Computational Biology Part 1: Biomolecular Modeling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Computational Biology Part 1: Biomolecular Modeling

Description:

Reference: C. Brooks, M. Karplus, B. Pettitt, Proteins: A Theoretical ... Dr. Martin Tenniswood, Biological Sciences and Walther Cancer Institute, Notre Dame ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: jimb93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computational Biology Part 1: Biomolecular Modeling


1
Computational BiologyPart 1 Biomolecular
Modeling
Instructor Prof. Jesus Izaguirre Textbook Tamar
Schlick, Molecular Modeling and Simulation An
Interdisciplinary Guide, Springer-Verlag,
Berlin-New York, in press, 2002 Reference C.
Brooks, M. Karplus, B. Pettitt, Proteins A
Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure,
and Thermodynamics, Wiley, 1988
2
Outline
  • What is biomolecular modeling?
  • Historical perspective
  • Theory and experiments
  • Protein characterization
  • Computational successes
  • Remaining challenges

3
What is biomolecular modeling?
  • Application of computational models to understand
    the structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics of
    biological molecules
  • The models must be tailored to the question at
    hand Schrodinger equation is not the answer to
    everything! Reductionist view bound to fail!
  • This implies that biomolecular modeling must be
    both multidisciplinary and multiscale

4
Historical Perspective
  • 1946 MD calculation
  • 1960 force fields
  • 1969 Levinthals paradox on protein folding
  • 1970 MD of biological molecules
  • 1971 protein data bank
  • 1998 ion channel protein crystal structure
  • 1999 IBM announces blue gene project

5
Theoretical Foundations
  • Born-Oppenheimer approximation (fixed nuclei)
  • Force field parameters for families of chemical
    compounds
  • System modeled using Newtons equations of motion
  • Examples hard spheres simulations (alder and
    Wainwright, 1959) Liquid water (Rahman and
    Stillinger, 1970) BPTI (McCammon and Karplus)
    Villin headpiece (Duan and Kollman, 1998)

6
Experimental Foundations I
  • X-ray crystallography
  • Analysis of the X-ray diffraction pattern
    produced when a beam of X-rays is directed onto a
    well-ordered crystal. The phase has to be
    reconstructed.
  • Phase problem solved by direct method for small
    molecules
  • For larger molecules, sophisticated Multiple
    Isomorphous Replacement (MIR) technique used
  • Current resolution below 2 \AA
  • Protein crystallography
  • Difficult to grow well-ordered crystals
  • Early success in predicting alpha helices and
    beta sheets (Pauling, 1950s)

7
Experimental Foundations II
  • NMR Spectroscopy
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance provides structural
    and dynamic information about molecules. It is
    not as detailed as X-ray, limited to masses of 35
    kDa
  • Distances between neighboring hydrogens are used
    to reconstruct the 3D structure using global
    optimization

8
Proteins I
  • Polypeptide chains made up of amino acids or
    residues linked by peptide bonds
  • 20 aminoacids
  • 50-500 residues, 1000-10000 atoms
  • Native structure believed to correspond to energy
    minimum, since proteins unfold when temperature
    is increased

9
Proteins II
  • Secondary structure alpha helices, beta sheets,
    turns
  • Tertiary structure proteins are tightly packed,
    with hydrophobic groups in the core and charged
    sidechains in the surface
  • Quaternary structure protein domains may
    assemble into so called quaternary structures

10
Proteins III
  • Protein motions of importance are torsional
    oscillations about the bonds that link groups
    together
  • Substantial displacements of groups occur over
    long time intervals
  • Collective motions either local (cage structure)
    or rigid-body (displacement of different regions)
  • What is the importance of these fluctuations for
    biological function?

11
Proteins IV
  • Effect of fluctuations
  • Thermodynamics equilibrium behavior important
    examples, energy of ligand binding
  • Dynamics displacements from average structure
    important example, local sidechain motions that
    act as conformational gates in oxygen transport
    myoglobin, enzymes, ion channels

12
Proteins V Local Motions
  • 0.01-5 AA, 1 fs -0.1s
  • Atomic fluctuations
  • Small displacements for substrate binding in
    enzymes
  • Energy source for barrier crossing and other
    activated processes (e.g., ring flips)
  • Sidechain motions
  • Opening pathways for ligand (myoglobin)
  • Closing active site
  • Loop motions
  • Disorder-to-order transition as part of virus
    formation

13
Proteins VI Rigid-Body Motions
  • 1-10 AA, 1 ns 1 s
  • Helix motions
  • Transitions between substrates (myoglobin)
  • Hinge-bending motions
  • Gating of active-site region (liver alcohol
    dehydroginase)
  • Increasing binding range of antigens (antibodies)

14
Proteins VII Large Scale Motion
  • gt 5 AA, 1 microsecond 10000 s
  • Helix-coil transition
  • Activation of hormones
  • Protein folding transition
  • Dissociation
  • Formation of viruses
  • Folding and unfolding transition
  • Synthesis and degradation of proteins
  • Role of motions sometimes only inferred from two
    or more conformations in structural studies

15
Study of Dynamics I
  • The computational study of atomic fluctuations in
    BPTI and other proteins has shown that
  • Directional character of active-site fluctuations
    in enzymes contributes to catalysis
  • Small amplitude fluctuations are lubricant
  • It may be possible to extrapolate from short time
    fluctuations to larger-scale protein motions

16
Study of Dynamics II
  • Collective motions particularly important for
    biological function, e.g., displacements for
    transition from inactive to active
  • Extended nature of these motions makes them
    sensitive to environment great difference
    between vacuum and solution simulations
  • Collective motions transmit external solvent
    effects to protein interior

17
Study of Dynamics III
  • For the related storage protein, myoglobin
  • Fluctuations in the globin are essential to
    binding the protein matrix in X-ray is so
    tightly packed that there is no low energy path
    for the ligand to enter or leave the heme pocket
  • Only through structural fluctuations can the
    barriers be lowered sufficiently
  • Demonstrated through energy minimization and
    molecular dynamics

18
Study of Dynamics IV
  • For the transport protein hemoglobin there are
    several important motions
  • Oxygen binding produces tertiary structural
    change
  • A quaternary structural change from deoxy (low
    oxygen affinity) to oxy configuration takes
    place. This transmits information over a long
    distance
  • From the X-ray deoxy and oxy structures, a
    stochastic reaction path has been found. Detailed
    ligand binding has been performed using MD. A
    statistical mechanical model has provided
    coupling between these two processes

19
Study of Dynamics VI
  • Three open problems are the following
  • Ion channel gating highly correlated
    fluctuations are likely to be of great
    importance. Long time dynamics problem
  • Flexible docking for MMP, enzymes, etc.,
    fluctuations enter into thermodynamics and
    kinetic of reactions. Sampling problem
  • Protein folding too complicated for full
    treatment but for smallest proteins, beyond
    current methodology. Coarsening problem

20
Lengthening scales DPD
  • Dissipative Particle Dynamics combines coarsening
    of atoms into fluid packages with dissipative
    pair interactions, and a stochastic pair
    interaction
  • Total momentum conserved
  • Self-organization of lipid bilayer,
    self-assembled aggregates formed by amphiphilic
    lipid molecules in water.

21
Lengthening of Scales SRP
  • Enzyme simulation of a ms using stochastic
    reaction path disadvantage need initial and
    final configuration
  • Finds a trajectory where global energy is
    minimized

22
Lengthening of Scales MUSICO
  • Multiscale molecular dynamics combining
  • Symplectic splitting into nearly linear and
    nonlinear parts
  • Implicit integration of linear part (similar to
    SRP) with constraining of internal d.o.f
  • Explicit treatment of highly nonlinear part
  • Optional pairwise stochasticity for stability
  • No coarsening yet

23
Scalable Parallelization of ProtoMol
ProtoMol--parallel software framework for the
simulation of bio-molecules
  • OBJECTIVE Make ProtoMol a more scalable parallel
    program
  • Hundreds of nodes
  • Heterogeneous platforms
  • APPROACH
  • Abstract parallel layer
  • Dynamic load balancing
  • Multithreading
  • More scalable algorithms

ProtoMol is open source and available at
http//www.cse.nd.edu/lcls/Protomol.html
24
Web-based Simulation Services
Simulation Request
Results via XML
ProtoMol Parallel Server
  • OBJECTIVE Make ProtoMol a web application
  • Web service for molecular and cellular
    simulations
  • Component that provides data and simulation
    capabilities through the web
  • APPROACH
  • .NET platform for Windows and Linux
  • .NETMicrosofts platform for XML Web services

25
Interactive Simulation Interfaces
  • OBJECTIVE Interactive interfaces for ProtoMol
  • User friendly interface to setup, monitor, and
    steer simulations
  • Ability to quickly experiment with molecules and
    cells
  • APPROACH
  • 3-D Visualization using OpenGL
  • Sockets interface between ProtoMol and
    visualization component
  • Haptic Device interface

A haptic device interface was demonstrated at
SuperComputing 2000, and will be again at the
2001 event.
26
Acknowledgements
  • The LCLS would like to thank the following--
  • National Science Foundation Biocomplexity grant
    PHY-0083653
  • Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
    Univ. of Notre Dame
  • and our Collaborators
  • Dr. Mark Alber, Mathematics and Center for
    Applied Mathematics, Notre Dame
  • Dr. Petter E. Bjorstad, Institutt for
    Informatikk, U. of Bergen, Norway
  • Dr. Gabor Forgacs, Physics and Biology,
    University of Missouri-Columbia
  • Dr. James A. Glazier, Physics, Notre Dame
  • Dr. George Hentschel, Physics, Emory University
  • Dr. Edward Maginn, Chemical Engineering, Notre
    Dame
  • Dr. J. Andrew McCammon, Chemistry Biochemistry,
    University of California, San Diego
  • Dr. Stuart Newman, Cell Biology and Anatomy, New
    York Medical College
  • Dr. Martin Tenniswood, Biological Sciences and
    Walther Cancer Institute, Notre Dame
  • Dr. Robert Skeel, Computer Science and Beckman
    Institute, University of Illinois at
    Urbana-Champaign
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com