Martin Knapp - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Martin Knapp

Description:

Title: Individual budgets: evaluation Author: IT Services Last modified by: KNAPP Created Date: 12/5/2005 9:24:09 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: ITSer3
Learn more at: https://www.oecd.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Martin Knapp


1
OECD, Paris, 26 June 2014
Dementia policy and practice challenges,
economic responses
  • Martin Knapp
  • Personal Social Services Research Unit
  • London School of Economics and Political Science

2
Structure of my talk
  1. The individual with dementia
  2. New realities?
  3. New responses?
  4. New scenarios?
  5. New directions?

3
  • A
  • An individual with dementia

4
An older person with dementia
Older person
5
supported by family and friends
Family
Older person
6
with support from paid care staff
Care staff
Family
Older person
7
in their care setting / facility
Care staff
Care setting (eg care home)
Family
Older person
8
managed by a local provider
Care staff
Care setting (eg care home)
Family
Local provider (eg local charity)
Older person
9
and located within a national body,
Care staff
Care setting (eg care home)
National provider body
Family
Local provider (eg local charity)
Older person
10
whose services are commissioned
Care staff
Care setting (eg care home)
National provider body
Family
Local provider (eg local charity)
Older person
Commissioning bodies funders purchasers
11
within various regulatory, advocacy and policy
contexts
Advocacy bodies
Policy-making bodies (national, regional, local)
Care staff
Care setting (eg care home)
National provider body
Family
Local provider (eg local charity)
Older person
Commissioning bodies funders purchasers
Regulatory bodies
12
But two enormous, exogenous pressures influence
what happens
Advocacy bodies
Economics
Policy-making bodies (national, regional, local)
Care staff
Care setting (eg care home)
National provider body
Family
Local provider (eg local charity)
Older person
Commissioning bodies funders purchasers
Regulatory bodies
Demography
13
  • B
  • New realities

14
Growing prevalence
A global epidemic. An emergency in slow
motion. A demographic time-bomb
Big impacts on overall disability /
ill-health Growth in disability-adjusted life
years (DALYs) due to dementia, between 1990 and
2010, in the UK 76 higher than almost every
other cause.
And big consequences for expenditure - for
healthcare and long-term care systems - for
individuals with dementia and their families.
From Alzheimers Disease International website
15
Public spending on long-term care as of GDP
2010 and projected to 2060
Spending on dementia care will be proportionately
much higher by 2060
European Union, Ageing Report 2012
16
Trends in health spending 1960-2010
of GDP
OECD
17
Global economic recession
18
Recession hurts
Unemployment Poverty Lower salaries Reduced
income More personal debt Mortgage failures
19
Recession hurts
Lower wellbeing
  • Unemployment
  • Poverty
  • Lower salaries
  • Reduced income
  • More personal debt
  • Mortgage failures

More mental health needs
Lower resilience
Slower recovery
Higher suicide rate
Alcohol misuse (?)
Hardened attitudes
More social isolation
Worse physical health
Greater inequalities
20
Recession and income-related inequalities in
mental health
  • Economic recession in South Korea (late 1990s
    onwards) ? worsening mental health, including
    rapidly rising rates of suicide and depression
  • Trends in income-related inequalities in
    depression, suicidal ideation and suicide
    attempts, 1998-2007.
  • Persistent pro-rich inequality in depression,
    suicidal ideation and suicide attempts over the
    past decade in South Korea (i.e. individuals with
    higher incomes were less likely to have these
    conditions).
  • Inequalities in each case doubled over the period

Hong et al World Psychiatry 2011
21
Recession, unemployment and stigma
Recession widened the gap in unemployment rates
between individuals with and without MH problems
...especially for males and people with low
education levels.
Evans-Lacko et al. PLOS ONE 2013
22
Stigmatising attitudes
  • Public attitudes played a part in this increase
  • Eurobarometer 2006 asked the general public
    questions about people with psychological or
    emotional health problems. Do you agree that
  • they constitute a danger to others
  • they are unpredictable
  • they have themselves to blame
  • they never recover.
  • We converted these to a single overall measure of
    stigmatizing beliefs concerning mental illness.

23
Recession, unemployment and stigma
The disadvantage facing people with mental health
problems is greater in countries with higher
levels of stigmatizing attitudes towards mental
illness.
Those stigmatizing attitudes probably carry over
to people with dementia and their family carers.
Evans-Lacko et al. PLOS ONE 2013
24
Recession hurts
But does austerity kill? Many national
governments have responded to recession with
austerity policies big cuts in government
spending big increases in taxes. David Stuckler
and Sanjay Basu, in The Body Economic (2013),
argue that austerity measures make matters much
worse having devastating effects on public
health.
Lower wellbeing
  • Unemployment
  • Poverty
  • Reduced income
  • Debt (personal)
  • Housing problems
  • Family disruption
  • Social deprivation

More mental illness
Lower resilience
Slower recovery
More suicides
More alcohol abuse
Hardened attitudes
  • Greater inequalities
  • rich and poor
  • ill and well

More social isolation loneliness
Poorer physical health
25
  • C
  • New responses

26
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

This ought to be a winner but not enough
economics evidence yet.
Early detection ought to be another winner but
again no strong economics evidence.
Both areas urgently need research attention
Knapp et al. IJGP 2012 reviews some of the above
27
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

Family other unpaid carers are the frontline
providers
Cooper et al. Int Psychoger 2007 Mahoney et al.
AJGP 2005
28
The cost of dementia in England 2015 per person
per year (, at 2012 prices)
High costs major impacts on quality of life
Knapp et al. Scenarios of Dementia Care 2014
29
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
Family other unpaid carers are the frontline
providers
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

Caring rewarding and fulfilling, but
emotionally physically draining. Depression
anxiety highly prevalent. Poor carer wellbeing
linked to care breakdown care home admission
elder abuse
Cooper et al. Int Psychoger 2007 Mahoney et al.
AJGP 2005
30
START encouraging new evidence of a carer
support intervention
  • Individual therapy programme (8 sessions with
    psychology graduate manual)
  • Techniques to understand/manage behaviours of
    person they support, change unhelpful thoughts,
    promote acceptance, improve communication, plan
    for future, relax, engagement.
  • Costs and outcomes (8-month 24-month follow-up)
  • More effective than standard care and no more
    costly (from NHS and societal perspectives) at
    8m and 24m
  • Cost-effective by reference to carer and patient
    outcomes
  • Reduces care home admission rate for patients

Livingston et al. BMJ 2013 Knapp et al. BMJ
2013 Livingston et al 2014 submitted
31
SADD intriguing evidence on carer collateral
benefits?
  • SADD a randomised trial of two different
    antidepressants for treating people with dementia
    who have co-morbid depression.
  • Antidepressants (mirtazapine and sertaline) not
    different from each other or placebo in symptom
    alleviation
  • But mirtazapine was more cost-effective because
    of carer effects lower carer costs
  • Ethics of treatment?

32
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

Can communities shoulder more of the
responsibility? Maybe. Befriending, time-banks
etc. can be cost-effective to engage community
involvement
Knapp et al. Comm Development J 2013
33
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

Dementia care not a high-status occupation. Low
wages high turnover. Cognitive stimulation
therapy works and it is cost-effective but
not widely commissioned or provided (in UK).
Woods et al. Cochrane Review Knapp et al. Brit J
Psychiatry 2006 Orrell et al Brit J Psychiatry
2014
34
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
Lots of evidence now on medications and when they
are likely to be cost-effective.
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

Some evidence on CBT effectiveness for co-morbid
depression and anxiety, but no economics evidence.
But little evidence on treatment when there are
co-morbid physical health problems.
NICE Technology Appraisals
35
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
ICT-based monitoring or treatment really ought to
be one way forward especially to support
family carers. But the evidence from robust
trials is equivocal. Needs technological
development and better targeting.
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

Steventon et al. BMJ 2012 Henderson et al. BMJ
2013 Hirani et al Age Ageing 2014 Henderson
et al Age Ageing 2014
36
What works in ways that key decision-makers
consider affordable?
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Carer support
  • Community capacity
  • Staff skills training
  • Treatments
  • Telehealth / telecare
  • Self-directed support
  • Re-ablement home care

Greater choice and control for people with
dementia and their carers.
Personal budgets work! Carer-held budgets
especially successful. BUT is there risk of
financial abuse?
Glendenning et al IBSEN report 2007 Manthorpe
Samsi BJSW 2013
37
  • D
  • New scenarios

38
Question What is the economic case for new
dementia care scenarios?
  • Current care scenario Care and support as
    currently provided in England (Scenario A).
  • No-diagnosis scenario Dementia is not diagnosed
    or treated (B).
  • Diagnosis-only scenario Dementia is diagnosed
    but not treated (C).
  • Improved care scenario Dementia is diagnosed,
    followed by evidence-based, improved care and
    support (D).
  • Disease-modifying scenario Disease-modifying
    treatments are available to slow progression or
    delay (E).

39
Methods for our models
1. Prevalent dementia population by age gender
2. Severity of cognitive impairment
3. Place of residence community or care home
4. Type of care (formal, unpaid, both, neither)
5. Cost quality of life data from trials (n
1400)
6. Estimate compare scenario costs and QALYs
40
The cost of dementia in England today per
person per year () (Scenario A)
High costs major impacts on quality of life
Knapp et al. Scenarios of Dementia Care 2014
41
Is there an economic case for alternative
dementia care scenarios?
  • Current care scenario Care and support as
    currently provided in England (Scenario A).
  • No-diagnosis scenario Dementia is not diagnosed
    or treated (B).
  • Diagnosis-only scenario Dementia is diagnosed
    but not treated (C).
  • Improved care scenario Dementia is diagnosed,
    followed by evidence-based, improved care and
    support (D).
  • Disease-modifying scenario Disease-modifying
    treatments are available to slow progression or
    delay (E).

The two worse scenarios no diagnosis (B), no
post-diagnostic support (C) both increase costs
and worsen quality of life
So what about the better scenarios?
Knapp et al. Scenarios of Dementia Care 2014
42
Improving dementia care modest effects on costs
( millions, 2012 prices, UK)
Quality of life improvements important but not
huge
  • But we have not examined
  • distributional impacts
  • better targeting

Knapp et al. Scenarios of Dementia Care 2014
43
Disease-modification effects on costs (
millions, 2012 prices, UK)
Highest cost but also highest QALY gain
What about the treatment costs?
Knapp et al. Scenarios of Dementia Care 2014
44
Disease-modification factoring in the costs of
the new treatments
Treatment costs will have a huge influence,
depending on price and number treated
These treatment costs are purely hypothetical
Knapp et al. Scenarios of Dementia Care 2014
45
MODEM a projections study (2014-18)
  • Research questions
  • How many people with dementia between now and
    2040?
  • What will be the costs and outcomes of their
    treatment, care and support under present
    arrangements?
  • How do these costs and outcomes vary with
    individual characteristics and circumstances?
  • How could costs and cost-effectiveness change if
    better interventions were more widely available
    and accessed?
  • Methods data-heavy modelling
  • Micro-simulation, macro-simulation, care pathways

46
  • E
  • New directions

47
Are we facing the perfect storm?
  • Demography is rapidly pushing up prevalence
  • and creating smaller families
  • which are geographically more dispersed.
  • Communities may be less supportive(?)
  • Hence huge (and long-term?) economic pressures on
    individuals and governments
  • Hardening attitudes towards mental illness
  • While decision-makers retreat into their silos,
    in pursuit of immediate cashable savings.

48
An economic case for better responses?
  • Dementia is already costly ... and much of that
    impact falls to family and other unpaid carers.
  • Dementia will get much more costly everywhere,
    soon.
  • Known evidence-based improvements will help
    to achieve quality of life gains, but costs wont
    fall much.
  • Some of those economic gains rely heavily on
    carers can they cope with greater
    responsibilities?
  • Disease-modifying treatments are needed to
    delay onset / slow progression to cut costs and
    improve lives.
  • We need a two-pronged approach improve todays
    care and find tomorrows cure (treatment
    breakthroughs).

49
Further details
Thank you. m.knapp_at_lse.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com