Case Study 56 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Case Study 56

Description:

Case Study 56 Kenneth Clark, MD Question 1 This is a 59-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of granulomatous nephritis (diagnosed 7 years prior), myelodysplastic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: clarkkh2
Category:
Tags: case | design | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Case Study 56


1
Case Study 56
  • Kenneth Clark, MD

2
Question 1
  • This is a 59-year-old Caucasian woman with a
    history of granulomatous nephritis (diagnosed 7
    years prior), myelodysplastic syndrome, and
    common variable immunodeficiency with
    progressively worsening dizziness, blurry vision
    and headache. Workup at an outside hospital
    revealed a sellar mass along with
    panhypopituitarism, adrenal insufficiency and
    hypothyroidism.
  • Describe the MRI findings.

3
(No Transcript)
4
Answer
  • Symmetric enlargement of pituitary gland and
    infundibulum with mild homogeneous enhancement.
    No areas of T2 or T2 FLAIR signal abnormality are
    evident.

5
Question 2
  • What is the differential diagnosis of a sellar
    lesion?

6
Answer
  • Pituitary Adenoma
  • Craniopharyngioma
  • Meningioma
  • Pituitary Carcinoma
  • Pituicytoma
  • Oncocytoma
  • Granular Cell Tumor
  • Lymphocytic Hypophysitis
  • Granulomatous Hypophysitis
  • Metastatic Disease (rare)

7
Question 3
  • What are the common signs and symptoms of sellar
    lesions (tumors or inflammatory)?

8
Answer
  • Headaches (non-specific)
  • Double Vision (non-specific)
  • Loss of Peripheral Vision Bitemporal
    Hemianopsia (non-specific)
  • Facial Pain and Numbness (non-specific)
  • Symptoms related to hormonal abnormalities
  • lack of energy
  • weight loss, nausea, vomiting, constipation
  • amenorrhea and infertility
  • dry skin, increased pigmentation of the skin
  • cold intolerance
  • mental status changes sleepiness, psychosis

9
Question 4
  • The lesion was resected. Describe the findings.
  • Click here to view the slide

10
Answer
  • The tissue shows near complete effacement of
    pituitary architecture by a rich
    lymphohistiocytic infiltrate. The histiocytes
    have large irregularly shaped nuclear with
    prominent nucleoli and finely distributed pale
    blue chromatin. The cytoplasmic borders are
    completely indistinct, resulting in a syncytial
    appearance of groups of histiocytes. Small
    numbers of small monomorphic lymphocytes are
    positioned around the periphery of the histiocyte
    collections. Small randomly isolated nests of
    polytypic pituitary cells are seen randomly
    distributed throughout the specimen.

11
Question 5
  • What is your diagnostic impression?

12
Answer
  • The lesion appears to be inflammatory in nature
    rich in histiocytes either infectious or
    idiopathic in etiology. It does not appear to be
    neoplastic, although lymphoma cannot be entirely
    ruled out at this point.

13
Question 6
  • What immunohistochemical and/or special stains
    would be helpful in confirming your initial
    impression of this lesion?

14
Answer
  • Inflammatory Cell Markers
  • CD3 (T-cells)
  • CD20 (B-cells)
  • CD68 (macrophages, histiocytes)
  • GFAP, IDH1 (to rule out an unusual glial process)
  • Synaptophysin (to ascertain the pituitary
    element)
  • Reticulin (to evaluate residual pituitary
    structure/architecture)
  • Click to view CD3, CD68, Reticulin

15
Question 7
  • Based on the results of the stains (see below)
    and HE slides, what is the general diagnostic
    category?
  • CD3 - highlights numerous small mature
    lymphocytes
  • CD20 - very rare positive b-lymphocytes
  • CD68 - strong staining in numerous histiocytes
    highlights ill-defined granuloma formation
  • Synaptophysin - positive in sparse scattered
    small nests of pituitary cells highlights
    architectural distortion by histiocytes
  • GFAP - rare positive glial cells near periphery
    of lesion
  • IDH1 - negative
  • Reticulin highlights total effacement of nested
    pituitary architecture

16
Answer
  • Inflammatory/histiocytic process

17
Question 8
  • What is the differential diagnosis of a
    non-necrotizing histiocytic / granulomatous
    process?

18
Answer
  • Neurosarcoidosis
  • Infectious (fungal or mycobacterial)
  • Langerhans cell histiocytosis
  • Erdheim Chester disease
  • Rosai-Dorfman disease

19
Question 9
  • What additional stains would you order to better
    characterize the lesion?

20
Answer
  • Acid Fast, Grocott (rule out infectious process)
  • CD1A S100
  • Langerhans cell histiocytosis histiocytes are
    CD1a and S100 positive
  • Erdheim Chester disease histiocytes are S100
    negative (usually) and CD1a negative
  • Rosai Dorfman disease histiocytes are S100
    positive and CD1a negative
  • Sarcoidosis has similar staining profile of ECD

21
Question 10
  • The results of the additional stains are as
    follows
  • S100 shows sparsely scattered background
    folliculo-stellate cells negative in histiocytes
  • CD1a negative
  • Grocott negative
  • Acid Fast negative
  • What is your diagnosis?

22
Answer
  • Non-necrotizing granulomatous hypophysitis, favor
    neurosarcoidosis

23
Question 11
  • Why favor sarcoidosis when Erdheim Chester
    disease has a similar histologic appearance and
    immunohistochemical profile? Explain.

24
Answer
  • ECD, which is far more rare than sarcoidosis
    (300-400 reported cases worldwide), is also
    called polyostotic sclerosing histiocytosis
    because it most often involves long bones.
    Because this patient had a history of
    non-necrotizing renal granulomas and no bone
    lesions it is much more likely that this
    represents sarcoidosis involving the pituitary
    than ECD. Furthermore, ECD has a progressive and
    usually fatal course in cases with extra-osseous
    involvement and is not responsive to steroid
    therapy if this patient had ECD at the time of
    her renal biopsies her clinical course would
    likely have been much more aggressive and
    probably fatal. Histologically, ECD lesions often
    show Touton-like giant cells and are rich in
    eosinophils neither of which are seen in this
    lesion. Considering the clinical AND
    histopathologic elements of this case, it seems
    that sarcoidosis is more likely than ECD.

25
References
  • Veyssier-Belot C, Cacoub P, Caparros-Lefebvre D,
    Wechsler J, Brun B, Remy M, Wallaert B, Petit H,
    Grimaldi A, Wechsler B, Godeau P (1996)
    ErdheimChester disease. Clinical and Radiologic
    Characteristics of 59 Cases. Medicine
    (Baltimore). 75157169.
  • Louis D, Ohgaki H, Wiestler O, Cavanee W. WHO
    Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous
    System. IARC Lyon 2007.
  • Burns T. Neurosarcoidosis (2003). Arch Neurol.
    601166-1168.
  • Rosai J. Rosai and Ackermans Surgical Pathology.
    Elsevier 2004.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com