Pathway Modeling and Problem Solving Environments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Pathway Modeling and Problem Solving Environments

Description:

Pathway Modeling and Problem Solving Environments Cliff Shaffer Department of Computer Science Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: shaffer
Learn more at: https://people.cs.vt.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pathway Modeling and Problem Solving Environments


1
Pathway Modeling andProblem Solving Environments
  • Cliff Shaffer
  • Department of Computer Science
  • Virginia Tech
  • Blacksburg, VA 24061

2
The Fundamental Goal of Molecular Cell Biology
3
ApplicationCell Cycle Modeling
  • How do cells convert genes into behavior?
  • Create proteins from genes
  • Protein interactions
  • Protein effects on the cell
  • Our study organism is the cell cycle of the
    budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

4
G1
cell division
S
DNA replication
M (mitosis)
G2
5
Mcm1
Cdh1
Cdc20
Cln2 Clb2 Clb5
Mitosis
Mad2
growth
APC-P

unaligned chromosomes

Mcm1
Cdc20
Cdh1
Clb2
APC
Inactive trimer
Cdc14
and
Cln3
Swi5
CDKs
SCF
P
Cdc14
Bck2
Inactive trimer
?
MBF
Clb5
DNA synthesis
Clb2
SBF
Cln2
Budding
6
Modeling Techniques
  • One method Use ODEs that describe the rate at
    which each protein concentration changes
  • Protein A degrades protein B
  • with initial condition A(0) A0.
  • Parameter c determines the rate of
    degradation.
  • Sometimes modelers use creative rate laws to
    approximate subsystems

7
Mathematical Model
8
Simulation of the budding yeast cell cycle
mass
CKI
Cln2
Clb2
Cdh1
Cdc20
Time (min)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Experimental Data
11
Tysons Budding Yeast Model
  • Tysons model contains over 30 ODEs, some
    nonlinear.
  • Events can cause concentrations to be reset.
  • About 140 rate constant parameters
  • Most are unavailable from experiment and must set
    by the modeler

12
Fundamental Activities
  • Collect information
  • Search literature (databases), Lab notebooks
  • Define/modify models
  • A user interface problem
  • Run simulations
  • Equation solvers (ODEs, PDEs, deterministic,
    stochastic)
  • Compare simulation results to experimental data
  • Analysis

13
Modeling Lifecycle
14
Our Mission Build Software to Help the Modelers
  • Typical cycle time for changing the model used to
    be one month
  • Collect data on paper lab notebooks
  • Convert to differential equations by hand
  • Calibrate the model by trial and error
  • Inadequate analysis tools
  • Goal Change the model once per day.
  • Bottleneck should shift to the experimentalists

15
Another View
  • Current models of simple organisms contain a few
    10s of equations.
  • To model mammalian systems might require two
    orders of magnitude in additional complexity.
  • We hope our current vision for tools can supply
    one order of magnitude.
  • The other order of magnitude is an open problem.

16
JigCell
  • Current Primary Software Components
  • JigCell Model Builder
  • JigCell Run Manager
  • JigCell Comparator
  • Automated Parameter Estimation (PET)
  • Bifurcation Analysis (Oscill8)
  • http//jigcell.biol.vt.edu

17
Model Builder
Parameter Values
Run Manager
Comparator
Parameter Optimizer
18
JigCell Model Builder
  • From a wiring diagram

19
JigCell Model Builder
  • to a reaction mechanism

N.B. Parameters are given names, not numerical
values!
to ordinary differential equations
(ode files, SBML)
20
Mutations
  • Wild type cell
  • Mutations
  • Typically caused by gene knockout
  • Consider a mutant with no B to degrade A.
  • Set c 0
  • We have about 130 mutations
  • each requires a separate simulation run

21
Run Manager
  • Inheritance patterns

22
JigCell Run Manager
23
Phenotypes
  • Each mutant has some observed outcome
    (experimental data). Generally qualitative.
  • Cell lived
  • Cell died in G1 phase
  • Model should match the experimental data.
  • Model should not be overly sensitive to the rate
    constants.
  • Overly sensitive biological systems tend not to
    survive

24
Comparator
  • Visualize results

Kumagai1
Kumagai2
25
Comparator
26
Optimization
  • How to decide on parameter values?
  • Key features of optimization
  • Each problem is a point in multidimensional space
  • Each point can be assigned a value by an
    objective function
  • The goal is to find the best point in the space
    as defined by the objective function
  • We usually settle for a good point

27
Parameter Optimization
28
Error Function
Parameter Optimization
orthogonal distance regression
Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm
29
Parameter Optimization
Only 1 experiment shown here. The model must be
fitted simultaneously to many different
experiments.
30
Global DIRECT Search(DIViding RECTangles)
31
Global DIRECT Search(DIViding RECTangles)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Composition Motivation
  • Models are reaching the limits of manageability
    due to an increase in
  • Size
  • Complexity
  • Making a model suitable for stochastic simulation
    increases the number of reactions by a factor of
    3-5.
  • Models of the mammalian cell cycle will require
    100-1000 reactions (even more for stochastic
    simulation).

35
Model Composition
  • Notice that the yeast cell diagram contains
    natural components

36
Composition Processes
  • Fusion
  • Merging two or more existing models
  • Composition
  • Build up model hierarchy from existing models by
    describing their interactions and connections
  • Aggregation
  • Connects modular blocks using controlled
    interfaces (ports)
  • Flattening
  • Convert hierarchy back into a single flat model
    for use with standard simulators

37
Composition Processes
38
Sample Sub-models
39
Sample Composed Model
40
Composition Wizard
  • Final Species Mapping Table

41
Composition Wizard
  • Final Reaction Mapping Table

42
Aggregated Submodels
43
Final Aggregated Model
44
Aggregation Connector
45
Composition in SBML
  • Virginia Techs proposed language features to
    support composition/aggregation being written
    into forthcoming SBML Level 3 definition

46
Stochastic Simulation
  • ODE-based (deterministic) models cannot explain
    behaviors introduced by random nature of the
    system.
  • Variations in mass of division
  • Variations in time of events
  • Differences in gross outcomes

47
Gillespies Stochastic Simulation Algorithm
  • There is a population for each chemical species
  • There is a propensity for each reaction, in
    part determined by population
  • Each reaction changes population for associated
    species
  • Loop
  • Pick next reaction (random, propensity)
  • Update populations, propensities
  • Slow, there are approximations to speed it up

48
Comments on Collaboration
  • Domain team routinely underestimates how
    difficult it is to create reliable and usable
    software.
  • CS team routinely underestimates how difficult it
    is to stay focused on the needs of the domain
    team.
  • Partial solution truly integrate.

49
How to Succeed in CBB
  • Programming skills are necessary but not
    sufficient
  • Math is usually the biggest bottleneck
  • Statistics for Bioinformatics
  • Numerical analysis, optimization, differential
    equations for computational biology
  • Chemistry/biochemistry are good choices for
    domain knowledge
  • You have to have an interdisciplinary attitude
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com