The Threats - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

The Threats

Description:

The Threats & Promises/Opportunities of Downsizing Shelter Susanne Beaton – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: SallyG66
Category:
Tags: place | shelter | threats

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Threats


1
The Threats Promises/Opportunities of
Downsizing Shelter
  • Susanne Beaton

2
Two Axions to Frame the Discussion
  • From The Power of Intention by Dr. Wayne W. Dyer
  • When you change the way you look at things, the
    things you look at change (principle of
    quantum physics)
  • If you always do what you always did, you will
    always get what you already got.

3
Applying Axioms to Homelessness
  • If the intent is to end family homelessness, then
    we do have to think harder about keeping families
    housed, rapid re-housing strategies and shorter
    shelter stays.
  • When we think of the Threat and Promise of
    downsizing the shelter system, we need to think
    about the threat coming from how we used to think
    about responding to family homelessness, and the
    promise coming from being viewed through a new
    lens change.

4
Threats to Think About
  • Community loses a publicly sited facility
    safety net is lost. Staff become unemployed
  • Lack of trust in the politics and shifting winds
    Section 8s are here and then gone, etc
    Government takes a walk and wont respond, kids
    get hurt, no stable place for families.
  • Shifting economy resulting in more poverty
  • Fragile families living on the edge, too poor to
    live on their own
  • Families becoming invisible.
  • Loss of emotional connection- shelters are the
    holiday stops, volunteer opportunities and
    fundraising platforms
  • Family shelters are better than no place at all.

5
Promises/Opportunities to Consider
  • Now, with my new lens change I see...
  • 1. Families getting what they really want a
    home.
  • 2. Local communities becoming engaged and aligned
    resulting in
  • Better collaborations that can provide some new
    private/public partnership approaches and
    resources
  • A new front door to assess and respond to any
    family in need (not just eligible families)
  • Prevention becoming the real goal, facility
    re-use given a broader agendaother populations
    (SROs, Aging Out of Foster Care, Drug and
    Alcohol rehab, etc)
  • New assessment and stabilization centers
  • 4. Re-thinking our budgets and allowing data to
    drive the resources, innovation and evaluation.
    If poverty is the issue, money and mainstream
    resources are the solution.
  • 5. Coordinating the front door, better
    assessment, reduction in fragmentation, catching
    fragile families and packaging support before
    they lose it all

6
More Opportunities..
  • 6. Bringing new stakeholders to the
    conversation, allowing new leadership and thus
    new solutions (In MA, the business leaders made
    the difference in our Governor creating an
    Interagency Council on Housing and Homelessness
    with real Commissioner participation across state
    agencies. It broke the isolation and the silos)
  • 7. Raising private resources through
    community/stakeholder involvement, fundraising
    campaigns (i.e. supermarket debit cards, walks,
    etc),
  • 8. Creating stakeholder advisory committees help
    to broaden awareness of the issue. All data is
    published and public. The data tells the story
    and drives the resources. Keeps momentum going
    in community

7
Successful Programs in Massachusetts
  • Rental Assistance for Families in Transition
    (RAFT)
  • 436 Families assisted over a two-month period,
    with rental assistance, back rent, etc
  • 1,365 Average per household
  • All of these families were prevented from
    falling into homelessness
  • Department of Transitional Assistances Toolbox
    (stabilization supports)
  • 476 families prevented or quickly re-housed over
    2 months with flexible dollars
  • 3,080 Average per household
  • Shelter to Housing Pilot
  • 207 families rapidly re-housed with
    stabilization services with a shallow subsidy
  • 6,000 granted per household, per year
  • After two years 80 success rate, families
    remain in housing
  • These 3 initiatives keep 1,119 families housed
    for the same cost
  • as 63 family shelter rooms

8
Costs of Shelter vs. Housing Aid
9
Compare the Costs
  • A shelter bedroom costs MA approx. 47,000
    annually
  • While Prevention/Rapid Re-Housing costs MA per
    family an average of 2,222 annually.
  • Prevention Initiatives keep 22 families housed
    for the same cost as ONE shelter room

10
Summary
  • Flexible resources (public and private), short
    term shelter, local design, mixed stakeholders
    will help convert minds and hearts toward a
    Housing First model because in the end, the data
    will drive the discussion. Aligning the universe
    will get you closer to the dream of ending family
    homelessness.
  • Government alone will never be able to get the
    job done.
  • Serving more families for less money with better
    outcomes requires
  • public and private partnership both locally and
    at the state and
  • federal level.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com