Analysis of Resilience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis of Resilience

Description:

Flood Disaster Risk Management in the Philippines and Thailand: An Institutional and Political Perspective Jesse Bacamante Manuta School of Arts and Sciences – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: LouisL151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis of Resilience


1
Flood Disaster Risk Management in the
Philippines and Thailand An Institutional and
Political Perspective
Jesse Bacamante Manuta School of Arts and
Sciences Ateneo de Davao University Davao City,
The Philippines
First Meeting of the Vulnerability of Food
Systems to GEC Research Network SAC5 and Exec 10
Meetings 17-18 May 2006 Hawkwell House
Hotel Oxford, UK
2
Outline
  • Background
  • Framework and Approaches
  • Findings and Insights
  • Ways forward

3
Vulnerability Framework
4
Differential Social Vulnerability
  • Institutions- are working rules or norms which
    define roles, rights and responsibilities of
    actors (Young 2002)
  • Household, communities, firms or state (actors)
    may host many kinds of institutions that guide
    the behavior of their members
  • Formal and informal institutions shapes
    differences in risk and vulnerability
  • Interplay of institutions define what and whom
    is to be at risk shape the way flood disaster
    are defined, perceived and acted upon

5
  • Coping and Adaptive Capacity
  • Capacities to reduce risks of disaster LIE both
    within actors and in the relationship among
    actors
  • Relations that regularly define roles and
    responsibilities and rules of engagement in ways
    that enhance the capacities of actors--
    institutionalized capacities
  • Relationship among actors have different
    functions that may be institutionalized
  • the capacity for deliberations and
    negotiations
  • capacity to mobilize and coordinate resources
  • implementation
  • capacity for evaluation

6
General Framework for Assessing Institutional
Capacities Practices
FUNCTIONS (relations among actors) PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE
FUNCTIONS (relations among actors) Mitigation (Well before) Preparedness (Before) Emergency (During) Rehabilitation (After)
Deliberation What should be done?
Coordination Who is responsible?
Implementation How was it done?
Evaluation Was it done well?
Source Lebel et al (2006)
7
  • Focus Formal institutions created by the state
    to deal with
  • flood related disaster and how
    these institutions
  • interact with local, often
    informal, institutions
  • Methods and Study Area
  • _________________________________________________
    __
  • Review formal institutions (Thailand the
    Philippines)
  • _________________________________________________
    _________
  • Flood disaster case studies (Thailand only)
  • Upland and lowland villages in Omkoi District,
    Chiang Mai (20 May 2004)
  • Urban settlements in Saraphi and Muang in Chiang
    Mai (20 May 2004 14-16 Aug 2005)
  • Urban and rural settlements of Sena and Muang in
    Ayutthaya (previous floods)
  • _______________________________________________
    __________
  • General Review of Newspapers and
    Secondary
  • Materials (Thailand the Philippines)

8
Summarized Table of Flood Disaster in the
Philippines from 1905-2005
Average per Event
Number of Events 65
Number of People Killed 2,666 41
Number of People Injured 570 9
Homeless 500,841 7,705
Affected 10,124,281 155,758
Damages USD (000s) 434,549 6,685
Source EM-DATThe OFDA/CRED International
Disaster Database (www.em-dat.net)
9
Summarized Table of Flood Disaster in Thailand
from 1955-2005
Average per Event
Number of Events 49
Number of People Killed 2,503 51
Number of People Injured 4,085 83
Homeless 163,283 3,332
Affected 27,277,515 556,684
Damages USD (000s) 4,598,651 93,850
Source EM-DATThe OFDA/CRED International
Disaster Database (www.em-dat.net)
10
Some Development Indicators
Republic of the Philippines Kingdom of Thailand
Population (2004) Rural Population Urban Population 81.6 million 38 of total 62 63.7 million 68 of total 32
Poverty ( of population below national poverty line) 30 10
GDP (US billions) 84.6 163.5
Total Debt (US millions) 61,042 51,318
Source World Bank (2006) ADRC (2006)
11
  • The Rules (Thailand)
  • Civil Defense Act 1979 and Government Reform in
    2002 (eg. DDPM)
  • Flood Control and Mitigation
  • Land and Water Use Control (eg. guidelines for
    watershed and urban development)
  • Relief and Compensations (Treasury Act of 2003)
  • Others

12
The Players (Thailand)
Key Agencies Duties Responsibilities
Department of Disaster Prevention Mitigation Major line agency for urgent assistance to flood victims
Department of Water Resources Major line agency for flood mitigation, research and national water resource management system
Royal Irrigation Department Major agency for water provision, storage, maintenance and allocation to agriculture, energy, consumption industry
Department of Public Works City Planning Major agency for city planning and control of construction process
Meteorological Department Major agency to monitor, forecast and set up early warning system
Ministry of Social Development Human Security Lead agency on rehabilitation of flood victimsmental, social and economic healing recovery
13
(No Transcript)
14
  • The Rules (Philippines)
  • PD 1566 (1978)
  • Local Government Code (RA 8185)
  • Land Use Management and Zoning Ordinances

15
(No Transcript)
16
Some NDCC Member Agencies and Area of
Responsibilities
Departments Responsibilities
National Defense Convenes NDCC as necessary and calls on other government agencies and private sector as needed
Public Works Highway Restore destroyed public structures such as flood control, waterworks, roads, bridges and other vertical and horizontal facilities provides equipment for rescue, relief and recovery
Transportation Communication Restores destroyed communication and transportation facilities such as railroads organizes national transport services.
Science Technology (Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services (PAGASA) Continuing watch on environmental conditions o prepare daily weather forecasts, typhoon watches and flood outlooks
Social Welfare Development Extends relief assistance and social services to victims and provide rehabilitation
Agriculture Undertake surveys in disaster-prone areas and actual disaster areas to determine extent of damage of agricultural crops, livestock and fisheries provide technical assistance to victims
17
Some NDCC Member Agencies and Area of
Responsibilities
Departments Responsibilities
Education, Culture Sports Provides assistance in public education and campaign regarding disaster preparedness, prevention and mitigation through integration of relevant subjects in school curriculum makes school building available as evacuation centers
Finance Issues rules and regulation regarding funding by local government of DCC requirements with DBM issues rules and regulations on preparation of local government budget and utilization of the 2 reserve for disaster operations
Interior Local Government Oversees organization of local DCCs, the establishment of Disaster Operation Centers of all local governments, and the training of DCC members
Health Provides health services during emergencies and organizes reaction teams also issues public health warning notices.
Environment Natural Resources Responsible for reforestation and control of areas prone to flood, landslide, mudflow and ground subsidence
National Housing Authority Assessment of housing requirements of displaced persons provision of temporary housing and rebuilding of destroyed areas.
18
  • Several indications of improved institutional
    performance.
  • The government and the private sectors have been
    actively collaborating during emergency for
    mobilizing resources for relief and emergency
    assistance.
  • Provisions for Early Warning/Risk
    Vulnerability Mapping
  • Attempts to involve the general public are now
    being explored through the formation of basin
    river organization, with a mandate that includes
    a planning unit for flood mitigation and
    prevention.
  • Integration of Disaster Risk management in
    development programs (policy rhetoric) and
    Community-based disaster risk management pilot
    projects
  • Emergence of private sectors (NGOs and Firms)
    providing financial assistance for livelihood
    recovery (ex. Siam Cement and Save Andaman micro
    credit programs)
  • Strong Civil Society Groups in Thailand and the
    Philippines

19
  • Institutional Incapacities
  • Poor coordination fragmented measures
  • -Poor coordination across administrative
    hierarchies delays the timely delivery of
    services and assistance (e.g Tambon- Provincial)
  • - National level no policy coordination (eg
    DWR and RID)
  • _ The process of budget preparation and
    allocation procedures hampers coordination
    between local government and line agencies.
  • - Watershed, rural and urban uses planning
    are not well articulated with water-related
    infrastructure projects for flood control

20
  • Incomplete Implementation
  • Incomplete implementation in terms of
    geographical coverage, unfulfilled promises, and
    unattained goals is common (eg. Land
    rehabilitation and livelihood trainings)
  • Poor prioritization of marginal communities has
    led to institutional incapacity of the state to
    bring prevention, mitigation, recovery and even
    relief operations to where they are, arguably,
    most needed the places where the poor and other
    socially marginalized groups live.
  • Examples tribal groups and small fisherfolks

21
  • No monitoring and evaluation
  • After the tragedy, several government agencies
    were quick to offer help. But when I returned,
    everything was still the same. (Bangkok Post
    reporter who won award for disaster journalism)
  • A disaster doesnt end the day flood water
    resides and emergency relief operations declare
    success.
  • - Protection of interests and a culture of
    uncritical promotion of performance have
    institutionalized an incapacity for evaluation
    and critical reflection
  • Narrow deliberation
  • - Framing of flood-related disaster requiring
    technical fixes
  • - Bias to protect the rapidly urbanizing and
    industrial centers shifts flood risks
    surrounding agricultural-based provinces

22
Impacts of Altered Flood Regimes Depends on
Livelihood Lifestyles
Flood Regime Change with Climate Change Flood Regime Change with Climate Change
More intense, prolonged or frequent flooding Less intense, shorter and rarer flooding
Objective of Livelihood-Lifestyles relationship with Floods Depend on Floods Beneficial up to a threshold of adaptation Increased risk after barsha beneficial floods plabob severe floods Lack of floods disaster
Objective of Livelihood-Lifestyles relationship with Floods Avoid Floods Increased risks of disaster Reduced risk of disaster
23
  • Impediments of Institutional Reforms
  • Misplaced emphasis on emergency relief to the
    detriment of crafting institutions to reduce
    vulnerabilities and prevent disaster (the
    politics of disaster)
  • Self-serving belief that disaster management is
    a technical problem that calls for expert
    judgement that systematically exclude the
    interests of the most socially vulnerable groups
  • Overemphasis on structural measures which again
    and again have shown to be more about
    redistributing risk in time and place rather than
    reducing risks (turfing)
  • Failure to integrate flood disaster as
    inevitable challenges into normal development
    planning in flood-prone region (from rhetoric to
    action).

24
Ways Forward
FUNCTIONS PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE PHASES OF DISASTER CYCLE
FUNCTIONS Mitigation (Well before) Preparedness (Before) Emergency (During) Rehabilitation (After)
Deliberation What should be done? Active participation in district area planning, river-basin management, disaster preparedness plans and water-related disaster policies are some of the avenues for engagement Active participation in district area planning, river-basin management, disaster preparedness plans and water-related disaster policies are some of the avenues for engagement Active participation in district area planning, river-basin management, disaster preparedness plans and water-related disaster policies are some of the avenues for engagement Active participation in district area planning, river-basin management, disaster preparedness plans and water-related disaster policies are some of the avenues for engagement
Coordination Who is responsible? Cross-scale coordination among agencies and stakeholders is important for flood mitigation, particularly in the design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of program and policies that help address the underlying causes of flood disaster risks. Framework for private sectors to help finance recovery and rehabilitation (insurance and micro finance schemes) Cross-scale coordination among agencies and stakeholders is important for flood mitigation, particularly in the design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of program and policies that help address the underlying causes of flood disaster risks. Framework for private sectors to help finance recovery and rehabilitation (insurance and micro finance schemes) Cross-scale coordination among agencies and stakeholders is important for flood mitigation, particularly in the design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of program and policies that help address the underlying causes of flood disaster risks. Framework for private sectors to help finance recovery and rehabilitation (insurance and micro finance schemes) Cross-scale coordination among agencies and stakeholders is important for flood mitigation, particularly in the design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of program and policies that help address the underlying causes of flood disaster risks. Framework for private sectors to help finance recovery and rehabilitation (insurance and micro finance schemes)
Implementation How was it done? Acknowledging role for communities in disaster management creates opportunities to broaden participation on the one hand, and improve accountability and responsiveness of states institutions on the other. Acknowledging role for communities in disaster management creates opportunities to broaden participation on the one hand, and improve accountability and responsiveness of states institutions on the other. Acknowledging role for communities in disaster management creates opportunities to broaden participation on the one hand, and improve accountability and responsiveness of states institutions on the other. Acknowledging role for communities in disaster management creates opportunities to broaden participation on the one hand, and improve accountability and responsiveness of states institutions on the other.
Evaluation Was it done well? Instituting monitoring and evaluation mechanisms in disaster risk management may also facilitate institutional learning among different agencies. Performance evaluation among different agencies may provide institutional incentives to be become better and accountable. Instituting monitoring and evaluation mechanisms in disaster risk management may also facilitate institutional learning among different agencies. Performance evaluation among different agencies may provide institutional incentives to be become better and accountable. Instituting monitoring and evaluation mechanisms in disaster risk management may also facilitate institutional learning among different agencies. Performance evaluation among different agencies may provide institutional incentives to be become better and accountable. Instituting monitoring and evaluation mechanisms in disaster risk management may also facilitate institutional learning among different agencies. Performance evaluation among different agencies may provide institutional incentives to be become better and accountable.
25

Thank You!
Work in progress.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com