorsed Conceptual model of
    GeoScience that we can all use to exchange
    geoscience data
  • Note the WMS (Raster) level service does not
    require a Markup Language like GeoSciML
  • Must have GeoSciML to fully exploit vector data
    and to exchange feature data within OneGeology

7
5. Linguistic base of OneGeology project
  • Recommendations
  • The legend available with each web map service
    may by default, be in the nations home language,
    but each nation aims to provide an English (and
    or other) alternative legend in parallel when it
    can
  • Full Multilingual capability (e.g. where returned
    feature attributes are linked to multilingual
    concept definitions) is part of semantic
    interoperability, and therefore part of future
    goals
  • Need multilingual initiatives to come together
    under CGI and to combine with the GeoSciML
    Concept Definitions Working Group

8
6. Prerequisites for OneGeology Involvement (1)
  • To provide a WMS you only require georeferenced
    scanned paper map or raster digital GIS data
  • To provide feature and complex data queries via
    GeoSciML based WFS you
  • Need to map from your GIS server (ARCINFO, Map
    Info,ORACLE etc ) data store to WFS server
    configuration (Geoserver or Mapserver/arcims/Cocoo
    n)
  • Need a (trained) person week, but includes
    getting WFS going with open source software (IT
    issues)
  • Note that the mapping process will be simple
    (small part of GeoSciML) if the themes chosen by
    the geological specification group are simple
    e.g. simple polygons with few attributes such as
    bedrock, lithology and age

9
6. Prerequisites for OneGeology Involvement (2)
  • Support services required
  • A OneGeology specific branded cookbook (No 1) on
    How to setup a WMS (raster) service (with no
    GIS/GeoSciML)
  • A cookbook (No 2) that explains how we map from
    the backend data base to the GeoSciML WFS service
    and these could be developed in multi-lingual
    versions
  • A cookbook (No 3) How to set up a WMS and/or WFS
    web service on your web server using Opensource
    software
  • A support team or available (email?) expert team
    and it has to be funded
  • A series of Regional Workshops to build
    technology capability within staff
  • Base work on Open Source technologies so software
    free
  • Use a collaborative Website (TWIKI) (as with
    GeoSciML)

10
7. Detailed Timetable
  • Recommendation
  • Need a specification that shows what OneGeology
    is about
  • Need a draft which is developed in a short time
    so that it is available for comment could be
    achieved within three months of staff funding
    being obtained.
  • Specification would include
  • Project outline and Roadmap
  • Diagrams on how it will work
  • Reference to cookbooks and support to be used

11
Conclusions
  • Positive atmosphere
  • People wanted to move forward aggressively to
    adopt advanced solutions
  • However, we need to recognise and respect the
    varying technical capabilities that the
    individual agencies have
  • We also need to respect their own business
    drivers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com